Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Perception of Medical Students on Lecture Methods:Power Point or Chalkboard?


Affiliations
1 Department of Surgery, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India
 

Aim: Using chalkboard is a traditional method of lecture delivery. Use of power point is relatively new. Modern day teaching is always learner oriented. This study was aimed to assess perceptions of undergraduate students on these methods of lecture delivery in learning surgery. Methods: Study was done in a teaching hospital over a period of six months. Theory classes of 5th semester in surgery were taken alternately by using chalkboard and power point. At the end of the term students' perception was assessed on the basis of a questionnaire in Likert scale regarding lecture content, ability to take note, ability to take diagram, interesting nature of lecture, and advancement in understanding, stimulation of interest, clarity and understandability of lecture, clarity of work, audibility and on organization of lecture. Results: Favorable responses to chalkboard and power point were-informative content (72.2% & 92.6%), ability to take notes (66.67% & 79.63%), take diagram (67.6% & 71.3%), interesting nature of lecture(75% & 74.07%), advancement of student's understanding on subject (83.33% & 81.48%), stimulation of interest (77.78% & 62.96%), understandability (76.85% & 83.33%), clarity (58.33% & 85.19%), audibility (82.41% & 87.04%) and organization of presentation (79.63%&83.33%). Conclusion: Medical students preferred power point over chalk and talk in terms of its informative content, ability to take notes and clarity of the presentation. Chalkboard scored over power point in developing interest in the subject and in advancing the students' understanding on the subject. A combination of both methods could be valuable.

Keywords

Perception, Medical Students, Lecture, Chalkboard, Power Point, Surgery.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Brown G, Atkins M. Studies of lecturing. In Brown G, Atkins M. Editors. Effective Teaching in Higher Education. London & New York: Routledge; Taylor & Francis e Library (eBook edition); 2002:7-18.
  • Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Kumar V. Impact of various lecture delivery methods in pharmacology. Exp Clin J 2010;9:96-101.
  • Sahu DR, Supe AN. The art and science of presentation: 35-mm slides. J Postgrad Med 2000;46:280–285.
  • Prasad S, Roy B, Smith M. The art and science of presentation: Electronic presentations. J Postgrad Med 2000;46:193–19.
  • Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M and Kumar V. An assessment of teachers’ preference for lecture delivery methods in medical education. Educational Research and Review 2010; 5 (9):533-7
  • deSa SB, Keny MS. Power point versus chalkboard based lectures in pharmacology: Evaluation of their impact on medical student’s knowledge and their preferences. Int J Adv Health Sci 2014;1(5):10–1.
  • Biswas S, Mondal S, Mukharjee J. Impact of Electronic and Non-Electronic Teaching Methods in Medical Physiology. Indian Medical Gazette 2013;147(12):431-33
  • Waheeda S, Murthy KS. A comparative study of blackboard teaching with PowerPoint teaching in 1st year medical students. National Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2015;6(1):11-13.
  • Seth V, Upadhyaya P, Ahmad M, Moghe V. Power point or chalk and talk: Perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India. Adv Med Educ Pract 2010;1:11-16.
  • Gail M. Sullivan, Anthony R. Artino, Jr. Analysing and interpreting data from Likert type scales. J Grad Med Educ 2013:5(4):541-542.
  • Roy B, Banerjee I, Sathian B, Mondal M, Kumar SS, Saha CG. Attitude of basic science medical students towards medicine and surgery post graduation: A questionnaire based cross sectional study from western region of Nepal. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2010;1(4):126-34.
  • Sawant SP. Power point versus chalkboard: Impact on the medical student. International Journal of Pharmacology Research 2015;5(3):282-85
  • Priyadarshini KS, Shetty HV, Reena R. Assessment of differ-ent teaching aids and teaching methods for the better percep-tion of biochemistry by 1st MBBS students. J Eval Med Dent Sci 2012;1:1159-65.
  • Shaguphta TS. Teaching Learning aids in medical education: The students perspective. Int J Clin Surg Adv 2015;3(1):32-37
  • Banerjee I, Jauhari A C, Bista D, Johorey A C, Roy B, Sathian B. Medical Students view about the integrated MBBS course: A questionnaire based cross-sectional survey from a medical college of Kathmandu valley. Nep J Epidemiol 2011;1(3):95-100.
  • Lalvarmawi F, Ningthoujam S, U, N, Mishra M. Perception of postgraduate students on teaching aids. J Med Soc 2013;27:36-8.
  • Swati C, Suresh, T, and Sachin D. Student assessment on learning based on power point versus chalkboard. International J of recent trends in science and technology 2014;13:347–51.
  • Mishra H, Kumar V, Modi PK. Comparison of different teaching methodologies in a medical college in North India. Indian journal of basic and applied medical research 2013;2(6):464-69.
  • Manohar T, Dashputra A, Suresh C. Students’ perception about teaching learning media in didactic lectures. JETHS 2015;2(3):103-5.
  • Baxi SN, Shah C J, Parmar RD, Parmar D, Tripathi CB. Student’s perception of different teaching aids in a medical college. Afr J Health Prof Educ 2009;1(1):15-6.
  • Saha N, Tripura K, Das R. Students’ Opinion towards audiovisual aids used in lecture classes. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2015;14(4):96-100.
  • Chaudary R, Dullo P, Gupta U. Attitude of 1st MBBS medical students about two different visual aids in physiology lectures. Pak J Physiol 2009;5(2):16-19.
  • Petimani MS, Adake P. Blackboard versus power point presentation: Students opinion in medical education. Int J Educ Psychol Res 2015;1(4):289-92.
  • Jabeen N, Ghani A. Comparison of the traditional chalk and board lecture system versus power point presentation as a teaching technique for teaching gross anatomy to the first professional medical students. JEMDS 2015;4(11):1811-17.
  • Parvin R, Md Haque N, Ahmed N, Ahmed R, MI, Ara R, Rahman MM, Bhattacharjee S, Bhattacharjee S, Rafiqueuddin AKM. Is audio visual method better than tradi-tional for medical students? A survey report. Bangladesh J Med 2010;21:60-4.
  • Amane HS, Kaore SN, Vasvani SV. Evaluation of existing teaching methods used for lecture classes in pharmacology. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2013;4(1):193-8
  • Heirdsfield A, Walker S, Tambyah M, Beutel D. Blackboard as an online learning environment: What do teacher education students and staff think?. Aust J Teach Educ. 2011;36:1-17.
  • Garg A, Rataboli PV, Muchandi K. Students’ opinion on the prevailing teaching methods in pharmacology and changes recommended. Indian J Pharmacol 2004;36:155–158.
  • Harley KN, Jankar J, Mohod KM. Perception of first MBBS medical students towards different teaching aids used in teaching learning process: A comparison between power point versus chalkboard teaching. Int J Adv Res Biol Sc 2015;2(7):71-80.
  • Prabhu R, Pai KM, Prabhu G, Shrilatha. A lecture in medical physiology: PowerPoint versus chalkboard. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education 2014;8(1):72-76.

