Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Gupta, Nishikant
- Freshwater Fish Safe Zones: A Prospective Conservation Strategy for River Ecosystems in India
Abstract Views :404 |
PDF Views:139
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Geography, King’s College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, GB
2 Conservation Research Group, St Albert’s College, Kochi 682 011, IN
3 Department of Endangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
1 Department of Geography, King’s College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, GB
2 Conservation Research Group, St Albert’s College, Kochi 682 011, IN
3 Department of Endangered Species Management, Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box 18, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 107, No 6 (2014), Pagination: 949-950Abstract
No Abstract.Full Text
- Need for Targeted Education Programme for Preparedness and formulating Adaptive Strategies in the Indian Himalayan Region
Abstract Views :370 |
PDF Views:136
Authors
Nishikant Gupta
1,
Asha Rajvanshi
1,
S. Sathyakumar
1,
J. A. Johnson
1,
K. Sivakumar
1,
G. S. Rawat
1,
Vinod B. Mathur
1
Affiliations
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
1 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 7 (2015), Pagination: 1233-1234Abstract
The Indian Himalaya continues to face increasing anthropogenic stressors despite numerous conservation actions. Further, climate change has the potential to negatively affect this biodiversity rich region. To counteract the changing climatic variables, targeted education programmes could act as a strategy and assist in protecting the floral/faunal species requiring urgent intervention, and benefit communities and ecosystems at large.Full Text
- 'Fish Festivals' in the Garhwal Himalaya:Conservation Options Amidst Age-Old Practices
Abstract Views :769 |
PDF Views:178
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sinola House, Village and P.O. Sinola, Dehradun 248 003, IN
2 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
1 Sinola House, Village and P.O. Sinola, Dehradun 248 003, IN
2 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun 248 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 7 (2016), Pagination: 1155-1156Abstract
Rivers provide ecological and socio-economic benefits despite being highly threatened ecosystems. They continue to face anthropogenic and natural stresses. The Aglar in the Indian Himalaya is an important tributary of the Yamuna River, and hosts the annual 'fish festival' of the region. Field studies have revealed that this festival could harm endemic/threatened fish species of the Aglar. Lethal methods such as the use of bleaching powder and electricity should be banned; instead angling and cast netting in a regulated way could be promoted.Full Text
- Climate Change and Human-Wildlife Conflicts in the Indian Himalayan Biodiversity Hotspot
Abstract Views :369 |
PDF Views:160
Authors
Affiliations
1 International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Post Box # 3226, Kathmandu, NP
2 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, 248 001, IN
1 International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Post Box # 3226, Kathmandu, NP
2 Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun, 248 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 05 (2017), Pagination: 846-847Abstract
Human-wildlife conflict is a conservation challenge facing scientists and policy-makers worldwide with an increasing demand for holistic resolution strategies. Conflict with wild animals has the potential to negatively affect the livelihood and well-being of communities and revengeful killing of the animals to safeguard personal interests. This is a worrying development, especially for threatened wild species if deemed as 'conflict species, as it can greatly hinder their protection and conservation especially in developing countries.Full Text
References
- Messmer, T., Hum.–Wildl. Interact., 2009, 3, 10–17.
- Redpath, S. M. et al., Trends Ecol. Evol., 2013, 28, 100–109.
- Dickman, A. J., Anim. Conserv., 2010, 13, 458–466.
- Thirgood, S. and Redpath, S., J. Appl. Ecol., 2008, 45, 1550–1554.
- Kretser, H. E., Curtis, P. D., Francis, J. D., Pendall, R. J. and Knuth, B. A., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2009, 14, 102–118.
- Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., NaughtonTreves, L. and Morales, A., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2006, 11, 383–396.
- Fall, M. W. and Jackson, W. B., Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2002, 49, 87–91.
- Wang, S. W. and Macdonald, D. W., Biol. Conserv., 2006, 129, 558–565.
- Inskip, C. and Zimmermann, A., Oryx, 2009, 43, 18.
- Gupta, N. et al., Curr. Sci., 2015, 109, 1233–1234.
- Ogra, M. V., Geoforum, 2008, 39, 1408– 1422.
