Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Adhiguru, P.
- Quantitative Assessment of Crop Species Diversity in Shifting Cultivation System o Eastern Himalaya
Abstract Views :161 |
PDF Views:18
Authors
Affiliations
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University (I), Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Division of Agricultural Extension, KAB-I, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Kanpur 278 002, IN
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University (I), Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Division of Agricultural Extension, KAB-I, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi 110 012, IN
4 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Kanpur 278 002, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 8 (2019), Pagination: 1357-1363Abstract
The narrowing of diversity in crop species contributing to the world’s food supplies has been considered a potential threat to food security. The present study quantifies crop species diversity in controversial shifting cultivation system (SCS) using primary data from 52 villages spread across six North-Eastern (NE) hill states of India. The findings reveal that SCS is much diversified compared to settled cultivation system. Along with cereals, millets and pulses, the upland tribes grow a variety of horticultural crops on SC land. At the aggregate level, horticultural crops in the sampled states were observed to be much diversified and the mean diversification index value was found to be 0.79 (Simpson’s Diversity Index) for the six NE hill states on SC land. The present study documented 25 cultivars of vegetables, 22 cultivars of fruits, spices and plantation crops, and 12 field crops in SCS, besides many minor fruits and underutilized vegetables. However, the most densely populated crop species were rice, maize and finger millet in the case field crops. Vegetable crops included pumpkin, potato and ash gourd, and fruit crops included banana, pineapple and citrus, while spices like ginger, chilli and turmeric were densely cultivated on SC land. Thus, the prevailing crop species in SCS had their own attributes, performances and challenges. Experiences of the present study shall be the guiding benchmark for those who negate the possibilities of agrobiodiversity in SCS.Keywords
Agrobiodiversity, Crop Diversity, Upland Tribes, Shifting Cultivation.References
- FAO, Second global plan of action for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy, 2011.
- United Nations, World population prospects: the 2017 revision, 2018; https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/world-population-prospects-2017.html
- Litrico, I. and Violle, C., Diversity in plant breeding: a new conceptual framework. Trends Plant Sci., 2015, 20, 604–613.
- Engels, J., Diulgheroff, S. and Alvarez, J. S., Management of Crop Diversity: Key Practices for DRR Implementers, 2014.
- Pant, R. M., Tiwari, B. K. and Choudhury, D., Report of Working Group III Shifting Cultivation: towards a transformational approach, NITI Aayog, New Delhi, 2018.
- Kerkhoff, E. and Sharma, E., Debating shifting cultivation in the Eastern Himalayas: Farmers’ innovations as lessons for policy. International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2006.
- Vavilov, N. I., Phytogeographic basis of plant breeding. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron. Bot., 1951, 13, 1–366.
- Darlong, V. T., To jhum or not to jhum: policy perspectives on shifting cultivation. Missing Link (TML), Society for Environment and Communication, New Delhi, 2004.
- Basnet, D., Kandel, P., Chettri, N., Yang, Y., Lodhi, M. S., Htun, N. Z. and Sharma, E., Biodiversity research trends and gaps from the confluence of three global biodiversity hotspots in the fareastern Himalaya. Int. J. Ecol., 2019, 2019, 1–14; https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1323419.
- Nkoa, R., Owen, M. D. K. and Swanton, C. J., Weed abundance, distribution, diversity, and community analyses. Weed Sci., 2015, 63, 64–90; doi:10.1614/WS-D-13-00075.1
- Simpson, E. H., Measurement of diversity. Nature, 1949, 163, 688.
- Yeom, D. J. and Kim, J. H., Comparative evaluation of species diversity indices in the natural deciduous forest of Mt. Jeombong. For. Sci. Technol., 2011, 7, 68–74.
- Nakro, V., Traditional agricultural practices and sustainable livelihood, a thematic report. Department of Planning and Coordination, Government of Nagaland, 2011.
- Yumnam, J. Y., Bhuyan, S. I., Khan, M. L. and Tripathi, O. P., Agro-diversity of East Siang, Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalaya. Asian J. Agric. Sci., 2011, 3, 317–326.
