Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Singhvi, Mukta
- Comparing Coping Resources for Counseling Center Clients and Non-Counseling Center Clients
Abstract Views :269 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, IN
1 Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 5, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 93-97Abstract
The aim of the research is to compare the coping resources of counseling and non-counseling centre clients using the Coping Resources Inventory by Hammer and Marting (1983). It was administered on 96 college going students:48 counseling seeking and 48 normal individuals. Coping resource inventory classify cognitive, social, emotional, spiritual/philosophical and physical resources that are currently available to individuals for managing stress. The scores are interpreted and discussed with two profile, that is, ipsative profile in which it was inferred that the participant scored highest on the emotional coping resource (35.2-46.8) indicating that she is more likely to use this resource in order to deal with harsh or stressful situations, and the normative profile to compare the coping resources of counseling and non-counseling centre clients. It was found that Cognitive t(94) 7.0876, p<0.0001, Social t(94)=9.2974, p<0.0001. Emotional t(94)=6.1020, p<0.0001 and Spiritual t(94)=3.3543, p<0.0001 were statistically significant. However, no significant difference was found on Physical Resources t(94)=1.9430, p<0.0550. This reveals that both the groups utilize all the coping resources, except the Physical Resources, to deal with everyday stress and problems. Also, the scores of Indian and American counseling seeking individuals were compared. The results showed that the Indian group scored higher on the Cognitive, Spiritual and Physical coping resources as compared to the American group.Keywords
Coping Resource Inventory (CRI), Coping Resources, Counseling Seeking Individual.
- Gender Differences on Religiosity and Spirituality:Promoters of Well-Being
Abstract Views :241 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Renu Soyal
1,
Mukta Singhvi
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, IN
1 Department of Psychology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 7, No 6 (2019), Pagination: 1914-1918Abstract
Religion refers to belief in god, also sometimes related to moral values. Spirituality refers to the deepest values and meanings by which people live. In India religion holds important position in people's lives in various forms, mostly it is practiced in the form of rituals which unknowingly and unconsciously helps in inculcating moral and spiritual values in the masses. In the patraichical family system where male is the head of the family and females are home makers it is observed that females practice rituals more than males and are labeled as more religious than males and on the other hand males are labeled as more spiritual than females. In this light the present study has been undertaken to verity if these differences do exist for young boys and girls too. The sample chosen comprised of 50 boys and 50 girls from Jaipur city. Tools used were Religiosity scale by Bhushan (1971) and Spiritual intelligence scale by (Mittal et al., 2014). The findings are in congruence with the observation, depicting that girls are more religious than boys and boys are more spiritual than girls on the dimensions of meaning in life and transcendental awareness. Whatsoever both religiosity and spirituality are important for well-being.Keywords
Religiosity, Spirituality, Meaning in Life, Well-Being, Body and Girls.References
- Ai, A. L., Park, C. L., Huang, B., Rodgers, W., & Tice, T. N. (2007). Psychosocial mediation of religious coping styles: A study of short-term psychological distress following cardiac surgery. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 867-882.
- Berry, D. (2005). Methodological pitfalls in the study of religiosity and spirituality. Western Journal of Nursing Research, -27(5), 628-647.
- Bryant, A. N. (2007). Gender differences in spiritual development during the college years.SexRoles, 56(11-12), 835-846. doi: 10.1007/slll99-007-9240-2.
- Buchko, K. J. (2004). Religious beliefs and practices of college women as compared to college men. .Journal of College Student Development, 45, 89-98.
- Cela-Conde, C. (1998). The hominid evolutionaryjoumey: A summary. In R. Russell, W. Stoeger, and F. Ayala (Eds.), Evolutionary and molecular biology: Scientific perspectives on divine action (pp. 59-78). Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory.
- Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L.H. (2009). Religiosity/spirituality and mortality. PsychotherPsychosom, 75,81-90.
- Cotton, S. P., Levine, E. G., Fitzpatrick, C. M.,Dold, K. H., & Targ, E. (1999). Exploring the relationships among spiritual well-being, quality of life, and psychological adjustment in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 8,429-438.
- Dorr, A. (2001). Religiositat undpsychische Gesundheit. Zur Zusammenhangsstruktur spezifischerreligioserKonzepte; Kovac: Hamburg, Germany.
- Egan, R. (2009). Spirituality in New Zealand Hospice Care. University of Otago, Dunedin.
- Eller, C. (1991). Relativizing the patriarchy: The sacred history of the feminist spirituality movement. In M. Eliade, J. Kitagawa, and C. Long (Eds.), History of religions (pp. 279-295). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Ellison, C. G., & Fan, D. (2008). Daily spiritual experiences and psychological wellbeing among US adults. Social Indicators Research, 88r 247-271.
- Ellison, C. G., & Levin, J. S. (1998). The religion-health connection: Evidence, theory, and future directions. Health Education and Behavior, 25,700-720.