- Graham, K., Beckerman, A. P. and Thirgood, S., Biol. Conserv., 2005, 122, 159–171.
- Gusset, M., Swarner, M. J., Mponwane, L., Keletile, K. and McNutt, J. W., Oryx, 2009, 43, 67.
- Chapron, G. et al., Science, 2014, 34, 1517–1519.
- Choudhury, A., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2004, 9, 261–270.
- Dar, N. I., Minhas, R. A., Zaman, Q. and Linkie, M., Biol. Conserv., 2009, 142, 2076–2082.
- Badola, R. and Hussain, S. A., Mt. Res. Dev., 2003, 23, 234–237.
- Rajvanshi, A. R. et al., Wildlife Institute of India, Technical Report, plus Appendices, 2012, p. 203.
- Barua, M., Sci. Commun., 2010, 32, 55– 75.
- Sundriyal, R. C. and Dhayani, P. P., Curr. Sci., 2014, 107, 346–347.
- Bagchi, S. and Mishra, C., J. Zool., 2006, 268, 217–224.
- Gubbi, S., Biol. Conserv., 2012, 148, 88– 95.
- DeFries, R., Karanth, K. K. and Pareeth, S., Biol. Conserv., 2010, 143, 2870– 2880.
- Delahay, R. J. et al., Mamm. Rev., 2009, 39, 53–66.
- Madden, F., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2004, 9, 247–257.
- Don Carlos, A. W., Bright, A. D., Teel, T. L. and Vaske, J. J., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2009, 14, 174–184.
- Dublin, H. T. aand Hoare, R. E., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2004, 9, 271–278.
- Baruch-Mordo, S., Breck, S. W., Wilson, K. R. and Broderick, J. A., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2009, 14, 219–223.
- Shreshtha, A. B. et al., ICIMOD, GRIDArendal and CICERO, 2015, pp. 1–96.
- Liu, F. et al., Biol. Conserv., 2011, 144, 538–547.
- Cotton, W., Hum.–Wildl. Conflicts, 2008, 2, 151–152.
- Athreya, V. et al., Conserv. Biol., 2011, 25, 133–141.
- Gillingham, S. and Lee, P. C., Environ. Conserv., 1999, 26, 218–228.
- Espinosa, S. and Jacobson, S. K., J. Environ. Educ., 2012, 43, 55–65.
- Graham, M. D., Douglas-Hamilton, I., Adams, W. M. and Lee, P. C., Anim. Conserv., 2009, 12, 445–455.
- Zhang, L. and Wang, N., Biol. Conserv., 2003, 112, 453–459.
- Gupta, N., Sivakumar, K., Mathur, V. B. and Chadwick, M. A., Area, 2014, 46, 389–397.
- Hemson, G., Maclennan, S., Mills, G., Johnson, P. and Macdonald, D., Biol. Conserv., 2009, 142, 2718–2725.
- Hill, C. M., Hum. Dimens. Wildl., 2004, 9, 279–286.
- Worthy, F. and Foggin, J. M., Hum.Wildl. Interact., 2008, 2, 200–205.
- Lawler, J. J., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 2009, 1162, 79–98.
- Merkle, J. A., Robinson, H. S., Krausman, P. R. and Alaback, P., J. Mammal., 2013, 94, 378–385.
