Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Stabilizing Flash Butt Welding of Varied Chemistry Steels during End-To-End Coil Joining


Affiliations
1 Research and Development, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
2 PLTCM, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
3 Product Technology Group, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Flash butt welding (FBW) is extensively used for joining front end of incoming hot rolled coil to the tail end of the previous coil in pickling and tandem cold rolling mill (PLTCM). Improper welding causes failure in the cold rolling strands in the later stages. Hence, it is of paramount importance to establish a sound weld line by selecting the right welding process parameters. Optimizing the process parameters largely depends on the thickness and chemistry of the steels because slight variations in steel chemistry can cause weld failures. Recently, during flash butt welding of hot rolled Interstitial Free (IF) steel from TSK (Steel A) in the cold rolling mill (CRM) of TSJ (Steel B), adjustments had to be made in the welding parameters to enable smooth cold rolling. The flash butt welded TSK coils showed oxides of Fe, Mn, Al and Ti on fractured surfaces with the standard TSJ welding parameters. Back up study suggested that higher Mn, Al and Ti levels in the TSK coils were possibly responsible for greater volume fraction of oxides at the weld zone. Since, flash butt welding is done without the use of shielding gas, oxidation of the molten pool happens at the abutting edges. Improper process parameters can lead to the entrapment of oxides at the fusion line causing failure initiation. Therefore, this called for a change in welding parameter from the set value. Increasing the flashing length and upset length enabled in removing the excessive oxides formed during the flashing stage and prevented failure of the welds. The downstream end has hence been stabilized.

Keywords

Flash Butt Welding, Oxidation, Interstitial Free Steel, Cold Spot/penetrators.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Mansouri H and Monshi A (2004); Microstructure and residual stress variations in weld zone of flash-butt welded railroads, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 9(3), pp.237-245.
  • Tawfik D, Mutton PJ and Chiu WK (2006); Transient thermal stress analysis on rapid post-weld heat treatments applied to flash butt welded rails, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 11 (3), pp.326-336.
  • Xu Z, Lu P and Shu Y (2016); Microstructure and fracture mechanism of a flash butt welded 380CL steel, Engineering Failure Analysis, 62, pp.199-207.
  • Ziemian CW, Sharma MM and Whaley DE (2012); Effects of flashing and upset sequences on microstructure, hardness, and tensile properties of welded structural steel joints, Materials & Design, 33, pp.175-184.
  • Lu P, Xu Z, Jiang K, Ma F and Shu Y (2017); Influence of flash butt welding parameters on microstructure and mechanical properties of HSLA 590CL welded joints in wheel rims, Journal of Materials Research, 32(4), pp.831-842.
  • Xi C, Sun D, Xuan Z, Wang J and Song G (2016); Microstructures and mechanical properties of flash butt welded high strength steel joints, Materials & Design, 96, pp.506-514.
  • Arabaci U, Çetînkaya C and Akay A (2007); An investigation of effects of upsetting current time and normalization heat treatment on mechanical properties of X40CrMoV5 1 and Ç1030 steels joined by flash butt welding, Materials & Design, 28(8), pp.2351-2360.
  • Çetinkaya C and Arabaci Uu (2006); Flash butt welding application on 16MnCr5 chain steel and investigations of mechanical properties, Materials & Design, 27(10), pp.1187-1195.
  • Ichiyama Y and Saito T (2004); Factors affecting flash weldability in high strength steel- a study on toughness improvement of flash welded joints in high strength steel, Welding International, 18(6), pp.436-443.
  • Räsänen AN and Martikainen J (2011); Experimental review of metallurgical flash weld defects in welded joints: essence of flat spots, penetrators and oxide inclusions, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 16(6), pp.471-476.
  • Bhattacharyya S, Adhikary M, Das MB and Sarkar S (2008); Failure analysis of cracking in wheel rims-material and manufacturing aspects, Engineering Failure Analysis, 15(5), pp.547-554.
  • Shajan N, Arora KS, Sharma V and Shome M (2017); Effect of upset pressure on texture evolution and its correlation to toughness in flash butt joints, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 23(5), pp.1-7.
  • Shajan N, Arora KS and Shome M (2019); Correlation between grain misorientation, texture and impact toughness across a flash butt weld of HSLA steel, Materials Letters, 236, pp.436-439.
  • Shajan N, Arora KS, Asati B, Sharma V and Shome M (2018); Effects of post-weld heat treatment on the microstructure and toughness of flash butt welded high-strength low-alloy steel, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 49(4), pp.1276-1286.
  • Suzuki M and Endo S (1991); Effect of PWHT on TMCP steel flash butt welded joints, Welding International, 5(4), pp.271-276.
  • Kerstens NFH and Richardson IM (2009); Heat distribution in resistance upset butt welding, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(5), pp.2715-2722.

Abstract Views: 212

PDF Views: 7




  • Stabilizing Flash Butt Welding of Varied Chemistry Steels during End-To-End Coil Joining

Abstract Views: 212  |  PDF Views: 7

Authors

Nikhil Shajan
Research and Development, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
Kanwer Singh Arora
Research and Development, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
Mahadev Shome
Research and Development, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
Atanu Roy
PLTCM, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
US Patnaik
PLTCM, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
Niranjan Behera
Product Technology Group, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India
V. Santhanagopalan
Product Technology Group, TATA Steel, Jamshedpur- 831001, India

Abstract


Flash butt welding (FBW) is extensively used for joining front end of incoming hot rolled coil to the tail end of the previous coil in pickling and tandem cold rolling mill (PLTCM). Improper welding causes failure in the cold rolling strands in the later stages. Hence, it is of paramount importance to establish a sound weld line by selecting the right welding process parameters. Optimizing the process parameters largely depends on the thickness and chemistry of the steels because slight variations in steel chemistry can cause weld failures. Recently, during flash butt welding of hot rolled Interstitial Free (IF) steel from TSK (Steel A) in the cold rolling mill (CRM) of TSJ (Steel B), adjustments had to be made in the welding parameters to enable smooth cold rolling. The flash butt welded TSK coils showed oxides of Fe, Mn, Al and Ti on fractured surfaces with the standard TSJ welding parameters. Back up study suggested that higher Mn, Al and Ti levels in the TSK coils were possibly responsible for greater volume fraction of oxides at the weld zone. Since, flash butt welding is done without the use of shielding gas, oxidation of the molten pool happens at the abutting edges. Improper process parameters can lead to the entrapment of oxides at the fusion line causing failure initiation. Therefore, this called for a change in welding parameter from the set value. Increasing the flashing length and upset length enabled in removing the excessive oxides formed during the flashing stage and prevented failure of the welds. The downstream end has hence been stabilized.

Keywords


Flash Butt Welding, Oxidation, Interstitial Free Steel, Cold Spot/penetrators.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.22486/iwj.v53i3.202940