Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Harinarayana, N. S.
- Citation Analysis of Publications of LIS Teachers in South India
Abstract Views :151 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
2 Government First Grade College, Periyapatana, Mysore District, IN
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, IN
2 Government First Grade College, Periyapatana, Mysore District, IN
Source
Information Studies, Vol 18, No 3 (2012), Pagination: 143-161Abstract
This paper analyzes the impact of research contributions of South Indian LIS teachers using citation analysis method. The research output of South Indian LIS teachers published in various national and international journals, conference proceedings, books since 1950s have been collected as available in Google Scholar. It is a known fact that Google Scholar is yet to become a comprehensive database of scholarly literature. So the data sample collected for the study would have some limitations with respect to the comprehensiveness of the data. However, authors believe that the sample available from Google Scholar is sufficient for conducting citation analysis studies. Research contributions of South Indian LIS teachers have been analysed and results are reported with appropriate inferences. 1909 research papers published by the South Indian LIS teachers form the basic data for the study. The number of research papers being published is increasing sharply in recent years. About half of the data collected (48.40%) for the study is in the form of articles published in journals. While DRTC and Karnatak University occupy top two positions in number of articles published. University of Mysore is a close competitor for the second position. Articles from SRLES (28.45%) and Information Studies (9.63%) are visible in Google Scholar more than other journals. 'Organization of Information' and 'Bibliometrics' are the most favoured area of research for South Indian LIS teachers. The study also reports the most cited articles of South Indian LIS teachers. As one could expect Neelameghan, Karisiddappa and Ravichandra Rao occupy the first three positions in the h-index ranking of teachers.Keywords
Academic Impact, LIS Research, H-index, Scholormeter, Bibliometric Studies, Research Contributions, South India.
References
- Bar-Man. J. (2008). Which h-index? A comparison of WoS Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientomethcs, 74(2), 257-271.
- Chandrakar, R., and Arora, J. (2011). Indian national research productivity in library and information science. INFLIBNET Newsletter, 17(4), 15-20. Retrieved from http;//wvw.inflibnet.ac.in/pubiication/newsletter/Vol.l7,No.4%28Oct-Dec2010%29.pdf
- Chandrashekara, M., and Ramasesh, C.P. (2009). Library and information science research in India. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library and Information Education and Practice, Japan. Retrieved from http://slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/~atsushi/aliep/proceedings/Papers/a65.pdf
- Chatterjee, A., Rath, N.P., and Podder, A. (1995). Research trends in library and information science in India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 42(2), 54-60.
- Cronin, B., and Meho, L. 1. (2006). Using H-index to rank influential information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278.
- Glanzel. W. (2006). On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 10-11. Retrieved from http;//eprints.rclis.org/bitstream/10760/9378/l/H_lndex_opprtunities.pdf
- Harinarayana, N.S., Mahadevaswamy.. and Vasantha Raju, N. (2008). Indian contribution in foreign journals in the field of library and information science: A study. SRELS Journal of Information Management. 45(4), 399-410.
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An inde.x to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Slates of America, 102(46), 16569-16572.'
- Kousha, K. and Thelwall, M (2008). Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines. Scienlometrics. 74(2). 273-294.
- Kumbar, M., and Vasantha Raju, N. (2008). Research productivity in library and information science in India during 1957-2006. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 45(1). 71-81.
- Meho, L. I., and Spurgin, K. M. (2005). Ranking the research productivity of library and information science faculty and schools: An evaluation of data sources and research methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1314-1331.
- Patra, S. K., and Chand, P. (2006). Library and information science research in India: A bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 53(4), 219-223.
- Rana, R. (2011). Research trends in library and information science in India with a focus on Panjab University, Chandigarh. The International Information and Library Review, 43(1), 23-42.
- Satija, M.P. (1999). Doctoral research in library and information science in India: Some observations and comments. Libri, 49, 236-242.
- Scholarometer. (2011). Retrieved from http://scholarometer.indiana.edu/
- Shivalingaiah, D., Sheshadri, K.N., and Manjunatha. (2009). LIS research in India 1980-2007: An analysis of doctoral dissertations. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library and Information Education and Practice, Japan. Retrieved from http://www.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/~atsushi/a-liep/proceedings/Papers/a9.pdf
- Singh, S.P. (2003). Library and information science education in India: Issues and trends.Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science. 8(2), 2003.
- Talawar, V.G. (1997). Research trends in library and information science in India: .An overview. In P.R. Brahmananda. V.G. Talawar, and Mruthynjaya Kiilenur (Eds.), Knowledge through our life time. Mysore: Prof M. Madaiah Felicitation Committee.
- Varalakshmi, V. S. R. (2010). Library and information science education in South India: Perspectives and challenges. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 30(5), 32-47.
- van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scienlometrics. 67(3).491-502.
- Zhang, L., Thijs, B. and Gliinzel. W. (2011). The diffusion of H-related literature. Journal of Informatrics, 5, 583-593.
- Citation Analysis of SRR's Works:A Look Through the Window of Google Scholar
Abstract Views :137 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570 006, IN
2 Government First Grade College, Periyapatna 571107, Mysore Dist., IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570 006, IN
2 Government First Grade College, Periyapatna 571107, Mysore Dist., IN
Source
Information Studies, Vol 15, No 3 (2009), Pagination: 165-178Abstract
This paper presents the findings of a citation analysis study, the impact of S.R.Ranganathan's (SRR's) seminal works, namely. Five laws of library science, Prolegomena to library classification, and Colon classification. More specifically the objective was to quantify the impact of SRR's works through citation analysis, and to study the citation pattern to SRR's works. Google Scholar (GS) was the major data source for the study. We searched the GS during the first week of Decembet 2008 SRR was a prolific writer with over 50 books and over 1000 articles) OS's 894 citations, of which more than half (54.8%) is accounted for by the three books of SRR just mentioned.. Presents .ranked list of authors citing SRR's three works, their affiliation the periodicals in which these authors have published and related statistics.Keywords
Ranganathan, S.R., Books, Bibliometric Analysis, Citation Analysis, Google Scholar Application.References
- Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
- Davarpanah, M.R. and Aslekia, S. (2008). A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics. Scientometrics, 77(1), 21-39.
