Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sakthivel, T.
- The Impact of Mobility Models on Geographic Routing in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks and Extensions – A Survey
Abstract Views :296 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Firstsoft Technologies Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Information Technology, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IN
1 Firstsoft Technologies Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Information Technology, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, IN
Source
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Vol 8, No 5 (2021), Pagination: 364-670Abstract
Multi-hop Wireless Networks (MWNs) emerge as an enabling communication technology, evolving rapidly due to the accelerating advancements and creating potential network applications that significantly improve the quality of life. Pure general-purpose MANET laid the theoretical foundation for MWNs, and many extensions are successfully deployed in commercial networks. This article surveys geographical routing protocols and mobility models applicable to MWNs and their recently proposed extensions. Mobility is a significant factor that profoundly impacts the performance of multi-hop geographical routing. This study analyzes various mobility models that significantly influence the performance of geographical routing protocols based on the characteristics and behavior of various network extensions. This survey investigates the primary challenges in designing geographical routing for various mobility models that notably impact the routing performance for a particular network extension. It also explores the enormous potential of geographical routing protocols under each extension and adequately addressing the routing and mobility-related issues. The essential factors that impact geographical routing, the freshness of location information, and the adaptive location update are examined extensively for various network extensions. Finally, the survey concludes with future research challenges and directions.Keywords
Multihop Wireless Networks, Geographical Routing, Mobility Models, MANET, FANET, WSN, VANET, DTN.References
- Macro Conti, Silvia Giordano, “Multi-hop Ad-hoc networking: The Reality”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 45, No.4, pp. 88-95, 2007
- Ruhrup, Stephan, “Theory and practice of Geographic routing”, Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks: Architectures, Algorithms and Protocols, pp. 1-37, 2009
- Chlamtac Imrich, Marco Conti, and Jennifer J-N. Liu, “Mobile ad hoc networking: imperatives and challenges”, Ad hoc networks, Vol.1, No.1, pp 13-64, 2003.
- Bekmezci, Ilker, Ozgur Koray Sahingoz, and Şamil Temel, “Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey”, Ad Hoc Networks, Vol.11, No. 3, pp.1254-1270, 2013.
- Priyanka Rawat, Kamal Deep Singh, Hakima Chaouchi, Jean Marie Bonnin, “Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies”, The Journal of Super computing, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp 1–48, 2014.
- Tong Wang, Yue Cao, Yougzhe Zhou, Pengcheng Li, "A Survey on Geographic Routing Protocols in Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networks", International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3174670
- Souaad Boussoufa-Lahlaha, FouziSemchedinea, LouizaBouallouche-Medjkounea, “Geographic routing protocols for Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks (VANETs): A survey”, Vehicular Communications, Vol. 11, pp. 20-31, 2018.
- Tasneem Darwish, Kamalrulnizam Abu Bakar, Ahlam Hashim, “Green geographical routing in vehicular ad hoc networks: Advances and challenges”, Computers & Electrical Engineering, Vol.64, pp. 436-449, 2017.
- Cadger Fraser, Kevin Curran, Jose Santos, and Sandra Moffett, “A survey of geographical routing in wireless ad-hoc networks", IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 621-653, 2013
- Nakano, Keisuke, Masakazu Sengoku, and Shoji Shinoda, “Effect of mobility on connectivity of mobile multihop wireless networks”, IEEE 55th Conference on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 3, pp. 1195-1199, 2002.
- Son, D., Helmy, A. and Krishnamachari, B, “The effect of mobility-induced location errors on geographic routing in ad hoc networks: analysis and improvement using mobility prediction”, In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Vol.1, pp.189-194, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004.
- T. Camp, J. Bowling, and V. Davies, “A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research”, Wireless Communication and Mobile Computing, Vol.2, No. 5, pp.483–502, 2002.
- Pan, Jianli, and Raj Jain, “A survey of network simulation tools: Current status and future developments”, Vol.7, No. 6, pp. 1-13, 2008.
- Treurniet, J, “A taxonomy and survey of microscopic mobility models from the mobile networking domain”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol.47, No.1, pp. 1-32, 2014.
- Gorawski Michal, and Krzysztof Grochla, “Review of mobility for performance evaluation of wireless networks”, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, Vol. 242, pp. 567-577, 2014.
- Vaity, N. P., & Thombre, D. V, “A survey on vehicular mobility modeling: flow modeling”, International Journal of Communication Network Security, Vol.1, No.4, 21, 2012
- Batabyal, Suvadip, and Parama Bhaumik, “Mobility models, traces and impact of mobility on opportunistic routing algorithms: A survey”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol.17, No. 3, pp. 1679-1707, 2015.
- B. Karp and H. T. Kung, “GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks”, in Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, pp. 243-254, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2000.
- E. Kranakis, S. O. C. Science, H. Singh, and J. Urrutia, “Compass Routing on Geometric Networks,” in Proc. 11 th Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, pp. 51–54, Ottawa, Canada, 1999.
- F. Kuhn, R. Wattenhofer, and A. Zollinger, “An algorithmic approach to geographic routing in ad hoc and sensor networks”, IEEE/ACM Transactions On Networking, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 51–62, 2008.
- J. Na and C. Kim, “GLR: A novel geographic routing scheme for large wireless ad hoc networks,” Computer Networks, Vol. 50, No. 17, pp. 3434–3448, 2006.
- J. Na, D. Soroker, and C.-k. Kim, “Greedy Geographic Routing using Dynamic Potential Field for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Communication Letters., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 243–245, 2007.
- Y.-J. Kim, R. Govindan, B. Karp, and S. Shenker, “On the pitfalls of geographic face routing,” Proceeding joint workshop on Foundations of mobile computing - DIALM-POMC, pp. 34-43, Cologne, Germany, 2005.
- F. Kuhn, R. Wattenhofer, and A. Zollinger, “Asymptotically optimal geometric mobile ad-hoc routing,” Proceeding 6th international workshop on Discrete algorithms and methods for mobile computing and communications - DIALM, pp. 24-33, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2002.
