Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ahmad, Riyaz
- Forage and Security Trade-Offs by Markhor Capra falconeri Mothers
Abstract Views :243 |
PDF Views:76
Authors
Affiliations
1 Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore 3076/5, IV Cross, Gokulam Park, Mysore 570 002, IN
2 Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 90183,, SE
3 Wildlife Trust of India, Noida 201 301, IN
1 Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore 3076/5, IV Cross, Gokulam Park, Mysore 570 002, IN
2 Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 90183,, SE
3 Wildlife Trust of India, Noida 201 301, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 8 (2016), Pagination: 1559-1564Abstract
Food acquisition and security from predators are primary determinants of habitat use in ungulates. There is usually a trade-off in the response of animals to these two factors, influenced by the individual's reproductive state. Females with vulnerable offspring, after parturition, are expected to compromise food acquisition for security. In temperate species such as the markhor Capra falconeri, however, the females give birth at a time when nutritious forage begins to become available after the long lean period of winter. The need to access quality forage in spring should, therefore, be significant even for new mothers, making the issue of female habitat choice particularly interesting and important to understand. We assessed habitat use patterns of the Pirpanjal markhor during the winter and parturition periods, to examine the response of markhor females to contrasting pressures of forage acquisition and neonate security. Markhor were observed during morning and evening hours along trails and vantage points in the Limber Wildlife Sanctuary, western Himalaya, India. Vegetation abundance and quality were assessed. Principal Components Analyses revealed that during winter, as expected, access to forage was the primary factor influencing habitat choice by female markhor. Following parturition, however, despite the low availability of quality forage throughout the preceding winter, markhor mothers predominantly used secure areas with steep slopes closer to cliffs, even though they were poorer in forage availability. Our results underscore the importance of neonate security in determining habitat use of markhor and the causes of low productivity of this population.Keywords
Forage, Habitat Use, Kashmir, Markhor, Mountain Ungulates, Parturition, Security, Trade-Off.- Distribution and Conservation Status of the Western Tragopan Tragopan melanocephalus in Jammu and Kashmir, India
Abstract Views :245 |
PDF Views:81
Authors
Riyaz Ahmad
1,
Narayan Sharma
2,
Upender Pacchnanda
3,
Intesar Suhail
3,
Kasturi Deb
1,
Yash Veer Bhatnagar
2,
Rahul Kaul
1
Affiliations
1 Wildlife Trust of India, F-13, Sector 8, Noida 201 301, IN
2 Nature Conservation Foundation, 3076/5, IV Cross, Gokulam Park, Mysuru 570 002, IN
3 Department of Wildlife Protection, Rajbagh, Srinagar 190 001, IN
1 Wildlife Trust of India, F-13, Sector 8, Noida 201 301, IN
2 Nature Conservation Foundation, 3076/5, IV Cross, Gokulam Park, Mysuru 570 002, IN
3 Department of Wildlife Protection, Rajbagh, Srinagar 190 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 09 (2017), Pagination: 1948-1953Abstract
In India, western tragopan is reported from Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand. We documented the current status and distribution of western tragopan in J&K. We also predicted its potential distribution in the state. We used literature, field surveys and semi-structured questionnaire surveys to ascertain the distribution and conservation status of the pheasant species in J&K. Between 2007 and 2011, we conducted counts of western tragopan in five areas: Tattakuti Wildlife Sanctuary, Khara Galli Conservation Reserve (CR), Limber Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS), Lacchipora WLS and Kazinag National Park (NP) to assess its current status. We estimated 113 callers of western tragopan from Kazinag NP, Limber WLS, Lacchipora WLS, Tattakuti WLS and Khara Galli CR. We also discovered four new sites - Tattakuti WLS and Khara Galli CR (through direct surveys), Noorpur Galli and Narian-Ratannard (through secondary surveys) - of this species. We have confirmed the presence of western tragopan in Lacchipora WLS and re-confirmed its presence in Padder, Bhadarwa and Sudh Mahadev. Our habitat model predicted potential distribution of western tragopan, adding few additional potential sites. There is an urgent need to plan long-term monitoring and initiate appropriate measures to conserve the species.Keywords
Conservation Status, Distribution, Hunting, Tragopan melanocephalus.References
- www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 4 January 2015).
