Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Facebook as a Meeting Point for Generations? Experiences of Intergenerational Relations on Social Networking Sites


Affiliations
1 University of Bamberg, Germany
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Digital technology, demographic transformations, increasing globalization, and individual mobility-daily lives of people are changing, and all of these factors influence intergenerational contact. The number of children is decreasing, life expectations are raising, and families are becoming "multilocal" (Bertram 1995). At the same time, the Internet is losing its image as "youth media" and is becoming an integral part of everyday life, even for the older generations. Social networking sites are used not only as an information source but also as a communication channel and as a tool for socializing. Thus, the question appears: To what extent are social networking sites such as Facebook used as a platform for intergenerational communication? To answer this question, young and old users of Facebook were asked in qualitative interviews and in an online survey about their communication habits and how they use the social networking site to maintain interactions with family members from different generations.

Keywords

Communication, Social Network Sites, Intergenerational Contacts, Online Survey.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bargh, John A., & McKenna, Katelyn A. 2004. The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55: 573-590.
  • Bertram, Hans. 1995. Individuen in einer individualisierten Gesellschaft. in: Bertram, Hans (ed.) Das Individuum und seine Familie. Lebensformen, Familienbeziehungen und Lebensereignisse im Erwachsenenalter, Opladen: 9-33.
  • Bonfadelli, Heinz. 2009. Medien und Alter: Generationen aus Sicht der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In: H.Kunemund & M. Szydlik (Eds.), Generationen. Multidisziplinare Perspektiven. Wiesbaden, 150-169.
  • Bowes, Alison M., & McColgin, Gillian. 2005. Smart Technology at Home: 'users' and 'carers' perspectives: interim report. University of Stirling. Retrieved from: http://topics.developmentgateway.org/evaluation/rc/ItemDetail.do∼103802 8 (28.2.2013).
  • Franz, Gerhard. 2010. Digital Natives und Digital Immigrants: Social Media als Treffpunkt von zwei Generationen. Ergebnisse einer Onlinebefragung. Media Perspektiven, 9, 399-409.
  • Foley, P., Alfonso, X., Brown, K., & Fisher, J. 2003. Connecting people: tackling exclusion? An examination of the impact on and use of the Internet by socially excluded groups in London. Paper pre-pared by IECRC and Citizens Online for the Greater London Authority, London Developmental Agency, LondonConnects, and BT.
  • Hernandez, C.R., & Gonzalez, M.Z. 2008. Effects of Intergenerational Interaction on Aging. Educational Gerontology, 34(4), 292-305.
  • Harley, Dave, Kurniawan, Sri H., Fitzpatrick, Geraldine, & Vetere, Frank. 2009. Age Matters: Bridging the Generation Gap through Technology-Mediated Interaction. Extended Abstract for CHI 2009, April 4-9, 2009, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Hutchinson, Hilary, Hansen, Heiko, Roussel, Nicolas, Eiderback, Bjorn, Mackay, Wendy, Westerlund, Bosse, Bederson, Benjamin, Druin, Alison, Plaisant, Catherine, Beaudouin-Lafon, Michel, Conversy, Stephane, &Evans, Helen. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design For and With Families. In: Proceedings from CHI 2003, Ft Lauderdale, FL: 17-24.
  • Hutter, Thomas. 2012. Facebook: Nutzerzahlen in der DACH-Region, July 2012.
  • Kanayama, Tomoko. 2003. Ethnographic research on the experience of Japanese elderly people online. In: New Media & Society 5(2): 267-288.
  • Lenhart, Amanda, Raine, Lee, & Lewis, Oliver. 2001. Teenage Life Online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2001/Teenage-Life-Online/Summary-of-findings.aspx , 26.7.2013.
  • Madge, Clare, Meek, Julia, Wellens, Jane, & Hooley, Tristram. 2009. Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: 'It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.' In: Learning, Media and Technology, 34: 141-155.
  • McMillan, Sally J., & Morrison, Margret. 2006. Coming of age with the Internet: A qualitative exploration of how the Internet has become an integral part of young people's lives. New Media & Society, 8, 73-95.
  • Mesch, Gustavo. 2003. The Family and the Internet. The Israeli Case. In: Social Science Quarterly, 84(4): 1038-1050.
  • Padilla-Walker, Laura M., Coyne, Sarah M., & Fraser, Ashley M. 2012. Getting a High-Speed Family Connection: Associations Between Family Media Use and Family Connection. In: Family Relations, 61: 426-440.
  • Quadrello, T., Hurme, H., Menzinger, J., Smith, P.K., Veisson, M., Vidal, S., & Westerback, S. 2005. Grandparents use of new communication technologies in a European perspective. In: European Journal of Ageing, 2(3): 200-207.
  • Roux, Patricia, Gobet, Pierre, Clémence, Alain, & Hopflinger, François. 1996. Generationenbeziehungen und Altersbilder. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Lausanne/Zurich. http://www.snf.ch/SiteCollectionDocuments/nfp_altersbilder_nfp32_d.pdf (12.12.2012).
  • Schachman, Kathleen A. 2010. Online fathering: The experience of first-time fatherhood in combat-deployed troops. In: Nursing Research, 59: 11-17.
  • Senyurekl, Aysem R., & Detzner, Daniel F. 2009. Communication Dynamics of the Transnational Family. In: Marriage & Family Review, 45 (6-8): 807-824.
  • Stern, Michael J., & Messer, Chris. 2009. How Family Members Stay in Touch: A Quantitative Investigation of Core Family Networks. In: Marriage & Family Review, 45: 654-676.
  • Stefanov, Dimitar, Bien Zeugmam, & Bang Won-Chul. 2004. The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: Structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 12(2), 228-50.
  • Thompson, Mark G., & Heller, Kenneth. 1990. Facets of support related to well-being: quantitative social isolation and perceived family support in a sample of elderly women. Psychology and Aging, 5(4), 535-44.
  • Turow, Joseph, & Nir, Lilach. 2000. The Internet and the family 2000: The view from the parents, the view from the kids. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.

Abstract Views: 274

PDF Views: 0




  • Facebook as a Meeting Point for Generations? Experiences of Intergenerational Relations on Social Networking Sites

Abstract Views: 274  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Bernadette Kneidinger
University of Bamberg, Germany

Abstract


Digital technology, demographic transformations, increasing globalization, and individual mobility-daily lives of people are changing, and all of these factors influence intergenerational contact. The number of children is decreasing, life expectations are raising, and families are becoming "multilocal" (Bertram 1995). At the same time, the Internet is losing its image as "youth media" and is becoming an integral part of everyday life, even for the older generations. Social networking sites are used not only as an information source but also as a communication channel and as a tool for socializing. Thus, the question appears: To what extent are social networking sites such as Facebook used as a platform for intergenerational communication? To answer this question, young and old users of Facebook were asked in qualitative interviews and in an online survey about their communication habits and how they use the social networking site to maintain interactions with family members from different generations.

Keywords


Communication, Social Network Sites, Intergenerational Contacts, Online Survey.

References