Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

High Uranium Concentration in Groundwater Used for Drinking in Parts of Eastern Karnataka, India


Affiliations
1 Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
2 Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity, Mangalore University, Mangala Gangothri, Mangalore 574 199, India
 

The limits recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) and the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) of India for uranium concentration in drinking water are 30 μg/l and 60 μg/l respectively. The present study on uranium concentration in groundwater used for drinking purposes in 73 villages of Karnataka, India, shows that in 57 villages uranium concentration is more than 30 μg/l, including 48 villages where it exceeds 60 μg/l. Thus in 78% and 66% of the villages studied, uranium concentration exceeds permissible limits given by WHO and AERB respectively. It is alarming to note that in one village each in Tumkur and Chitradurga districts, five in Kolar and seven in Chikkaballapura districts, uranium concentration is in thousands of micrograms per litre. None of the borewells from which water has been sampled is anywhere in the vicinity of nuclear facilities or urban waste disposal channels. Thus, the observed uranium contamination is considered to be geogenic. Previous geological studies have shown that the eastern portion of Karnataka is a part of the Neoarchean Eastern Dharwar Craton dominated by large ion lithophile element-rich K-feldspar granites and gneisses with higher abundance of radioactive elements (uranium and thorium) compared to the Mesoarchean tonalite–trondhjemite–gneisses and granitoids widely distributed in the Western Dharwar Craton.

Keywords

Dharwar Craton, Geogenic Contamination, Groundwater, Uranium.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ma, M., Wang, R., Xu, L., Ming, X. and Liu, S., Emerging health risks and underlying toxicological mechanisms of uranium contamination: lessons from the past two decades. Environment International, 2020, 1(45), 106107, pp. 1–15.

  • Bean, J. A, Isacson, P., Hahne Rolf, M. A. and James, K., Drinking water and cancer incidence in Iowa. II. Radioactivity in drinking water. Am. J. Epidemiol., 1982, 116(6), 924–932.

  • Wagner, S. E. et al., Groundwater uranium and cancer incidence in South Carolina. Cancer Causes Control, 2011, 22(41), 41–50.

  • Radespiel-Tröger, M. and Meyer, M., Association between drinking water uranium content and cancer risk in Bavaria, Germany. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 2013, 86, 767–776.

  • WHO, Uranium in drinking water. Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012, pp. 1–21.

  • AERB, Limits on uranium in drinking water, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board of India, Mumbai, AERB/VC/16/2004/80/373, dated 29 June 2004.

  • Coyte, R. M., Jain, R. C., Srivastava, S. K., Sharma, K. C., Khalil, A., Ma, L. and Vengosh, A., Large-scale uranium contamination of groundwater resources in India. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 2018, 5, 341–347.

  • CGWB, Uranium occurrence in shallow aquifers in India. Central Ground Water Board, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Department of Water Resources, Ministry of Jal Sakthi, Government of India, 2020, p. 58.

  • Sahoo, S. K., Jha, S. K., Jha, V. N., Patra, A. C. and Kulkarni, M. S., Survey of uranium in drinking water sources in India: interim observations. Curr. Sci., 2021, 120(9), 1482–1490.

  • GoI, Department of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India’s Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) database on drinking water; https://ejalshakthi.gov.in/IMI Sreports/reports/waterquality (accessed on 2018).

  • KSNDMC, Climate change scenario in Karnataka: a detailed parametric assessment, Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre, Bengaluru, 2020, p. 65.

  • CGWB, Groundwater Year Book of Karnataka, Central Ground Water Board, Bengaluru, 2018–19, p. 134.

  • Geological map of the Dharwar (adapted and modified from Project Vasundhara map of the AMSE Wing of the Geological Survey of India, Bengaluru, 1994).

  • Pichamuthu, C. S., Regional metamorphism and charnockitization in Mysore state. Indian Mineral., 1965, 6, 119–126.