Abstract Views: 155

PDF Views: 70




  • Perception of Medical Students on Lecture Methods:Power Point or Chalkboard?

Abstract Views: 155  |  PDF Views: 70

Authors

Dipak Kumar Sarma
Department of Surgery, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India

Abstract


Aim: Using chalkboard is a traditional method of lecture delivery. Use of power point is relatively new. Modern day teaching is always learner oriented. This study was aimed to assess perceptions of undergraduate students on these methods of lecture delivery in learning surgery. Methods: Study was done in a teaching hospital over a period of six months. Theory classes of 5th semester in surgery were taken alternately by using chalkboard and power point. At the end of the term students' perception was assessed on the basis of a questionnaire in Likert scale regarding lecture content, ability to take note, ability to take diagram, interesting nature of lecture, and advancement in understanding, stimulation of interest, clarity and understandability of lecture, clarity of work, audibility and on organization of lecture. Results: Favorable responses to chalkboard and power point were-informative content (72.2% & 92.6%), ability to take notes (66.67% & 79.63%), take diagram (67.6% & 71.3%), interesting nature of lecture(75% & 74.07%), advancement of student's understanding on subject (83.33% & 81.48%), stimulation of interest (77.78% & 62.96%), understandability (76.85% & 83.33%), clarity (58.33% & 85.19%), audibility (82.41% & 87.04%) and organization of presentation (79.63%&83.33%). Conclusion: Medical students preferred power point over chalk and talk in terms of its informative content, ability to take notes and clarity of the presentation. Chalkboard scored over power point in developing interest in the subject and in advancing the students' understanding on the subject. A combination of both methods could be valuable.

Keywords


Perception, Medical Students, Lecture, Chalkboard, Power Point, Surgery.

References