Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rajpoot, Sudhir K.
- Bt-Cotton–Vegetable-Based Intercropping Systems as Influenced by Crop Establishment Method And Planting Geometry Of Bt-Cotton In Indo-Gangetic Plains Region
Abstract Views :215 |
PDF Views:68
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi - 110 012, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi - 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 115, No 3 (2018), Pagination: 516-522Abstract
The present study was conducted at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi in a splitplot design replicated thrice with four main-plot treatments, i.e. four combinations of two cotton establishment methods (CEMs) and two planting geometries (PGMs) [M1 – transplanted cotton (90 × 60 cm PGM); M2 – transplanted cotton (120 × 45 cm PGM); M3 – direct seeded cotton (DSC; 90 × 60 cm PGM); M4 – DSC (120 × 45 cm PGM)]; while sub-plot treatments comprised three intercropping systems [S-Ct – sole cotton; Ct + Ok – cotton + okra (1 : 2 row ratio); Ct + Cp – cotton + cowpea (vegetable purpose; 1 : 2 row ratio)]. It can be inferred from the study that transplanted cotton (TPC) with 90 × 60 cm planting geometry in Bt-cotton + vegetable cowpea intercropping system exhibited maximum seed-cotton equivalent yield (SCEY) as well as gross and net returns and other economic indices, followed by Ct + Ok and sole cotton. DSC with 90 × 60 cm PGM in Ct + Ok intercropping system proved superior in terms of SCEY, and gross and net returns besides other economic indices. Based upon yield advantage indices, TPC in 90 × 60 cm PGM under Ct+Cp intercropping system and DSC in 90 × 60 cm PGM under both intercrops were found to be the best options. Crop competition indices also revealed that the inclusion of these intercrops is advantageous because of spatial and temporal complementarity, different ischolar_maining pattern and plant architecture to utilize natural resources more efficiently in Bt-cotton-based intercropping systems in the semiarid Indo-Gangetic plains region.Keywords
Bt-Cotton, Crop Establishment Methods, Intercropping Systems, Planting Geometry, Vegetable Cowpea.Full Text
References
- DES, Agriculture Statistics at a Glance, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Food Processing, Government of India, 2011, p. 15.
- Kumar, A., Rana, K. S., Rana, D. S., Bana, R. S., Choudhary, A. K. and Pooniya, V., Effect of nutrient and moisture management practices on crop productivity, water-use efficiency and energy dynamics in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) + soybean (Glycine max L.) intercropping system. Indian J. Agron., 2015, 60(1), 152–156.
- Choudhary, A. K., Thakur, S. K. and Suri, V. K., Technology transfer model on integrated nutrient management technology for sustainable crop production in high value cash crops and vegetables in north-western Himalayas. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2013, 44(11), 1684–1699.
- Choudhary, A. K., Singh, A. and Yadav, D. S., On farm testing of wheat cultivars for site-specific assessment under varied biophysical regimes in mid-hill conditions of Mandi district of Himachal Pradesh. J. Community Mobiliz. Sustain Dev., 2010, 5(1), 1–6.
- Ahlawat, I. P. S., Gangaiah, B. and Singh, O. P., Irrigation requirement of gram + Indian mustard intercropping system. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2005, 75(1), 23–26.
- Willey, R. W. and Osiru, D. S. O., Studies on mixture of maize and beans with particular reference to plant population. J. Agric. Sci., 1972, 79, 519–529.
- Heibsch, C. K. and McCollum, R. E., Area × time equivalency ratio – a method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agron. J., 1987, 79, 15–22.
- McGilchrist, C. A., Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics, 1965, 21, 975–985.
- De Wit, C. T., On competition. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz., 1960, 66, 1–81.
- Willey, R. W. and Rao, M. R., A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp. Agric., 1980, 16, 117–125.
- Adetiloye, P. O. and Ezedinma. F. O. C., A land equivalent coefficient concept for the evaluation of competitive and productive interactions in simple to complex crop mixtures. Ecol. Model., 1983, 19, 27–39.
- Schultz, B., Phillips, C., Rosset, P. and Vandermeer, J., An experiment in intercropping cucumbers and tomatoes in southern Michigan, USA. Sci. Hortic., 1982, 18, 1–8.
- Jain, T. C. and Rao, G. N., Note on a new approach to analysis of yield data in intercropping systems. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 1980, 50(12), 570–572.
- Rajpoot, S., Rana, D. S. and Choudhary, A. K., Influence of diverse crop management practices on weed suppression, crop and water productivity and nutrient dynamics in Bt-cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) based intercropping systems in a semi–arid IndoGangetic plains. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2016, 86(12), 1637–1641.
- Bhalerao, P. D. and Gaikwad, G. S., Productivity and profitability of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under various plant geometry and fertilizer levels. Indian J. Agron., 2010, 55, 60–63.
- Kumar, A., Suri, V. K., Choudhary, A. K., Yadav, A., Kapoor, R., Sandal, S. and Dass, A., Growth behaviour, nutrient harvest index and soil fertility in okra-pea cropping system as influenced by AM fungi, applied phosphorus and irrigation regimes in Himalayan acid Alfisol. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 2015, 46(17), 2212–2233.
- Kumar, A., Choudhary, A. K. and Suri, V. K., Influence of AM fungi, inorganic phosphorus and irrigation regimes on plant water relations and soil physical properties in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) – pea (Pisum sativum L.) cropping system in Himalayan acid Alfisol. J. Plant Nutr., 2016, 39(5), 666–682.
- Ganajaxi, Halikatti, S. I., Hiremath, S. M. and Chittapur, B. M., Production of Bt and non-Bt cotton and frenchbean intercropping system in north transition zone of Karnataka. Indian J. Agron., 2011, 56, 92–97.
- Singh, R. J. and Ahlawat, I. P. S., Productivity, competition indices and soil fertility changes of Bt cotton–groundnut intercropping system using different fertility levels. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2011, 81, 606–611.