Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bairwa, Rekha
- Impact of Select E-Content Projects Developed by the MHRD
Abstract Views :107 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 University Central Library, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Manikya Lal Verma Shramjeevi Evening College, JNRV (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
1 University Central Library, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Manikya Lal Verma Shramjeevi Evening College, JNRV (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
Source
International Journal of Information Studies & Libraries, Vol 6, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 33-38Abstract
Purpose: Measuring the newly created e-content by the UGC to enhance education, and establishing high-quality e-content, with experience in the long-term production of such material are the purposes of this research work. Design/Methodology: For this research, the secondary data of the NPTEL and E-PGP is used to measure the e-content availability for the students. This paper analyses the difference in e-content developed across subject categories and a comparison of e-content developed by NPTEL and E-PGP. Approach: This programme offers financial assistance and professional help for the creation of e-content for teachers and other specialists located at various colleges and universities. The approach of the paper is empirical, with an analysis of the data gathered from secondary sources. Originality/Value: e-content development by two major content development projects (NPTEL and E-PGP) across multiple subject categories and courses are analysed in the research; further, it measures whether sufficient course material is available in all the subjects from the NPTEL and E-PGP. Findings: The results, with ANOVA and chi-square test by SPSS software, revealed significant disparity in the subject and category; further, the E-PGP has more, and significantly high quality e-content.Keywords
E-Content, NPTEL, E-PGP, No. of Courses, No. of Projects, MHRD, IITs.
References
- Ajadi, T. O., Salawu, I. O., & Adeoye, F. A. (2008). E-learning and distance education in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4).
- Benta, D., Bologa, G., & Dzitac, I. (2014). E-learning platforms in higher education: Case study. In Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1170-1176.
- Brown, S. (2002). Re-engineering the university. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(3), 231-244.
- Dickey, M. D. (2003). Teaching in 3D: Pedagogical affordances and constraints of 3D virtual worlds for synchronous distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 105-121.
- Jones, C. (2004). Networks and learning: Communities, practices and the metaphor of networks. research in Learning Technology, 12(1), 81-93.
- Kattimani, S. F., & Naik, R. R. (2012). E-learning technology in the ICT era: Application to technical education. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(6).
- Mishra, S. (2009). E-learning in India. International Journal on E-Learning, 8(4), 549-560. Mishra, S. (2010). Developing e-learning materials: Some pedagogical concerns. Indian Journal of Open Learning, 17(2), 154-161.
- Panda, S. (2020). Measuring the usage analysis of open educational resources in India: A case study of e-PG Pathshala, In ICT Trends and its application in Libraries (pp. 206-225). New Delhi: Book Age Publications.
- Press Trust of India. (2015). Human Resource Development Ministry to Launch Smart Apps to Make Education (pp. 120-122). Available on The Go. NDTV.
- Ravi, J. S., & Jani, H. J. (2011). A critical study of NPTEL. IEEE International Conference on Technology for Education, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 2011, 35-42.
- Ravi, J. S., & Jani, H. J. (2012). Segmentation of NPTEL Users: A study of Gujarat State. IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education, 4, Hyderabad, 111-118.
- Saravan, M., & Esmail, S. M. (2014). Availability and impact of NPTEL in selected engineering colleges around Thiruvallur District Tamil Nadu: A case study. International Journal of Information Services and Technology, 1(1), 6-10.
- Sheorey, T. (2014). Empirical evidence of relationship between virtual lab development and students learning through field trials on v-lab on mechatronics. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(1), p. 97.
- Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education: Advantages, disadvantages, conveniences, and limitations of applying e-learning to agricultural students in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Iran, 152, 300-305.
- Tham, C. M., & Werner, J. M. (2005). Designing and evaluating e-learning in higher education: A review and recommendations. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11-15.
- Times of India. (2015, November). E-pathshala to put textbooks at fingertips (p. 8).
- Venkataraman, S., & Sivakumar, S. (2015). Engaging students in group based learning through e-learning techniques in higher education system. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 2(1), 1741-1746.
