Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Interdisciplinary Models of Teamwork in Augmentative and Alternative Communication


Affiliations
1 Laurentian University, Canada
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Augmentative and alternative communication is a specialization in speech-language pathology that aims to help people with complex communication needs. Gestures, signs, pointing to symbols or technology are examples of methods that can be used to facilitate the communication of thoughts and needs. Clients seeking an augmentative and alternative communication assessment must be evaluated by a team of professionals, which includes a speech-language pathologist and an occupational therapist. Members of the team need to work closely together, within what is considered to be a transdisciplinary model. The speech-language pathologist and occupational therapist work closely with other professionals in order to help people needing augmentative and alternative communication. These other professionals can include: technicians, communicative disorders assistants, physical therapists, physicians, psychologists and teachers. A conceptual model encompassing multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary practice has been proposed for the assessment and intervention of people who have complex communication needs.

Keywords

Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Interdisciplinarity, Speech-Language Pathology.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aboelela, Sally W., Elaine Larson, Suzanne Bakken, Olveen Carrasquillo, Allan Formicola, Sherry A. Glied, Janet Haas, and Kristine M. Gebbie. 2007. "Defining interdisciplinary research: conclusions from a critical review of the literature." Health Services Research 42: 329-46.
  • Apple. 2012. Last modified 2012. http://www.apple.com.
  • Bastide, Roger. 1967. "Approche interdisciplinaire de la maladie mentale." Social Science Information 6:37-52.
  • Batorowicz, Beata., and Tracy A. Shepherd. 2011. "Teamwork in AAC: Examining Clinical Perceptions." Augmentative and Alternative Communication 27: 16-25.
  • Batorowicz, Beata., and Tracy A. Shepherd. 2008. "Measuring the quality of transdisciplinary teams." Journal of Interprofessional Care 22: 612-20.
  • Beukelman, David R., and Pat Mirenda. 2013. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Supporting Children and Adults with Complex Communication Needs. Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks Co.
  • Blischak, Doreen M., Linda J. Lombardino, and Alice T. Dyson. 2003. "Use of Speech-Generating Devices: In Support of Natural Speech." Augmentative and Alternative Communication 19: 29-35.
  • Chettiparamb, Angelique. 2007. Interdisciplinarity: a literature review. University of Southampton, School of Humanities: The Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Group, Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies.
  • Counsell, Steven R., Ryan David Kennedy, Peggy A. Szwabo, Nancy S. Wadsworth, and Claire Wohlgemuth. 1999. "Curriculum recommendations for resident training in Geriatrics Interdisciplinary Team Care." Journal of the American Geriatrics Association 47: 1145-48.
  • Drinka, Theresa J.K., Thomas F. Miller, and Brian M. Goodman. 1996. "Characterizing motivational styles of professionals who work on interdisciplinary healthcare teams." Journal of Interprofessional Care 10: 51-61.
  • Duffy, Joseph R. 2005. Motor Speech Disorders: substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St-Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc.
  • Glennen, Sharon L., and Denise C. Decoste. 1997. The handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
  • Gibbon, Bernard. 1999. "An investigation of interprofessional collaboration team conferences." Journal of Clinical Nursing 8: 246-52.
  • Hall, Pippa. 2005. "Interprofessional teamwork : Professional cultures as barriers." Journal of Interprofessional Care 1: 188-96.
  • Health Canada. 2001. Social accountability: A vision for Canadian medical schools. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada Publications.
  • Hibbert, Emily, Sheri St-Arnaud, and Shem Dharampaul. 1994. "Nurses' satisfaction with the patient care team." Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 8: 87-95.
  • Klein, Julie Thompson, and William H. Newell. 1998. "Advancing interdisciplinary studies." In Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the literature, edited by William H. Newell, 3-22. New York: College Board.
  • Lary, Marvis J., Salme E. Lavigne, Richard D. Muma, Sarah E. Jones, and Hans-Joachim Hoeft. 1997. "Breaking down barriers: Multidisciplinary educational model." Journal of Allied Health 26: 63-69.