- Fredrickson, B. L., Cohn, M. A., Coffey, K. A., Pek, J., & Finkel, S. M. (2008). Open hearts build lives: Positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 5 ,1045-1062.
- Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances on Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 153-160.
- Glock, C.Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Hammermeister, J., Flint, M., El-Alayli, A., Ridnour, H., & Peterson, M. (2005). Gender differences in spiritual well-being: Are females more spiritually-well than males? American Journal of Health Studies, 20(2), 80-84.
- Hill, P. C.,Pargament,K. I., Hood, R.W.Jr., McCullough, M. E., Swyers, J. P., Larson,D. B., & Zinnbauer, B. J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journalfor the ’Theory of Social Behaviour, 30, 51-77.
- Krause, N. (2005). God-mediated control and psychological well-being in late life. Research on Aging, 2 7 ,136-164.
- Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297-314.
- Koenig, H.G., McCullough, M.E., & Larson, D.B. (2001). Handbook of religion and health. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
- Koenig, H. G. (2012). Religion, spirituality, and health: The research and clinical implications. ISRNPsychiatry, 16,278-730. doi:10.5402/2012/278730
- Knox, D., Langehough, S.O., Walters, C., & Rowley, M. (1998). Religiosity and spirituality among college students. College Student Journal, 32,430-432.
- Love, P. G. (2001). Spirituality and student development: Theoretical connections. InM. A. Jablonski (Ed.), The implications of student spirituality fo r student affairs practice: New directionsfor student services (pp. 7-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Love, P. G. (2002). Comparing spiritual development and cognitive development. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 357-373.
- Martos, T., Thege, B. K., & Steger, M. F. (2010). It's not only what you hold, it's how you hold it: Dimensions of religiosity and meaning in life. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 863-868.
- Meissner, W. W. (1987). Life and faith: Psychology perspectives on religious experiences. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Miller, A. S., & Hoffman, J. P. (1995). Risk and religion: An explanation of gender differences in religiosity. Journal fo r the Scientific Study of Religion, 34,63-15.
- Miller, L., & Kelley, B.S. (2005). Relationships of religiosity and spirituality with mental health and psychopathology. In R.F. Paloutzian, and C.L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of thepsychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 460-478). Guilford: New York, NY, USA.
- Mirola, W. A. (1999). Arefuge for some: Gender differences in the relationship between religious involvement and depression. Sociology of Religion, 60,419-437.
- Pargament, K. I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, practice. New York, NY: GuilfordPress.
- Park, C.L. (2005). Religion and meaning. In R.F. Pa-loutzian and C.L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 295-314). Guilford: New York, NY, USA.
- Park, C.L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 115-144.
- Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor ofpersonality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. .Journal ofPersonality, 67,985-1013.
- Saroglou, V. (2014). Introduction: Studying religion in personality and social psychology. In V. Saroglou (Ed.), Religionrpersonalityr and social behavior (pp. 128). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
- Saroglou, V., & Munoz-Garcia, A. (2008). Individual differences in religion and spirituality: An issue of personality traits and/or values. Journalfor the Scientific Study of Religion, 47, 83-101.
- Shek, D. T. L. (1999). Parenting characteristics and adolescent psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study in a Chinese context. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 125,27-44.
- Simpson, D. B., Cloud, D. S., Newman, J. L.,& Fuqua, D. R. (2008). Sex and gender differences in religiousness and spirituality. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 36( l),42-52.
- Smith, C., Denton, M. L., Faris, R., & Regnerus, M. (2002). Mapping American adolescent religious participation. Journalfor the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 597-612.
- Smith, C., & Denton, M.L. (2005). Soul searching: The religious and spiritual lives of American teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Steger, M. F., & Frazier, P. (2005). Meaning in life: One link in the chain from religiousness to well-being. .Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 574-582.
- Tamminen,K. (1994a). Comparing Oser'sandFowler's developmental stagq. Journal of Empirical Theology, 7,52-74.
- Valdesolo, P., & Graham, J. (2014). Awe, uncertainty, and agency detection. Psychological Science, 2 5 ,170-178.
- Van Cappellen, P., & Saroglou, V. (2012). Awe activates religious and spiritual feelings and behavioral intentions. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4, 223-236.
- Van Cappellen, P., Saroglou, V., Iweins, C., Piovesana, M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Self-transcendent positive emotions increase spirituality through basic world assumptions. Cognition and Emotion, 2 7 ,1378-1394.
- Whittington, B.L., & Scher, S.J. (2010). Prayer and subjective well-being: An examination of six different types of prayer. International Journal fo r the Psychology of Religion, 20,59-68.
- Wills, T. A., Yaeger, A. M., & Sandy, J. M. (2003). Buffering effect of religiosity for adolescent substance use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17,24-31.