Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Food, nutrition and energy security of small and marginal farmers through integrated agriculture


Affiliations
1 Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500 059, India., India
2 College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Kyrdemkulai, Umiam 793 103, India., India
 

Food security and environmental sustainability are threatened by the degradation of natural resources in India’s rice-based agricultural systems. On-farm and on-station experiments on the integrated farming system (IFS) were carried out at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to develop a productive, profitable and long-term resource-conserving alternative agricultural system that secures the food, nutrition and energy requirements of small farmers. IFS helped in making the farming system sustainable through different cropping, biodiversity and ecosystem services. It provided food and nutrition security to the farmer family through the production of diversified food commodities such as cereal, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits, eggs, milk, fish, meat, etc. Dairy–biogas integration offered a promising win–win opportunity to improve crop production while, at the same time, meeting the fuel needs of the farmer families. Field application of slurry reduced fertilizer burden on the farmers, besides improving the sustainability of their fields. Ecosystem services such as pollination of crops, run-off water harvesting, prevention of soil erosion, carbon sequestration by plants and soil, cultural services, etc. are vital for the sustainable supply of food and fibre. The experiment was conducted for three consecutive years (2015–18), and was observed that the IFS model generated net returns of INR 378,784 and employment of 628 mandays which are more than the conventional rice–wheat system. In the Indo-Gangetic Plains, IFS leads to sustainable intensification besides food security and poverty alleviation.

Keywords

Biodiversity, Food Security, Integrated Agriculture, Nutrition and Energy Security, Resource Recycling, Sustainable Intensification.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Anon., Agriculture census. Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers’ Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, 2016, p. 10.

  • Muzari, W., Gatsi, W. and Muvhunzi, S., The impacts of technology adoption on smallholder agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. J. Sustain. Dev., 2012, 5(8), 69.

  • Singh, V. K., Dwivedi, B. S., Shukla, A. K., Chauhan, Y. S. and Yadav, R. L., Diversification of rice with pigeonpea in a rice–wheat cropping system on a Typic Ustochrept: effect on soil fertility, yield and nutrient use efficiency. Field Crops Res., 2005, 92, 85–105.

  • Das, T. K., Bhattacharyya, R., Sudhishri, S., Sharma, A. R., Saharawat, Y. S., Bandyopadhyay, K. K. and Jat, M. L., Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton–wheat system of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains: crop and water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Res., 2014, 158, 24–33.

  • Mahapatra, I. C. and Behera, U. K., Rice-based farming systems for livelihood improvement of Indian farmers. Indian J. Agron., 2011, 56(1), 1–19.

  • Kaur, K. and Kaur, R., Levels, pattern and distribution of income among marginal and small farmers in rural areas of Haryana. Indian J. Econ. Dev., 2017, 13(2a), 88–92.

  • Schindler, J., Graef, F. and Konig, H. J., Methods to assess farming sustainability in developing countries. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2015, 35, 1043–1057.

  • Rawal, V., Bansal, V. and Bansal, P., Prevalence of undernourishment in Indian states. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2019, 54(15), 35.

  • Behera, U. K. and Mahapatra, I. C., Income and employment generation for small and marginal farmers through integrated farming systems. Indian J. Agron., 1999, 44(3), 431–439.

  • Bhargavi, B. and Behera, U. K., Securing the livelihood of small and marginal farmers by diversifying farming systems. Curr. Sci., 2020, 119, 854–860.

  • Das, A., Munda, G. C., Thakur, N. A., Yadav, R. K., Ghosh, P. K., Ngachan, S. V. and Dutta, K. K., Rainwater harvesting and integrated development of agri–horti–livestock-cum-pisciculture in high altitudes for livelihood of Tribal farmers. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2014, 84(5), 643–649.

  • NIN, Dietary Guidelines for Indians 2011 – A Manual, ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, 2011, p. 91; https:// www.nin.res.in/downloads/DietaryGuidelinesforNINwebsite.pdf

  • Bhargavi, B., Behera, U. K., Rana, K. S. and Raj Singh, Productivity, resource-use efficiency and profitability of high-value crops embedded diversified cropping systems. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2018, 89(5), 821–827.