- Anticipating the impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns on the Indian fisheries sector for technological and policy reforms
Abstract Views :291 |
PDF Views:129
Authors
Mukesh P. Bhendarkar
1,
B. B. Gaikawad
2,
K. K. Ramteke
3,
H. D. Joshi
4,
N. A. Ingole
5,
M. P. Brahmane
2,
Nishikant Gupta
6
Affiliations
1 ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413 115, IN
2 ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413 115, IN
3 ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400 006, IN
4 Fisheries Survey of India, Mumbai 400 005, IN
5 Tata Trusts, Pune 411 040, IN
6 Tahaan, Pune 411 038, IN
1 ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413 115, IN
2 ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Baramati 413 115, IN
3 ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai 400 006, IN
4 Fisheries Survey of India, Mumbai 400 005, IN
5 Tata Trusts, Pune 411 040, IN
6 Tahaan, Pune 411 038, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 6 (2021), Pagination: 752-757Abstract
The lockdowns imposed to contain the COVID-19 spread had an indisputably cascading effect on the aquaculture industry across the globe. It has adversely impacted the Indian fisheries sector through changing purchaser demand, supply chain disruptions, trade restrictions, and also the livelihood of millions dependent on it. However, the consequential reduced fishing will also likely help in replenishment of the aquatic biodiversity and provide the balance needed in the long-term sustenance of the fisheries sector. The technological and policy interventions in pre- and post-harvest fisheries operations are anticipated to reduce some of these negative impacts in similar lockdown scenarios.Keywords
Aquaculture, COVID-19 lockdown, fisheries sector, policy reforms, technological interventions.Full Text
References
- KPMG, Potential impact of COVID-19 on the Indian economy; https://www.nicct.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Potential-impactof-COVID-19-on-the-Indian-economy-1.pdf (accessed during April 2020).
- Bondad-Reantaso, et al., Viewpoint: SARS-CoV-2 (the cause of COVID-19 in humans) is not known to infect aquatic food animals nor contaminate their products. Asian Fish. Sci., 2020, 33, 74–78; https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.2020.33.1.009
- FAO, How is COVID-19 affecting the fisheries and aquaculture food systems, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 2020.
- DAHDF, Annual Report 2018–19, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India (GoI), 2019.
- International Labour Organization, ILO Sectoral Brief: COVID-19 and the impact on agriculture and food security, 2020; http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---sector/documents/ briefingnote/wcms_742023.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2020).
- Bhendarkar, M. P., Brahmane M. P., Gaikwad, B. B. and Singh, N. P., The status and prospectus of fisheries and aquaculture in Maharashtra, India. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci., 2020, 49(4), 567–575.
- Bhendarkar, M. P., Gajbhiye, A. M., Chaudhari, K. J., Verma, L. and Rathod, R. H., An assessment of entrepreneurship behaviour of fisherwomen in the Ratnagiri block of Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra state, India. Asian J. Agric. Exten., Econ. Sociol., 2017, 17(3), 1–8.
- Bhendarkar, M. P., Sarang, N., Bhosale, M., Rathod, R. H., Verma, L. and Vardia, H. K., A study on profile of socio-economic condition of fishermen in selected village in Kabirdham District, Chhattisgarh State, India. Int. J. Educ. Sci. Res., 2017, 7(6), 49– 56.
- Raja, K., Aanand, P., Padmavathy, S., Stephen, J. and Kumar, S., Present and future market trends of Indian ornamental fish sector. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 2019, 7(2), 6–15.
- Vinayak, A., Aquarium trade will be worth Rs 1200 crore in a decade: expert. The Hindu, 2018; https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/agri-business/aquarium-trade-will-be-worth-1200cr-in-a-decade-expert/article9699877.ece (accessed on 11 January 2018).
- Sharma, M., Ornamental fish rearing and breeding – a new dimension to aquaculture entrepreneurship in Himachal Pradesh. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud., 2020, 8(2), 157–162.
- Gareth, J., Michael, P., Thilsted, S. H. and Belton, B., Addressing COVID-19 impacts on fish and aquatic food systems; http://blog.worldfishcenter.org/2020/04/addressing-covid-19-impactson-fish-and-aquatic-food-systems/ (accessed on 10 April 2020).
- MPEDA, Annual Report 2017–18, Marine Products Export Development Authority, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, 2018.
- USDA, India’s shrimp sector growing steadily. US Department of Agriculture, Office of Agricultural Affairs, New Delhi, 2017.
- Planque, B., Fromentin, J., Cury, P., Drinkwater, K. F, Jennings, S., Perry, R. I. and Kifani, S., How does fishing alter marine populations and ecosystems sensitivity to climate? J. Mar. Syst., 2010, 79, 403–417.
- Garcia, S. M., Zerbi, A., Aliaume, C., Do Chi, T. and Lasserre, G., The ecosystem approach to fisheries, issues, terminology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 443, 2003.