- McGowan, P. J. K. and Garson, P. J., Pheasants: Status Surveys and Conservation Action Plan 1995–1999. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1995.
- Duke, G., Using call counts to compare western tragopan populations in Pakistan’s Himalaya. In Pheasants in Asia (eds Hill, D. A., Garson, P. J. and Jenkins, D.), World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 1990, pp. 193–199.
- Qadri, M. Y., Kaul, R. and Iqbal, M., Status of pheasants of Kashmir with special reference to endangered species. In Pheasants in Asia (eds Hill, D. A., Garson, P. J. and Jenkins, D.), World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 1990, pp. 124–128.
- Gaston, A. J., Garson, P. J. and Hunter, M. L., Present distribution and status of pheasants in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas. J. World Pheasant Assoc., 1981, 6, 10–30.
- Prasad, N., On the occurrence of western and satyr tragopan together in Uttar Pradesh. Newsl. Birdwatchers, 1993, 33(1), 6.
- BirdLife International, Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book, Cambridge, UK, 2001.
- Gaston, A. J., Garson, P. J. and Hunter, M. L., The status and conservation of forest wildlife in Himachal Pradesh, Western Himalayas. Biol. Conserv., 1983, 27, 291–314.
- Jandrotia, J. S., Sharma, V. and Katoch, S. S., A pheasant survey in the Ravi Catchment of Chamba District, Himachal Pradesh, India. Annu. Rev. World Pheasant Assoc., 1995, pp. 67–74.
- Pandey, S., Pheasant surveys and their conservation in protected areas in Upper Beas Valley, H.P. In Pheasants in Asia (ed. Jenkins, D.), World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 1993, pp. 58–61.
- Ramesh, K., An ecological study on pheasants of the Great Himalayan national park, Western Himalaya. Ph D Dissertation, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2003.
- Chauhan, B. S. and Sharma, V., Status of the Western tragopan in Himachal Pradesh, India. World Pheasant Assoc., News, 1991, 34, 25–28.
- Islam, K., Status and distribution of the Western tragopan in northeastern Pakistan. In Pheasants in Asia (eds Savage, C. D. W. and Ridley, M. W.), World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 1982.
- Kaul, R. and Qadri, S., Western tragopan surveys in Limber Valley, Kashmir, India. WPA News, 1989, pp. 12–14.
- Narang, M. L., Searches for Western tragopan in Himachal Pradesh, India. In Pheasants in Asia (ed. Jenkins, D.). World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 1992.
- Jandrotia, J. S., Katoch, S. S., Kaul, R. and Seth, K, Surveys of pheasants in Chamba district of Himachal Pradesh, India. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Galliformes Symposium, Kathmandu. World Pheasant Association, Reading, UK, 2000.
- Javed, S., Birds of Limbar Valley Forest (Jammu & Kashmir). Newsl. Birdwatchers, 1992, 32(5&6), 13–15.
- Awan, M. N., Buner, F. and Kingdon, N., A review of published and unpublished surveys of a red-listed ‘flagship species’, the Western tragopan Tragopan melanocephalus in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Bird Conservation International 2011, pp. 1–16; doi:10.1017/S0959270915000246.
- Miller, J. R. B., Survey of Western Tragopan, Koklass Pheasant, and Himalayan Monal populations in the Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds, 2010, 6(3), 60–65.
- Kaul, R. and Shakya, S., Spring call counts of some Galliformes in the Pipar Reserve, Nepal. Forktail, 2001, 17, 75–80.
- Khaling, S., Kaul, R. and Saha, G. K., Surveys of the Satyr tragopan Tragopan satyra in the Singhalila National Park, Darjeeling India using spring call counts. Bird Conserv. Int., 1998, 8(4), 361–372.