- Learner’s Satisfaction with E-Content : A Case Study among University Libraries in Rajasthan
Abstract Views :79 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Manikya Lal Verma Shramjeevi Evening College, JNRV (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
2 University Central Library, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Manikya Lal Verma Shramjeevi Evening College, JNRV (Deemed to be University), Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
2 University Central Library, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, IN
Source
International Journal of Information Studies & Libraries, Vol 6, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 72-79Abstract
Among the learning technologies, Web-based learning offers several benefits over conventional classroom-based learning. Its biggest advantage is the reduced costs since a physical environment is no longer required, and therefore, it can be used at any time and place at the convenience of the student. The present paper studies the student perception on impact of e-content projects of MHRD. Findings indicate that students agree with the fact that e-learning systems provide benefit by improving content and delivery, with anytime, anywhere access; increase student interaction with other learners; improve teaching pedagogy; make learning more interesting; and will improve learning outcomes.Keywords
E-Learning, E-Content, Library, Student Satisfaction.References
- Alqahtani, Z., & Mohammed, M. (2020). An exploratory study of e-learning stakeholders’ experiences of developing, implementing, and enhancing e-courses in One Saudi University (Doctoral dissertation, Durham University).
- Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education.
- Arora, J., & Kumar, A. (2012). E-learning content development and hosting, 19(1), 19-22.
- Benta, D., Bologaa, G., & Dzitaca, I. (2014). E-learning platforms in higher education: Case study. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1170-1176.
- Bora, U. J., & Ahmed, M. (2013). E-learning using cloud computing
- Camac, K. (2018). Student-centered approach vs. teachercentered approach: Which is more effective for a graduate data analytics course in an e-learning environment?
- Chyung, S. Y., & Vachon, M. (2013). An investigation of the profiles of satisfying and dissatisfying factors in e-learning. Perf. Improvement Qrtly, 26, 117-140. doi:10.1002/piq.21147
- Du, Z., Fu, X., Zhao, C., Liu, Q., & Liu, T. (2013). Interactive and collaborative e-learning platform with integrated social software and learning management system. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering (pp. 11-18). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Hamid, S. N. M., Lee, T. T., Taha, H., Rahim, N. A., & Sharif, A. M. (2021). E-content module for chemistry massive open online course (MOOC): Development and students’ perceptions. JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 67-92.
- Jolliffe, A., Ritter, J., & Stevens, D. (2001). The online learning handbook: Developing and using Web-based learning. Kogan Page, London.
- Joseph, L., & Abraham, S. (2017, July). Instructional design for learning path identification in an e-learning environment using felder-silverman learning styles model. In 2017 International Conference on Networks & Advances in Computational Technologies (NetACT) (pp. 215-220). IEEE.
- Juhary, J. (2010). The challenges in developing e-content. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 5(SI-3), 52-56.
- Kant, N., Prasad, K. D., & Anjali, K. (2021). Selecting an appropriate learning management system in open and distance learning: A strategic approach. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.
- Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Aristovnik, A., & Umek, L. (2019). Exploring critical factors of the perceived usefulness of blended learning for higher education students. PloS one, 14(11).
- Kop, R., & Carroll, F. (2011). Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 14(2).
- Li, C., He, L., & Wong, I. A. (2021). Determinants predicting undergraduates’ intention to adopt e-learning for studying English in Chinese higher education context: A Structural equation modelling approach. Education and Information Technologies, 1-19.
- Li, Y., Duan, Y., Fu, Z., & Alford, P. (2012). An empirical study on behavior intention to reuse e-learning systems in rural China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 933-948. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01261.x
- Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.
- Madhumathi, C., & Ganapathy, G. (2013). An academic cloud framework for adapting e-learning in universities. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication, 2(11).
- Mahdizadeh, H., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2008). Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Computers & Education, 51(1), 142-154.
- Malhotra, L., & Bhatia, H. K. (2021). From walls to clouds: SWOCs of online learning from voices of prospective teacher educators in India in response to COVID-19. The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-Learning, 9(1), 92-105.
- McAlpine, I., Koppi, T., McLean, J., & Pearson, E. (2004). Course developers as students: A designer perspective of the experience of learning online. ALT-J, 12(2), 147-162.
- McPherson, M. A., & Nunes, J. M. (2008). Critical issues for e-learning delivery: What may seem obvious is not always put into practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 433-445. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00281.x
- Phankokkruad, M. (2012). Implement of cloud computing for e-learning system. 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS) (vol. 1, pp. 7-11). IEEE.
- Talebian, S., Mohammadi, H. M., & Rezvanfar, A. (2014). Information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education: Advantages, disadvantages, conveniences and limitations of applying e-learning to agricultural students in Iran. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 300-305.
- Venkataraman, S., & Sivakumar, S. (2015). Engaging students in group-based learning through e-learning techniques in higher education system. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Science and Technology, 2(1), 1741-1746.
- Whitworth, A. (2005). The politics of virtual learning environments: Environment change, conflict and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 685-691.
- Yuen, A. H., & Ma, W. W. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243.