  • Light, Janice, and Kathryn Drager. 2007. "AAC Technologies for Young Children with Complex Communication Needs: State of the Science and Future Research Directions." Augmentative and Alternative Communication 23: 204-16.
  • Locke, Peggy Ann, and Pat Mirenda. 1992. "Roles and responsibilities of special education teachers serving on teams delivering AAC services." Augmentative and Alternative Communication 8: 200-14.
  • Mariano, Carla. 1999. "The case for interdisciplinary collaboration." Nurse Outlook 37: 285-88.
  • Molyneux, Jeanie. 2001. "Interprofessional teamworking: What makes a team work well?" Journal of Interprofessional Care 15: 29-35.
  • Moran, Joe. 2002. Interdisciplinarity. New York: Routledge.
  • Newell, William H. 1998. "The Case for Interdisciplinary Studies: Response to Professor Benson's Five Arguments." In Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature, edited by William H. Newell, 109-22. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Norsen, Lisa, J. Opladen, and Jason C. Quinn. 1995. "Practice model: Collaborative." Critical Care Nursing Clinics North America 7: 43-52.
  • Reilly, Carolyn. 2001. "Transdisciplinary approach : An atypical strategy for improving outcomes in rehab and long-term acute care settings." Rehabilitation Nursing 26: 216-44.
  • Salter, Liora, and Alison Mary Virginia Hearn. 1996. Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Press.
  • Sands, Roberta G., Judith Stafford, and Marleen McClelland. 1990. "«I beg to differ»: Conflict in the interdisciplinary team." Social Work in Health Care 14: 55-72.
  • Sorrells-Jones, Jean. 1998. "Practitioner response." Journal of Health Care Management 43: 203-04.
  • Summers, Jane, Kerry Boyd, Julie Reid, Judith Adamson, Brenda Habjan, Valerie Gignac, and Charles Meister. 2002. "Chapter 10: The Interdisciplinary Mental Health Team." In Dual Diagnosis: An Introduction to the mental health needs of persons with developmental disabilities, edited by Dorothy M. Griffiths, Chrissoula Stavrakaki and Jane Summers, 325-59. Sudbury: Habilitative Mental Health Resource Network.
  • Thylefors, Ingela, Olle Persson, and Daniel Hellstrom. 2005. "Team types, perceived efficiency and team climate in Swedish cross professional teamwork." Journal of Interprofessional Care 19: 102-14.
  • Vinokur-Kaplan, Diane. 1995. "Treatment Teams That Work (and Those That Don't): An Application of Hackman's Group Effectiveness Model to Interdisciplinary Teams in Psychiatric Hospitals." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 31: 303-27.
  • Wilkinson, Krista M., and Shannon Hennig. 2007. "The State of Research and Practice in Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Children with Developmental/Intellectual Disabilities." Mental retardation and developmental disabilities: Research reviews 13: 58-69.

Abstract Views: 368

PDF Views: 2




  • Interdisciplinary Models of Teamwork in Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Abstract Views: 368  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Manon Robillard
Laurentian University, Canada
Roxanne Belanger
Laurentian University, Canada
Nicole Keating
Laurentian University, Canada
Chantal Mayer-Crittenden
Laurentian University, Canada
Michele Minor-Corriveau
Laurentian University, Canada

Abstract


Augmentative and alternative communication is a specialization in speech-language pathology that aims to help people with complex communication needs. Gestures, signs, pointing to symbols or technology are examples of methods that can be used to facilitate the communication of thoughts and needs. Clients seeking an augmentative and alternative communication assessment must be evaluated by a team of professionals, which includes a speech-language pathologist and an occupational therapist. Members of the team need to work closely together, within what is considered to be a transdisciplinary model. The speech-language pathologist and occupational therapist work closely with other professionals in order to help people needing augmentative and alternative communication. These other professionals can include: technicians, communicative disorders assistants, physical therapists, physicians, psychologists and teachers. A conceptual model encompassing multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary practice has been proposed for the assessment and intervention of people who have complex communication needs.

Keywords


Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Interdisciplinarity, Speech-Language Pathology.

References