Refine your search
Collections
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Banerjee, Raj
- A Comparative Assessment of the Seismic Response of an Earthen Dam Using Analytical Simulation and Empirical Methods
Abstract Views :251 |
PDF Views:74
Authors
Affiliations
1 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, IN
2 Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, IN
1 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400 085, IN
2 Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 05 (2017), Pagination: 902-910Abstract
This article presents the permanent deformation of an earthen dam located in the vicinity of a safety related structure for Mw = 6.5 design basis earthquake. A non-linear 2D dynamic analysis using a real earthquake motion compatible with the design spectrum was performed to check the earthquake-induced deformations of the dam. Deformations of the dam were also estimated by semi-empirical and empirical methods suc has Seed and Makdisi’s method, Newmark’s double integration method, Jansen’s method and Swaisgood’s method. Results from different methods are compared to obtain a range for the value of permanent deformations of the dam. It is observed that the lateral deformation obtained by Seed and Makdisi’s method is the highest while Jansen’s method predicts the highest crest settlement. The crest settlement of the dam is found to vary between 11.8 mm and 17.8 mm, which is within the safety limits according to IITK-GSDMA guidelines.Keywords
Earthen Dam, Dynamic Analysis, Deformations, Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis.Full Text
References
- USBR, Seismic design and analysis of embankment dams, Design Standards. Chapter 13, In United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado, DS-13(13)-7, 1989.
- IS:1893, Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1 – general provisions and buildings, Bureau of Indian Standards, Fifth Revision, New Delhi, 2001.
- Newmark, N. M., Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 1965, 15(2), 139–159.
- Makdisi, F. I. and Seed, H. B., Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake induced deformations. J. Geotech. Eng. Div., 1978, 104(7), 849–867.
- Jansen, R. B., Estimation of embankment dam settlement caused by earthquake. Int. Water Power Dam Constr., 1990, 42(12), 35–40.
- Swaisgood, J. R., Estimating deformation of embankment dams caused by earthquakes. In ASDSO Western Regional Conference, Montana, USA, 1995, pp. 1–7.
- Singh, R., Roy, D. and Jain, S. K., Analysis of earth dams affected by the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake. Eng. Geol., 2005, 80, 282–291.
- Basudhar, P. K., Rao, N. S. V. K., Bhookya, M. and Dey, A., 2D FEM analysis of earth and rockfill dam under seismic condition. In 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 2010.
- Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., Soil modulii and damping factors for dynamic response analysis. Report EERC, 70–10, University of California, Berkeley, 1970.
- Hardin, B. O. and Drenvich, V. P., Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equations and curves. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1972, 98(7), 667–692.
- Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F., Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration (second paper). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1956, 46(2), 105–145.
- Idriss, I. M., Evaluating seismic risk in engineering practice. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, USA, 1985, vol. 1, pp. 255–320.
- Ghosh, A. K., Rao, K. S. and Kushwaha, H. S., Development for UHRS for Tarapur, Trombay and Kakrapara Sites. Report BARC/2003/E/019, 2003.
- Sengupta, A., Estimation of permanent displacements of the Tehri dam in the Himalayas due to future strong earthquakes. Sadhana, 2010, 35(3), 373–392.
- Ghaboussi, J. and Wilson, E. L., Seismic analysis of earth dam reservoir systems. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1973, 99(10), 849–862.
- Dakoulas, P. and Gazetas, G., A class of inhomogeneous shear models for seismic response of dams and embankments. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 1985, 4(4), 166–182.
- Seed, H. B. and Sun, J. H., Implication of site effects in the Mexico City earthquake of 19 September 1985 for Earthquakeresistancedesign criteria in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. In Report No. UCB/EERC-89/03, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 1989.
- Bishop, A. W., The use of slip circles in the stability analysis of earth slopes. Geotechnique, 1955, 5(1), 7–17.
- Seed, H. B. and Martin, G. R., The seismic coefficient in earth dam design. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 1966, 92(3), 25–58.
- Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., A simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 1971, 97(9), 1249–1274.
- IIT-K, GSDMA guidelines for seismic design of earth dams and embankments, 2007.
