Indian Science Cruiser

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Physics, Mathematics And Philosophy A Menage A Trois


Affiliations
1 Formerly of International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Manage k Trois, however interesting and exciting it may seem, has serious drawbacks. It is rarely successful or satisfactory to all concerned. The three disciplines : physics, mathematics and philosophy — all including or based on logic — have their separate jurisdictions, aims and methods. While the first two are generally unequivocal and to a great extent uncontroversial in their utterances, philosophers may differ greatly among themselves when discussing the same subject, for instance, about the existence of physical and matheniatical entities (ontology) or the manner in which we come to know about the external world (epistemology), with nobody being proved right or wrong in the end. Not with standing this well known feature about the three enterprises, and the fact that cross-fertilization of ideas from different disciplines can be very fruitful, we should guard against pitfalls when treading border areas. A few examples of such pitfalls and resulting confusion are discussed in this article.

Keywords

No Keywords
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • R Courant and H Robbins, What is Mathematics? Oxford University Press, 1941.

  • Mario Bunge, A Skeptic's Beliefs and Disbeliefs, New Ideas in Psychology, 9, J3J, J59J.

  • R B Lindsay, The Nature of Physics, Brown University Press, Providence, USA 1968.

  • Mario Bunge, Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 7, Chapter 2, Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht, 1985.

  • G H Hardy, A Mathematician's Apology, Cambridge University Press, 1940, 1967

  • Hao Wang, Imagined Discussions with Godel and with Wittgenstaein, 2nd Kurt Gbdel Colloquium, Kirchberg, 1991.

  • P F Strawson, Analysis and Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, 1992.

  • G P Baker and P M S Hacker, Wittgenstein, Meaning and Understanding, Blackwell, 1983

  • Mario Bunge, The Interpretation of Heisenberg's Inequalities, Benken und Umdenken, Piper Verlag, Munchen, 1977.

  • R Scruton, Kant, Oxford University Press, 1982.

  • K Mainzer, Chaos, Fraktale und Philosophic, Information Philosophie, Lorrach, Mai 1992.

  • D R Hofstadter, Godel, Escher, Bach, Penguin, 1980.

  • H C Reichel and E P de la Riba (eds), Naturwissenschaft und Weltbild, Verlag Holder, Vienna, 1992.


Abstract Views: 116

PDF Views: 0




  • Physics, Mathematics And Philosophy A Menage A Trois

Abstract Views: 116  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Saurabh Sanatani
Formerly of International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria

Abstract


Manage k Trois, however interesting and exciting it may seem, has serious drawbacks. It is rarely successful or satisfactory to all concerned. The three disciplines : physics, mathematics and philosophy — all including or based on logic — have their separate jurisdictions, aims and methods. While the first two are generally unequivocal and to a great extent uncontroversial in their utterances, philosophers may differ greatly among themselves when discussing the same subject, for instance, about the existence of physical and matheniatical entities (ontology) or the manner in which we come to know about the external world (epistemology), with nobody being proved right or wrong in the end. Not with standing this well known feature about the three enterprises, and the fact that cross-fertilization of ideas from different disciplines can be very fruitful, we should guard against pitfalls when treading border areas. A few examples of such pitfalls and resulting confusion are discussed in this article.

Keywords


No Keywords

References