  • Senthil Kumar, P. and Reddy, G. K., Radioelements and heat production of an exposed Archaean crustal cross-section, Dharwar, south India. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2004, 224, 309–324.

  • Chaki, A., Pandit, S. A. and Achar, K. K., An appraisal of uranium exploration in the Kaladgi–Badami and Bhima basins in Karnataka and identification of potential targets by geophysical methods. Exp. Res. At. Miner., 2004, 5, 13–24.

  • Pandit, S. A., Natarajan, V. and Dhana Raju, R., Exploration for uranium in the Bhima Basin in parts of Karnataka, India. Exp. Res. Atomic Miner., 2002, 14, 59–78.

  • Radhakrishna, B. P., Groundwater in Hard Rock Aquifer of South India, Geological Society of India, Bengaluru, 2004, p. 16.

  • Dharumarajan, S., Lalitha, M., Hegde, R., Janani, N., Rajawat, A. S., Sastry, L. N. and Singh, S. K., Status of desertification in South India – assessment, mapping and change detection analysis. Curr. Sci., 2018, 115(2), 331–338.

  • Manual for LED Fluorimeter LF-2a, Quantalase Enterprises Pvt Ltd, Indore, India, 2012, p. 28.

  • Dhanaraju, R., Kumar, M. K., Babu, E. V. S. S. K. and Pandit, S. A., Uranium mineralization in the Neoproterozoic Bhima Basin at Gogi and near Ukkinhal: an ore petrological study. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2002, 59, 299–321.

  • Manoj, S., Thirumurugan, M. and Elango, L., An integrated approach for assessment of groundwater quality in and around uranium mineralized zone, Gogi region, Karnataka, India. Arab. J. Geosci., 2017, 10(557), 1–17.

  • Hunse, T. M., Najeeb, K. Md., Rajarajan, K. and Muthukkannan, M., Presence of radon in groundwater in parts of Bangalore. J. Geol. Soc. India, 2010, 75, 704–708.

  • Langmuir, D., Uranium solution–mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 1978, 42, 547–569.


Abstract Views: 183

PDF Views: 73




  • High Uranium Concentration in Groundwater Used for Drinking in Parts of Eastern Karnataka, India

Abstract Views: 183  |  PDF Views: 73

Authors

R. Srinivasan
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
S. A. Pandit
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
N. Karunakara
Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity, Mangalore University, Mangala Gangothri, Mangalore 574 199, India
Deepak Salim
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
K. Sudeep Kumara
Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity, Mangalore University, Mangala Gangothri, Mangalore 574 199, India
M. Rajesh Kumar
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Ganesh Khatei
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
Kavitha Devi Ramkumar
Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India

Abstract


The limits recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) and the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) of India for uranium concentration in drinking water are 30 μg/l and 60 μg/l respectively. The present study on uranium concentration in groundwater used for drinking purposes in 73 villages of Karnataka, India, shows that in 57 villages uranium concentration is more than 30 μg/l, including 48 villages where it exceeds 60 μg/l. Thus in 78% and 66% of the villages studied, uranium concentration exceeds permissible limits given by WHO and AERB respectively. It is alarming to note that in one village each in Tumkur and Chitradurga districts, five in Kolar and seven in Chikkaballapura districts, uranium concentration is in thousands of micrograms per litre. None of the borewells from which water has been sampled is anywhere in the vicinity of nuclear facilities or urban waste disposal channels. Thus, the observed uranium contamination is considered to be geogenic. Previous geological studies have shown that the eastern portion of Karnataka is a part of the Neoarchean Eastern Dharwar Craton dominated by large ion lithophile element-rich K-feldspar granites and gneisses with higher abundance of radioactive elements (uranium and thorium) compared to the Mesoarchean tonalite–trondhjemite–gneisses and granitoids widely distributed in the Western Dharwar Craton.

Keywords


Dharwar Craton, Geogenic Contamination, Groundwater, Uranium.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv121%2Fi11%2F1459-1469