- Study of a Surface Raft Foundation in Dry Cohesionless Soil Subjected to Dynamic Loading
Abstract Views :282 |
PDF Views:84
Authors
Affiliations
1 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 480 005, IN
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, IN
1 Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 480 005, IN
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721 302, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 1800-1812Abstract
In this study, behaviour of a raft foundation in dry cohesionless soil when subjected to dynamic loadings is presented. The numerical model is validated by model tests on shaking table and numerically by a plane strain finite difference program, FLAC 2D. In both shaking table tests and numerical analyses, the raft located in dry Kasai River sand in Kharagpur has been subjected to 10 cycles of equivalent sinusoidal loadings with an amplitude of 0.2412 g at a frequency of 2 Hz, which represents an irregular time history of the Loma Prieta Earthquake (1989). The results of the above study in terms of response time histories, bending moment and lateral displacement of the raft have been validated with numerical simulations, and the results are in reasonable agreement with the corresponding experimental findings. A methodology to study the behaviour of a raft foundation subjected to harmonic excitations has been proposed in terms of vertical deformations of the raft foundation in dry sand for a given value of dynamic (or degraded) factor of safety.Keywords
Dry Soil, Dynamic Loading, Numerical Analysis, Raft Foundation, Shaking Table Test.Full Text
References
- Richart, F. E., Foundation vibrations. Trans: ASCE, 1962, 127(1), 863–898.
- Kishida, H., Damage to reinforced concrete buildings on Nigata city with special reference to foundation engineering. Soils Found., 1966, 6(1), 71–88.
- Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE, 1967, 93(3), 83–108.
- Richart, F. E. and Whitman, R. V., Design procedures for dynamically loaded foundations. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE, 1967, 93(SM6), 168–193.
- Richart, F. E. and Whitman, R. V., Comparison of footing vibrations with theory. J. SMFD, Proc. ASCE, 1967, 93(SM6), 143– 167.
- Richards, R., Elms, D. G. and Budhu, M., Seismic bearing capacity and settlements of foundations. J. Geotech. Eng., 1993, 119, 662–674.
- Yoshimi, Y. and Tokimatsu, K., Settlement of buildings on saturated sand during earthquakes. Soils Found., 1977, 17(1), 23–38.
- Dobry, R and Gazettas, G., Dynamic response of arbitrarily shaped foundations. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE, 1986, 112(2), 109–125.
- Dobry, R., Gazettas, G. and Stokoe, K. H., Dynamic response of arbitrarily shaped foundations: experimental verification. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE, 1986, 112(2), 126–154.
- Gazettas, G. and Stokoe, K. H., Free vibrations of embedded foundations: theory versus experiment. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE, 1991, 117(9), 1382–1401.
- Puri, V. K. and Das, B. M., Dynamic response of block foundation. In Third International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, 1993.
- Ragheb, A. M., Numerical analysis of seismically induced deformations in saturated granular soil strata. Ph D thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, NY, 1994.
- Paolucci, R., Simplified evaluation of earthquake-induced permanent displacements of shallow foundations. J. Earthq. Eng., 1997, 1(3), 563–579.
- Gajan, S. and Kutter, B. L., Contact interface model for shallow foundations subjected to combined cyclic loading. J. Geotech. Geo-Environ. Eng., 2009, 135(3), 407–419.
- Omer, C., Nonlinear analysis of thin rectangular plates on Winkler–Pasternak elastic foundations by DSC–HDQ methods. Appl. Math. Modell., 2006, 31, 606–624.
- Ribeiro, D. B. and Paiva, J. B., An alternative BE–FE formulation for a raft resting on a finite soil layer. Eng. Anal. Boundary Elem., 2015, 50, 352–359.
- Mandal, J. J. and Roychoudhury, S., Response of rectangular raft foundations under transient loading. The 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, 2008.
- Wang, C. M., Chow, Y. K. and How, Y. C., Analysis of rectangular thick rafts on an elastic half-space. Comp. Geotech., 2000, 28, 161–184.
- Stokoe, K. H., Kacar, O. and Van Pelt, J., Predicting settlements of shallow footings on granular soil using nonlinear dynamic soil properties. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, 2012, pp.3467–3470.
- Asgari, A., Golshani, A. and Bagheri, M., Numerical evaluation of seismic response of shallow foundation on loose silt and silty sand. J. Earth System Sci., 2014 123(2), 365–379.
- Itasca, User’s Guide for FLAC Version 5.0, Itasca India Consulting, Nagpur, 2005.
- Bhattacharya, S., Lombardi, D., Dihoru, L., Dietz, M., Crewe, A. J. and Taylor, C. A., Model container design for soil–structure interaction studies. Role of Seismic Testing Facilities in Performance Based Earthquake Engineering, Springer Series, 2011, vol. 22, pp. 135–158.
- Lombardi, D. and Bhattacharya, S., Shaking table tests on rigid soil container with absorbing boundaries. Lisbon, 2012, 15WCEE.
- Banerjee, R., Konai, S., Sengupta, A. and Deb, K., Shake table tests and numerical modeling of Kasai River Sand. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 2017, 35(4), 1327–1340.