- Teegalapalli, K. and Datta, A., Shifting to settled cultivation: changing practices among the Adis in Central Arunachal Pradesh, North-East India. Ambio, 2016, 45, 602–612; https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13280-016-0765-x.
- Alam, M. K. and Mohiuddin, M., Shifting cultivation (jhum) agrobiodiversity at stake: Bangladesh situation. Acta Hortic., 2009, 806, 709–716; https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.806.88.
- DRD, State-wise rice productivity analysis, State: Arunachal Pradesh. Directorate of Rice Development, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Patna, 2015; http://drdpat.bih.nic.in
- Fukuoka, S., Suu, T., Ebana, K., Trinh, L., Nagamine, T. and Okuno, K., Diversity in phenotypic profiles in landrace populations of Vietnamese rice: a case study of agronomic characters for conserving crop genetic diversity on farm. Genet. Res. Crop Evol., 2006, 53, 753–761.
- Rana, R. B., Garforth, C., Sthapit, B. and Jarvis, D., Influence of socio-economic and cultural factors in rice varietal diversity management on-farm in Nepal. Agric. Human Values, 2007, 24, 461–472.
- Lalengzama, C., Agrarian structure and transformation in Mizoram, North East India. J. Hum. Soc. Sci., 2019, 24, 6–23.
- Tirkey, A., Sarawgi, A. K. and Subbarao, L. V., Studies on genetic diversity in various qualitative and quantitative characters in rice germplasm. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour., 2013, 26(2), 132– 137.
- Dikshit, K. R. and Dikshit, J. K., North-East India: Land, People and Economy, Springer, Dordrecht, 2014.
- Delang, C. O., Weiyi, X., Brooke, B. and Chun, K. P., The effect of fallow period length on the abundance and diversity of usable plant assemblages in shifting cultivation system (swidden agriculture) in northern Laos. Pol. J. Ecol., 2016, 64, 350–356.
- Attachment to Shifting Cultivation among Konyak Naga Tribe in Eastern Himalaya:Choice or Compulsion?
Abstract Views :122 |
PDF Views:16
Authors
Affiliations
1 Central Agricultural University (I), Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar 751 002, IN
1 Central Agricultural University (I), Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar 751 002, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 116, No 8 (2019), Pagination: 1387-1391Abstract
Community attachment to places or practices and the cultural contexts of tribes are subjects of long traditions of research. A few studies, however, have extended these traditions into increasingly marginalized areas located beyond historically deprived upland communities. This study addresses issues related to the sentiments of attachment and constructions of place among the low-income Konyak Naga tribe in Nagaland, situated on the outer fringes of the Eastern Himalaya. Using four-dimensional model proposed by Raymond et al., with factor analysis, the study revealed that in addition to socio-economic factors that affect such connection to land and landscape, place dependence construct (lack of alternate livelihood) is observed to be the most important driver of attachment to the practice of shifting cultivation. This was followed by strong connections with the natural environment or nature bonding of Konyak Naga to the forest. Contribution of economic and traditional institution- bonding with the practice was found among the tribe as a means of livelihood. Sensing that such debate of the socio-spatial environment might be perceived as inconsistent, ill-informed and negative, we discuss implications in relation to cultural diversity and broader concerns about evolving rural poverty.Keywords
Factorial Analysis, Place Attachment Model, Shifting Cultivation, Tribal Communities.References
- Pradheep, K., Pandey, A. and Bhatt, K. C., Wild edible plants used by Konyak tribe in Mon district of Nagaland: survey and inventorisation. Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 2016, 7(1), 74–81.
- Kuotsuo, R. U., Chatterjee, D. I., Deka, B. C., Kumar, R.A. A. O. M. and Vikramjeet, K. O., Shifting cultivation: an ‘organic like’ farming in Nagaland. Indian J. Hill Farming, 2014, 27, 23–28.
