Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Do Seasonal Forecasts of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall Show Better Skill with February Initial Conditions?


Affiliations
1 Multi-Scale Modelling Programme, CSIR Fourth Paradigm Institute, Bengaluru 560 037, India
2 Multi-Scale Modelling Programme, CSIR Fourth Paradigm Institute, Bengaluru 560 037, India
3 Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India
4 Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences; and DST Centre for Excellence in Climate Change, Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012India, India
 

Prediction for Indian summer monsoon rainfall (ISMR) is generated by integrating model from initial conditions (ICs) of weather at some time prior to season. We examine the factors responsible for the widely reported highest ISMR forecast skill for February ICs in climate forecast system (CFSv2) model. Skill for February ICs is highest only based on correlation between observed and predicted year-to-year variation of ISMR, whereas other skill scores indicate highest skill for late-April/early-May ICs having shorter yet useful forecast lead-time. Higher correlation for February ICs arises from correct forecasting of 1983 ISMR excess, which is however due to wrong forecast of La Niña and correlation drops to lower value than that for late-April/early-May ICs if 1983 is excluded. Forecast skill for sea-surface temperature variation over equatorial central Pacific (ENSO) in Boreal summer is lowest for February ICs indicating role of dynamical drift induced by long forecast lead-time. Model deficiencies such as oversensitivity of ISMR to ENSO and unrealistic ENSO influence on variation of convection over equatorial Indian Ocean (EQUINOO) lead to errors in ISMR forecasting. In CFSv2, ISMR is mostly decided by ENSO whereas in observation it is influenced by ENSO and EQUINOO independently.

Keywords

Boundary Forcing, Forecast Skill, Seasonal Forecasts, Sea-Surface Temperature, Summer Monsoon Rainfall.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • DelSole, T. and Shukla, J., Climate models produce skillful predictions of Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2012, 39, L09703; doi:10.1029/2012GL051279.

  • Saha, S. et al., The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 2010, 91, 1015–1057.

  • Krishnamurthy, V. and Rai, S., Predictability of South Asian monsoon circulation in the NCEP climate forecast system. Adv. Geosci., 2011, 22, 65–76.

  • Pattanaik, D. R., Mukhopadhyay, B. and Kumar, A., Monthly forecast of Indian southwest monsoon rainfall based on NCEP’s coupled forecast system. Atmos. Climate Sci., 2012, 2(4), 479–491.

  • Saha, S. et al., The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J. Climate, 2014, 27, 2185–2208.

  • Pattanaik, D. R. and Kumar, A., Prediction of summer monsoon rainfall over India using the NCEP climate forecast system. Climate Dyn., 2010, 34, 557–572.

  • Charney, J. G. and Shukla, J., Predictability of monsoons. Monsoon Dyn., 1981, 4, 99–109.

  • Rasmusson, E. M. and Carpenter, T. H., The relationship between eastern equatorial Pacific sea surface temperatures and rainfall over India and Sri Lanka. Mon. Weather Rev., 1983, 111(3), 517–528.

  • Shukla, J. and Wallace, J. M., Numerical simulation of the atmospheric response to equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci., 1983, 40, 1613–1630.

  • Krishnamurthy, V. and Shukla, J., Predictability of the Indian monsoon in coupled general circulation models. COLA Tech. Rep., 2011, no. 313.

  • Slingo, J. and Palmer, T. N., Uncertainty in weather and climate prediction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser., 2011, 369, 4751–4767.

  • Kumar, A., Chen, M. and Wang, W., An analysis of prediction skill of monthly mean climate variability. Climate Dyn., 2011, 37(5), 1119–1131.

  • Webster, P. J. and Yang, S., Monsoon and ENSO: selectively interactive systems. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 1992, 118, 877–926.

  • Pokhrel, S. et al., Seasonal prediction of Indian summer monsoon rainfall in NCEP CFSv2: forecast and predictability error. Climate Dyn., 2016, 46, 2305–2326.

  • Ramu, D. A. et al., Indian summer monsoon rainfall simulation and prediction skill in the CFSv2 coupled model: impact of atmospheric horizontal resolution. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 2016, 121(5), 2205–2221.

  • Pillai, P. A. et al., Seasonal prediction skill of Indian summer monsoon rainfall in NMME models and monsoon mission CFSv2. Int. J. Climatol., 2018, 38, e847–e861.

  • Rao, S. A. et al., Monsoon Mission: a targeted activity to improve monsoon prediction across scales. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2019, 100(12), 2509–2532.

  • Schaeybroeck, B. V. and Vannitsem, S., Postprocessing of longrange forecasts. In Statistical Postprocessing of Ensemble Forecasts, Elsevier, 2019, chapter 10, pp. 267–290.

  • Pai, D. S., Latha, S., Rajeevan, M., Sreejith, O. P., Satbhai, N. S. and Mukhopadhyay, B., Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25° × 0.25°) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region. Mausam, 2014, 65, 1–18.

  • Adler, R. F. et al., The version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeorol., 2003, 4, 1147–1167.

  • Rayner, N. A. et al., Global analyses of SST, sea ice and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 2003, 108, 4407; 10.1029/2002JD002670.

  • Reynolds, R. W., Smith, T. M., Liu, C., Chelton, D. B., Casey, K. S. and Schlax, M. G., Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 2007, 20, 5473–5496.

