Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rajan, K. S.
- Automatic Estimation of Tree Stem Attributes Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Central Indian Dry Deciduous Forests
Abstract Views :699 |
PDF Views:81
Authors
Affiliations
1 Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Centre, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
2 Lab of Spatial Informatics, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500 032, IN
1 Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Centre, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
2 Lab of Spatial Informatics, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad 500 032, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 01 (2018), Pagination: 201-206Abstract
Forest inventories are critical for effective management of forest resources. Recently, the use of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) to automatically extract forest inventory parameters at tree level (e.g. tree location, diameter at breast height (DBH) and height) has gained significant importance. TLS using both single-scan and multi-scan techniques, not only helps in detailed and accurate measurements of tree objects but also helps increase the measurement frequency. In the current study, we develop an automated solution to extract forest inventory parameters at individual tree level from TLS data by using random sample consensus (RANSAC)-based circle fitting algorithm. The method was evaluated on both single- and multiscan data by characterizing four circular plots of radius 20 m in dry deciduous forests of Betul, Madhya Pradesh (India). Over all the plots, tree detection rates of 75% and 97% were obtained using single- and multi-scan TLS data respectively. Tree detection rates were significantly affected by increase in distance from the scanner, in single-scan approach when compared to multi-scan approach. Field based DBH measurements correlated well using both single (R2 = 0.96) and multiple scans (R2 = 0.99). The DBH estimates from multi-scan TLS data resulted in low ischolar_main-meansquare error (RMSE) of 2.2 cm compared to that of 4.1 cm using single-scan. Further, tree heights were extracted from TLS data and validated with selectively measured trees on field (R2 = 0.98; N = 65). The RMSE of tree height was estimated to be 1.65 m. The current results show the potential use of TLS in automatically deriving forest inventory parameters with reliable accuracy at individual tree level.Keywords
DBH, Forest Inventory Parameters, Multiscan, Single-Scan, Terrestrial Laser Scanner.References
- Wang, B., Huang, J., Yang, X., Zhang, B. and Liu, M., Estimation of biomass, net primary production and net ecosystem production of China’s forests based on the 1999–2003 National Forest Inventory. Scand. J. For. Res., 2010, 25, 544–553.
- Maas, H.-G., Bienert, A., Scheller, S. and Keane, E., Automatic forest inventory parameter determination from terrestrial laser scanner data. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2008, 29, 1579–1593.
- Bienert, A., Scheller, S., Keane, E., Mohan, F. and Nugent, C., Tree detection and diameter estimations by analysis of forest terrestrial laserscanner point clouds. In ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning, 2007, pp. 50–55.
- Xu, W. et al., Comparison of conventional measurement and LiDAR-based measurement for crown structures. Comput. Electron. Agric., 2013, 98, 242–251.
- Olofsson, K., Holmgren, J. and Olsson, H., Tree stem and height measurements using terrestrial laser scanning and the RANSAC algorithm. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6, 4323–4344.
- Antonarakis, A. S., Richards, K. S., Brasington, J. and Muller, E., Determining leaf area index and leafy tree roughness using terrestrial laser scanning. Water Resour. Res., 2010, 46.
- Hackenberg, J., Spiecker, H., Calders, K., Disney, M. and Raumonen, P., SimpleTree – an efficient open source tool to build tree models from TLS clouds. Forests, 2015, 6, 4245–4294.
- Zheng, G., Moskal, L. M. and Kim, S.-H., Retrieval of effective leaf area index in heterogeneous forests with terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2013, 51, 777–786.
- Thies, M. and Spiecker, H., Evaluation and future prospects of terrestrial laser scanning for standardized forest inventories. Forest, 2004, 2, 1.
- Huang, H. et al., Automated methods for measuring DBH and tree heights with a commercial scanning lidar. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing, 2011, 77, 219–227.
- Simonse, M., Aschoff, T., Spiecker, H. and Thies, M., Automatic determination of forest inventory parameters using terrestrial laser scanning. In Proceedings of the Scand Laser Scientific Workshop on Airborne Laser Scanning of Forests, 2003, pp. 252–258.