- Karmaker, R., Nagaland loses soil heavily due to ‘jhum’, 2018; https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-otherstates/nagaland-loses-soil-heavily-due-to-jhum/article23552211.ece (accessed on 13 September 2018).
- Pant, R. M., Tiwari, B. K. and Choudhury, D., Report of Working Group III, shifting cultivation: towards a transformational approach. NITI Aayog, New Delhi, 2018.
- Fox, J., Castella, J. C. and Ziegler, A. D., Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia? Global Environ. Change, 2014, 29, 318–326.
- Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact Foundation and Indigenous Knowledge and Peoples Network, Who we are: Indigenous Peoples in Asia, Briefing Paper, Chiang Mai, AIPP Printing Press, 2010.
- Rao, M. G., Mukherjee, C., Bhasin, A., Barua, A., Anand, M., Pandey, R. and Srinivasan, R., Vision document for the State of Meghalaya 2030. Nat. Institute of Public Finance and Policy, 2011; http://www.megplanning.gov.in/report/vision2030/ (accessed on 16 September 2018).
- Erni, C., Shifting cultivation, livelihood and food security: new and old challenges for indigenous peoples in Asia. In Shifting Cultivation, Livelihood and Food Security, 2015, vol. 3.
- Mertz, O. and Bruun, T. B., Shifting cultivation policies in Southeast Asia – does criminalizing traditional farming practices make them go away? In Shifting Cultivation Policy: Trying to Get it Right (ed. Cairns, M.), Earthscan Routledge Press, Oxon, UK, 2016.
- Dressler, W. H., Wilson, D., Clendenning, J., Cramb, R., Keenan, R., Mahanty, S. and Lasco, R. D., The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: a review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio, 2017, 46(3), 291–310.
- Alawadi, K., Place attachment as a motivation for community preservation: the demise of an old, bustling, Dubai community. Urban Stud., 2017, 54(13), 2973–2997.
- Anton, C. E. and Lawrence, C., The relationship between place attachment, the theory of planned behaviour and residents’ response to place change. J. Environ. Psychol., 2016, 47, 145– 154.
- Brown, G. and Raymond, C., The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr., 2007, 27(2), 89–111.
- Raymond, C. M., Brown, G. and Weber, D., The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections. J. Environ. Psychol., 2010, 30(4), 422–434.
- Pearson, Karl, On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag., 1901, 2(11), 559–572.
- Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A. and Bixler, R. D., Place bonding for recreation places: Conceptual and empirical development. Leisure Stud., 2006, 25(1), 17–41.
- Pant, M., Nagaland State Human Development Report 2016, Department of Planning and Coordination, Government of Nagaland, 2016 (accessed on 29 October 2018).
- Tynsong, H., Tiwari, B. K. and Dkhar, M., Contribution of NTFPs to cash income of the War Khasi community of southern Meghalaya, North-East India. For. Stud. China, 2012, 14(1), 47–54.
- Padoch, C., Coffey, K., Mertz, O., Leisz, S. J., Fox, J. and Wadley, R. L., The demise of swidden in Southeast Asia? Local realities and regional ambiguities. Geogr. Tidsskr.-Dan. J. Geogr., 2007, 107(1), 29–41.
- Mishra, S., Mazumdar, S. and Suar, D., Place attachment and flood preparedness. J. Environ. Psychol., 2010, 30(2), 187–197.
- Fernandes, W., Look (act) East policy: with or through the Northeast. In Mainstreaming the Northeast in India’s Look and Act East Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 2018, pp. 233–251.
- Tripathi, P., Tribes and forest: a critical appraisal of the tribal forest right in India. Res. J. Soc. Sci. Manage., 2016, 6(6), 1–8.
- Singh, B. P., Biodiversity, tribal knowledge and life in India. Environ. Soc. Psychol., 2017, 2(1), 1–10.
- Chaudhry, P., Dollo, M., Bagra, K. and Yakang, B., Traditional biodiversity conservation and natural resource management system of some tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Interdiscip. Environ. Rev., 2011, 12(4), 338–348.
