Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Public transport (MRTS) and the need of choice mechanism: a case of the Indian public transport


Affiliations
1 Department of Architect and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
 

The Indian cities are growing and urbanizing rapidly, resulting in vast urban sprawls. Hence, the mobility of people is increasing, pushing the Government to develop a sustainable transport system in these cities. To achieve this goal, the Government is encouraging and developing mass rapid transit systems (MRTS) in cities. However, the goals and objectives set by the policies and Government guidelines are not met through the ongoing development process. The experiences of MRTS have raised some questions for transport experts and decision-makers in the country. These are regarding the justification for selection of technology of MRTS, the process of selection, coverage throughout the city, and affordability and acceptance by different city resident groups. According to the experts, there is a need for proper analysis and justification for the selection of any technology. This study with the objective to understand the gaps in the process of selection of technology for MRTS and associated controversies, reviews the policies, guidelines and proposals for suitable MRTS in India. The study concludes that the transport planners and decision-makers have failed to formulate a knowledge centre, as suggested in NUTP 2006 and 2014. This has been the main hurdle transfer the knowledge and experience from city to city. Additionally, the Indian policies and guidelines have failed to provide any explicit criteria to select technology of MRTS in the decision-making process. The study therefore recommends to formulate an expert mechanism/system to transfer expertise and experience from one city to another.

Keywords

Choice mechanism, expert mechanisms, knowledge centre, public transport.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Pucher, J., Korattyswaroopam, N. and Ittyerah, N., The crisis of public transport in India: overwhelming needs but limited resources. J. Public Transp., 2004, 7(3), 1–20.
  • GoI, National Urban Transport Policy, 2006, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, 2006; http://urbanindia.nic.in/policies/TransportPolicy.pdf
  • Singh, S. K., Urban transport in India: issues, challenges, and the way forward. European Transp., 2012, 52, 1–26.
  • Lambat, N., Kapse, V. and Sabnani, C., Evaluation of the decision-making process for urban public transport in India: a Delphi approach. Curr. Sci., 2019, 116(10), 1706–1714; doi:10.18520/cs/ v116/i10/1706-1714.
  • Mahadevia, D., Joshi, R. B. and Datey, A., Ahmedabad’s BRT system: a sustainable urban transport panacea? Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2013, xlviii(48), 56–64; http://www.researchgate.net/publication/259289231
  • Mohan, D., Mythologies, metro rail systems and future urban transport. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2008, 41–53; http://tripp.iitd.ernet.in/delhibrts/metro/Metro/MetroMythology08.pdf
  • Goel, R. and Tiwari, G., Promoting low carbon transport in India: case study of metro rails in Indian cities, UNDP Project, 2014; doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
  • Advani, M. and Tiwari, G., Evaluation of public transport systems: case study of Delhi Metro. In START-2005 Conference, IIT Kharagpur, 2005, pp. 1–8; http://tripp.iitd.ernet.in/publications/ paper/planning/mukti_metro_kharagpur_05.pdf
  • Randhawa, P., Delhi Metro Rail beyond mass transit. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2012, XLVII, 25–29.
  • Sanghvi, D. and Varia, H. R., Light rail transit – today’s need for developing cities in India. Int. J. Sci. Res., 2015, 4(3), 596–601.
  • Sreenivas, A., Urban transport planning: lessons from the proposed Pune Metro Rail. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2011, xlvi(6), 27–32; http://www.epw.in/commentary/urban-transport-planning-lessons-proposed-pune-metro-rail.html
  • Ministry of Urban Development, GoI, Asian Development Bank. Guidelines and toolkits for urban transport development in medium sized cities in India module 1: comprehensive mobility plans (CMPs): preparation toolkit, 2008.
  • Planning Commission, Recommendations of Working Group on Urban Transport for 12th Five-Year Plan, GoI, 2012; http://planningcommission.nic.in/aboutus/committee/wrkgrp12/hud/wg_urbanTransport.pdf
  • GoI, National Transport Development Policy Committee (NTDPC) – Working Group on Urban Transport, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, 2012.
  • GoI, National Urban Transport Policy, 2014, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, 2014; www.iutindia.org
  • GoI, Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (URDPFI) Guidelines, Volume 1, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India, 2015.
  • GoI, Metro Rail Policy – 2017, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, 2017.
  • GoI, Appraisal Guidelines for Metro Rail Project Proposals, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, 2017.
  • DMRC, Detailed Project Report (DPR), Kochi Metro Project, Alwaye–Petta Corridor, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd; https://kochimetro.org/kmrl_content/uploads/dpr.pdf
  • DMRC, Jaipur metro (Phase-II) Sitapura to Ambabari DPR, 2014; http://www.jaipurmetrorail.in/pdf/Combiined_DPRPhase 2_Upload Website.pdf
  • DMRC, Nagpur Metro Rail Project DPR, 2013; https://www.metrorailnagpur.com/pdf/DPR.pdf
  • DMRC, Ahmedabad metro rail project phase I, DPR, 2015; http://www.gujaratmetrorail.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Revised-Ahmedabad-Metro-DPR-Compiled-20th-May-2015.pdf
  • Comprehensive Mobility Plan and Bus Rapid Transit System Plan, CEPT University and Lea Associates South Asia Pvt Ltd, vol. II, DPR, 2008.
  • CEPT University. Bus rapid transit system Hubli–Dharwad detailed feasibility report, Directorate of Urban and Transport, 2013.
  • Mackett, R. and Edwards, M., An expert system to advise on urban public transport technologies. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 1996, 20(4–5), 261–273; doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(96)00020-8.
  • Vuchic, V., Urban transit: operations, planning and economics. 2005.
  • Tiwari, G., Urban transport priorities. Cities, 2002, 19(2), 95–103.
  • GoI, Road Transport Year Book (2012–13), Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Transport Research Wing, Government of India, 2015.

Abstract Views: 210

PDF Views: 84




  • Public transport (MRTS) and the need of choice mechanism: a case of the Indian public transport

Abstract Views: 210  |  PDF Views: 84

Authors

Nitin Lambat
Department of Architect and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
Vijay Kapse
Department of Architect and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
Chandra Sabnani
Department of Architect and Planning, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India

Abstract


The Indian cities are growing and urbanizing rapidly, resulting in vast urban sprawls. Hence, the mobility of people is increasing, pushing the Government to develop a sustainable transport system in these cities. To achieve this goal, the Government is encouraging and developing mass rapid transit systems (MRTS) in cities. However, the goals and objectives set by the policies and Government guidelines are not met through the ongoing development process. The experiences of MRTS have raised some questions for transport experts and decision-makers in the country. These are regarding the justification for selection of technology of MRTS, the process of selection, coverage throughout the city, and affordability and acceptance by different city resident groups. According to the experts, there is a need for proper analysis and justification for the selection of any technology. This study with the objective to understand the gaps in the process of selection of technology for MRTS and associated controversies, reviews the policies, guidelines and proposals for suitable MRTS in India. The study concludes that the transport planners and decision-makers have failed to formulate a knowledge centre, as suggested in NUTP 2006 and 2014. This has been the main hurdle transfer the knowledge and experience from city to city. Additionally, the Indian policies and guidelines have failed to provide any explicit criteria to select technology of MRTS in the decision-making process. The study therefore recommends to formulate an expert mechanism/system to transfer expertise and experience from one city to another.

Keywords


Choice mechanism, expert mechanisms, knowledge centre, public transport.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv122%2Fi8%2F888-899