  • Hersbach, H. et al., The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 2020, 146(730), 1999–2049.

  • Gadgil, S., Vinayachandran, P. N., Francis, P. A. and Gadgil, S., Extremes of Indian summer monsoon rainfall, ENSO, equatorial Indian Ocean oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2004, 31, L12213.

  • Gadgil, S., Rajendran, K. and Pai, D. S., A new rain-based index for the Indian summer monsoon rainfall. Mausam, 2019, 70(30), 485–500.

  • Walker, G. T. and Bliss, E. W., World weather. Mem. R. Meteorol. Soc., 1932, 4, 53–84.

  • Walker, G. T., Seasonal weather and its prediction. Nature, 1933, 132(3343), 805–808.

  • Sikka, D. R., Some aspects of the large-scale fluctuations of summer monsoon rainfall over India in relation to fluctuations in the planetary and regional scale circulation parameters. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), 1980, 89, 179–195.

  • Torrence, C. and Webster, P. J., Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system. J. Climate, 1999, 12(8), 2679–2690.

  • Kumar, K. K., Rajagopalan, B. and Cane, M. A., On the weakening relationship between the Indian monsoon and ENSO. Science, 1999, 284(5423), 2156–2159.

  • Chen, W., Dong, B. and Lu, R., Impact of the Atlantic Ocean on the multidecadal fluctuation of El Niño-southern oscillation–south Asian monsoon relationship in a coupled general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 2010, 115, D17109.

  • Kumar, K. K., Rajagopalan, B., Hoerling, M., Bates, G. and Cane, M. A., Unraveling the mystery of Indian monsoon failure during El Niño. Science, 2006, 314(5796), 115–119.

  • Azad, S. and Rajeevan, M., Possible shift in the ENSO–Indian monsoon rainfall relationship under future global warming. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6(1), 20145.

  • Fan, F. et al., Revisiting the relationship between the South Asian summer monsoon drought and El Niño warming pattern. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 2017, 18(4), 175–182.

  • Vishnu, S., Francis, P. A., Ramakrishna, S. S. V. S. and Schenoi, S. S. C., On the relationship between the Indian summer monsoon rainfall and the EQUINOO in the CFSv2. Climate Dyn., 2019, 52, 1263–1281.

  • Sperber, K. R. and Palmer, T. N., Interannual tropical rainfall variability in general circulation model simulations associated with the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. J. Climate, 1996, 9, 2727–2750.

  • Gadgil, S. and Sajani, S., Monsoon precipitation in the AMIP runs. Climate Dyn., 1998, 14, 659–689.

  • Rajendran, K., Nanjundiah, R. S., Gadgil, S. and Srinivasan, J., How good are the simulations of tropical SST–rainfall relationship by IPCC AR4 atmospheric and coupled models? J. Earth Syst. Sci., 2012, 121(3), 595–610.

  • Saji, N. H., Goswami, B. N., Vinayachandran, P. N. and Yamagata, T., A dipole in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature, 1999, 401, 360–363.

  • Sajani, S., Gadgil, S., Francis, P. A. and Rajeevan, M., Prediction of Indian rainfall during the summer monsoon season on the basis of links with equatorial Pacific and Indian Ocean climate indices. Environ. Res. Lett., 2015, 10, 094004.


Abstract Views: 182

PDF Views: 96




  • Do Seasonal Forecasts of Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall Show Better Skill with February Initial Conditions?

Abstract Views: 182  |  PDF Views: 96

Authors

K. Rajendran
Multi-Scale Modelling Programme, CSIR Fourth Paradigm Institute, Bengaluru 560 037, India
Sajani Surendran
Multi-Scale Modelling Programme, CSIR Fourth Paradigm Institute, Bengaluru 560 037, India
Stella Jes Varghese
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India
Arindam Chakraborty
Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences; and DST Centre for Excellence in Climate Change, Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012India, India

Abstract


Prediction for Indian summer monsoon rainfall (ISMR) is generated by integrating model from initial conditions (ICs) of weather at some time prior to season. We examine the factors responsible for the widely reported highest ISMR forecast skill for February ICs in climate forecast system (CFSv2) model. Skill for February ICs is highest only based on correlation between observed and predicted year-to-year variation of ISMR, whereas other skill scores indicate highest skill for late-April/early-May ICs having shorter yet useful forecast lead-time. Higher correlation for February ICs arises from correct forecasting of 1983 ISMR excess, which is however due to wrong forecast of La Niña and correlation drops to lower value than that for late-April/early-May ICs if 1983 is excluded. Forecast skill for sea-surface temperature variation over equatorial central Pacific (ENSO) in Boreal summer is lowest for February ICs indicating role of dynamical drift induced by long forecast lead-time. Model deficiencies such as oversensitivity of ISMR to ENSO and unrealistic ENSO influence on variation of convection over equatorial Indian Ocean (EQUINOO) lead to errors in ISMR forecasting. In CFSv2, ISMR is mostly decided by ENSO whereas in observation it is influenced by ENSO and EQUINOO independently.

Keywords


Boundary Forcing, Forecast Skill, Seasonal Forecasts, Sea-Surface Temperature, Summer Monsoon Rainfall.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi12%2F1863-1874