IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Personality and Criminal Thinking Styles of Offenders: A Theoretical Overview


Affiliations
1 Department of Research, SOMAARTH, INCLEN Trust International, Mitrol, Aurangabad, Palwal, Haryana, India
2 Department of Students Wellness (SWD), NSPIRA Management Services Private Limited, Telangana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Personality and Criminal thinking styles have been studied globally along with other psychosocial variables as predictors of offending behavior. There are very few research evidences are available that have been carried out to see the association between personality and criminal thinking styles in offenders. Criminal thinking style is defined by Walters (2006b) as a“content, matter of thought and a process leading to the initiation and maintenance of behavior characterized by the habitual violation of the law”. “Personality is defined as a dynamic organization, inside the person, of psychophysical systems that create the person's characteristic patterns of behavior, thoughts and feelings” (Allport, 1961). Yochelson and Samenow's Criminal Personality Theory emphasizes on the role of thinking error in criminal or offending behavior based on their idea of free will. Walters' Criminal Lifestyle Theory too further on highlighted the importance of thinking in criminality by incorporating three independent factors; external factor (condition), decision making process (choice) and mindset (cognition). This article is, therefore, an attempt to study personality and criminal thinking styles in offenders, and how it can have an effect on offending behavior. The description of the variables of personality and criminal thinking styles is elaborated in light with the existing appropriate theoretical model. Findings of different empirical studies conducted by researchers to understand personality factors and their association with criminal thinking styles in offenders are incorporated. The implications of the study have been highlighted as well.

Keywords

Criminal Behavior, Personality, Criminal Thinking Styles.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Akers, R. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. Belmont: Wadsworth.

  • Akers, R., Krohn, M., Lanze-Kaduce, M., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A test of general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636 55.

  • Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Reinhart & Winston.

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge.

  • Blackburn, R. (1993). The psychology of criminal conduct: Theory, research and practice. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Boduszek, D. (2010). Underlying psychological factors of criminal attitudes within exoffender population. Irish Psychologist, 36(6), 5.

  • Boduszek, D., Gary, A., Mark, S., & Philip, H. (2012a). The role of personality in the relationship between criminal social identity and criminal thinking style within a sample of prisoners with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 3, 1224.

  • Boduszek, D., McLaughlin, C., & Hyland, P. (2011). Criminal attitudes of ex-prisoners: The role of personality, anti-social friends and recidivism. Internet Journal of Criminology, 9, 110.

  • Boduszek, D., Philip, H., & Ashling, B. (2012c). An investigation of the role of personality, familial, and peer-related characteristics in homicidal offending using retrospective data. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 2, 96-106.

  • Boduszek, D., Shevlin, M., Adamson, G., & Hyland, P. (2013). Eysenck's personality model and criminal thinking style within a violent and nonviolent offender sample: Application of propensity score analysis. Deviant Behavior, 34(6), 483-493.

  • Bulten, E., Henk, N., & Cees van der, S. (2009). Measuring criminal thinking style: The construct validity and utility of the PICTS in a Dutch prison sample. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 35-49.

  • Cale, E. M. (2006). A quantitative review of the relations between the “Big 3” higher order personality dimensions and antisocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(3), 250-284.

  • Center, D. B., Jackson, N., & Kemp, D. (2005). A test of Eysenck's antisocial behavior hypothesis employing 11-15 year old students dichotomous for PEN and L. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 393-402.

  • Egan, V., McMurran, M., Richardson, C., & Blair, M. (2000). Criminal cognitions and personality: What does the PICTS really measure? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, 170-184.

  • Engels, R. C., Luijpers, M. E., Landsheer, J., & Meeus, W. (2004). A longitudinal study of relations between attitudes and delinquent behavior in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 244-260.

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. New York: Crane, Russak and Co.

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1977). Crime and personality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Personality and crime. In T. Millon, E. Simonsen, M. Birket Smith, and R.D. Davis (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behavior (pp. 40-49). Guilford, New York, NY.

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1989). The causes and cures of criminality. New York: Plenum Press.

  • Fonseca, A. C., & Yule, W. (1995). Personality and antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: An enquiry into Eysenck's and Gray's theories. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23(6), 767-781.

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1997). The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Hove: Psychology Press.

  • Hanson, R. K., Gizzarelli, R., & Scott, H. (1994). The attitudes of incest offenders: Sexual entitlement and acceptance of sex with children. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 187-202.

  • Hatch-Maillette, M. A., Scalora, M. J., Huss, M. T., & Baumgartner, J. V. (2001). Criminal thinking patterns: Are child molesters unique? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(1), 102-117.

  • Heaven, P. C. L., Newbury, K., & Wilson, V. (2004). The Eysenck psychoticism dimension and delinquent behaviours among non-criminals: Changes across the lifespan? Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1817-1825.