- Astrup, R., Ducey, M. J., Granhus, A., Ritter, T. and von Lüpke, N., Approaches for estimating stand-level volume using terrestrial laser scanning in a single-scan mode. Can. J. For. Res., 2014, 44, 666–676.
- Kankare, V. et al., Diameter distribution estimation with laser scanning based multisource single tree inventory. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, 2015, 108, 161–171.
- Fischler, M. A. and Bolles, R. C., Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 1981, 24, 381–395.
- Chum, O., Two-view geometry estimation by random sample and consensus, Czech Technical University in Prague, 2005.
- Strahler, A. H. et al., Retrieval of forest structural parameters using a ground-based lidar instrument (Echidna{®}). Can. J. Remote Sensing, 2008, 34, S426–S440.
- Liang, X. et al., Automatic stem mapping using single-scan terrestrial laser scanning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2012, 50, 661–670.
- Liang, X. et al., Terrestrial laser scanning in forest inventories. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sensing, 2016, 115, 63–77.
- Research Output of Indian Institutions during 2011–2016:Quality and Quantity Perspective
Abstract Views :259 |
PDF Views:77
Authors
Affiliations
1 Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, IN
2 SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, IN
1 Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, IN
2 SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 04 (2018), Pagination: 740-746Abstract
The publication output from Indian institutions has been steadily increasing during the last few years. This may be attributed to the higher investment in research and also linking the number of publications with career advancement. There is a need to analyse the publication output of Indian institutions in terms of quality of publications. In this study, output in the top 10 percentile, as computed by SciVal (a product of Elsevier), has been used as an indicator of the quality of research output, since it reflects the percentage of an institution’s publication in the top 10 percentile of the most cited articles. Out of the 15 subject areas listed in SciVal, 7 contribute to more than 65% of publications from Indian institutions. Accordingly, Indian institutions with output in the top 10 percentile greater than the national average in these 7 major subject areas have been identified to compare their research output in terms of quality.Keywords
Public and Private Institutions, Performance Assessment, Quality and Quantity Perspective, Research Output.References
- Singh, A., Are our all research journals scholarly and peer reviewed? Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(2), 161.
- http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/fake-journals-make-in-india-gone-wrong/article7800231.ece (last viewed on 22August 2017).
- Prathap, G., Excellence mapping of research performance in India during the 2009–2013 window. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112(3), 437–438.
- Garg, K. C., Dutt, B. and Kumar, S., Scientometric profile of Indian science as seen through Science Citation Index. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud., 2006, 53, 114–125.
- Kumar, S., Garg, K. C. and Dutt, B., Indian scientific output as seen through Indian Science Abstracts. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud., 2009, 56, 163–168.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B. M., Ranking of Indian engineering and technological institutes for their research performance during 1999–2008. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 304–306.
- Basu, A., Banshal, S., Singhal, K. and Singh, V., Designing a Composite Index for research performance evaluation at the national or regional level: ranking Central Universities in India. Scientometrics, 2016, 107(3), 1171–1193.
- https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/53327/scival-metrics-guidebook-v1_01-february2014.pdf (last viewed on 22 August 2017).
- Garg, K. C. and Kumar, S., Scientometric profile of Indian scientific output in life sciences with a focus on the contributions of women scientists. Scientometrics, 2014, 98(3), 1771–1783.
- Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Natarajan, M. and Ramesh Babu, B., Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: a scientometric analysis, 1990–2009. Scientometrics, 2011, 89(2), 501–522.
- Kaur, H. and Mahajan, P., Ranking of medical institutes of India for quality and quantity: a case study. Scientometrics, 2015, 105(2), 1129–1139.
- Singh, V., Uddin, A. and Pinto, D., Computer science research: the top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics, 2015, 104(2), 529–553.
- Prathap, G., A three-dimensional bibliometric evaluation of recent research in India. Scientometrics, 2017, 110(3), 1085–1097.