Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mantri, Vaibhav A.
- Marine Algal Herbarium: a National Repository
Abstract Views :268 |
PDF Views:78
Authors
Affiliations
1 Marine Algal Research Station, CSIR-Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Mandpam Camp 623 519, IN
1 Marine Algal Research Station, CSIR-Central Salt & Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Mandpam Camp 623 519, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 8 (2015), Pagination: 1379-1379Abstract
No Abstract.- Life Cycle-Based Selection of Elite Germplasm in Industrially Important Red Alga Gracilaria dura:Implications for Commercial Farming
Abstract Views :278 |
PDF Views:80
Authors
Affiliations
1 Applied Phycology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute (CSIR-CSMCRI), Bhavnagar 364 002, IN
2 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201 002, IN
1 Applied Phycology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute (CSIR-CSMCRI), Bhavnagar 364 002, IN
2 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201 002, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 1777-1778Abstract
Agar-yielding seaweed commonly known as agarophytes are sourced for commercial exploitation from countries of the Middle East, Japan and to a certain extent from the Republic of Korea1. This industrially lucrative gel commands a high prize (US$ 18 kg–1) globally due to its natural high gelling strength and low gelling temperature compared to other seaweed hydrocolloids such as alginates (US$ 12 kg–1) and carrageenans (US$ 10.4 kg–1)2. The unique phycocolloid is being extracted from the cell walls of red seaweed species mostly from Gelidium, Gelidiella and Gracilaria. The agar trade annually requires about 125,200 dry tonne of biomass for the production of 14,500 t agar worth US$ 246 million3. The Moroccan government has now put restrictions on legal annual harvest of Gelidium to negate the decline of wild populations and thereby enforcing trade limits on export. This development has triggered agar scarcity in the global market. A recent trend indicates a shift, wherein Gracilaria is preferred as the raw material source consisting of over 91% of material supply chain (i.e. 114,100 dry t) with only about 9% (i.e. 11,100 dry t) represented by Gelidium3. Nevertheless, unlike other phycocolloids, where only a couple of species dominated the trade, several regional species are important in agar business, contributing immensely to the local economy4.References
- Veeragurunathan, V., Prasad, K., Singh, N., Malarvizhi, J., Mandal, S. K. and Mantri, V. A., J. Appl. Phycol., 2016, 28, 3479–3489.
- Veeragurunathan, V. et al., J. Appl. Phycol., 2019, 31, 2609–2621.
- Porse, H. and Rudolph, B., J. Appl. Phycol., 2017, 29, 2187–2200.
- Ashok, K. S. et al., Aquacult. Eng., 2016, 74, 186–197.
- Oza, R. M. and Zaidi, S. H., A revised checklist of Indian marine algae. Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar, 2001, p. 286.
- Ganesan, M., Eswaran, K. and Reddy, C. R. K., J. Appl. Phycol., 2017, 29, 2239– 2248.
- Meena, R. et al., Carbohydr. Polym., 2007, 69, 179–188.
- Meena, R. et al., RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 28093–28098.
- Mantri, V. A., Thakur, M. C., Kumar, M., Reddy, C. R. K. and Jha, B., Aquaculture, 2009, 297, 85–90.
- Veeragurunathan, V., Eswaran, K., Malarvizhi, J. and Gobala Krishnan, M., J. Appl. Phycol., 2015, 27, 2353–2365.
- Mantri, V. A., Reddy, C. R. K. and Jha, B., In Seaweeds and their Role in Globally Changing Environments. Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology (eds Israel, A. et al.), Springer, Switzerland, 2010, pp. 319–338.
- Drew, K. M., Nature, 1949, 164, 748– 749.
- van der Meer, J. P. and Todd, E. R., Can. J. Bot., 1980, 58(11), 1250–1256.
- Whyte, J. N. C., Englar, J. R., Saunders, R. G. and Lindsay, J. C., Bot. Mar., 1981, 24, 493–501.
- Durairatnam, M. and Nascimento, H. C., Seaweed Res. Util., 1985, 8, 9–22.
- Marinho-Soriano, E., Bourret, E., De Casabianca M. L. and Maury, L., Bioresour. Technol., 1999, 67, 1–5.
- Hoyle, M. D., Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 1978, 35, 273–283.
- Barufi, J. B., De Oliveira, E. C., Plastino, E. M. and De Oliveira, M. C., Sci. Mar., 2010, 74, 297–303.
- Zhang, X. C. and van der Meer, J. P., Can. J. Bot., 1988, 66, 2022–2026.