- Das, S., and Das, M., Shifting cultivation in Tripura – a critical analysis. J. Agric. Life Sci., 2014, 1(1), 48–54.
- Lombi, P., People’s perception about shifting cultivation – with special reference to the Galo tribe of West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh (India). Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 2016, 6(7), 454–459.
- Sangma, R. C., Festivals and ceremonies of Garo. Garo J., 2018; https://garojournal.com/festivals-ceremonies-garos/ (accessed on 23 October 2018).
- Teegalapalli, K. and Datta, A., Shifting to settled cultivation: changing practices among the Adis in central Arunachal Pradesh. North-East India. Ambio, 2016, 45(5), 602–612.
- Chapin III, F. S. (eds). Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate: An Ecophysiological Perspective, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 2012.
- Raymond, C. M. et al., Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships. BioScience, 2013, 63(7), 536–546.
- Is Rubber Monoculture Banishing Agrobiodiversity and Happiness? Evidences from Shifting Cultivation Landscape of Tripura, Northeast India
Abstract Views :125 |
PDF Views:13
Authors
Affiliations
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Division of Agricultural Extension, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, ICAR, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 278 002, IN
4 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Kanpur 278 002, IN
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Division of Agricultural Extension, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan-I, ICAR, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 278 002, IN
4 ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Kanpur 278 002, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 118, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 108-113Abstract
Natural environmental settings, in general, are considered by humans as the ideal ambience which makes them happy and reinvigorated especially within their mental realm. If this is the case, can we assume that all green spaces are synonymous to augmenting happiness? Biodiversity is expressed in terms of a system having number and abundance of different species. For resilience of various ecosystem services like food production, climate regulation, and pest management to take place, prevalence of such biodiversity is essential which can substantially contribute to sustained human well-being. In this study, we assessed the status of agrobiodiversity and subjective well-being of an indigenous community amidst the transition from shifting cultivation (SC) to monoculture of natural rubber (NR). Sampling the respondents from 18 villages of Dhalai, Tripura, a remotely located district in northeast India and bordered by Bangladesh, we used mixed methods research for in depth investigation. Findings revealed that in the SC landscape of study area, the cultivated crop species and livestock breeds were being largely replaced by encroachment from rubber plantation. We documented only 19 crop species on such a landscape which is otherwise known for its vast agrobiodiversity in the tropics. This kind of transition from SC to NR which is usually supported by the government development interventions, has severely affected the ecosystem services of such landscapes and banishing happiness from the indigenous communities, as perceived by them. Hence stabilization of rich agrobiodiversity and simultaneously ensuring the peoples’ well-being is the only potential alternative for development in the region.Keywords
Agrobiodiversity, Indigenous Community, Northeast India, Rubber Plantation, Shifting Cultivation Landscape.References
- Peng, L., Zhiming, F., Luguang, J., Chenihual, L. and Jingua, Z., A review of swidden agriculture in Southeast Asia. Remote Sens., 2014, 6, 1654–1683; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021654.
- Schuck, E. C., Nganje, W. and Yantio, D., The role of land tenure and extension education in the adoption of slashes and burn agriculture. Ecol. Econ., 2002, 43, 61–70; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00180-5.
- Heinimann, A. et al., A global view of shifting cultivation: recent, current, and future extent. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(9), e0184479; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184479.
- van Vliet, N. et al., Trends, drivers and impacts of changes in swidden cultivation in tropical forest-agriculture frontiers: a global assessment. Global Environ. Chang., 2012, 22, 418–429; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.009.
- Craswell, E. T., Sajjapongse, A., Howlett, D. J. B. and Dowling, A. J., Agroforestry in the management of sloping lands in Asia and the Pacific. Agroforest. Syst., 1997, 38, 121–137; https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005960612386.
- Bruun, T. B., Berry, N., de Neergaard, A., Xaphokahme, P., McNicol, I. and Ryan, C. M., Long rotation swidden systems maintain higher carbon stocks than rubber plantations. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2018, 256, 239–249; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.09.010.
- Dressler, W. H. et al., The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: a review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio, 2017, 46, 291–310; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0836-z.