- F. Kuhn, R. Wattenhoffer, and A. Zollinger, “Worst-case optimal and average-case efficient geometric ad-hoc routing,” in Proc. 4th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking & computing,ser. MobiHoc, ACM, pp. 267–278, Annapolis, Maryland, USA, 2003
- F. Kuhn, R.Wattenhofer, Y. Zhang, and A. Zollinger, "Geometric ad-hoc routing: Of theory and practice", In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing(PODC), pages 63–72, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2003
- B. Leong, S. Mitra, and B. Liskov, “Path vector face routing: geographic routing with local face information,” 13th IEEE International Conference on Routing Protocols, pp. 12, Boston, MA, USA, 2005
- Biswas, S., & Morris, R., “Opportunistic routing in multi-hop wireless networks”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol.34, No.1, pp.69-74, 2004
- Zhong, Z., Wang, J., Nelakuditi, S., & Lu, G. H., “On selection of candidates for opportunistic any path forwarding”, ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Vol.10, No.4, pp.1-2, 2006
- R. Jain, A. Puri, and R. Sengupta, “Geographical Routing Using Partial Information for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Personal Communications, Vol. 8, No.1, pp. 48–57, 2001
- Dazhi chen and Pramod k. Varshney, “A survey of void handling techniques for geographic routing in wireless networks”, IEEE communications Surveys and Tutorials, Vol. 9, No.1, 2007
- Hugo Barbosa-Filho, et.al, "Human Mobility: Models and Applications", arXiv.org, physics, arXiv:1710.00004, 2017.
- Fan Bai and Ahmed He, “A Survey of Mobility Models in Wireless Adhoc Networks”, 2004.
- M. Guenes and J. Siekermann, “CosMos–communication scenario and mobility scenario generator for mobile ad-hoc networks”, in Proc 2nd Int. Worksh, MANETs Interoper, Iss. MANETII, Las Vegas, USA, 2005
- B. Zhou, Y.-Z. Lee, and M. Gerla, “Direction assisted geographic routing for mobile ad hoc networks,” in Proceedings of MILCOM Military Communications Conference. IEEE, 2008
- Seungjoon Lee, Bobby Bhattacharjee , Suman Banerjee and Bo Han, “A General Framework for Efficient Geographic Routing in Wireless Networks”, Computer Networks, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 844-861, 2010
- Baban A. Mahmood and D. Manivannan, “GRB: Greedy Routing Protocol with Backtracking for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems, Dallas, TX, USA, 2015
- Dong Yang, Hongxing Xia, Erfei Xu, Dongliang Jing and Hailin Zhang, “An Energy-Balanced Geographic Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks” Energies, Vol. 11, No. 9, pp. 1-16, 2018
- Noureddine, H., Ni, Q., Min, G., & Al-Raweshidy, H, “A New Link Lifetime Prediction Method for Greedy and Contention-based Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 2010
- Nallusamy, C., & Sabari, A, “Particle Swarm Based Resource Optimized Geographic Routing for Improved Network Lifetime in MANET”, Mobile Networks and Applications, 2017
- Chih‑Lin Hu and Chuluuntulga Sosorburam, “Enhanced Geographic Routing with Two‑Hop Neighborhood Information in Sparse MANETs” Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal, Vol.107, No. 1, pp. 417-436, 2019
- Jung, W.-S., Yim, J., & Ko, Y.-B, “QGeo: Q-Learning-Based Geographic Ad Hoc Routing Protocol for Unmanned Robotic Networks”, IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 2258–2261, 2017
- Haesu Hwang, In HUT, and Hyunseung Choo, “GOAFR Plus-ABC: Geographic Routing Based on Adaptive Boundary Circle in MANETs”, International Conference on Information Networking, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2009
- Ben Newton, Jay Aikat, Kevin Jeffay, “Geographic Routing in Large-Scale Highly-Dynamic Mobile Ad hoc Networks”, IEEE 24th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS), London, UK, 2015
- Alshehri, A., Badawy, A.-H. A., & Huang, H, “FQ-AGO: Fuzzy Logic Q-Learning Based Asymmetric Link Aware and Geographic Opportunistic Routing Scheme for MANETs”, Electronics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2020
- Daeho Kanga , Hyung-Sin Kimb , Changhee Jooc , Saewoong Bahk, “ORGMA: Reliable opportunistic routing with gradient forwarding for MANETs”, Computer Networks, 2017
- Li, N., Martinez-Ortega, J.-F., & Diaz, V. H, “Cross-Layer and Reliable Opportunistic Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 5595–5609, 2018
- Wang, Z., Chen, Y., & Li, C. “CORMAN: A novel cooperative opportunistic routing scheme in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol.30, No.2, pp. 289-296, 2012
- Armir Bujari, Carlos T Calafate, Juan-Carlos Cano, Pietro Manzoni, Claudio Enrico Palazzi and Daniele Ronzani, "Flying ad-hoc network application scenarios and mobility models", International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, Vol 13, No.10, 2017.
- Samira Hayat, Evşen Yanmaz, Raheeb Muzaffar,"Survey on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Networks for Civil Applications: A Communications Viewpoint", IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol: 18, No: 4, pp 2624 - 2661, 2016.
- Oubbati, Omar Sami, Abderrahmane Lakas, Fen Zhou, Mesut Güneş, and Mohamed Bachir Yagoubi, “A survey on position-based routing protocols for Flying Ad hoc Networks (FANETs)”, Vehicular Communications, Vol. 10, pp. 29-56, 2017.
- Guillen-Perez, A. and Cano, M.D, “Flying ad hoc networks: A new domain for network communications”, Sensors, Vol.18, No.10, p.3571, 2018
- Omar Sami Oubbatia, , Abderrahmane Lakasb, Fen Zhouc , Mesut G¨une¸sd, Nasreddine Lagraaa, Mohamed Bachir Yagoubia, “Intelligent UAV-Assisted Routing Protocol for Urban VANETs”, Computer Networks, 2017
- Robert L. Lidowski, Barry E. Mullins, Rusty O. Baldwin, "A novel communications protocol using geographic routing for swarming UAVs performing a Search Mission", In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, USA, 2009.
- Vieira, L. F. M., & Cunha, A. V. dos S, “Performance of Greedy Forwarding in Geographic Routing for the Internet of Drones”, Internet Technology Letters, Vol: 1, No:5, 2018.
- Qamar Usman, Omer Chughtai, Nadia Nawaz, Zeeshan Kaleem, Kishwer Abdul Khaliq, Long D. Nguyen, "A Reliable Link-adaptive Position-based Routing Protocol for Flying Ad hoc Network", Mobile Networks and Applications, 2021.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01758-w
- Lin Lin, Qibo Sun, Jinglin Li, Fangchun Yang, "A Novel Geographic Position Mobility Oriented Routing Strategy for UAVs", Journal of Computational Information Systems, Vol:8, No: 2, pp 709-716, 2012.
- E. Kuiper, S. Nadjm-Tehrani, “Geographical routing with location service in intermittently connected MANETs”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 60 , No.2, pp. 592–604, 2011.
- Jabbar, J. P. Sterbenz, “AeroRP: A geolocation assisted aeronautical routing protocol for highly dynamic telemetry environments”, in: Proceedings of the International Telemetering Conference, pp. 1-10, Las Vegas, NV, 2009.
