Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Vartak, Ajit
- Mycology and Mycotechnology on Postal Stamps
Abstract Views :258 |
PDF Views:64
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Nano Bioscience, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune 411 004, IN
2 Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology- Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, IN
3 PCCF Office, HP Forest Department, Talland, Shimla 171 002, IN
4 Department of Geology and Petroleum Technology, Wadia College, Pune 411 001, IN
5 Biochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411 008, IN
1 Department of Nano Bioscience, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune 411 004, IN
2 Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology- Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, IN
3 PCCF Office, HP Forest Department, Talland, Shimla 171 002, IN
4 Department of Geology and Petroleum Technology, Wadia College, Pune 411 001, IN
5 Biochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411 008, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 4 (2021), Pagination: 628-636Abstract
Mycology, the study of fungal biology, and philately, the study of postage stamps, are rarely connected, as they are very different activities. However, philatelic mycology can raise awareness of the facets of fungi which contribute significantly to human welfare. Fungi are photogenic and exhibit physiological wonders such as luminescence. They are important in biotechnology for their secondary metabolites. So, stamps depicting fungi signal the recognition of problems and prospects of prosperity posed by fungi in nutrition and health, agriculture, engineering, industry and ecology. Many countries have issued thousands of stamps on fungi. India with a rich heritage of fungal diversity lags in this respect. This article hopes to inspire action by celebrating the beauty and significance of fungi in the art of philately.Keywords
Mycotechnology, Mycology, Mycophilately, Photogenic Appeal, Postal Stamps.References
- Proctor, N., Philately and geography teaching. Geogr. L., 1965, 50, 134–141.
- Senanayake, M. P., Paediatric philately. Arch. Dis. Childhood, 1997, 76, 287–288.
- Bandyopadhyay, M., Food and nutritional education through the world of philately. J. Agric. Eng. Food Technol., 2017, 4, 71–74.
- Zagkotas, V. and Niaoustas, G., Philately as a teaching aid through the implementation of a small-scale project in a Greek primary school. Education, 2020, 48, 3–13.
- Luther, B. S., The earliest postage stamps with fungi. Spore Prints, 2012, 483, 4–6.
- Marasas, W. F. O., Marasas, H. M., Wingfield, M. J. and Crous, P. W., Philatelic Mycology: Families of Fungi, CBS Biodiversity Series No. 14, CBSKNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2014, ISBN 978-90-70351-99-1.
- Blackwell, M., The fungi: 1, 2, 3 … 5.1 million species? Am. J. Bot., 2011, 98, 426–438.
- O’Connell, C., Fungi stamp their mark on post. The Irish Times, 7 August 2008.
- Ing, B., Fungi on stamps. Bull. Br. Mycol. Soc., 1976, 10, 32–37.
- Moore, D., Fungi on stamps: introduction and references. a guide to the world of fungi on stamps and other postal ephemera, 2016; http://www.davidmoore.org.uk/Fungi-on-Stamps00.htm (accessed on 10 September 2019).
- Spores, moulds and fungi, A mycology of New Zealand in 10 fungi; https://sporesmouldsandfungi.wordpress.com/2016/08/07/a-mycologyofnew-zealand-in-10-fungi/ (accessed on 10 September 2019).
- Experience nature-mushrooms-miniature sheet, 2018; https://www.wopaplus.com/en/stamps/product/&pid=49258 (accessed on 10 September 2019).
- Widder, E., U. S. postal service to dedicate bioluminescent life stamps, 2018; https://about.usps.com/news/national-releases/2018/pr18_013.htm (accessed on 10 September 2019).
- Luthar, B. S., Bioluminescent fungi on stamps. Spore Prints, 2014, 507, 4–5.
- Luthar, B. S., Mushroom stamps from Peru. Spore Prints, 2015, 508, 7–8.
- Haneef, M., Ceseracciu, L., Canale, C., Bayer I. S., HerediaGuerrero, J. A. and Athanassiou, A., Advanced materials from fungal mycelium: fabrication and tuning of physical properties. Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 41292.
- Luther, B. S., Largest edible mushroom shown on postage. Spore Prints, 2014, 502, 5–6.
- Luther, B. S., Truffles on postage stamps. Spore Prints, 2014, 498, 4–6.
