Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sarma, Anirban
- Internet Use and Social Behaviour:A Perspective
Abstract Views :159 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Programme Officer (Communication and Information), UNESCO Office, UNESCO House, B-5/29, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, IN
1 National Programme Officer (Communication and Information), UNESCO Office, UNESCO House, B-5/29, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, IN
Source
Information Studies, Vol 18, No 4 (2012), Pagination: 211-220Abstract
There is a substantial body of literature that deals with patterns of social behavior shaped by Internet use. A large part of the literature takes a pessimistic view arguing that the increasing amount of time spent online by people leads to a reduction of the time spent on other possibly more fulfilling forms of interpersonal engagement, and also to a decline in the quality or richness of those forms of engagement. This article counters the claim that Internet use makes people less sociable. It draws on contemporary research to argue that individuals' capacity for sociability is pre-existent. The Internet simply provides new channels for interaction, with some definite implications for the resulting quality and quantum of social engagement. Section 2 states the central questions of the sociability debate, and develops the idea of "cycles of socialization". It proceeds to discuss how online communication helps maintain strong ties, creates weak ties, and stimulates individuals' capacity for sociability. Section 3 explores the role of online interaction in building social capital, by examining three types of socialcapital- building exercises: creating network capital, civic engagement, and participating in virtual communities. Sections 2 and 3 discuss this paper's core proposition, and section 4 recommends further academic inquiry into the accumulation of social capital at a macro-level, not just at the level of personal and community networks.Keywords
Internet, Use, Users, Social Networking, User Behaviour.
References
- Wellman, Barry. (2000). Changing Connectivity: A Future History of Y2.03K. Sociological Research Online. 4(4). Available at http://www.socresonline.org.Uk/4/4/wellman.html.
- Wellman, Barry. (2001). Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? American Behavioral Scientist. 45(3); p.436-455.
- Anderson, Ben; Tracey, Karina. (2002). Digital Living: The Impact (or Otherwise) of the Internet on Everyday Life. In The Internet in Everyday Life, ed. by Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythomthwaite, Oxford: Blackwell, p. 149-150.
- Kraut, Robert et al. (1998). Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Weil-Being? American Psychologist. 53(9); p. 1017-31.
- Howard, Philip E N; et al. (2001). Days and Nights on the Internet: The Impact of a Diffusing Technology. American Behavioral Scientist. 45(3); p.383^04.
- Katz, James E; et al. (2001). The Internet, 1995-2000: Access, Civic Involvement, and Social Interaction. American Behavioral Scientist. 45(3); p.405^19.
- Orgad, Shani. (2007). The Interrelations between Online and Offline: Questions, Issues, and Implications. In The Oxford Handbook of Information and Communication Technologies, ed. by Robin Mansell et al, Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 522.
- Castells, Manuel. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 118.
- Cummings, J; et al. (2002). The Quality of Online Social Relationships. Communications ofthe ACM. 45(7); P.103-S.
- Quan-Haase, Annabel; et al. (2002). Capitalizing on the Net: Social Contact, Civic Engagement, and Sense of Community. In The Internet in Everyday Life, ed. by Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythomthwaite, Oxford: Blackwell; p. 299-310.
- Haddon, Leslie. (2004). Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg; p. 78.
- Putnam, Robert. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster; p. 19.
- Granovetter, Mark S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78(6); p. 1360-1380.
- Bourdieu, Pierre. (1985). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. by J Richardson, New York: Greenwood Books.
- Uslaner, Eric M; Dekker, Paul. (2001). The 'Social' in Social Capital." In Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life ed. by Paul Dekker and Eric M Uslaner, New York: Routledge,p. 181.
- Kavanaugh, Andrea L; Patterson, Scott J. (2002). The Impact of Computer Community Networks on Social Capital and Community Involvement in Blacksburg. In The Internet in Everyday Life, ed. by Barry Wellman and Caroline Haythomthwaite, Oxford: Blackwell; p. 334-342.
- van den Besselaar, Peter; Beckers, Dennis. (2005). The Life and Death of the Great Amsterdam Digital City. In Digital Cities III: Information Technologies for Social Capital, ed. by Peter van den Besselaar and Satoshi Koizumi, Amsterdam: Springer; p. 267.
- Bourdieu, Pierre. (1985). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. by J Richardson, New York: Greenwood Books; p. 249.
- Hampton, Keith. (2004). Networked Sociability Online, Off-line. In The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, ed. by Manuel Castells, Chehenham: Edward Elgar; p. 226-228.
- Katz, James E; Rice, Ronald E. (2002). Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Coleman, James. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94: S95-S120; S101.