Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kaur, Harvinder
- Farm Mechanization in Indian Agriculture and its impact on Social Change: A Review
Abstract Views :114 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Sociology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Sociology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 10, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 223-227Abstract
The reviewed paper describes the importance and role of modern technology in farm sector in India. Technological changes are the crucial driving forces for increasing farm productivity and promoting farm development in all developing countries. In past the adoption of mechanization in farm was started due to the green revolution, then government want to fulfill the demand of food grains of population. But now the dimensions are changed from last few decades' policies for farm, research and development, trade, training and education has been strong impact on the adoption of technology, the level of farm production and agricultural practices. It is recognized fact that improved modern inputs and machinery are major determinants of farm output, yet it is important to interpret the relationship of mechanization with other social and economic factors. Study also concluded the crop wise adoption of mechanization, farm machinery, major driving forces in social change, participation of women in farm, agribusiness, cost and the labor employed in the farm sector. The paper also recommends suggestions, to ensure that the farm sector takes its rightful place in our economy.Keywords
Farm Mechanization, Labor, Machinery and Social ChangeReferences
- Ayoob (2003). Technological advancement and its impact on the traditional way of life in the rural farming society: South Eastern region of Sri Lanka. Department of Social Sciences, South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Oluvil, Sri Lanka. (email:ayoobsm @seu.ac.lk)
- DAS (2012). Agricultural data (2012-13) of U. P. directorate of agricultural statistics. Lucknow. 12-34.
- Economic survey 2018-19, volume II. https://www.thehinducentre.com/resources/arti cle28283530.ece
- Farm mechanization FICCI.,2015. http://ficci.in/
- Gathala, M.K., Kumar. V., Kumar. V., Saharawat, Y.S., Blackwell, J., & Ladha, J.K. (2011). Happy seeder technology: A solution for residue management for the sustainability and improved production of the rice-wheat system of the Indo- Gangetic plains. Australia www.wcca20I l.org’
- ICAR (2011). Annual report (2011-12) of Indian council of agricultural research. 28- 32.
- KVK (2013). Annual report (2013-14) of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Mirzapur. 8-12.
- Karthik, S.K., Kumar, S., & Raj, B. (2015). Development and performance evaluation of multi crop thresher. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 3(3), 313-322.
- Kankal, U.S., Karale, D.S.,Thakare, S.H., & Khamballar, V.P. (2016). Performance evaluation of tractor operated rotavator in dry land and wet land field condition. Journal of Agricultural Science and Research (IJASR), 6(1), 137-146.
- Kumar, V.A. (2018). An analysis on the trends in the participation of women in agriculture in India. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), 261-264.
- Murumkar, R.P., Dongarwar, U.R., Borkar, P.A., Pisalkar, P.S., & Phad, D.S. (2014). performance evaluation of self-propelled vertical conveyor reaper. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 3(5), 1701-1705.
- Mahesvari, T.K., & Singh, U.V. (2016). Tractor drawn rotavator: A comparative study. International Journal Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(4), 2373-2380.
- Mechanization: Key to higher productivity to double farmers' income, FICCI (2017). Imarc research 2019, industry reports and PwC analysis. https://www.granthorn ton.in/insight/articles/mechanisation-key-tohigher -productivity-todouble-farmersincome/
- Mahadik, A., Rahuvirsingh, P., Modi, R.U., & Parihar, D.S. (2021). Patato planting guide and its recent advancement in mechanization technologies. Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 2(3), 18-20.
- Narayannamoorthy, A., & Devika, N. (2017). Economic and resources impacts od drip method of irrigation on okra cultivation: An analysis of field survey data. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 6(1), 16-33.
- Singh, S., & Singh, J. (2002). Research digest on energy requirement in agricultural sector. Technical Bulletin, Department of Farm Power & Machinery, PAU Ludhiana. 2-8.
- Singh, R.K., Singh, A.K., Singh, J.B., & Singh, L. (2012). Success of zero-tillage: A case of knowledge management for sustainable agriculture. Indian Research Journal of Extensiuon Education, 12(1), 110-115.
