Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Babbar, Parveen
- Bibliometrics of Social Science and Humanities Research in India
Abstract Views :293 |
PDF Views:93
Authors
Affiliations
1 Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi 110 067, IN
2 Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi 110 068, IN
1 Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi 110 067, IN
2 Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi 110 068, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 11 (2018), Pagination: 2240-2247Abstract
The present study is an attempt to highlight the research output generated in India in the field of social sciences and humanities (SSH) during the period 2005–2014. This study is based on secondary data, extracted from the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI), which are integral components of the Web of Science. Descriptive and inferential statistical techniques were applied in the study. There were 9525 articles by Indian scholars in SSH during 2005–2014; they preferred to publish in Indian journals. The research contributions were in the form of research articles and book reviews with a consistent drop in the number of book reviews with time. Co-authorship was the norm in SSH disciplines with a steady increase in the number of multi-author papers in recent years. The study shows that multi-authored research papers received more citations than single-authored papers.Keywords
Authorship, Bibliometrics, Citations, Social Sciences and Humanities.Full Text
References
- https://uwaterloo.ca/institutional-analysis-planning/reports/bibliometrics
- https://www.cwts.nl/
- Gupta, B. M. and Dhawan, S. M., Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996–2006. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(2), 473–490.
- Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A. and Verma, C., Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999–2008. Scientometrics, 2010, 86(2), 261–283.
- Kademani, B. S., Kumar, V., Sagar, A. and Kumar, A., Scientometric dimensions of nuclear science and technology research in India: A study based on INIS (1970–2002) database. Malays. J. Libr. Inf. Sci., 2006, 11(1), 23–48.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 304–306.
- Gupta, B. M. and Bala, A., A scientometric analysis of Indian research output in medicine during 1999–2008. J. Nat. Sci., 2011, 2(1), 87.
- Karki, M. M., Garg, K. C. and Sharma, P., Activity and growth of organic chemistry research in India during 1971–1989. Scientometrics, 2000, 49(2), 279–288.
- Garg, K. C., Kumar, S. and Lal, K., Scientometric profile of Indian agricultural research as seen through Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(1), 151–166.
- Chatterjee, P., Institutional context of social science research in South Asia. Econ. Pol. Wkly., 2002, 37(35), 3604–3612.
- Pandian, M. S., Social sciences in South India: a survey. Econ. Pol. Wkly., 2002, 37(35), 3613–3627.
- Zaidi, S. A., Dismal state of social sciences in Pakistan. Econ. Pol. Wkly., 2002, 37(35), 3644–3661.
- Hachhethu, K., Social sciences research in Nepal. Econ. Pol. Wkly., 2002, 37(35), 3631–3643.
- Hammarfelt, B., Beyond coverage: toward a bibliometrics for the humanities. In Research Assessment in the Humanities, Springer Publishing, 2016, pp. 115–131.
- Gumpenberger, C., Sorz, J., Wieland, M. and Gorraiz, J., Humanities and social sciences in the bibliometric spotlight–Research output analysis at the University of Vienna and considerations for increasing visibility. Res. Eval., 2016, 25(3), 271–278.
- Nwagwu, W. and Egbon, O., Bibliometric analysis of Nigeria's social science and arts and humanities publications in Thomson Scientific databases. Electron. Libr., 2011, 29(4), 438–456.
- Prins, A. A., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N. and Wouters, P. F., Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: a comparison with Web of Science data. Res. Evaluat., 2016, 25(3), 264–270.
- Tang, M. C., Cheng, Y. J. and Chen, K. H., A longitudinal study of intellectual cohesion in digital humanities using bibliometric analyses. Scientometrics, 2017, 113(2), 985–1008.
- Web of Science; https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hs_document_type.html
- Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C. A., The relationship between the number of authors of a publication, its citations and the impact factor of the publishing journal: Evidence from Italy. J. Infor., 2015, 9(4), 746–761.
- Greene, M. The demise of the lone author. Nature, 2007, 450(7173), 1165.
- Moody, J., The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. Am. Socio. Rev., 2004, 69(2), 213–238.
- Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C. and Galán, J. L., Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. J. Management Stud., 2006, 43(5), 957–983.
- Hicks, D., The four literatures of social science. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 2004, pp. 473–496.
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. and Uzzi, B., The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 2007, 316(5827), 1036–1039.