Refine your search
Collections
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Agrawal, Sanjyoti
- Birth Oder, Personality and Risk-Taking Behaviour among Adolescents and Young Adults
Abstract Views :302 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Prachi Gupta
1,
Rashi Sharma
1,
Ritirikta Mishra
1,
Ritisikta Mishra
1,
Sanjyoti Agrawal
1,
Swati Singh
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Psychology, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 7, No 6 (2019), Pagination: 1835-1840Abstract
This aim of the research was to study the differences between first-boms and later-bom in terms of personality and risk-taking behaviour. For the purpose of this study, between subject design was utilised. A sample size of 120 was selected, comprising of adolescents and young adults falling in the age group of 16 to 25. A self- developed demographic sheet, The Eysenck Personality Inventory and The Dospert Scale were used to study the three parameters. In the sample population, it was found that neuroticism was significantly different across birth orders (p<0.05). However, no such difference was revealed while considering the dimension of extraversion. Similarly, risk-taking propensity was also not found to be significantly different (p>0.05). Male and female subject did not differ significantly in four out of five domains of risk-taking behaviour. Significant difference was found between the genders in case of recreational domain of risk-taking behaviour. Future research can take into account a wider sample size, geographical area, and more subsets of the variables and finally can take up a more multicultural study.Keywords
Birth-Order, Personality, Risk-Taking, First-Borns, Later-Boms.
References
- Argys, L.M., Rees, D.I., Averett, S.L.,& Witoonchart, B. (2006). Birth order and risky adolescent behaviour. Economic Inquiry, 44(2), 215-233.
- Adler, A. (1928). Characteristics ofthe first, second, and third child. Children, 3 , 14-52.
- Bajczyk, J. (2011). Rate changes in risky behaviour and the role of sibling influence. Rowan Digital Works. Http://rdw.rowan.edu/etd/57
- Birth Order - Psychology - Oxford Bibliographies - obo (2018, June 21). Retrieved from http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199828340/ obo9780199828340-0103.xml
- Butcher, K., & Case, A. (1994). The effect of sibling sex composition on women's education and earnings. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), 531-563.
- Cattell, R. B., & Butcher, H. J. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
- Jefferson, T., Herbst, J. H., & Mccrae, R. R. (1998). Associations between birth order and personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings. Journal of Research in Personality,32(A), 498-509. doi:10.1006/jrpe.l998.2233
- Kalkan, M. (2008). The relationship of psychological birth order to irrational relationship beliefs. Social Behaviour and Personality, 36(4), 455-466.
- Lampi, E., & Nordblom, K. (2011). Nature and nurture: The relation between number of siblings and earnings. Applied Economics Letters, 19(8), 759-762.
- Leman, K. (1982). The birth order book: Why you are the way you are. Baker Publishing Group.
- Rohrer, E., & Schmukle (2015). Examining the effects of birth order on personality. Department of psychology, University of Lizpeg, pp. 46-52.
- Saroglou, V., & Fiasse, L. (2003). Birth order, personality, and religion: A study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 3 5 ,19-29.
- Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics and creative lives. New York: Pantheon.
- Trimpop, R. (1994). Thepsychology of risk taking behaviour. Amsterdam; New York: North-Holland.