- Parrotta, J. A., Wildburger, C. and Mansourian, S., Understanding relationships between biodiversity, carbon, forest and people: the key to achieving REDD+ objectives, a global assessment report by the Global Expert Panel on Biodiversity, Forest Management, and REDD+ IUFRO World Series, International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO), Vienna, Austria, 2012, vol. 31, p. 161.
- Dalle, S. P., Pulido, M. T. and de Blois, S., Balancing shifting cultivation and forest conservation: lessons from a ‘sustainable landscape’ in south eastern Mexico. Ecol. Appl., 2011, 21, 1557–1572; https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0700.1.
- Erskine, P. D., Lamb, D. and Bristow, M., Tree species diversity and ecosystem function: can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity? Forest Ecol. Manage., 2006, 233 (2–3), 205–210; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.013.
- Alem, S., Pavlis, J., Urban, J. and Kucera, J., Pure and mixed plantations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and Cupressus lusitanica: their growth interactions and effect on diversity and density of undergrowth woody plants in relation to light. Open J. For., 2015, 5(4), 375–386; https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2015.54032.
- Baltodano, J., Monoculture forestry: a critique from an ecological perspective. In Tree Trouble: A Compilation of Testimonies on the Negative Impact of Large-scale Monoculture Tree Plantations Prepared for the 6th Conference of the Parties of the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Friends of the Earth International, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000, pp. 2–10.
- Colchester, M., Plantations for People? Arborvitae (IUCN/WWF Forest Conservation Newsletter), 2006, vol. 31, p. 7.
- Chattopadhyay, S., Environmental consequences of rubber plantations in Kerala. National Research Programme on Plantation Development. Discussion Paper, 2015, No. 44.
- Nath, T. K., Inoue, M. and De Zoysa, M., Rubber planting for forest rehabilitation and enhancement of commercial livelihood: a comparative study in three South Asian countries. In 18th Commonwealth Forestry Conference, Edinburgh, 2010.
- Xu, J., Grumbine, R. E. and Beckschäfer, P., Landscape transformation through the use of ecological and socioeconomic indicators in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China, Mekong Region. Ecol. Indic., 2014, 36, 749–756.
- Zhao, N., Wang, Z. Y., Xu, M. Z., Han, L. J. and Zhou, X. D., Research on aquatic ecology in the Naban River and restoration suggestions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics (River Flow 2014) (eds Schleiss, A. J. et al.), Lausanne, CRC Press, Switzerland, 3–5 September 2014, pp. 2363–2369.
- FAO, Sustainable Agriculture for Biodiversity. Biodiversity for Sustainable Agriculture, 2018; http://www.fao.org/3/I6602E/i6602e.pdf.
- Millennium Assessment, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Synthesis Report). Island Press, Washington DC, 2005; www.millenniumassessment.org
- Scherr, S. J., Poverty-Environment Interactions in Agriculture: Key Factors and Policy Implications. Paper prepared for the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the European Commission (EC) expert workshop on Poverty and the Environment, Brussels, Belgium, 20–21 January 1999.
- GoI, National Rubber Policy 2019, Department of Commerce Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India; https://commerce.gov.in/writereaddata/uploadedfile/MOC_636871123490373426_National%20Rubber%20Policy%202019.pdf
- Sinha, A. K., Rubber plantations in Northeast India: hopes vs. concerns. The Tripura Foundation, 2012, p. 3.
- MoSPI, Statistical Year Book India: 2014. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Govt of India, 2014; http://www.mospi.gov.in/statistical-year-book-india/2014.
- GoT, Economic Review of Tripura: 2017–18, Directorate of Economics and Statistics Planning (Statistics) Department, Government of Tripura, Agartala, 2018.
- GoT, Dhalai District Profile: 2016, Office of the District Magistrate & Collector, Dhalai, District, Ambassa, Tripura, 2016.
- Chandramouli, C. and General, R., Census of India: 2011. Provisional Population Totals. New Delhi, Government of India, 2011.