- Sharma, S.B., & Chaudhary, A. (2018). Modern technology: The key to agricultural development in India. International Journal of Technical Research and Science, 12(2), 829-832.
- Singh, R., Singh, S., & Singh, S.P. (2015). Farm power and machinery availability on Indian farms. Agriculture Engineering Today, 39(1), 45-56.
- Sahni, R.K., Kumar, M., & Gaikwad, B. B. (2018). Status of farm mechanization in Indian agriculture. ICAR-Central institute of agricultural engineering Bhopal- 462038. Biotech Articles, online publish article.
- Vatsa, D.K. (2013). Mechanizing agriculture in hills of Himanchal Pradesh, India: A review. Agriculture for Sustainable Development, 1(1), 89-93.
- ZPD (2012). Annual report (2012-13) of zonal project directorate, zone-IV, Kanpur. 55- 68.
- https://www.ilo.org (www.iari.res.in.) http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html www.statista.com/statistics
- Crop Residue Management with Conservation of Agriculture in India: A review
Abstract Views :111 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Sociology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Sociology, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 10, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 232-236Abstract
The reviewed paper explains about aggregate of the residue's genesis from different crops, usage in-field and outfield, reason of flaming and managing crop residue with conservation of agriculture and alternative strategies. This paper also discusses the available agriculture machinery to manage the several type of residues in-situ and ex-situ. Management of crop residue has emerged to be a big issue in northern states of India, subsequently farmers choose inflame the residues. Management of residue is important because it carry plant nutritious that enhance the topsoil fertility capacity. Flaming residue affect nature and also deficit of scrumptious number of plant exigent nutrients. The issue of on farm burning of stubbles is sharpen in recent years due to lack of labour, combine harvester and huge capital loss in removing the stubbles by traditional ways, The residues of sugarcane, rice, mustard, maize, cotton, groundnut, jute, and millet are normally inflamed on-farm by various provenience of the India. This hurdle is more vital in the northern and western states where the wheat-rice system is mechanized. It is necessary to create consciousness among cultivators and farm societies to know the value of management of residues for resilience & sustainability of Indian agriculture.Keywords
Crop Residue, Management, Machinery, Agriculture, Soil, BurningReferences
- Anil, K., Shivananda, P., Yarazari., Devegowda, S.R., & Pavan, M. K. (2019). Custom hiring services of farm machinery in India. Agro-bios Newsletter, xviii(4), 123-124.
- Awasthi, A., Singh, N., Mittal, S., & Agarwal, R. (2010). Effects of agriculture crop residue burning on children and young on pets in North West India. Science of the Total Environment, 408(20), 4440-4445.
- Bimbraw, A. S. (2019). Generation and impact of crop residue and its management. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 7(3), 304-309. doi : http://dx.doi.org/10. 12944/CARJ.7.3.05
- Bhuvaneshwari, S., Hiroshan, H., & Meegoda, J. N. (2019). Crop residue burning in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health, 16(832), 1-19.
- Chhokar, R.S., Sharma, R.K., Gill, S.C., Singh, R.K., Joon, V., Kajla, M., & Chaudhary, A. (2018). Suitable wheat cultivars and seeding machines for conservations agriculture in rice-wheat and sugarcane-wheat cropping system. Wheat and Barley Research, 10, 78-88.
- CIMMYT (2019). The international maize and wheat improvement centre. www.cim myt.org/news/happy-seeder-can-reduce-air-pollution-and-greenhouse-gasemmissions- while-making-profits-for-farmers/.
- Devi, S., Gupta, C., Jat, S.L., & Parmar, M.S. (2017). Crop residue recycling for economic and environmental sustainability: The case of India. De Gruyter Open Agriculture, 2, 486-494.
- Grover, D., Kaur, P., & Sharma, H.R. (2015). Possible reasons and farmers awareness towards crop residue burning: An overview and a case study from Mirzapur Village of Kurukshetra district, India. Environment and we an International Journal of Science and Technology, 10, 75-85.
- Gathala, M.K., Kumar, V., Saharawat, Y.S., Blackwell, J., & Ladha, J.K. (2011). Happy Seeder technology: A solution for residue management for the sustainability and improved production of the rice-wheat system of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Australia www.wcca20I l.org’
- Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. World Bank: Washington, DC, USA.
