Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance and progress of OIC countries towards building technology development capacity


Affiliations
1 Pakistan Council for Science and Technology, Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, Islamabad, Pakistan
 

This study evaluates the technology development capacity of 21 Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries based on technology achievement index. The state of four fundamental contributors of technology development capacity, i.e. technology creation, diffusion of old technologies, diffusion of recent technologies and development of human skills, essential for indigenous technology development or/and technology transfer and adaptation is studied for each of the 21 OIC countries. Each fundamental factor is represented by two indicators. Achievement gap, comparing with the highest achiever, has been calculated for all the countries. Based on the achievement gap analysis, progress of each country during the five-year period (2009-2014) in building technology development capacity has been assessed. Strong and weak areas have been mentioned for some selected countries. Technology development capacity and achievement gap analysis of individual countries present useful information for the policy makers and planners of the relevant countries to formulate appropriate policies and programmes for enhancing national capacity for technology development.

Keywords

Achievement gap analysis, OIC countries, technology achievement index, technology development capacity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Naim, S. T. K. and Atta-ur-Rahman, Status of scientific research in OIC member states, COMSTEC Secretariat, Islamabad, Pakistan,2005.
  • Nasir, A., Ali, T. M., Shahdin, S. and Tariq-ur-Rahman, Technology achievement index 2009: ranking and comparative study of nations. Scientometrics, 2011, 87(1), 41–62.
  • Mahmud, I., Science, technology and Muslim world – from a golden age to stagnation, Khan Bahadur Ahsanullah Memorial,Lecture, 2009.
  • Khan, H. A., Education, science and technology in developing countries: some thoughts and recollections, commission on sciencescience and technology for sustainable development in the south (COMSATS) headquarters, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2004.
  • ISESCO, Strategy for science and innovation in Islamic countries, Islamic educational, scientific and cultural organization, ISESCO-1430/H, 2009.
  • Juma, J. et al., Global governance of technology: meeting the needs of developing countries. Int. J. Technol. Manage., 2001,22(7–8), 629–655.
  • http://www.oic-oci.org
  • http://blog.mile.org/factors-impacting-the-transition-of-oic-countries
  • http://www.oicstatcom.org
  • http://www.iea.org
  • http://www.unwater.org
  • Desai, M., Fukuda-Parr, S., Johansson, C. and Sagasti, F., Measuring the technology achievement of nations and capacity to participate in the network age. J. Hum. Dev., 2002, 3(1), 95–122.
  • Ali, T. M., Kiani, A. K., Bashir, T. and Asrar, M., Technology achievement index of Muslim nations – ranking and comparative study. Sci. Tech. Dev., 2014, 33(2), 49–62.
  • Ali T. M., Bashir T. and Kiani, A. K., Assessment of technological capabilities of OIC countries. Sci. Technol. Soc., 2015, 20, 114–131.
  • Lall, S., The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985–98, Oxford Development Studies, 2000.
  • Lipton, Blackman and Sinha, Background paper for Human Development Report, 2001.
  • Lee, Jong-Wha, Education for technology readiness: prospects for developing countries. J. Hum. Dev., 2001, 2(1), 115–151.
  • Archibugi, D. and Coco, A., A new indicator of technology capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCO), Working Paper, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, UK, 2002. Retrieved from http://www.econ.uniurb.it/zanfei/miur/to/papers/arco.pdf
  • Hobday, M., Innovation in East Asia, Edward Elgar, 1995.
  • Mani, S., Policy instruments for stimulating R&D in the enterprise sector: the contrasting experience of two MNC dominated economies from Southeast Asia, UNU Institute for New Technologies,2000.
  • Paweł, B., Newly Industrialized Countries: Globalization and the Transformation of Foreign Economic Policy, Ashgate Publishing,2006.
  • Stark, J., Malaysia and the Developing World: The Asian Tiger on the Cinnamon Road, Routledge, 2012.
  • http://blogs.worldbank.org/endpovertyinsouthasia/should-south-asiaemulate-east-asian-tigers
  • World Bank, Malaysia: Firm Competitiveness, Investment Climate, and Growth, World Bank, East Asia and Pacific Region, 2005, Report 26841-MA, DC.
  • Lai, M. C. and Yap, S. F., Technology development in Malaysia and the newly industrializing economies: a comparative analysis.Asia-Pac. Dev. J., 2004, 11(2), 54–80.
  • Riboud, M., Savchenko, Y. and Tan, H., The Knowledge Economy and Education and Training in South Asia, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank,2007.

Abstract Views: 248

PDF Views: 87




  • Performance and progress of OIC countries towards building technology development capacity

Abstract Views: 248  |  PDF Views: 87

Authors

Tariq Bashir
Pakistan Council for Science and Technology, Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, Islamabad, Pakistan
Tariq Mahmood Ali
Pakistan Council for Science and Technology, Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, Islamabad, Pakistan
Mudassir Asrar
Pakistan Council for Science and Technology, Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, Islamabad, Pakistan
Shakeel Babar
Pakistan Council for Science and Technology, Shahrah-e-Jamhuriat, Islamabad, Pakistan

Abstract


This study evaluates the technology development capacity of 21 Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) countries based on technology achievement index. The state of four fundamental contributors of technology development capacity, i.e. technology creation, diffusion of old technologies, diffusion of recent technologies and development of human skills, essential for indigenous technology development or/and technology transfer and adaptation is studied for each of the 21 OIC countries. Each fundamental factor is represented by two indicators. Achievement gap, comparing with the highest achiever, has been calculated for all the countries. Based on the achievement gap analysis, progress of each country during the five-year period (2009-2014) in building technology development capacity has been assessed. Strong and weak areas have been mentioned for some selected countries. Technology development capacity and achievement gap analysis of individual countries present useful information for the policy makers and planners of the relevant countries to formulate appropriate policies and programmes for enhancing national capacity for technology development.

Keywords


Achievement gap analysis, OIC countries, technology achievement index, technology development capacity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv109%2Fi5%2F878-888