- Edible mushrooms of Kyrgyzstan, Kyrgyz Express Post Newsl., 2017, 22, 1–3.
- Poisonous mushrooms of Kyrgyzstan, Kyrgyz Express Post Newsl., 2019, 51, 1–3.
- Luther, B. S., Malaysian mushroom stamps. Spore Prints, 2013, 491, 4–6.
- Luther, B. S., Uruguay mushroom stamps show a dermatophyte. Spore Prints, 2013, 497, 4.
- Houbraken, J., Frisvad, J. C. and Samson, R. A., Fleming’s penicillin producing strain is not Penicillium chrysogenum but P. rubens. IMA Fungus, 2011, 2, 87–95.
- Luther, B. S., Canadian postage & postal items with fungi. Spore Prints, 2014, 505, 1–3.
- Moss, M. O. and Dunkley, I. P., Recent issues of postage stamps depicting fungi. Mycologist, 1988, 2, 116–121.
- Luther, B. S., Mycophilately in Mexico. Spore Prints, 2013, 489, 4–5.
- Luther, B. S., Resupinate fungus shown on a postage stamp. Spore Prints, 2014, 502, 6.
- https://www.ebay.ie/itm/Tuvalu-520-523-MNH-Fungi-1989/401741176863 (accessed on 20 September 2019).
- Moore, D. World of fungi stamp collection – David Moore’s world of fungi, 2012; www.davidmoore.org.uk › stampWEB › StampWeb_full_list-2012 (accessed on 20 September 2019).
- Deshpande, M. V., Ghormade, V. and Pathan, E. K., New special cover from Pune. Rainbow Newsletter, 11 November 2018.
- Madhu, K. P., Coming of age: chitin chitosan research. Curr. Sci., 2018, 115, 1849–1851.
- Subramanian, C. V., The progress and status of mycology in India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.), 1986, 96, 379–392.
- Luther, B. S., The first African mushroom stamps. Spore Prints, 2012, 485, 6–7.
- Luthar, B. S., Icelandic mushroom stamps. Spore Prints, 2014, 506, 4–5.
- Moss, M. O., A selection of microfungi depicted on postage stamps. Mycologist, 1992, 6, 68–71.
- Parasitic Flowering Plants on Postal Stamps: Vehicles for Learning
Abstract Views :207 |
PDF Views:93
Authors
Affiliations
1 Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, US
2 Maharashtra Vruksh Samvardhini, Pune 411 001, IN
1 Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, US
2 Maharashtra Vruksh Samvardhini, Pune 411 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 12 (2021), Pagination: 1538-1548Abstract
It is proposed that philately and the study of parasitic plants can be conflated for educational purposes. Of the 12 lineages of parasitic flowering plants, eight are currently represented on postal stamps. The most frequent genus seen on stamps is Rafflesia, closely followed by Viscum. These stamps convey messages about the history and importance of parasitic plants such as witchweed (Striga), sandalwood and mistletoes. Some of the parasitic plants are beautiful wildflowers such as Castilleja, Euphrasia and Pedicularis, whereas many mistletoes in Loranthaceae have flowers that rival orchids. Countries with rich parasite floras that currently do not have stamps featuring these plants should consider them as worthy subjects.Keywords
Botanical Diversity, Educational Purpose, Parasitic Angiosperm, Philately, Plant Blindness.References
- Raven, P. H., Plants make our existence possible. Plants, People, Planet, 2021, 3, 2–6.
- Balding, M. and Williams, K. J. H., Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conserv. Biol., 2016, 30, 1192–1199.
- Nickrent, D. L., The Parasitic Plant Connection; http://www.parasiticplants.siu.edu/
- Gogate, M. G., Sawarkar, V. B. and Vartak, A., Novel approaches to promote poorly known mammals of Maharashtra state. Indian For., 2020, 146, 1009–1015.
- Das, I. and Vartak, A., Pangolins on Coins and Stamps of the World, Sahyadri Nisarga Mitra, Chiplun, District Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, 2021; ISBN 978-8-1936-2875-1.
- Ghormade, V., Pathan, E., Jyoti, J., Vartak and Deshpande, M., Mycology and mycotechnology on postal stamps. Curr. Sci., 2021, 120, 628–636.
- Nickrent, D. L., Parasitic angiosperms: how often and how many? Taxon, 2020, 69, 5–27.