  • Edwards, P., Aquaculture, poverty impacts and livelihoods. In ODI Natural Resource Perspectives, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 2000, p. 56; https://hdl.handle.net/10535/3704

  • Jones, A. D., Shrinivas, A. and Bezner-Kerr, R., Farm production diversity is associated with greater household dietary diversity in Malawi: findings from nationally representative data. Food Policy, 2014, 46, 1–12.

  • Paramesh, V. et al., Integrated farming system approaches to achieve food and nutritional security for enhancing profitability, employment, and climate resilience in India. Food Energy Security, 2022, e321.

  • Kamusoko, R., Jingura, R. M., Parawira, W. and Sanyika, W. T., Comparison of pretreatment methods that enhance biomethane production from crop residues – a systematic review. Biofuel Res. J., 2019, 24, 1080–1089.

  • Putti, V. R., Tsan, M., Mehta, S. and Kammila, S., The state of the global clean and improved cooking sector. ESMAP Technical Paper No. 007/15, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 2015.

  • Farabi-Asl, H., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Chapman, A., Bina, S. M. and Itaoka, K., Energy challenges for clean cooking in Asia, the background, and possible policy solutions. Asian Development Bank Institute Working Paper Series, No. 1007, ADBI, 2019.

  • Parthasarathy, R. P. and Hall, A. J., Importance of crop residues in crop–livestock systems in India and farmers perceptions of fodder quality in coarse cereals. Field Crops Res., 2003, 84, 189–198.

  • Kumar, A. and Samadder, S. R., A review on technological options of waste to energy for effective management of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage., 2017, 69, 407–422.

  • Behera, U. K., Bhargavi, B., Meena, S. L., Raj Singh and Singh, V. K., Integrated farming system model for livelihood security and doubling the income of small and marginal farmers under changing climate scenario. Indian Farm., 2018, 68, 32–36.

  • Behera, U. K., Panigrahi, P. and Sarangi, A., Multiple water use protocols in integrated farming system for enhancing productivity. Water Resour. Manage., 2012, 26(9), 2605–2623.


Abstract Views: 136

PDF Views: 60




  • Food, nutrition and energy security of small and marginal farmers through integrated agriculture

Abstract Views: 136  |  PDF Views: 60

Authors

Bhargavi Bussa
Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500 059, India., India
Umakanta Behera
College of Agriculture, Central Agricultural University, Kyrdemkulai, Umiam 793 103, India., India

Abstract


Food security and environmental sustainability are threatened by the degradation of natural resources in India’s rice-based agricultural systems. On-farm and on-station experiments on the integrated farming system (IFS) were carried out at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, to develop a productive, profitable and long-term resource-conserving alternative agricultural system that secures the food, nutrition and energy requirements of small farmers. IFS helped in making the farming system sustainable through different cropping, biodiversity and ecosystem services. It provided food and nutrition security to the farmer family through the production of diversified food commodities such as cereal, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, fruits, eggs, milk, fish, meat, etc. Dairy–biogas integration offered a promising win–win opportunity to improve crop production while, at the same time, meeting the fuel needs of the farmer families. Field application of slurry reduced fertilizer burden on the farmers, besides improving the sustainability of their fields. Ecosystem services such as pollination of crops, run-off water harvesting, prevention of soil erosion, carbon sequestration by plants and soil, cultural services, etc. are vital for the sustainable supply of food and fibre. The experiment was conducted for three consecutive years (2015–18), and was observed that the IFS model generated net returns of INR 378,784 and employment of 628 mandays which are more than the conventional rice–wheat system. In the Indo-Gangetic Plains, IFS leads to sustainable intensification besides food security and poverty alleviation.

Keywords


Biodiversity, Food Security, Integrated Agriculture, Nutrition and Energy Security, Resource Recycling, Sustainable Intensification.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv124%2Fi7%2F858-862