- Ghose, D., Report on the survey of Blyth’s tragopan in the Blue Mountain National Park, Mizoram, India. Submitted to the World Pheasant Association, 1997.
- Gaston, A. J., Census techniques for Himalayan pheasants including notes on individual species. J. World Pheasant Assoc., 1980, 5, 40–53.
- Conservation Prospects of the Kashmir Red Deer (Cervus hanglu hanglu) beyond Dachigam National Park, in Jammu and Kashmir, India
Abstract Views :313 |
PDF Views:77
Authors
Rahul Kaul
1,
Mayukh Chatterjee
1,
Tapajit Bhattacharya
1,
Smita Bodhankar
1,
Riyaz Ahmad
1,
Mansoor Nabi Sofi
1,
Samina Amin Charoo
2
Affiliations
1 Wildlife Trust of India, F-13, Sec-8, Noida 201 301, IN
2 Department of Wildlife Protection, Jammu and Kashmir 190 008, IN
1 Wildlife Trust of India, F-13, Sec-8, Noida 201 301, IN
2 Department of Wildlife Protection, Jammu and Kashmir 190 008, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 10 (2018), Pagination: 2123-2130Abstract
India’s only extant red deer species, the Kashmir red deer, or hangul (Cervus hanglu hanglu) is restricted today to the confines of the 141 sq. km Dachigam National Park (NP) in Jammu and Kashmir, with about 200 surviving individuals. A continual population decline of hangul has necessitated the identification of relict populations and suitable habitats outside Dachigam NP, so that a meta-population approach to its conservation may be employed. Extensive surveys in 2008–2012 across the Kashmir valley, helped identify three distinct areas, where the presence of the red deer was confirmed year-round. Ecological Niche Factor Analysis results indicated that hangul exhibits high global marginality (1.24) and low global tolerance (0.28). Habitat suitability modelling predicted 610.75 sq. km area of conifer and temperate broadleaved forests as highly (61–100%) suitable and 980.25 sq. km as moderately (31–60%) suitable, primarily in two distinct areas of Wanghat Naranag and Chandaji, which also showed presence of the hangul year-round. This suggests that apart from Dachigam NP, suitable habitats bearing hangul populations still exist in Kashmir valley (935.46 sq. km), emphasizing the need to urgently direct protection and conservation focus to these areas to conserve hangul successfully in this landscape.Keywords
Corridor, Habitat Suitability, Hangul, Kashmir Stag, Red Deer.References
- Dolan, J. M., A deer of many lands – a guide to the subspecies of the red deer Cervus elaphus. Zoonooz, 1988, 62, 20.
- Lovari, S. et al., Cervus elaphus. In IUCN 2013, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2008, Version 2013.1.
- Flint, V., Pereladova, O. B. and Mirutenko, M. V., Program for Bukara deer restoration in the USSR. All Union Research Institute for Nature Protection and Reserve Services, State Committee on Nature, USSR, 1989.
- Carranza, J., The preservation of Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) from genetic introgression by other European subspecies. Deer Specialist Group Newsletter, 2003.
- Hmwe, S. S., Zachos, F. E., Eckert, I., Lorenzini, R., Fico, R. and Hartl, B., Conservation genetics of the endangered red deer from Sardinia and Mesola with further remarks on the phylogeography of Cervus elaphus corsicanus. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond., 2006, 88, 691–701.
- Lorenzini, R. and Garofalo, L., Insights into the evolutionary history of Cervus (Cervidae, tribe cervinae) based on Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial marker sequences, first indication of a new species. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res., 2015, 53(4), 340–349.
- Kurt, F., Kashmir deer (Cervus elaphus hangulu) in Dachigam, Working meeting of the IUCN Deer Specialist Group, Longview, September, 1977, p. 43.
