Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Katneni, V. K.
- Restoration of Old Genus Name Penaeus Based on Molecular Phylogenetic Affiliations Using Complete Mitochondrial Genome
Abstract Views :229 |
PDF Views:77
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai 680 028, IN
1 ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture, Chennai 680 028, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 3 (2021), Pagination: 423-428Abstract
Genus Penaeus sensu lato has been focus of intense scientific research for several decades owing to the high market demand of this group. Twenty eight species of shrimps, were grouped in this genus until Perez Farfante and Kensely raising the former six subgenera in this genus to generic status. Being a most valuable group, this decision made considerable concern among the end users. Recently research group from ICAR-Central Institute of Brackishwater Aquaculture made a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis and confirmed the monophyletic origin of genus Penaeus. In the present article we provide a summary of the revisionary work, and currently accepted binomial to encourage practitioners to use the modern up-to-date classification.Keywords
Genus Penaeus, Molecular Phylogenetic Affiliations, Mitochondrial Genome, Scientific Name.Full Text
References
- Crisp, D. J. and Fogg, G. E., Taxonomic instability continues to irritate. Nature, 1988, 335(6186), 120–121.
- Teletchea, F., Systematics and aquaculture: what could they bring to each other? J. Life Sci., 2016, 10, 240–244.
- Flegel, T. W., Confirmation of the right to refuse revision in the genus Penaeus. Aquaculture, 2008, 1, 1–4.
- Burkenroad, D., The Penaeidae of Louisiana, with a discussion of their world relationships. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1934, 68, 61–143.
- Dall, W., Hill, B., Rothlisberg, P. and Sharples, D., The biology of the Penaeidae. In Advances in Marine Biology (eds Blaxter, J. H. S. and Southward, A. J.), Academic Press, New York, 1990, pp. 1–489.
- Lavery, S., Chan, T. Y., Tam, Y. K. and Chu, K. H., Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the shrimp genus Penaeus sl derived from mitochondrial DNA. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol., 2004, 31(1), 39–49.
- Farfante, P. I. and Kensley, B. F., Penaeoid and sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world. Keys and diagnoses for the families and genera. Mémoir. Muséum National d’Histoire Natur., 1997, 175, 1–233.
- Schram, F. R. and Ng, P. K., What is cancer? J. Crustacean Biol., 2012, 32(4), 665–672.
- Flegel, T. W., The right to refuse revision in the genus Penaeus. Aquaculture, 2007, 64, 2–8.
- Auttarat, J., Phiriyangkul, P. and Utarabhand, P., Characterization of vitellin from the ovaries of the banana shrimp Litopenaeus merguiensis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, 2006, 143, 27–36.
- Rosenberry, B., Why are you still saying ‘Litopenaeus’ vannamei? Shrimp News International, 9 February 2015.
- Baldwin, J. D., Bass, A. L., Bowen, B. W. and Clark Jr, W. H., Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the marine shrimp Penaeus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 1998, 10, 399–407.
- Chu, K. H., Li, C. P., Tam, Y. K. and Lavery, S., Application of mitochondrial control region in population genetic studies of the shrimp Penaeus. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2003, 3(1), 120–122.
- Maggioni, R., Rogers, A. D., Maclean, N. and D’Incao, F., Molecular phylogeny of western Atlantic Farfantepenaeus and Litopenaeus shrimp based on mitochondrial 16S partial sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2001, 18, 66–73.
- Voloch, C. M., Freire, P. R. and Russo, C. A., Molecular phylogeny of penaeid shrimps inferred from two mitochondrial markers. Genet. Mol. Biol., 2005, 4, 668–674.
- Wang, Z. Y., Tsoi, K. H. and Chu, K. H., Applications of AFLP technology in genetic and phylogenetic analysis of penaeid shrimp. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 2004, 32, 399–407.
- Ma, K. Y., Chan, T. Y. and Chu, K. H., Refuting the six–genus classification of Penaeus sl (Dendrobranchiata, Penaeidae): a combined analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Zool. Scr., 2011, 40, 498–508.
- Morin, P. A. et al., Complete mitochondrial genome phylogeographic analysis of killer whales (Orcinus orca) indicates multiple species. Genome Res., 2010, 20, 908–916.
- DeFilippis, V. R. and Moore, W. S., Resolution of phylogenetic relationships among recently evolved species as a function of amount of DNA sequence: an empirical study based on woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 2000, 16(1), 143–160.
- Rokas, A. and Carroll, S. B., More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2005, 22, 1337–1344.
- Ma, H., Ma, C., Li, X., Xu, Z., Feng, N. and Ma, L., The complete mitochondrial genome sequence and gene organization of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) with phylogenetic consideration. Gene, 2013, 519, 120–127.
- Katneni, V. K. et al., Phylogenetic relations and mitogenome‐wide similarity metrics reveal monophyly of Penaeus sensu lato. Ecol. Evol., 2021, 11, 2040–2049.
- Guindon, S., Dufayard, J. F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W. and Gascuel, O., New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. System. Biol., 2010, 59, 307–321.
- Lanfear, R., Frandsen, P. B., Wright, A. M., Senfeld, T. and Calcott, B., PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2017, 34, 772–773.
- Stamatakis, A., RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30, 1312–131.
- Huelsenbeck, J. P. and Ronquist, F., MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17(8), 754–755.
- McLaughlin, P. A., Lemaitre, R., Ferrari, F. D., Felder, D. L. and Bauer, R. T., A reply to TW Flegel. Aquaculture, 2008, 275, 370–373.
- Seberg, O., Humphries, C. J., Knapp, S., Stevenson, D. W., Petersen, G., Scharff, N. and Andersen, N. M., Shortcuts in systematics? A commentary on DNA-based taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2003, 18(2), 63–65.