- D. Ros ́ario, Z. Zhao, T. Braun, E. Cerqueira, A. Santos, I. Alyafawi, “Opportunistic routing for multi-flow video dissemination over flying ad-hoc networks”, in: Proceedings of the 15th International IEEE Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2014
- Arafat, M. Y., & Moh, S, “Location-Aided Delay Tolerant Routing Protocol in UAV Networks for Post-Disaster Operation”, IEEE Access, 2018
- Xiong Wang, Luoyi Fu, Yang Zhang, Xiaoying Gan and Xinbing Wang, “VDNet: an infrastructure-less UAV-assisted sparse VANET system with vehicle location prediction”, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2016
- Omar Sami Oubbati, Abderrahmane Lakas†, Nasreddine Lagraa, and Mohamed Bachir Yagoubi, “CRUV: Connectivity-based Traffic Density Aware Routing using UAVs for VANets”, International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), 2015
- Xiaoyan Ma, Simona Chisiu, Rahim Kacimi and Riadh Dhaou, “Opportunistic Communications in WSN Using UAV”, 14th IEEE SURVEY ARTICLE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), USA, 2017
- He, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, R., Du, X., Zhou, D., & Guizani, M, “A Course-Aware Opportunistic Routing Protocol for FANETs”. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, pp. 144303–144312, 2019
- Stefano Basagni, Alessio Carosi, and Chiara Petriol, "Mobility in Wireless Sensor Networks", Technical Report, 2012, https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2012/EECS-2012-270.pdf
- Ricardo Silva, JorgeSa Silva, Fernando Boavida, "Mobility in wireless sensor networks–Survey and proposal", Computer Communications, Vol 52, pp 1-20, 2014.
- R. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, and W. Brunette, “Data mules: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, pp. 30–41, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2003
- P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L. S. Peh, and D. Rubenstein, “Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet,” ACM SIGOPS Operation System Review, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 96–107, 2002.
- B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M. Goraczko, A. Miu, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden, “Cartel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system,” in Proceedings of ACM the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, SenSys, pp. 125–138, Boulder, Colorado, 2006.
- H. Smeets, C.-Y. Shih, M. Zuniga, T. Hagemeier, and P. Marron, “Trainsense: A novel infrastructure to support mobility in wireless sensor networks,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7772, pp. 18–33, 2013.
- T. Zhang, D. Wang, J. Cao, Y. Q. Ni, L.-J. Chen, and D. Chen, “Elevator-assisted sensor data collection for structural health monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 11, No. 10, pp. 1555–1568, 2012.
- D. Johnson, T. Stack, R. Fish, D. Flickinger, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, and J. Lepreau, “Mobile emulab: A robotic wireless and sensor network testbed,” in Proceedings of IEEE the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 1–12, Barcelona, Spain, 2006.
- P. De, A. Raniwala, R. Krishnan, K. Tatavarthi, J. Modi, N. A. Syed, S. Sharma, and T.-c. Chiueh, “Mint-m: an autonomous mobile wireless experimentation platform,” in Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Mobile systems, applications and services, ser. MobiSys, pp. 124–137, Uppsala, Sweden, 2006.
- S. Gandham, M. Dawande, R. Prakash, and S. Venkatesan, “Energy efficient schemes for wireless sensor networks with multiple mobile base stations,” in Proc. of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 377–381, San Francisco, USA, 2003.
- F. Ye, H. Luo, J. Cheng, S. Lu, and L. Zhang, “A two-tier data dissemination model for large-scale wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of ACM the 8th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, ser. MobiCom, pp. 148–15, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 2002.
- C.-J. Lin, P.-L. Chou, and C.-F. Chou, “Hcdd: hierarchical cluster-based data dissemination in wireless sensor networks with mobile sink,” in Proceedings of the ACM 2006 international conference on Wireless communications and mobile computing, ser. IWCMC, pp. 1189–1194, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2006.
- D. Jea, A. Somasundara, and M. Srivastava, “Multiple controlled mobile elements (data mules) for data collection in sensor networks,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3560, pp. 244–257, 2005.
- S. Basagni, A. Carosi, E. Melachrinoudis, C. Petrioli, and Z. M. Wang, “Controlled sink mobility for prolonging wireless sensor networks lifetime,” Wireless Networks, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 831–858, 2008.
- Y. Shi and Y. Hou, “Theoretical results on base station movement problem for sensor network,” in INFOCOM 2008. The 27th Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, pp. 1–5, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2008.
- M. Ma and Y. Yang, “Sencar: An energy-efficient data gathering mechanism for large-scale multihop sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, Vol. 18, No. 10, pp. 1476–1488, 2007.
- G. Xing, T. Wang, Z. Xie, and W. Jia, “Rendezvous planning in mobility-assisted wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), pp. 311–320, Tucson, Arizona, USA, 2007.
- M. Zhao and Y. Yang, “Bounded relay hop mobile data gathering in wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 265–277, 2012.
- Khelifi, M., Bourouais, S., Lounis, O., & Moussaoui, S, “GRCS: A cluster-based geographic routing protocol for WSNs”, Ninth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), 2017.
- Yu, F., Park, S., Lee, E., & Kim, S.-H. “Elastic routing: a novel geographic routing for mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks”, IET Communications, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 716–727, 2010
- Tran Dinh Hieu, Le The Dung, and Byung-Seo Kim, “Stability-Aware Geographic Routing in Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks”, Sensors, 2016
- Mouna Rekik, Nathalie Mitton, Zied Chtourou, “GRACO: a geographic GReedy routing with an ACO-based void handling technique” International Journal of Sensor Networks, Vol.26, No.3, pp.145–161, 2018.
- Sun, Y., Guo, J., & Yuhui Yao, “Speed Up-Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks (SU-GPSR)”, IEEE 18th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), 2017.
- Basagni, S., Carosi, A., Melachrinoudis, E., Petrioli, C., & Wang, Z, “A New MILP Formulation and Distributed Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks Lifetime Maximization”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2006.
- Antonio Caruso, Francesco Paparella, Luiz F. M. Vieira, Melike Erol, Mario Gerla, “The Meandering Current Mobility Model and its Impact on Underwater Mobile Sensor Networks”, IEEE INFOCOM The 27th Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 771-779, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2008.
- zheng yang and yunhao liu, “Sea Depth Measurement with Restricted Floating Sensors”, 28th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), Tucson, AZ, USA 2013
- Xie, P., Cui, J. and Lao, L, “VBF: Vector-based forwarding protocol for underwater sensor networks”, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 1216–1221, 2006.
- Nicolaou, N., See, A., Xie, P., Cui, J. H. and Maggiorini, D, “Improving the Robustness of Location-Based Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks,” IEEE Oceans Conference, pp.1-6, Aberdeen, UK, 2007.
