Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Nanophase Ceramics : Boon for Osseointegration


Affiliations
1 Department of Prosthodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, HP, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, National Dental College, Dera Bassi, Punjab, India
 

Traditional materials utilized for dental applications have been selected based on their mechanical properties and ability to remain inert in vivo; this selection process has provided materials that satifisfy physiological loading conditions but do not duplicate the mechanical, chemical, and architectural properties of bone. The less than optimal surface properties of conventional materials have resulted in clinical complications that necessitate surgical removal of many such failed bone implants due to insufficient bonding to juxtaposed bone. Due to unique surface and mechanical properties, as well as the ability to simulate the three-dimensional architecture of physiological bone, one possible consideration for the next generation of orthopedic and dental implants with improved efficacy are nanophase materials.

Keywords

Nanophase, Bioceramics, Cytocompatibility.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 168

PDF Views: 106




  • Nanophase Ceramics : Boon for Osseointegration

Abstract Views: 168  |  PDF Views: 106

Authors

Amit Sharma
Department of Prosthodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, HP, India
Jagmohan Lal
Department of Prosthodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, HP, India
Navreet Sandhu
Department of Prosthodontics, National Dental College, Dera Bassi, Punjab, India
Abhimanyu Singh Chauhan
Department of Prosthodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, HP, India
Ravneet Kaur
Department of Prosthodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, HP, India

Abstract


Traditional materials utilized for dental applications have been selected based on their mechanical properties and ability to remain inert in vivo; this selection process has provided materials that satifisfy physiological loading conditions but do not duplicate the mechanical, chemical, and architectural properties of bone. The less than optimal surface properties of conventional materials have resulted in clinical complications that necessitate surgical removal of many such failed bone implants due to insufficient bonding to juxtaposed bone. Due to unique surface and mechanical properties, as well as the ability to simulate the three-dimensional architecture of physiological bone, one possible consideration for the next generation of orthopedic and dental implants with improved efficacy are nanophase materials.

Keywords


Nanophase, Bioceramics, Cytocompatibility.