Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Simple Method to Identify Requirement Changes for Improvement in Software Design


Affiliations
1 Sathyabama University, Chennai, India
2 Department of Electronics and Communication, NITTTR, Chennai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The evaluation and performance analysis of software architecture at the design level increases the quality of the software and also reduces the cost of rework during the later stages of the product. There has been a lot of research in the area of software architecture and software design evaluations. When the design is to be improved based on the evaluation results, we lack in a feedback mechanism addressing the issues to be concentrated for design improvement. The paper aims at bringing out inter relationships among the various performance attributes, thereby identifying the specific changes that have to be brought about in design to satisfy customer requirements. The paper addresses a simple methodology using ranking and Karl Pearson method to find the critical areas to be updated for design improvements.

Keywords

Karl Pearson Method, Performance Attributes, Software Design, Correlation Coefficients.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 154

PDF Views: 2




  • A Simple Method to Identify Requirement Changes for Improvement in Software Design

Abstract Views: 154  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

B. Bharathi
Sathyabama University, Chennai, India
G. Kulanthaivel
Department of Electronics and Communication, NITTTR, Chennai, India

Abstract


The evaluation and performance analysis of software architecture at the design level increases the quality of the software and also reduces the cost of rework during the later stages of the product. There has been a lot of research in the area of software architecture and software design evaluations. When the design is to be improved based on the evaluation results, we lack in a feedback mechanism addressing the issues to be concentrated for design improvement. The paper aims at bringing out inter relationships among the various performance attributes, thereby identifying the specific changes that have to be brought about in design to satisfy customer requirements. The paper addresses a simple methodology using ranking and Karl Pearson method to find the critical areas to be updated for design improvements.

Keywords


Karl Pearson Method, Performance Attributes, Software Design, Correlation Coefficients.