- Jinming, C., Xiaobing, W. and Guihai, C. (2008) “REBAR: a reliable and energy balanced routing algorithm for UWSNs”. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on grid and cooperative computing, pp. 349-355, Shenzhen, China 2008.
- Daeyoup, H. and Dongkyun, K., “DFR: Directional flooding-based routing protocol for underwater sensor networks” IEEE OCEANS, pp. 1-7, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 2008
- Anupama, KR., Sasidharan, A. and Vadlamani, S., “A location-based clustering algorithm for data gathering in 3D underwater wireless sensor networks” In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Telecommunications, IST, pp. 343-348, Tehran, Iran, 2008.
- Rahman Z, Hashim F, Rasid MFA, Othman M, “Totally opportunistic routing algorithm (TORA) for underwater wireless sensor network”. PLoS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 1-28, 2018
- Chirdchoo, N., Wee-Seng, S. and Kee Chaing, C, “Sector-based routing with destination location prediction for underwater mobile networks”, In Proceedings of the international conference on advanced information networking and applications workshops, pp. 1148-1153, Bradford, UK, 2009.
- Coutinho, R. W. L., Vieira, L. F. M., & Loureiro, A. A. F, “DCR: Depth-Controlled Routing protocol for underwater sensor networks”, IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), 2013.
- Seyed Mohammad Ghoreyshi , Alireza Shahrabi, and Tuleen Boutaleb, “A Stateless Opportunistic Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks”, Wireless Communications andMobileComputingVolume, pp. 1-18, 2018.
- Noh, Y., Lee, U., Wang, P., Choi, B. S. C., & Gerla, M, “VAPR: Void-Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks”, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 895–908, 2013.
- Coutinho, R. W. L., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L. F. M., & Loureiro, A. A. F, “GEDAR: Geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with Depth Adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks”, IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2014.
- Choffnes, D., Bustamante, F, “An Integrated Mobility and Traffic Model for Vehicular Wireless Networks”, In: 2nd ACM Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, pp. 69-78, Cologne, Germany 2005.
- Uchiyama, A, “Mobile Ad-hoc Network Simulator based on Realistic Behavior Model”, Demo Session in MobiHoc, 2005
- Gainaru, A., Dobre, C., Cristea, V, “A Realistic Mobility Model Based on Social Networks for the Simulation of VANETs”, In: IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1–5, Barcelona, Spain, 2009.
- Choffnes, David, and Fabin E. Bustamante, “STRAW-An Integrated Mobility and Traffic Model for VANET”, Proc. of the 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (CCRTS), pp. 1-7, 2005.
- Khokhar, Rashid Hafeez, et al, “Fuzzy-assisted social-based routing for urban vehicular environments”, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, pp. 1-15, 2011
- Zhao, Jing, and Guohong Cao. "VADD: Vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks." IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, Vol.57, No.3, pp.1910-1922, 2008.
- Xue, G., Luo, Y., Yu, J., & Li, M. “A novel vehicular location prediction based on mobility patterns for routing in urban VANET”, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, Vol. 1, pp.1-14, 2012.
- Lochert, C., Hartenstein, H., Tian, J., Fussler, H., Hermann, D., & Mauve, M. “A routing strategy for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments”, IEEE Intelligent vehicles symposium, pp. 156–161, Columbus, OH, USA, 2003.
- Seet, Boon-Chong, Genping Liu, Bu-Sung Lee, Chuan-Heng Foh, Kai-Juan Wong, and Keok-Kee Lee, “A-STAR: A mobile ad hoc routing strategy for metropolis vehicular communications”, In International Conference on Research in Networking, pp. 989-999, 2004.
- Jerbi, M., Meraihi, R., Senouci, S. M., & Ghamri-Doudane, Y, “Gytar: Improved greedy traffic aware routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks in city environments”, ACM Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on vehicular ad hoc networks, pp. 88–89, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2006.
- V. Naumov and T.R. Gross. “Connectivity-aware routing (car) in vehicular ad-hoc networks”, In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pp.1919–1927, Barcelona, Spain, 2007.
- Schnaufer, S., & Effelsberg, W, “Position-based unicast routing for city scenarios”, International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, 2008
- B. Kirsch, W. Effelsberg, “Implementation of a Distance-Vector-Based Recovery Strategy for Position-Based-Routing”, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Mannheim, 2007.
- Tsiachris, S., Koltsidas, G., & Pavlidou, F.-N, “Junction-Based Geographic Routing Algorithm for Vehicular Ad hoc Networks”, Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp., 955–973, 2012
- Wang, L., Chen, Z., & Wu, J, “An Opportunistic Routing for Data Forwarding Based on Vehicle Mobility Association in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks”, Information, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2017
- I. Leontiadis and C. Mascolo, “GeOpps: geographical opportunistic routing for vehicular networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WOWMOM), pp. 1–6, Espoo, Finland, 2007.
- Ghaffari, A, “Hybrid opportunistic and position-based routing protocol in vehicular ad hoc networks”, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2019
- Lee, K. C., Le, M., Harri, J., & Gerla, M. “Louvre: Landmark overlays for urban vehicular routing environments”, IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology, Calgary, BC, Canada, 2008.
- Baischolar_mainkar M, Ghaffarpour Rahbar. A, & Sabaei, M, “LDAOR Location and Direction Aware Opportunistic Routing in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks”, Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 68–83, 2016.
- Sadatpour, V., Zargari, F., & Ghanbari, M, “A Collision Aware Opportunistic Routing Protocol for VANETs in Highways”, Wireless Personal Communications, 2019
- Li, N., Martinez-Ortega, J.-F., Diaz, V. H., & Fernandez, J. A. S, “Probability Prediction-Based Reliable and Efficient Opportunistic Routing Algorithm for VANETs”, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 1933–1947, 2018.
- Naderi, M., Zargari, F., Sadatpour, V., & Ghanbari, M, “A 3-Parameter Routing Cost Function for Improving Opportunistic Routing Performance in VANETs”, Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 109–123, 2017.
- Uddin, Md Yusuf S., David M. Nicol, Tarek F. Abdelzaher, and Robin H. Kravets, “A post-disaster mobility model for delay tolerant networking”, In Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2785-2796, Austin, TX, USA, 2009.
- Walker, Brenton D., T. Charles Clancy, and Joel K. Glenn, “Using localized random walks to model delay-tolerant networks”, In Military Communications Conference, MILCOM IEEE, pp. 1-7, San Diego, CA, USA, 2008.
- M Shahzamal, M F Pervez, M A U Zaman, and M D Hossain, "Mobility Models for Delay Tolerant Network: A Survey", International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2014.