- Nickrent, D. L. and Musselman, L. J., Introduction to parasitic flowering plants. American Phytopathological Society APSnet Education Center, the Plant Health Instructor; https://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/disandpath/parasiticplants/intro/Pages/ParasiticPlants.aspx
- Mrema, E., Shimelis, H., Laing, M. and Mwadzingeni, L., Integrated management of Striga hermonthica and S. asiatica in sorghum: a review. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 2020, 14, 36–45.
- Das, T. K., Ghosh, S., Gupta, K., Sen, S., Behera, B. and Raj, R., The weed Orobanche: species distribution, diversity, biology and management. J. Res. Weed Sci., 2020, 3, 162–180.
- Hawksworth, F. G. and Wiens, D., Dwarf Mistletoes: Biology, Pathology and Systematics, USDA Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook 709, Washington DC, USA, 1996.
- Těšitel, J., AiRong Li, Knotková, K, McLellan, R., Bandaranayake, P. C. G. and Watson, D. M., The bright side of parasitic plants: what are they good for? Plant Physiol., 2020, 185, 1309– 1324.
- Watson, D. M. and Herring, M., Mistletoe as a keystone resource: an experimental test. Proc. R. Soc. London, 2012, 279, 3853–3860.
- Hartley, S. E., Green, J. P., Massey, F. P., Press, M. C. P., Stewart, A. J. A. and John, E. A., Hemiparasitic plant impacts animal and plant communities across four trophic levels. Ecology, 2015, 96, 2408–2416.
- Press, M. C. and Phoenix, G. K., Impacts of parasitic plants on natural communities. New Phytol., 2005, 166, 737–751.
- Marvier, M. A. and Smith, D. L., Conservation implications of host use for rare parasitic plants. Conserv. Biol., 1997, 11, 839–848.
- Windsor, D. A., Equal rights for parasites. Conserv. Biol., 1995, 9, 1–2.
- Feild, T. S. and Brodribb, T. J., A unique mode of parasitism in the conifer coral tree Parasitaxus ustus (Podocarpaceae). Plant, Cell Environ., 2005, 28, 1316–1325.
- Musselman, L. J., The biology of Striga, Orobanche, and other ischolar_main-parasitic weeds. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 1980, 18, 463–489.
- Mohamed, K. I., Musselman, L. J. and Riches, C. R., The genus Striga (Scrophulariaceae) in Africa. Ann. Mi. Bot. Gard., 2001, 88, 60–103.
- Kumar, A. N. A. G. J. and Ram, H. Y. M., Sandalwood: history, uses, present status and the future. Curr. Sci., 2012, 103, 1408– 1416.
- Maroyi, A., Ximenia caffra Sond. (Ximeniaceae) in Sub-Haharan Africa: a synthesis and review of its medicinal potential. J. Ethnopharmacol., 2016, 184, 81–100.
- Polhill, R. and Wiens, D., Mistletoes of Africa, The Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond-Surrey, UK, 1998.
- Barcelona, J. F., Pelser, P. B., Balete, D. S. and Co, L. L., Taxonomy, ecology, and conservation status of philippine Rafflesia (Rafflesiaceae). Blumea, 2009, 54, 77–93.
- Musselman, L. J. and Visser, J. H., The strangest plant in the world! Veld Flora, 1986, 72, 109–111.
- Lebling, R. W., The treasure of tarthuth. Saudi Aramco World, 2003, 54, 12–17.
- Nickrent, D. L., Der, J. P. and Anderson, F. E., Discovery of the photosynthetic relatives of the ‘Maltese mushroom’ Cynomorium. BMC Evol. Biol., 2005, 5, 38.
- Simpson, B. B., Krameriaceae. Flora Neotrop., 1989, 49, 1–109.
- Dawson, J. H., Musselman, L. J., Wolswinkel, P. and Dörr, I., Biology and control of Cuscuta. Rev. Weed Sci., 1994, 6, 265–317.
- Nickrent, D. L., Blarer, A., Qiu, Y.-L., Vidal-Russell, R. and Anderson, F. E., Phylogenetic inference in Rafflesiales: the influence of rate heterogeneity and horizontal gene transfer. BMC Evol. Biol., 2004, 4, 40.