Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar, Neeraj
- A Bibliometric Assessment of Global Literature on "Facebook and Libraries" During 2006-14
Abstract Views :201 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Shri Venkateshwar University, Tirupati, IN
2 Panjab University, Central Library, Chandigarh, IN
3 1173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134 113, Haryana, IN
1 Shri Venkateshwar University, Tirupati, IN
2 Panjab University, Central Library, Chandigarh, IN
3 1173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134 113, Haryana, IN
Source
Information Studies, Vol 21, No 2&3 (2015), Pagination: 133-150Abstract
The present study examines 200 global publications on "Facebook and Libraries", as covered in Scopus database during 2006-14, experiencing an annual average growth rate of 109.94% and citation impact per paper of 4.94. The global publications on "Facebook and Libraries" came from 38 countries, of which the top 11 accounted for 74.5% publication share and 80.70% citations share of global publications and citations output during 2006-14. 164 organizations and 165 authors participated in global research on "Facebook and Library" during 2006-14, of which the top 27 organizations and 27 authors contributed 32% and 28.50% publications share and 29.20% and 14.02% citation share respectively of the global output and citations. Social sciences, among subjects, contributed the largest publications share of 80.50%, followed computer science (41.0%), engineering (6.0%), medicine (5.5%), business, management and accounting (3.0%), arts & humanities (2.0%) and decision sciences (2.0%) during 2006- 14. Of the total global publications, 156 appeared in 64 journals, of which the top 22 journals contributed 64.10% of the journal output. The top 20 highly cited papers registered 13 to 87 citations, and together contributed 591 citations, leading to the average citation per paper of 29.5. Based on existing studies available, the authors suggest the need to carry out a more comprehensive documentation on the existing studies on the application of Facebook to libraries, to learn about its actual usage, problems encountered and perception of users and librarians.
References
- Rutherford, L.L. Building participative library services: The impact of social software use in public libraries. Ubrary High Tech 2008,26(3): 411-423.
- Tiffen, B and England, A. Engaging with clients and personalizing services at UTS Library: Measuring the value of libraries and their clients. The Australian Library Journal 2011, 60(3): 237-247.
- Mack, D, Behler, A.B.R. and Rimland, E. Reaching students with Facebook: Data and best practices. Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship 2007,8(2). Retrieved on 6 July 2015 from http://southemlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v08n02/mack_d01 .html.
- Phillips, N.K. (2011). Academic library use of Facebook: Building relationship with students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6): 512-522.
- London, L. and Hall, H. (2010). From triviality to business tool: The case of Twitter in library and information services delivery. Business Information Review, 27(4): 236-241.
- Chu, S.K.W. and Du, H.S. (2012). Social networking tools for academic libraries. Journal of Librarians hip & Information Science, 13(1), 69-85.
- Du Toil, K and Mulatininsih, B. Social media for libraries. Retrieved on 20 November 2014 from http://www.slideshare.net/karendtoit/social-media-for-libraries-karen-du-toit-2692013 8. Rouse, M. Defmation of Facebook. Retrieved on June 16, 2014 from http://whatis.techtarget.com/ definition/Facebook.
- Mundt, S. (2013). Evaluating the marketing success of libraries social media presence. Paper presented at IFLA World Library & Information Science Congress, 17-23 August 2014, Singapore, 2013. Retrieved on June 14, 2014 from http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/196.
- Gallardo, R. Social media use for libraries. Retrieved on June 16, 2014 from http://www.webjunction.org/events/webjunction/LIbrary_Social_Media_Use.html.
- Chamigo, Laurie and Bamett-Ellis, (2007). Paula. Checking Out Facebook.com: The impact of a digital trend on academic libraries. Information technology and Libraries March, 23-34.
- Vassilakaki, E. and Garoufallou, E. (2014). The impact of Facebook on libraries and librarians: a review of the literature. Program: Electronic library and information systems, 48 (3), 226-245.
- Chu, M. and Meulemans, Y.N. (2008). The problems and potential of MySpace and Facebook usage in academic libraries .Internet Reference Services Quarterly February, 13(1): 69-75.
- Jacobson, T.B. (2011). Facebook as a library tool: Perceived vs. actual use. College and Research Libraries ianaaiy, 72(1): 79-90.
- Aharony, N. (2012). Facebook use in libraries: An exploratory analysis. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives June, 64(4): 358-372.
- Phillips, N.K. (2011). Academic Library Use of Facebook: Building Relationships with Students Journal of Academic Librarianship December, 37(6): 512-22.
- Ayu, A.R.R. and Abrizah, A. (2011). Do you Facebook? Usage and applications of Facebook page among academic libraries in Malaysia International Information and Library Review December, 43(4): 239-249.
- Wan, G. (2011). How Academic Libraries Reach Users on Facebook. College and Undergraduate Libraries October, 18(4): 307-18.
- Xia, Z.D. (2009). Marketing library services through Facebook groups. Library Management, 30(6): 469-78.
- Sachs, D.E, Eckel, E.J. and Langan, K.A. (2012). Striking a balance: Effective use of facebook in an academic library. Medical Reference Services Quaterly, 31(2): 171-87.
- Garcia-Milian, R, Norton, H.F. and Tennant, M.R. (2011). The presence of academic health science libraries on Facebook: The relationship between content and library popularity. D-Lib Magazine November, 17(11-12): 227-245.
- Gerolimos, M. (2009). Academic hbraries on Facebook: An analysis of users' comments. Journal of Web Librarianship April, 3(2): 111-128.
- Calvi, L, Casella, M and Nuijiten, K. (2014). Enhansing users experience: A content analysis of 12 university library Facebook profiles. Program, 48(3): 226-45.