- F. Ekman, A. Ker¨anen, J. Karvo, and J. Ott, “Working day movement model”, in Proceedings of the In Proceedings of the 1st ACMSIGMOBILE workshop on Mobility models, (MobilityModels), pp. 33–40, Hong Kong, China, 2008.
- Q. Zheng, X. Hong, J. Liu, D. Cordes, and W. Huang, “Agenda driven mobility modelling”, International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 22–36, 2009.
- X. Zhu, Y. Bai, W. Yang, Y. Peng, and C. Bi, “SAME: A students’ daily activity mobility model for campus delay-tolerant networks,” in Proceedings of the 8th Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), pp. 528–533, Jeju Island, South Korea, 2012.
- J. Ghosh, S. J. Philip, and C. Qiao, “Sociological orbit aware location approximation and routing (SOLAR) in MANET”, Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 189–209, 2007.
- W. J. Hsu, T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, and A. Helmy, “Modeling time-variant user mobility in wireless mobile networks,” in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pp. 758–766, Barcelona, Spain, 2007.
- K. Lee, S. Hong, S. J. Kim, I. Rhee, and S. Chong, “Slaw: A new mobility model for human walks”, in Proceedings of the INFOCOM, IEEE, pp. 855–863, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009.
- C. Boldrini and A. Passarella, “HCMM, Modelling spatial and temporal properties of human mobility driven by users social relationships,” Computer Communications, Vol. 33, No. 9, pp. 1056–1074, 2010.
- N. Vastardis and K. Yang, “An enhanced community-based mobility model for distributed mobile social networks,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 65–75, 2014.
- V. Borrel, F. Legendre, M. D. de Amorim, and S. Fdida, “Simps, Using sociology for personal mobility,” IEEE/ACMTransactions on Networking, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 831–842, 2009.
- D. Fischer, K.Herrmann, andK. Rothermel, “GeSoMo-A general social mobility model for delay tolerant networks,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), IEEE, pp. 99–108, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2010.
- Dávid HrabIák, Martin Matis, L’ubomír Doboš, and Ján Papaj, “Students Social Based Mobility Model for MANET-DTN Networks”, Mobile Information System, pp. 1-13, 2017
- H. Kang and D. Kim, “Vector routing for delay tolerant networks,” in Proceedings of the 68th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), pp. 1–5, Calgary, Canada, 2008.
- Yue Cao ; Zhili Sun ; Ning Wang ; Haitham Cruickshank ; Naveed Ahmad, “A Reliable and Efficient Geographic Routing Scheme for Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networks”, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, Vol. 2 , No. 6, pp. 603-606, 2013.
- H. Kang and D. Kim, “HVR: history-based vector routing for delay tolerant networks,” in Proceedings of the 18th Internatonal Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pp. 1–6, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 2009.
- Y. Cao, Z. Sun, N. Wang, M. Riaz, H. Cruickshank, and X. Liu, “Geographic-based spray-and-relay (GSaR): an efficient routing scheme for DTNs,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 1548–1564, 2015.
- Yue Cao, Kaimin Wei, Geyong Min, Jian Weng, Xin Yang and Zhili Sun, “A Geographic Multi-Copy Routing Scheme for DTNs With Heterogeneous Mobility”, IEEE Systems Journal, Vol. 12 , No.1, pp. 790-801, 2016.
- O. Turkes, H. Scholten, and P. Havinga, “RoRo-LT: social routing with next-place prediction from self-assessment of spatiotemporal routines,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 10th International Conference on IEEE Autonomic and Trusted Computing (UIC/ATC), pp. 201–208, Vietri sulMare, Italy, 2013.
- V. N. G. J. Soares, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, and F. Farahmand, “GeoSpray: a geographic routing protocol for vehicular delay tolerant networks,” Information Fusion, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 102–113, 2014.
- Y. Cao, Z. Sun, H. Cruickshank, and F. Yao, “Approach-and Roam (AaR): a geographic routing scheme for delay/disruption tolerant networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 266–281, 2014.
- Cao, Y., Han, C., Zhang, X., Kaiwartya, O., Zhuang, Y., Aslam, N., Dianati, M, “A Trajectory-Driven Opportunistic Routing Protocol for VCPS”, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2628-2642, 2018.
- Yue Cao ; Zhili Sun ; Ning Wang ; Fang Yao ; Haitham Cruickshank, “Converge-and-Diverge: A Geographic Routing for Delay/Disruption-Tolerant Networks Using a Delegation Replication Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 2339-2343, 2013.
- H.-Y. Huang, P.-E. Luo, M. Li et al., “Performance evaluation of SUVnet with real-time traffic data”, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 3381–3396, 2007
- X. Li, W. Shu, M. Li, H. Huang, and M.-Y. Wu, “DTN routing in vehicular sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 752– 756, New Orleans, La, USA, 2008.
- J. A. B. Link, D. Schmitz, and K. Wehrle, “GeoDTN: geographic routing in disruption tolerant networks,” in Proceedings of the 54th Annual IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–5, Houston, Tex, USA, 2011.
- Pei-Chun Cheng · Kevin C. Lee · Mario Gerla · Jérôme Härri, “GeoDTN+Nav: Geographic DTN Routing with Navigator Prediction for Urban Vehicular Environments”, Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol.15, No. 1, pp. 61-82, 2010.
- Jinyang Li, John Jannotti, Douglas S. J. De Couto, David R. Karger, Robert Morris, Robert, "A Scalable Location Service for Geographic Ad Hoc Routing", Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2000.
- S.M. Das, H. Pucha, Y.C. Hu, "Performance comparison of scalable location services for geographic ad hoc routing", Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2005.
- X. Shi and K. Liu, “A contention-based beaconless geographic routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks”, Third International Conference on Communications and Networking in China, pp. 840–843, Hangzhou, China, 2008.
- G. Y. Lee and Y. Lee, “Numerical analysis of optimum timer value for time-based location registration scheme,” IEEE Communication Letters., Vol. 6, No. 10, pp. 431–433, 2002.
- D. Son, A. Helmy, B. Krishnamachari, "The effect of mobility-induced location errors on geographic routing in mobile ad hoc sensor networks: analysis and improvement using mobility prediction", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol. 3, No 3, pp.233-245, 2004.
- Quanjun Chen, Salil S. Kanhere, Mahbub Hassan, "Adaptive Position Update for Geographic Routing in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol 12, No 3, pp 489-501, 2013.
- Marco Fiore, Claudio Casetti, Carla-Fabiana Chiasserini, Panagiotis Papadimitratos, "Discovery and Verification of Neighbor Positions in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks", IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, Vol 12, No. 2, pp. 289-303, 2013.