- FSI, State of Forest Report. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, 2017.
- Lau, J. D., Hicks, C. C., Gurney, G. G. and Cinner, J. E., What matters to whom and why? Understanding the importance of coastal ecosystem services in developing coastal communities. Ecosyst. Serv., 2019, 35, 219–230.
- Yeom, D. J. and Kim, J. H., Comparative evaluation of species diversity indices in the natural deciduous forest of Mt. Jeombong. Forest Sci. Technol., 2011, 7(2), 68–74; doi:10.1080/21580103.2011.573940.
- Cantril, H., The Pattern of Human Concerns, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, USA, 1965.
- Pavot, W., The cornerstone of research on subjective well-being: Valid assessment methodology. Handbook of Well-Being (eds Diener, E., Oishi, S. and Tay, L.), UT, DEF Publishers, Salt Lake City, 2018.
- Cheung, F. and Lucas, R. E., Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples. Qual. Life Res., 2014, 23(10), 2809–2818.
- Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R. and Sachs, J., World happiness Report 2013. UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, USA, 2014.
- Gallup, G., World poll methodology. Technical Report. Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
- Teegalapalli, K. and Datta, A., Shifting to settled cultivation: changing practices among the Adis in Central 318 Arunachal Pradesh, North-East India. Ambio, 2016, 45, 602–612; https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0765-x.
- Alam, M. K. and Mohiuddin, M., Shifting cultivation (Jhum) agrobiodiversity at stake: Bangladesh Situation. Acta Hortic., 2009, 806, 709–716. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.806.88.
- Pandey, D. K., Adhiguru, P., Vimla Devi, S., Dobhal, S., Dubey, S. K. and Mehra, T. S., A quantitative assessment of crop species diversity in shifting 3 cultivation system of Eastern Himalayas. Curr. Sci., 2019, 117(8), 1357–1363.
- Springate-Baginski, O., Decriminalise agro-forestry! A primer on shifting cultivation in Myanmar. Transnational Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2018.
- Steel, P., Taras, V., Uggerslev, K. and Bosco, F., The happy culture: a theoretical, meta-analytic, and empirical review of the relationship between culture and wealth and subjective well-being. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 2018, 22(2), 128–169; https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317721372.
- Torri, M. C. and Herrmann, T. M., Spiritual beliefs and ecological traditions in indigenous communities in India: enhancing communitybased biodiversity conservation. Nat. Cult., 2011, 6(2), 168– 191.
- The Contribution of Sense of Place to Shifting Cultivation Sustenance: Evidence from West Garo Hills, North East India
Abstract Views :72 |
PDF Views:14
Authors
Affiliations
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University (Manipur), Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Facult_e des Sciences de l’Homme et de l’Environnement, Universit_e de La R_eunion, Saint-Denis, FR
3 Agricultural Extension Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University (Manipur), Pasighat 791 102, IN
2 Facult_e des Sciences de l’Homme et de l’Environnement, Universit_e de La R_eunion, Saint-Denis, FR
3 Agricultural Extension Division, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 215-220Abstract
Nowadays, sense of place is increasingly becoming prevalent in environmental research. It is an interesting concept to study both attachment and emotional relationships that individuals or groups hold for a specific place. In order to understand such bonds to forested landscape and shifting cultivation (SC) among tribal communities, we employed a four-dimensional place attachment model and empirically tested it using factor analysis. The results of this study revealed that besides socio-economic factors which affect the bonds to a place and the place-based practice, strong connections with the natural environment and lack of alternative occupations are significant factors which might explain tribal dependence to the land and SC. Indeed, sense of place would allow a better understanding of territorial issues and favour place management.Keywords
Forested Landscape, Indigenous People, Sense of Place, Shifting Cultivation.References
- AIPP and IWGIA, Who we are: indigenous peoples in Asia. Briefing Paper, Chiang Mai, AIPP Printing Press, 2010.
- Fox, J., Castella, J. C. and Ziegler, A. D., Swidden, rubber and carbon: Can REDD+ work for people and the environment in Montane Mainland Southeast Asia? Global Environ. Change, 2014, 29, 318–326.