- Qureshi, Q. et al., Status and distribution of Hangul Cervus elaphus hanglu, Wagner in Kashmir, India. J. Bom. Nat. Hist. Soc., 2009, 106, 63–71.
- Charoo, S. A., Sharma, L. K. and Sathyakumar, S., Distribution and relative abundance of Kashmir Red deer or Hangul (Cervus elaphus hangul) at Dachigam National Park, India. Galemys 22 (N° special), 2010, pp. 171–184.
- Schaller, G. B., Observations on the Hangul or Kashmir Stag (Cervus elaphus hanglu). J. Bom. Nat. Hist. Soc., 1969, 66, 1–7.
- Kurt, F., Hangul, India: ecological study to identify conservation needs. Final Report, 1978, IUCN/WWF Project 1103.
- Ahmad, K., Sathyakumar, S. and Qureshi, Q., Feeding Preferences of Hangul (Cervus elaphus hanglu) at Dachigam National Park, Kashmir, India. Final Report submitted to the Department of Wildlife Protection, Jammu and Kashmir Government, Srinagar, and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 2005.
- Ahmad, K., Aspects of Ecology of Hangul (Cervus elaphus hanglu) at Dachigam National Park, Kashmir, India. Ph. D. Thesis. Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India, 2006.
- Sharma, L. K., Charoo, S. A. and Sathyakumar, S., Habitat use and food habit of Kashmir Red deer or Hangul (Cervus elaphus hangul) at Dachigam National Park, India. Galemys 22 (N° special), 2010, 309–329.
- Iqbal, S., Qureshi, Q., Sathyakumar, S. and Inayatullah, M., Predatorprey relationship with special reference to Hangul (Cervus elaphus hanglu) in Dachigam National Park. Final Report, 2005.
- Mukesh, Sharma, L. K., Kumar, V. P., Charoo, S. A., Mohan, N., Goyal, S. P. and Sathyakumar, S., Loss of genetic diversity and inbreeding in Kashmir red deer (Cervus elaphus hanglu) of Dachigam National Park, Jammu and Kashmir, India. BMC Res. Notes, 2012, 6, 326.
- Holloway, C. W. and Wani, A. R., Management plan for Dachigam Sanctuary 1971–1975. Mimeo, 1970, p. 26.
- Zachos, F. E., Hajji, G. M., Hmwe, S. S., Hartl, G. B., Lorenzini, R. and Mattioli, S., Population viability analysis and the genetic diversity of the endangered red deer Cervus elaphus population from Mesola, Italy. Wildl. Biol., 2009, 15, 175–186.
- Ferretti, F. and Mattioli, S., The Mesola red deer: present numbers and conservation perspectives. Hystrix, 2012, 23(2), 36–44.
- Brook, B. W., Tonkyn, D. W., O’Grady, J. J. and Frankham, R., Contribution of inbreeding to extinction risk in threatened species. Conserv. Ecol., 2002, (6) 16.
- Sweanor, L. L., Logan, K. A. and Hornocker, M. G., Cougar dispersal patterns, metapopulation dynamics and conservation. Conserv. Biol., 2000, 14, 798–808.
- Mandujano, S., Escobedo-Morales, L. A., Palacios-Silva, R., Arroyo-Rodriguez, R. and Rodriguez-Toledo, E. M., Approach to conserving the howler monkey in a highly fragmented landscape in Los-Tuxtlas, Mexico. In New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior, and Conservation (eds Alejandro, E. et al.), Springer, New York, 2005.
- Kuemmerle, T. et al., Predicting potential European bison habitat across its former range. Ecol. Appl., 2011, 21, 830–843.
- Hu, J. and Jiang, Z., Predicting the potential distribution of the endangered Przewalski’s gazelle. J. Zool., 2010, 282, 54–63.
- Pulliam, H. R. and Danielson, B. J., Source, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat., 1991, 137, 550–566.
- Harveson, P. M., Grant, W. E., Lopez, R. R., Silvy, N. J. and Frank, P. A., The role of dispersal in Florida key deer metapopulation dynamics. Ecol. Model., 2006, 195, 393–401.