- S.H. Shah and K. Nahrstedt. “Predictive location-based QoS routing in mobile ad hoc networks”,Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2002.
- Liu, G. & Maguire Jr., “A Class of Mobile Motion Prediction Algorithms for Wireless Mobile Computing and Communications”, Mobile Networks and Applications Journal, Springer, Vol.1, No.2, pp 113-121, 1996.
- M. Rieke, T. Foerster, A. Broering, “Unmanned aerial vehicles as mobile multi-platforms”, in: The 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, pp.18–21, 2011.
- Chellapa-Doss, R., Jennings, A. & Shenoy, N., “User Mobility Prediction in Hybrid and Ad Hoc Wireless Networks”, Proceeding of the Australian Telecommunications Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC), 2003.
- Saman, N. & Karmouch, A., “A Mobility Prediction Architecture Based on Contextual Knowledge and Spatial Conceptual Maps” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. Vol.4, No.6, pp. 537-551, 2005.
- Kulkarni, Vaibhav, and Benoît Garbinato. "20 Years of Mobility Modeling & Prediction: Trends, Shortcomings & Perspectives." In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pp. 492-495. 2019.
- Aarti Munjal,Tracy Camp, and Nils Aschenbruck, “Changing Trends in Modeling Mobility”, Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hindwai, Vol.2012, pp. 16, 2012
- V. Kulkarni, A. Mahalunkar, B. Garbinato, and J. D. Kelleher. Examining the limits of predictability of human mobility. Entropy, Vol.21, No.4, pp.432, 2019
- J. Feng, Y. Li, C. Zhang, F. Sun, F. Meng, A. Guo, and D. Jin. Deepmove: Predicting human mobility with attentional recurrent networks. In WWW, 2018
- Myounggyu Won, Wei Zhang, Chien-An Chen, Radu Stoleru, "GROLL: Geographic Routing for Low Power and Lossy IoT Networks", Internet of Things, Vol 9, 2020.
- Dmitrii Chemodanov, Flavio Esposito, Andrei Sukhov, Prasad Calyam, Huy Trinh, Zakariya Oraibia, "AGRA: AI-augmented geographic routing approach for IoT-based incident-supporting applications", Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol 92, pp 1051-1065, 2019.
- Deep Q-Learning Network-Based Energy and Network-Aware Optimization Model for Resources in Mobile Cloud Computing
Abstract Views :178 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Firstsoft Technologies Private Ltd., Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Firstsoft Technologies Private Ltd., Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Vol 9, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 361-373Abstract
Mobile Cloud Computing (MCC) enables computation offloading procedures and has become popular in resolving the resource limitations of mobile devices. To accomplish effective offloading in the mobile cloud, modeling the application execution environment with Quality of Service (QoS) is crucial. Hence, optimization of resource allocation and management plays a major role in ensuring the seamless execution of mobile applications. Recently cloud computing research has adopted the reinforcement learning models to optimize resource allocation and offloading. In addition, several optimization mechanisms have considered the network transmission rate while selecting the network resources. However, mitigating the response time becomes critical among the dynamically varying mobile cloud resources. Thus, this paper proposes a joint resource optimization methodology for the processing and network resources in the integrated mobile-network-cloud environment. The proposed approach presents the Energy and Network-Aware Optimization solution with the assistance of the Deep Q-learning Network (ENAO-DQN). Designing an energy and network-aware resource optimization strategy recognizes the quality factors that preserve the device energy while allocating the resources and executing the compute-intensive mobile applications. With the potential advantage of the Deep Q-learning model in decision-making, the ENAO-DQN approach optimally selects the network resources with the enrichment of the maximized rewards. Initially, the optimization algorithm prefetches the quality factors based on the mobile and application characteristics, wireless network parameters, and cloud resource characteristics. Secondly, it generates the allocation plan for the application-network resource pair based on the prefetched quality factors with the assistance of the enhanced deep reinforcement learning model. Thus, the experimental results demonstrate that the ENAO-DQN model outperforms the baseline mobile execution and cloud offloading models.Keywords
Mobile Cloud Computing, Resource Allocation, Optimization, Energy Consumption, QoS, Deep Reinforcement Learning, Q-learning, Wireless Network Resource.References
- Fernando, Niroshinie Seng W. Loke, and Wenny Rahayu, “Mobile cloud computing: A survey”, Future Generation Computer Systems, pp.84-106, Vol.29, No.1, 2013.
- Wu, Huaming. "Multi-objective decision-making for mobile cloud offloading: A survey”, IEEE Access, Vol.6, pp.3962-3976, 2018.
- Zhou, Bowen, and Rajkumar Buyya, “Augmentation techniques for mobile cloud computing: A taxonomy, survey, and future directions”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol.51, No.1, pp.1-38, 2018.
- Nayyer, M. Ziad, Imran Raza, and Syed Asad Hussain, “A survey of cloudlet-based mobile augmentation approaches for resource optimization”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol.51, No.5, pp.1-28, 2018.
- Dinh Hoang T, Chonho Lee, Dusit Niyato, and Ping Wang, “A survey of mobile cloud computing: architecture, applications, and approaches”, Wireless communications and mobile computing, Vol.13, No.18, pp.1587-1611, 2013.
- Noor, Talal H., Sherali Zeadally, Abdullah Alfazi, and Quan Z. Sheng, “Mobile cloud computing: Challenges and future research directions”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol.115, pp.70-85, 2018.
- Ferrer, Ana Juan, Joan Manuel Marquès, and Josep Jorba, “Towards the decentralised cloud: Survey on approaches and challenges for mobile, ad hoc, and edge computing”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol.51, No.6, pp.1-36, 2019.
- Parajuli, Nitesh, Abeer Alsadoon, P. W. C. Prasad, Rasha S. Ali, and Omar Hisham Alsadoon, “A recent review and a taxonomy for multimedia application in Mobile cloud computing based energy efficient transmission”, Multimedia Tools and Applications, Vol.79, No.41, pp.31567-31594, 2020.
- Junior, Warley, Eduardo Oliveira, Albertinin Santos, and Kelvin Dias, “A context-sensitive offloading system using machine-learning classification algorithms for mobile cloud environment”, Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol.90, pp.503-520, 2019.
- Duc, Thang Le, Rafael García Leiva, Paolo Casari, and Per-Olov Östberg, “Machine learning methods for reliable resource provisioning in edge-cloud computing: A survey”, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), Vol.52, No.5, pp.1-39, 2019.
- Shakarami, Ali, Mostafa Ghobaei-Arani, and Ali Shahidinejad, “A survey on the computation offloading approaches in mobile edge computing: A machine learning-based perspective”, Computer Networks, p.107496, 2020.