- Cherrier, J., Maharjan, S. K. and Maharjan, K. L., Shifting cultivation: misconception of the Asian Governments. J. Int. Dev. Coop., 2018, 24(1), 71–82.
- Comte, I., Davidson, R., Lucotte, M., de Carvalho, C. J. R., de Assis Oliveira, F., da Silva, B. P. and Rousseau, G. X., Physicochemical properties of soils in the Brazilian Amazon following fire-free land preparation and slash-and-burn practices. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2012, 156, 108–115.
- Erni, C., Shifting cultivation, livelihood and food security: New and old challenges for indigenous peoples in Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization, International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact, Bangkok, 2015.
- Mertz, O. and Bruun, T.B., Shifting cultivation policies in Southeast Asia – does criminalizing traditional farming practices make them go away. In Shifting Cultivation Policy: Trying to Get it Right (ed. Cairns, M.), Earthscan Routledge Press, Oxon, 2016.
- Kerkhoff, E. and Sharma, E., Debating shifting cultivation in the Eastern Himalayas: Farmers’ innovations as lessons for policy, International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Nepal, 2006.
- Dressler, W. H. et al., The impact of swidden decline on livelihoods and ecosystem services in Southeast Asia: a review of the evidence from 1990 to 2015. Ambio, 2017, 46(3), 291–310.
- Bhullar, L., The Indian Forest Rights Act 2006: a critical appraisal. Law Environ. Dev. J., 2008, 4, 20.
- Rao, M. G., Mukherjee, C., Bhasin, A., Barua, A., Anand, M., Pandey, R. and Srinivasan, R., Vision document for the State of Meghalaya 2030. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi, Noida, 2011.
- Menon, V., Kaul, R., Tiwari, S. K., Kyarong, S. and Dutta, R., Canopies and corridors–conserving the forest of Garo Hills with elephant and gibbon as flagships. Conservation Series, Wildlife Trust of India, Noida, 2010.
- Jorgensen, B. S. and Stedman, R. C., Sense of place as an attitude: lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. J. Environ. Psychol., 2001, 21(3), 233–248.
- Lin, C. C. and Lockwood, M., Assessing sense of place in natural settings: a mixed-method approach. J. Environ. Plann. Manage., 2014, 57(10), 1441–1464.
- Alawadi, K., Place attachment as a motivation for community preservation: the demise of an old, bustling, Dubai community. Urban Stud., 2017, 54(13), 2973–2997.
- Eisenhauer, B. W., Krannich, R. S. and Blahna, D. J., Attachments to special places on public lands: an analysis of activities, reason for attachments, and community connections. Soc. Nat. Resour., 2000, 13(5), 421–441.
- Altman, I. and Low, S., Place Attachment, Plenum Press, New York, USA, 1992.
- Backlund, E. A. and Williams, D. R., A quantitative synthesis of place attachment research: investigating past experience and place attachment. In (Murdy, J.), Proceedings of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 2003 April 6-8; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-317. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, 2004, pp. 320–325.
- Stokols, D. and Shumaker, S., People in place: a transactional view of settings. In Cognition, Social Behavior and the Environment (ed. Harvey, J.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ, 1981.
- Brown, G. and Raymond, C., The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment. Appl. Geogr., 2007, 27(2), 89–111.
- Junot, A., Paquet, Y. and Fenouillet, F., Place attachment influence on human well‐being and general pro‐environmental behaviors. J. Theor. Soc. Psychol., 2018, 2(2), 49–57.
- Proshansky, H. M., The city and self-identity. Environ. Behav., 1978, 10(2), 147–169.
- Masterson, V. A., Stedman, R. C., Enqvist, J., Tengö, M., Giusti, M., Wahl, D. and Svedin, U., The contribution of sense of place to social–ecological systems research: a review and research agenda. Ecol. Soc., 2017, 22(1), 49.
- Chan, K. M. et al., Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2016, 113(6), 1462– 1465.