  • Kemp, D. E., & Center, D. B. (2003). An investigation of Eysenck's antisocial behavior hypothesis in general education students and students with behavior disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1359-1371.

  • Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890.

  • Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., & Iacono, W. G. (2005). Externalizing psychopathology in adulthood: A dimensional-spectrum conceptualization and its implications for DSM-V. Journal Abnormal Psychology, 114, 537-550.

  • Levine, S. Z., & Jackson, C. J. (2004). Eysenck's theory of crime revisited: Factors or primary scales? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9(1), 135-152.

  • Marziano, V., Ward, T., Beech, A. R., & Pattison, P. (2006). Identification of five fundamental implicit theories underlying cognitive distortions in child abusers: A preliminary study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12(1), 97-105.

  • McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63(3), 365-396.

  • Mills, C. W. (2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.

  • Mills, J. F., Kroner, D. G., & Hemmati, T. (2004). The Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA) the prediction of general and violent recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 717-733.

  • Mitchell, D., & Tafrate, R. C. (2012). Conceptualization and measurement of criminal thinking: Initial validation of the criminogenic thinking profile. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(7), 1080-1102.

  • Nesdale, D., Maass, A., Kiesner, J., Durkin, K., Griffiths, J., & James, B. (2009). Effects of peer group rejection and a new group's norms on children's intergroup attitudes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 799-814.

  • Savina, N. N. (2009). Endogenous factors of juvenile delinquency and the perspectives of its prognosing. International Journal of Academic Research, 1(2), 195-198.

  • Sinha, S. (2016). Personality correlates of criminals: A comparative study between normal controls and criminals. Indian Psychiatry Journal, 25, 41-46.

  • Stermac, L. E., & Segal, Z. V. (1989). Adult sexual contact with children: An examination of cognitive factors. Behavior Therapy, 20(4), 573-584.

  • Sutherland, E. H., & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Criminology (8th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott.

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: J. Lipinicott.

  • Sutherland, E. H., Cressey, D. R., & Luckenbill, D. F. (1992). Principles of criminology. Dix Hills, N.Y.: General Hall.

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670.

  • Thomas, K. M., Yalch, M. M., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G., Markon, K. E., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and fivefactor model trait domains. Assessment, 20(3), 308-311.

  • Van Dam, C., Janssens, J. M., & Bruyn, de, E.E. (2005). PEN, big five, juvenile delinquency and criminal recidivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(1), 719.

  • Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R.E. (2000). Influence of deviant friends on delinquency: Searching for moderator variables. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28(4), 313-325.

  • Walker, J. S., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2006). The maudsley violence questionnaire: Relationship to personality and self-reported offending. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(4), 795-806.

  • Walters, G. D. (1990). The criminal life style: Patterns of serious criminal conduct. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Walters, G. D. (1995). The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles, part I: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 437-455.

  • Walters, G. D. (2006b). Proactive and reactive composite scales for the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42(2), 23-36.

  • Walters, G. D. (2009). Criminal thinking. In M. McMurran and R. C. Howard (Eds.), Personality, personality disorder, and violence (pp. 281-295). Chichester, England: Wiley.

  • Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The Criminal Personality: The Change Process. 1985.-Xvi, 578 S. Aronson.


Abstract Views: 333

PDF Views: 0




  • Personality and Criminal Thinking Styles of Offenders: A Theoretical Overview

Abstract Views: 333  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nitesh Kumar Jha
Department of Research, SOMAARTH, INCLEN Trust International, Mitrol, Aurangabad, Palwal, Haryana, India
Unnati Sharma
Department of Students Wellness (SWD), NSPIRA Management Services Private Limited, Telangana, India

Abstract


Personality and Criminal thinking styles have been studied globally along with other psychosocial variables as predictors of offending behavior. There are very few research evidences are available that have been carried out to see the association between personality and criminal thinking styles in offenders. Criminal thinking style is defined by Walters (2006b) as a“content, matter of thought and a process leading to the initiation and maintenance of behavior characterized by the habitual violation of the law”. “Personality is defined as a dynamic organization, inside the person, of psychophysical systems that create the person's characteristic patterns of behavior, thoughts and feelings” (Allport, 1961). Yochelson and Samenow's Criminal Personality Theory emphasizes on the role of thinking error in criminal or offending behavior based on their idea of free will. Walters' Criminal Lifestyle Theory too further on highlighted the importance of thinking in criminality by incorporating three independent factors; external factor (condition), decision making process (choice) and mindset (cognition). This article is, therefore, an attempt to study personality and criminal thinking styles in offenders, and how it can have an effect on offending behavior. The description of the variables of personality and criminal thinking styles is elaborated in light with the existing appropriate theoretical model. Findings of different empirical studies conducted by researchers to understand personality factors and their association with criminal thinking styles in offenders are incorporated. The implications of the study have been highlighted as well.

Keywords


Criminal Behavior, Personality, Criminal Thinking Styles.

References