- Garfield, E. (1984). Essays of an information scientist. Current Contents, 7 (6), 37-44.
- Gayatri Mahapatra. (1992). Post SRR era: A bibliometric analysis of SRR's contributions. lASUC Bulletin, 37(3), 177-182.
- Ginn, L.K. (2003). Citation analysis of authored articles in library and information science research, 2001-2002. Mississipi Libraries, 61, 6-l09.
- Kademani, B.S., Kalyane, V.L. and Balakrishnan, M.R. (1994). Scientometric portrait of P.K. Iyengar. Library Science, 31(4), 155-176.
- Kademani, B.S., Kalyane, V.L., and Jange, S. (1999). Scientometric portrait of Nobel laureate Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin. Scientometrics, 45(2), 233-250.
- Kademani, B.S., Kalyane, V.L., and Vijai Kumar (2002). Scientometric portrait of Nobel laureate Harold W. Kroto. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 39(4), 409-434.
- Kalyane, V.L. and Sen, B.K. (2003). Research productivity of Tibor Braun: An analytical ,- chemist-cum-scientometrician. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 50(2), 47-61.
- Kalyane, V.L., and Kalyane, S.V. (1993). Scientometric portrait of Vinodini Reddy. Journal of Information Sciences, 4( 1), 25-47.
- Khan, M.S.I, and others. (1998). Library and information science literature in Bangladesh: A bibliometric study. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(2), 11-34.
- Kherde, M.R. (2008). Core journals in the field of library and information science. Annals of Library and Information Studies. 50(1), 18-22.
- Kumpulajneh, S. (1999). Library and information science research in 1975: Content analysis of journal articles. Lilbri, 41(1), 59-76.
- Lancaster, F.W., Zeter, M. J., & Metzler, L. (1992). SRR's influence examined bibliometrically. Libri, 42(3), 268-281.
- Library of Congress. (2008). Library of Congress classification outline. Retrieved 10th November, 2008, from http://www.loc.gov/aba/cataloging/classification/lcco/lcco_q.pdf
- Lipetz, B. (1999). Aspects of JASIS authorship through four decades. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(11), 994-1003.
- Meho, L. I. Available at http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0701/0701012.pdf
- Nour, M.M. (1985). A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980. Library and Information Science Research, 7(3), 261-273.
- Tomosello, T. K. (2004). A content analysis of citations to J.C.R. Licklider's man-computer symbiosis 1960-2001: Diffusing the intergalactic network. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations &Theses. (UMI 3137497).
- Yang, K., and Meho, L. I. (2006). Citation analysis: A comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. In A. Dillon & A. Grove (Eds.), Information realities: Shaping the digital future for all - Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, Texas, 3-8 November, 2006. Silver Springs, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
- Role of Library in Promoting Reading Habits of Professional and Non Professional College Students:A Survey
Abstract Views :139 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 St. Agnes Autonomous College, Mangalore, Kamataka, IN
2 Department of Studies in Library Science and Information, University of Mysore, Mysore 560 006, Karnataka, IN
1 St. Agnes Autonomous College, Mangalore, Kamataka, IN
2 Department of Studies in Library Science and Information, University of Mysore, Mysore 560 006, Karnataka, IN
Source
Information Studies, Vol 14, No 4 (2008), Pagination: 235-248Abstract
The present study examines the issues related to the role of the library in promoting reading habits of professional and non professional students. The issues studied are the students' dependency on libraries, items that they read, and other factors that inspire them to develop their reading habits. A total of 1757 professional and non-professionals students from 52 colleges served as the sample for the present study. The data was collected by questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Chi square were applied to find out the difference between course type and gender on various issues. Results show that overall non-professional students were more dependent on libraries and were more positive about librarians and libraries than professional students. Suggestions to improve reading habits are also discussed. Factors like motivation through library orientation: library services relating to current events, journal articles, newspaper clippings library hour, book display and personal dialogue by library staff and other factors that improve reading habits are discussed.References
- Carey, R.J.P. (1972) Library guiding. London: Clive Bingley.
- Carter, C.J. (1986) Young people-and books: A review af research into young peoples' reading habits. Journal of Librarianship, 18(1); p.1-22.
- Clark, C. (2007) Young people and reading, a school study. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.iiteracytrust.org.uk.
- Clark, C; Foster, A. (2005) Children's and youn^ people's reading habits and preferences: The who, what, why, where and when, 2005, Retrieved 7-6-2007, from http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/Research/Reading_Connects_survey.pdf
- Ferriro, E. (2001) Reading and writing in a changing world. Publishing Research Quarterly, 16(3); p.53-61.
- Harmon, C; Bradbum, F. (1988) Realizing the reading and information needs of youth. Library Trends, 37(1); 19-27.
- Konnur, P.V. (2002) Reading habit development pro-am. Herald of Library Science, 41(12); p.60-64.
- Sharma S. (1989) Reading habit and Reader's Interest. New Delhi: Shree publishing House.
- Srivastava, A.P. (1979) Improving reading activities in colleges. University News.
- —. (1989) Librarian and user interaction. University News, 27(13); p.1-5.