- Raymond, C. M. et al., Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human–environment relationships. BioScience, 2013, 63(7), 536–546.
- von Heland, J. and Folke, C., A social contract with the ancestors – culture and ecosystem services in southern Madagascar. Global Environ. Change, 2014, 24, 251–264.
- Tapsuwan, S., Leviston, Z. and Tucker, D., Community values and attitudes towards land use on the Gnangara Groundwater System: a sense of place study in Perth, Western Australia. Landsc. Urban Plann., 2011, 100(1–2), 24–34.
- Cheng, A. S. and Mattor, K. M., Place-based planning as a platform for social learning: insights from a national forest landscape assessment process in Western Colorado. Soc. Nat. Resour., 2010, 23(5), 385–400.
- Kruger, L. E., Understanding community-forest relations. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, USA, 2003.
- FSI, India State of Forest Report, 2017. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, 2017.
- Chandramouli, C. and General, R., Census of India. Rural–urban distribution of population, provisional population total. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, New Delhi, 2011.
- Raymond, C. M., Brown, G. and Weber, D., The measurement of place attachment: personal, community, and environmental connections. J. Environ. Psychol., 2010, 30(4), 422–434.
- Kals, E., Schumacher, D. and Montada, L., Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environ. Behav., 1999, 31(2), 178–202.
- Schultz, P. W., The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J. Environ. Psychol., 2001, 21(4), 327–339.
- Kyle, G., Graefe, A. and Manning, R., Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environ. Behav., 2005, 37(2), 153–177.
- Hammitt, W. E., Backlund, E. A. and Bixler, R. D., Place bonding for recreation places: conceptual and empirical development. Leisure Stud., 2006, 25(1), 17–41.
- Dey, P. and Chattopadhyay, S., Impact of socio-economic status on place and dwelling attachment. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl., 2017, 41(2), 89–100.
- Ofoegbu, C., Chirwa, P. W., Francis, J. and Babalola, F. D., Socio-economic factors influencing household dependence on forests and its implication for forest-based climate change interventions. South. Forest., 2017, 79(2), 109–116.
- Tynsong, H., Tiwari, B. K. and Dkhar, M., Contribution of NTFPs to cash income of the War Khasi community of southern Meghalaya, North-East India. For. Stud. China, 2012, 14(1), 47–54.
- Padoch, C., Coffey, K., Mertz, O., Leisz, S. J., Fox, J. and Wadley, R. L., The demise of swidden in Southeast Asia? Local realities and regional ambiguities. Geogr. Tidsskr-Den., 2007, 107(1), 29–41.
- Mishra, S., Mazumdar, S. and Suar, D., Place attachment and flood preparedness. J. Environ. Psychol., 2010, 30(2), 187–197.
- Fernandes, W., Look (act) East policy: with or through the Northeast. In Mainstreaming the Northeast in India’s Look and Act East Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 2018, pp. 233–251.
- Aayog NITI, Shifting Cultivation: Towards a Transformational Approach, 2018; https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/doc3.pdf
- Tripathi, P., Tribes and forest: a critical appraisal of the tribal forest right in India. Res. J. Soc. Sci. Manage., 2016, 6(06), 1–8.
- Singh, B. P., Biodiversity, tribal knowledge and life in India. Environ. Soc. Psychol., 2017, 2(1), 1–10.
- Chaudhry, P., Dollo, M., Bagra, K. and Yakang, B., Traditional biodiversity conservation and natural resource management system of some tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Interdisc. Environ. Rev., 2011, 12(4), 338–348.
- Sangma, R. C., Festivals and ceremonies of Garo. Garo J., 2018; https://garojournal.com/festivals-ceremonies-garos/
- Chapin III, F. S., Mark, A. F., Mitchell, R. A. and Dickinson, K. J., Design principles for social–ecological transformation toward sustainability: lessons from New Zealand sense of place. Ecosphere, 2012, 3(5), 1–22.
- Potschin, M. and Haines-Young, R., Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol., 2013, 28(6), 1053–1065.