- Beier, P. and Noss, R. F., Do habitat corridors provide connectivity? Conserv. Biol., 1998, 12, 1241–1252.
- Pathey, P. Habitat corridor selection of an expanding red deer (Cervus elaphus) population. Ph D thesis, University of Lausanne, 2003.
- Larson, M. A., Thompson, F. R., Millspaugh, J. J., Dijak, W. D. and Shifley, S. R., Linking population viability, habitat suitability, and landscape simulation models for conservation planning. Ecol. Modell., 2004, 180, 103–118.
- Biotani, L. et al., Distribution of medium- to large sized African mammals based on habitat suitability models. Biodivers. Conserv., 2008, 17, 605–621.
- Hirzel, A. H., Hausser, J., Chessel, D. and Perrin, N., Ecological niche factor analysis: How to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology, 2002, 83, 2027–2036.
- Gu, W. and Swihart, R. K., Absent or undetected? Effects of nondetection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models. Biol. Conserv., 2004, 116, 195–203.
- Hirzel, A. H., Hausser, J. and Perrin, N., Biomapper 3.1, Lausanne, lab for conservation biology, 2002.
- Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, E. J., Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, W.H. Freeman, New York, 1981.
- Legendre, L. and Legendre, P., Numerical Ecology, Second English edition, Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998.
- Glass, G. V. and Hopkins, K. D., Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology, Prentice Hall, London, UK, Second edn, 1984.
- Hirzel, A. H. and Arlettaz, R., Modeling habitat suitability for complex species distributions by environmental-distance geometric mean. Environ. Manage., 2003, 32, 614–623.
- Fielding, A. H. and Bell, J. F., A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv., 1997, 24, 38–49.
- Hirzel, A. H., Le Lay, G., Helfer, V., Randin, C. and Guisan, A., Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol. Modell., 2006, 199(2), 142–152.
- Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E. and Schmiegelow, F. K. A., Evaluating resource selection functions, Ecol. Modell., 2002, 157, 281–300.
- Olson, K., Zahler, P. and Odonkhuu, D., Connectivity, corridors and stepping stones: conservation implications of roe deer distribution on the eastern steppe. Mong. J. Biol. Sci., 2004, 2, 23–27.
- Shepherd, B. and Whittington, J., Response of wolves to corridor restoration and human use management. Ecol. Soc., 2006, 11, 1.
- Dixon, J. D., Oli, M. K., Wooten, M. C., Eason, T. H., McCown, J. W. and Paetkau, D., Effectiveness of a regional corridor in connecting two Florida black bear populations. Cons. Biol., 2006, 20, 155–162.
- Frank, L. G., Rosie, W. and Ogada, M. O., People and predators in Laikipia district, Kenya, In. People and Wildlife: conflict or coexistence (eds Rosie, W., Simon, T. and Rabinowitz, A.), Zoological Society of London, 2005.
- Bartlam-Brooks, H. L. A., Bonyongo, M. C. and Stephen, H., Will reconnecting ecosystems allow long-distance mammal migrations to resume – a case study of Zebra Equus burchelli migration in Botswana. Oryx, 2011, 45, 210–216.
- Ashraf, N., Maqsood, A., Iftikhar, H. and Muhammad, A. N., Competition for food between the markhor and domestic goat in Chitral, Pakistan. Turk J. Zool., 2014, 38(2), 191–198.
- Shah, G. M., Jan, U., Bhat, B. A. and Ahanger, F. A., Causes of decline of critically endangered hangul deer in Dachigam National Park, Kashmir (India): a review. Int. J. Biodivers. Conserv., 2011, 3(14), 735–738.
- Ahmad, R., Mishra, C., Singh, N. J., Kaul, R. and Bhatnagar, Y. V., Forage and security trade-offs by markhor Capra falconeri mothers. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(8), 1559–1564.