- Zhou, Guangyao, Wenhong Tian, and Rajkumar Buyya, “Deep Reinforcement Learning-based Methods for Resource Scheduling in Cloud Computing: A Review and Future Directions”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.04086, 2021.
- Du, Wei, and Shifei Ding, “A survey on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: from the perspective of challenges and applications”, Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol.54, No.5, pp.3215-3238, 2021.
- Zhang, Weiwen, Yonggang Wen, Kyle Guan, Dan Kilper, Haiyun Luo, and D. Wu, “Energy-Optimal Mobile Cloud Computing under Stochastic Wireless Channel”, IEEE Transactions On Wireless Communications, Vol.12, No.9, pp.4569-4581, 2013.
- Shu, Peng, Fangming Liu, Hai Jin, Min Chen, Feng Wen, Yupeng Qu, and Bo Li, “eTime:energy-efficient transmission between cloud and mobile devices”, Proceedings IEEE in INFOCOM, pp.195-199, 2013.
- Mahinur, Fatema Tuz Zohra, and Amit Kumar Das, “Q-MAC: QoS and mobility aware optimal Resource Allocation for dynamic application offloading in mobile cloud computing”, In 2017 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE), pp.803-808, 2017.
- Chen, Meng-Hsi, Ben Liang, and Min Dong, “Joint offloading and Resource Allocation for computation and communication in mobile cloud with computing access point”, In IEEE INFOCOM 2017-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pp.1-9, 2017.
- Chunlin, Li, Zhou Min, and Luo Youlong, “Elastic resource provisioning in hybrid mobile cloud for computationally intensive mobile applications”, The Journal of Supercomputing, Vol.73, No.9, pp.3683-3714, 2017.
- Chunlin, Li, Liu Yanpei, and Luo Youlong, “Energy‐aware cross‐layer Resource Allocation in mobile cloud”, International Journal of Communication Systems, Vol.30, No.12, p.e3258, 2017.
- Zhang, Jing, Weiwei Xia, Feng Yan, and Lianfeng Shen, “Joint computation offloading and Resource Allocation in heterogeneous networks with mobile edge computing”, IEEE Access, Vol.6, pp.19324-19337, 2018.
- Chen, Meng-Hsi, Ben Liang, and Min Dong, “Multi-user multi-task offloading and Resource Allocation in mobile cloud systems”, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol.17, No.10, pp.6790-6805, 2018.
- Avgeris, Marios, Dimitrios Dechouniotis, Nikolaos Athanasopoulos, and Symeon Papavassiliou, “Adaptive Resource Allocation for computation offloading: A control-theoretic approach”, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), Vol.19, No.2, pp.1-20, 2019.
- Alkhalaileh, Mohammad, Rodrigo N. Calheiros, Quang Vinh Nguyen, and Bahman Javadi, “Dynamic Resource Allocation in hybrid mobile cloud computing for data-intensive applications”, In International Conference on Green, Pervasive, and Cloud Computing, Springer, pp.176-191, 2019.
- Malik, Saif UR, Hina Akram, Sukhpal Singh Gill, Haris Pervaiz, and Hassan Malik, “EFFORT: Energy efficient framework for offload communication in mobile cloud computing”, Software: Practice and Experience, Vol.51, No.9, pp.1896-1909, 2021.
- Ali, Abid, Muhammad Munawar Iqbal, Harun Jamil, Faiza Qayyum, Sohail Jabbar, Omar Cheikhrouhou, Mohammed Baz, and Faisal Jamil, “An efficient dynamic-decision based task scheduler for task offloading optimization and energy management in mobile cloud computing”, Sensors, Vol.21, No.13, p.4527, 2021.
- Mahesar, Abdul Rasheed, Abdullah Lakhan, Dileep Kumar Sajnani, and Irfan Ali Jamali, “Hybrid delay optimization and workload assignment in mobile edge cloud networks”, Open Access Library Journal, Vol.5, No.9, pp.1-12, 2018.
- Li, Ji, Hui Gao, Tiejun Lv, and Yueming Lu, “Deep reinforcement learning based computation offloading and resource allocation for MEC”, In 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp.1-6, 2018.
- Nawrocki, Piotr, and Bartlomiej Sniezynski, “Adaptive service management in mobile cloud computing by means of supervised and reinforcement learning”, Journal of Network and Systems Management, Vol.26, No.1, pp.1-22, 2018.
- Ali, Zaiwar, Lei Jiao, Thar Baker, Ghulam Abbas, Ziaul Haq Abbas, and Sadia Khaf, “A deep learning approach for energy efficient computational offloading in mobile edge computing”, IEEE Access, Vol.7, pp.149623-149633, 2019.
- Wang, Jiadai, Lei Zhao, Jiajia Liu, and Nei Kato, “Smart resource allocation for mobile edge computing: A deep reinforcement learning approach”, IEEE Transactions on emerging topics in computing, 2019.
- Eshratifar, Amir Erfan, Mohammad Saeed Abrishami, and Massoud Pedram, “JointDNN: An efficient training and inference engine for intelligent mobile cloud computing services”, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2019.
- Alfakih, Taha, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, Abdu Gumaei, Claudio Savaglio, and Giancarlo Fortino, “Task offloading and resource allocation for mobile edge computing by deep reinforcement learning based on SARSA”, IEEE Access, Vol.8, pp.54074-54084, 2020.
- Qu, Guanjin, Huaming Wu, Ruidong Li, and Pengfei Jiao, “Dmro: A deep meta reinforcement learning-based task offloading framework for edge-cloud computing”, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, Vol.18, no.3, pp.3448-3459, 2021.
- Shakarami, Ali, Ali Shahidinejad, and Mostafa Ghobaei-Arani, “An autonomous computation offloading strategy in Mobile Edge Computing: A deep learning-based hybrid approach”, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol.178, p.102974, 2021.
- Duardo Cuervo, Aruna Balasubramanian, Dae-ki Cho, Alec Wolman, Stefan Saroiu, Ranveer Chandra, and Paramvir Bahl, “MAUI: Making Smartphones Last Longer with Code Offload”, ACM, In Proceedings of 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, pp.49-62, 2010.