- IARI (2012). Crop residues management with conservation agriculture: Potential, constraints and policy needs. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, vii+32 p. TB-ICN: 100/2012.
- Jain, N., Pathak, H., & Bhatia, A. (2018). Sustainable management of crop residues in India. Advances in Agricultural Science, 6(1), 1-9.
- Jiang, H., Frie, A.L., Lavi, A., Chen, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Brown carbon formation from nigh time chemistry of unsaturated heterocyclic volatile organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Arctic.
- Kumar, S., & Chandra, R. (2013). Bioconversion of agricultural wastes for production of milky mushroom. Journal of Scientific Research, 57, 65-76.
- Kassam, A. (2015). The future of farming: What needs to change? The Sixth Hugh Bunting Memorial Lecture, University of Reading, UK.
- Kaur, K., Kaur, P., & Sharma, S. (2019). Management of crop residue through various techniques. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(1S), 618-620.
- Lohan, S. K., Jat, H. S., Yadav, A. K., Sidhu, H. S., Jat, M. L., Choudhary, M., Jyotsna, K. P., & Sharma, P. C. (2018). Burning issues of paddy residue management in north-west states of India. Renewable and sustainable. Energy Reviews, 81, 693- 706.
- Manjunatha, K., Shirwal, S., Sushilendra, Palled, V., & Raghavendra, V. (2015). Role of balers in agricultural crop residue management: A review. Ecology Environment and Conservation, 21(3), 285-293.
- MNRE (2018). Ministry of new and renewable resources. (www.mnre.gov.in/re latedlinks/biomassrsources).
- Mandal, K. G., Mishra, A.K., Hati, K.M., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Ghosh, P.K., & Mohanty, M. (2014). Rice residue- management options and effects on soil properties and crop productivity. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2(1), 224- 231.
- Peter, J.K., Masih, H., Kumar, Y., Singh, A.K., & Chaturvedi, S. (2014). Organophosphate pesticide (Methyl Parathion) degrading bacteria isolated from rhizospheric soil of selected plants and optimization of growth conditions for degradation. International Journal Research, 5, 1-13.
- Pathak, H., Saharawat, Y.S., Gathala, M., & Ladha, J.K. (2011). Impact of resource conserving technologies on productivity and greenhouse gas emission in the rice wheat system. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 1(3), 261-277.
- Panday, C. (2019). Management of crop residue for sustaining soil fertility and food grains production in India. Acta Scientific Agriculture, 3(1), 188-195.
- Rajan, P., Patle, G.T., Prem, M., & Solanke, K.R. (2017). Organic mulching: A water saving technique to increase the production of fruit and vegetables. Current Agriculture Research Journal, 5(3), 1-15.
- Ren, J., YU, P., & XU, X. (2019). Straw utilization in China- status and recommendation. Sustainability, 11, 1-17. www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability.
- Singh, A., Dhaliwal, I.S., & Dixit, A. (2011). Performance evaluation of tractor mounted straw chopper cum spreader for paddy straw management. Indian Journal of Agriculture Research, 45, 21-29.
- Shafie, S.M. (2016). A review on paddy residue based power generation. Energy, Environ Econ perspect. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Journal, 59(10), 89-100.
- Sharma, S., Manhas, S.S., Sharma, R.M., & Lohan, S.K. (2014). Potential of variable rate application technology in India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 45(4), 74-81.
- Sarkar, S., & Singh, R.P. (2018). Crop residue burning in Northern India: Increasing threat to greater India. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 123(13), 6920-6934.
- Times of India Report (2019). Stubble burning: Punjab farmers unhappy with happy seeder. September 27,2019, 12.04 IST.
- Venkatramanan, V., Shah, S., Rai, A.K., & Prasad, R. (2021). Nexus between crop residue burning, bioeconomy and sustainable development goals over Nothwestern India. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8(614212), 1-14.
- https://www.iari.res.in http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-Common/CensusData2011.html http://agricoop.nic.in/sites/default/files/NPMCR(2017)