- Giri, D. and Sengupta, A., Dynamic behaviour of small-scale model of nailed steep slopes. Geomech. Geoeng.: Int. J., 2010, 5(2), 99–108.
- Bandyopadhyay, S., Sengupta, A. and Reddy, G. R., Performance of sand and shredded rubber tire mixture as a natural base isolator for earthquake protection. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 2015, 14(4), 683–693.
- Dash, S. R., Lateral pile–soil interaction in liquefiable soils. Ph D thesis, University of Oxford, UK, 2010.
- Ha, I. S., Olson, S. M., Seo, M. W. and Kim, M. M., Evaluation of reliquefaction resistance using shaking table tests. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2011, 31(4), 682–691.
- Ramu, M., Prabhu, R. V. and Thyla, P. R., Development of structural similitude and scaling laws for elastic models. KSCE J. Civil Eng., 2011, 17(1), 139–144.
- Iai, S., Similitude for shaking table tests on soil–structure–fluid model in 1 g gravitational field. Soils Found., 1989, 29(1), 105–118.
- Wood, D. M., Geotechnical Modeling, Version 2.2, 2004.
- BIS, IS 2720 methods of test for soils, part 13 – direct shear test. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1986.
- Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M., Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 1970.
- Kawaguchi, T. and Tanaka, H., Formulation of Gmax from reconstituted clayey soil: its application to measured Gmax in the field. Soils Found., 2006, 48, 821–831.
- Murthy, V. N. S., Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, CBS Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, 2009.
- Elgamal, A., Yang, Z., Adalier, K. and Sharp, M. K., Effect of rigid container size on dynamic earth dam response in centrifuge experiments. Proceedings 16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2003.
- Dasgupta, S., Narula, P. L., Acharyya, S. K. and Banerjee, J., Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs, Geological Society of India, Kolkata, 2000.
- BIS, IS 1893 Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1 – general provisions and buildings. Fifth revision. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2002.
- Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M., Makdisi, F. and Banerjee, N., Representation of irregular stress time histories by equivalent uniform stress series in liquefaction analysis. EERC-75-29, University of California, Berkeley, USA, 1975.
- Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, 2015, 3rd edn.
- Chi-Chin, T., Wei-Chun, L. and Jiunn-Shyang, C., Identification of dynamic soil properties through shaking table tests on a large saturated sand specimen in a laminar shear box. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2016, 83, 59–68.
- Kuhlemeyer, R. L. and Lysmer, J., Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J. Soil Mech. Found., Div. ASCE, 1973.
- Lysmer, J. and Kuhlemeyer, R. L., Finite dynamic model for infinite media. J. Eng. Mech., 1969, 95(EM4), 859–877.
- Vaid, Y. P. and Saitharan, S., The strength and dilatancy of sand. Can. Geotech. J., 1992, 29(3), 522–526.
- Griffiths, S. C., Cox, B. R. and Rathje, E. M., Challenges associated with site response analyses for soft soils subjected to highintensity input ground motions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2016, 85, 1–10.
- Chattaraj, R. and Sengupta, A., Liquefaction potential and strain dependent dynamic properties of Kasai River sand. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2016, 90, 467–475.
- Menq, F. Y., Dynamic properties of sandy and gravelly soils. Ph D dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, USA, 2003.
- Hutabarat, D., Evaluation of one-dimensional seismic site response analyses at small to large strain level. Thesis (Master's), University of Washington, USA, 2016.
- Groholski, D. R., Hashash, Y. M. A., Kim, B., Musgrove, M., Harmon, J. and Stewart, J. P., Simplified model for small-strain nonlinearity and strength in 1D seismic site response analysis. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 2016, 142(9), 1–14.
- Choudhury, S. S., Deb, K. and Sengupta, A., Behavior of underground strutted retaining structure under seismic condition. Earthq. Struct., 2015, 8(5), 1147–1170.
- Karamitros, D. K., Bouckovalas, G. D. and Chaloulos, Y. K., Seismic settlements of shallow foundations on liquefiable soil with a clay crust. Soil Dyn. Earth. Eng., 2013, 46, 64–76.
- Kramer, S. L., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice hall, 1996.
- Richards, R., Elms, D. G. and Budhu, M., Seismic bearing capacity and settlements of foundations. J. Geotech. Eng., 1993, 119, 662–674.
- Yang, J., Li, J. B. and Lin, G., A simple approach to integration of acceleration data for dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 2006, 26, 725–734.
- BIS, IS 456 plain and reinforced concrete code of practice. Fourth revision. Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, 2000.
- Terzaghi, K., Theoretical Soil Mechanics, John Wiley, New York USA, 1943.