- Towards an Adaptive Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) for Reliable and Energy Efficient Communication in the Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT)
Abstract Views :124 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Rajalakshmi Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Firstsoft Technologies Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Science, Ponnusamy Nadar College of Arts and Science, Thozhuvur, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Computer Science Engineering, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Rajalakshmi Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Firstsoft Technologies Private Limited, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Science, Ponnusamy Nadar College of Arts and Science, Thozhuvur, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Computer Science Engineering, Panimalar Engineering College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Vol 9, No 5 (2022), Pagination: 578-590Abstract
Internet of Underwater Things (IoUT) is emerging as a powerful technology to explore underwater things. Reliable communication between underwater things is a significant challenge compared to communication at the surface, notably the unique characteristics imposed by the underwater environment, such as water currents, noisy scenarios, and limited resources. Several routing protocols have been suggested to overcome the challenges in IoUT. The previous works mainly focus either on improving the reliability or energy efficiency of the routing process. Concentrating on both parameters makes the routing process too complex with substantial overhead. Routing techniques face challenges in solving the noise and water current issues in the IoUT environment. The proposed work utilizes the potential of the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) on IoUT communication by enhancing its Objective Function (OF) to resolve the routing in the underwater environment. The proposed Underwater Adaptive RPL (UA- RPL) turns the inefficient DODAG construction into an efficient under noisy environment by extending DIO message features. Numerous neighboring nodes receive the extended DIO message, and the nodes that fit into the safety zone are decided according to the multiple routing metrics, such as hop count, ETX, and Energy factor. Entire network traffic is partitioned through multiple parent nodes with the best rank values and attains an energy-balancing routing over underwater things. It helps to improve the network lifetime without compromising communication reliability. The proposed work is evaluated to show its advantages over the underwater environment. The simulation results show that the UA-RPL delivers high performance when varying the underwater things from 15 to 60. Moreover, it outperforms the existing schemes under the IoUT environment.Keywords
Routing Protocol, Internet of Underwater Things, Noisy Environment, Water Current, Reliability, Energy Efficiency, RPLReferences
- Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, 2015, doi: 10.1109/comst.2015.2444095.
- Qiu, Tie, Zhao Zhao, Tong Zhang, Chen Chen, and CL Philip Chen.
- "Underwater Internet of Things in smart ocean: System architecture and open issues." IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 4297-4307, 2019
- W. Kim, H. W. Moon, and Y. J. Yoon, “Adaptive Triangular Deployment of Underwater Wireless Acoustic Sensor Network
- considering the Underwater Environment,” Journal of Sensors, vol.
- , pp. 1–11, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/6941907.
- C.-C. Kao, Y.-S. Lin, G.-D. Wu, and C.-J. Huang, “A Comprehensive Study on the Internet of Underwater Things: Applications, Challenges, and Channel Models,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 7, p. 1477, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/s17071477
- “RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy Networks,” datatracker.ietf.org. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/id/draft-ietf-roll-rpl13.html (accessed Sep. 21, 2022).
- Harith Kharrufa, H. A. A. Al-Kashoash and A.H. Kemp, "RPL-based routing protocols in IoT applications: A Review", IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 19, No. 15, pp. 5952 - 5967, 2019.
- Lamaazi, Hanane, and Nabil Benamar. "A comprehensive survey on enhancements and limitations of the RPL protocol: A focus on the objective function." Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 96, pp. 102001, 2020.
- S. Jiang, “On Reliable Data Transfer in Underwater Acoustic Networks: A Survey From Networking Perspective,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1036–1055, 2018, doi: 10.1109/comst.2018.2793964.
- Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, Jun.
- , doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2437904.
- Darabkh, Khalid A., and Muna Al-Akhras. "RPL over Internet of Things: Challenges, Solutions, and Recommendations." IEEE
- International Conference on Mobile Networks and Wireless
- Communications (ICMNWC), pp. 1-7, 2021.
- R. Diamant, P. Casari, F. Campagnaro, O. Kebkal, V. Kebkal, and M. Zorzi, “Fair and Throughput-Optimal Routing in Multimodal
- Underwater Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless
- Communications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1738–1754, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1109/twc.2017.2785223.
- Y. Su, R. Fan, X. Fu, and Z. Jin, “DQELR: An Adaptive Deep QNetwork-Based Energy- and Latency-Aware Routing Protocol Design for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp.
- –9104, 2019, doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2891590.
- S. Cai, Z. Gao, D. Yang, and N. Yao, “A network coding based protocol for reliable data transfer in underwater acoustic sensor,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1603–1609, Jul. 2013, doi:
- 1016/j.adhoc.2013.02.001.
- Pancaroglu, Doruk, and Sevil Sen. "Load balancing for RPL-based Internet of Things: A review." Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 116, pp. 102491, 2021
- Lamaazi, H., El Ahmadi, A., Benamar, N., &Jara, A. J. “Of-ecf: A new optimization of the objective function for parent selection in RPL” IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob), pp.27–32, 2019.
- Kechiche, I., Bousnina, I., &Samet, A. “A novel opportunistic fuzzy logic based objective function for the routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks”,15th international wireless communications & mobile computing conference (IWCMC), pp.698–703, 2019
- Mishra, S. N., Elappila, M., & Chinara, S. Eha-rpl: A composite routing technique in IoT application networks. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol.1045, pp.645–657, 2020
- Al-Kashoash, H. “Congestion-aware routing protocol for 6LoWPANs”.
- In Sensor networks: Toward the internet of things, pp. 95–107, 2020
- Eloudrhiri Hassani, Abdelhadi, Aicha Sahel, and Abdelmajid Badri. "IRH-OF: A New Objective Function for RPL Routing Protocol in IoT Applications." Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 673-689, 2021
- Liou, En-Cheng, Chien-Chi Kao, Ching-Hao Chang, Yi-Shan Lin, and Chun-Ju Huang. "Internet of underwater things: Challenges and routing protocols." IEEE international conference on applied system invention (ICASI), pp. 1171-1174, 2018.
- Coutinho, Rodolfo WL, Azzedine Boukerche, and Antonio AF Loureiro. "A novel opportunistic power controlled routing protocol for internet of underwater things." Computer Communications, Vol.150, pp. 72-82, 2020.
- Al-Bzoor, Manal, Ahmed Musa, Khawla Alzoubi, and Taha Gharaibeh.
- "A Directional Selective Power Routing Protocol for the Internet of Underwater Things." Wireless Communications and Mobile
- Computing, 2022.
- Lee, Sungwon, Yonghwan Jeong, Eunbae Moon, and Dongkyun Kim.
- "An efficient MOP decision method using hop interval for RPL-based underwater sensor networks." Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp.1027-1041, 2017.
- Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, Jun.
- , doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2437904.
- C. Petrioli, R. Petroccia, J. R. Potter, and D. Spaccini, “The SUNSET framework for simulation, emulation and at-sea testing of underwater wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 34, pp. 224–238, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.08.012.
- S. Karim, F. K. Shaikh, and B. S. Chowdhry, “Simulation-based quantitative analysis of efficient data transfer routing protocols for Internet of Underwater Things,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 121, p. 102645, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2022.102645.