- Gupta, V., Baghel, R. S., Kumar, M., Kumari, P., Mantri, V. A., Reddy, C. R. K. and Jha, B., Aquaculture, 2011, 318, 389–396.
- Guillemin, M. L., Faugeron, S., Destombe, C., Viard, F., Correa, J. A. and Valero, M., Evolution, 2008, 62-6, 1500– 1519.
- Accomplishments in edible seaweed domain in India and the way forward
Abstract Views :262 |
PDF Views:80
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Applied Phycology and Biotechnology, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar 364 002, India, and Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India, IN
1 Division of Applied Phycology and Biotechnology, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar 364 002, India, and Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 8 (2021), Pagination: 1006-1008Abstract
No Abstract.References
- https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- https://www.globalhungerindex.org/india. html (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Krishnamurthy, V. and Joshi, H. V., Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 1969, 62, 123.
- Joshi, H. V. and Krishnamurthy, V., Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 1972, 65, 119.
- Kavale, M. et al., J. Appl. Phycol., 2019, 32, 451.
- Anil Kumar, C. and Panikkar, M. V. N., Feddes Repert., 1997, 108, 419.
- Raju, P. V. and Thomas, P. C., Bot. Mar., 1971, 14, 71–75.
- Subbaramaiah, K. and Thomas, P. C., Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.), 1990, 100, 123.
- Ganesan, M. et al., Aquaculture, 2011, 321, 145–151.
- Subbaramaiah, K., Bot. Mar., 1970, 13, 25.
- Oza, R. M. and Srinivasa Rao, P., Bot. Mar., 1977, 20, 427.
- Mantri, V. A. et al., J. Appl. Phycol., 2011, 23, 243.
- Mairh, O. P. et al., Seaweed Res. Util., 1983, 6, 1.
- Oza, R. M. et al., Indian J. Mar. Sci., 1985, 14, 217.
- Mairh, O. P. et al., Indian J. Mar. Sci., 1986, 15, 212.
- Mantri, V. A., Curr. Sci., 2004, 87, 1321.
- Mary, A. et al., Curr. Sci., 2009, 97, 1420.
- Gupta, V. et al., Algal Res., 2018, 31, 463.
- Siddhantha, A. K. et al., Indian J. Mar. Sci., 2001, 30, 166.
- Ganesan, K. et al., Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 2011, 12, 73.
- Gajaria, T. K. et al., Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 243, 867.
- Kumari, P. et al., Phytochemistry, 2013, 86, 44.
- Tanna, B. et al., Algal Res., 2018, 36, 96.
- http://dof.gov.in/pmmsy (accessed on 28 September 2021).
- Need for Geographical Indication Tag to Indian Seaweeds: Case of Industrially Important Red Seaweed Gracilaria dura (C. Agardh) J. Agardh
Abstract Views :51 |
PDF Views:44
Authors
Affiliations
1 Applied Phycology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar 364 001, IN
1 Applied Phycology and Biotechnology Division, CSIR-Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar 364 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 125, No 5 (2023), Pagination: 466-466Abstract
No Abstract.Keywords
No Keywords.References
- Kishore, K. J., Intellect. Prop. Rights, 2018, 23, 159–166.
- https://ipindia.gov.in/writereaddata/Portal/Images/pdf/GI_Application_Register_List_14-07-2022.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2022).
- Mantri, V. A., Kavale, M. G. and Kazi, M. A., Diversity, 2020, 12, 13.
- Mantri, V. A., Ghosh, A., Eswaran, K. and Ganesan, M., Sustainability, 2022, 14, 10416.
- Oza, R. M. and Zaidi, S. H., A Revised Checklist of Indian Marine Algae, Central Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute, Bhavnagar, India, 2001, p. 296.
- Mantri, V. A., Shah, Y. and Thiruppathi, S., Appl. Phycol., 2019, 1(1), 12–19.
- Meena, R. et al., Carbohydr. Polym., 2007, 69, 179–188.
- Shah, Y., Rathod, M., Kavale, M., Jaiswar, S. and Mantri, V. A., Aquac. Int., 2022, 30, 273–287.
- Mantri, V. A., Veeragurunthan, V., Sambhwani, K. and Kazi, M. A., J. Appl. Phycol., 2022, 34, 1825–1841.
- Veeragurunathan, V., Eswaran, K., Saminathan, K., Mantri, V. A., Malar Vizhi, J., Ajay, G. and Jha, B., Aquaculture, 2015, 438, 68–74.