Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Application of electrical resistivity tool to monitor soil contamination by herbicide


Affiliations
1 National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India
2 National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India
3 Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering – DIATI, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Ducadegli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torinio, Italy
4 Department of Applied Science and Technology – DISAT, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Ducadegli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
 

The interpretation of the resistivity method depends on acquired resistivity contrast between the contaminated object and the host matrix. The present attempt reports preliminary understanding of the sensitivity of resistivity method to monitor herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) contamination in order to produce a reference dataset to develop a geophysical method to monitor soil bioremediation of herbicidecontaminated soil. Laboratory level experiments were carried out to define the correlation between herbicide concentration (Hc) and resistivity in non-polarizable (milli q double distilled water of 5.9 μs/cm EC) and sandy soil matrix. The results confirm that the resistivity method can be used for the purpose of monitoring herbicide by adopting formation factor as 2.5 for the sandy soil matrix. The results indicate that moisture content of soil affects the resistivity parameter and it should be considered in the interpretation of data.

Keywords

Agriculture geophysics, contamination, electrical resistivity method, herbicide.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Singh, K. P., Biogeophysical signatures of microbial natural gas accumulation. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(11), 1880–1884.
  • Atekwana, E. A., Werkema, D. D. and Atekwana, E. A., Biogeophysics: the effects of microbial processes on geophysical properties of the shallow subsurface. Appl. Hydrogeophys., 2006, 71, 161–193.
  • Personna, Y. R., Slater, L., Ntarlagiannis, D., Werkema, D. and Szabo, Z., Complex resistivity signatures of ethanol in sand–clay mixtures. J. Contaminant Hydrol., 2013, 149, 76–87.
  • Pujari, P., Pardhi, P., Muduli, P., Harkare, P. and Nanoti, M., Assessment of pollution near landfill site in Nagpur, India by resistivity imaging and GPR. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2007, 131, 489–500.
  • Bertermann, D. and Schwarz, H., Bulk density and water contentdependent electrical resistivity analyses of different soil classes on a laboratory scale. Environ. Earth. Sci., 2018, 77, 570.
  • Sauck, W., A model for the resistivity structure of LNAPL plumes and their environs in sandy sediments. J. Appl. Geophys., 2000, 44, 151–165.
  • Hudson, E., Kulessa, B., Edwards, P., Williams, T. and Walsh, R., Integrated hydrological and geophysical characterisation of surface and subsurface water contamination at abandoned metal mines. Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 2018, 229(8), 1–14.
  • Zheng, Z., Fu, Y., Liu, K., Xiao, R., Wang, X. and Shi, H., Threestage vertical distribution of seawater conductivity. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8(1), 9916.
  • Ajo-Franklin, J., Geller, J. and Harris, J., A survey of the geophysical properties of chlorinated DNAPLs. J. Appl. Geophys., 2006, 59(3), 177–189.
  • Aktar, M., Sengupta, D. and Chowdhury, A., Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol., 2009, 2(1), 1–12.
  • Salas, B., Duran, E. and Wiener, M., Impact of pesticides use on human health in Mexico: a review. Rev. Environ. Health, 2000, 5(4), 399–412.
  • Hardell, E., Carlberg, M., Nordström, M. and van Bavel, B., Time trends of persistent organic pollutants in Sweden during 1993– 2007 and relation to age, gender, body mass index, breast-feeding and parity. Sci. Total Environ., 2010, 408(20), 4412–4419.
  • Annual Report 2015–2016, Indian Council of Agricultural Research; https://icar.org.in/content/annual-report-2015-2016
  • Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry report, 2016; http://ficci.in/EY-FICCI-M2M-Report.pdf
  • Banks, M., Kennedy, A., Kremer, R. and Eivazi, F., Soil microbial community response to surfactants and herbicides in two soils. Appl. Soil Ecol., 2014, 74, 12–20,
  • Sidoli, P., Baran, N. and Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Glyphosate and AMPA adsorption in soils: laboratory experiments and pedotransfer rules. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2016, 23, 5733–5742.
  • Sorensen, S., Albers, C. and Aamand, J., Rapid mineralization of the Phenylurea herbicide diuron by Variovorax sp. SRS16 in pure culture and within a two-member consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2008, 74, 2332–2340.
  • Pierzynski, G., Sims, J. and Vance, G., Organic chemicals in the environment. In Soils and Environmental Quality, Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, 2000, 2nd edn.
  • Kuang, Z., McConnell, L., Torrents, A., Meritt, D. and Tobash, S., Atmospheric deposition of pesticides to an agricultural watershed of the Chesapeake Bay. J. Environ. Qual., 2003, 32(5), 1611–1622.
  • Ismail, B., Prayitno, S. and Tayeb, M., Contamination of rice field water with sulfonylurea and phenoxy herbicides in the Muda Irrigation Scheme, Kedah, Malaysia. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2015, 187(7), 406–414.
  • Ensminger, M., Budd, R., Kelley, K. and Goh, K., Pesticide occurrence and aquatic benchmark exceedances in urban surface waters and sediments in three urban areas of California, USA, 2008–
  • Environ. Monit. Assess., 2013, 185, 3697–3710.
  • Pimentel, D., Amounts of pesticides reaching target pests: Environmental impacts and ethics. J. Agric. Environment. Ethics, 1995, 8(1), 17–29.
  • Van Bruggen, A., He, M., Chin, K., Mai, V., Jeong, K., Finckh, M. and Morris Jr, J., Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 616–617, 255–268.
  • Wilson, N., Chuang, J., Lyu, C., Menton, R. and Morgan, M., Aggregate exposures of nine preschool children to persistent organic pollutants at day care and at home. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 2003, 13, 187–202.
  • Peterson, M., McMaster, S., Riechers, D., Skelton, J. and Stahlman, P., 2,4-D past, present, and future: a review. Weed Technol., 2016, 30(2), 303–345.
  • Wychowaniak, D., Zawadzki, Ł. and Lech, M., Application of column tests and electrical resistivity methods for leachate transport monitoring. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. SGGW Land Reclam, 2015, 47(3), 237–247.

Abstract Views: 175

PDF Views: 110




  • Application of electrical resistivity tool to monitor soil contamination by herbicide

Abstract Views: 175  |  PDF Views: 110

Authors

Pandurang Balwant
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India
Kavita Bramhanwade
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India
Veligeti Jyothi
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India
Paras R. Pujari
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India
Shalini Dhyani
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India; Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201 002, India
Parikshit Verma
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, India
Alberto Godio
Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering – DIATI, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Ducadegli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torinio, Italy
Fulvia Chiampo
Department of Applied Science and Technology – DISAT, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Ducadegli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Abstract


The interpretation of the resistivity method depends on acquired resistivity contrast between the contaminated object and the host matrix. The present attempt reports preliminary understanding of the sensitivity of resistivity method to monitor herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) contamination in order to produce a reference dataset to develop a geophysical method to monitor soil bioremediation of herbicidecontaminated soil. Laboratory level experiments were carried out to define the correlation between herbicide concentration (Hc) and resistivity in non-polarizable (milli q double distilled water of 5.9 μs/cm EC) and sandy soil matrix. The results confirm that the resistivity method can be used for the purpose of monitoring herbicide by adopting formation factor as 2.5 for the sandy soil matrix. The results indicate that moisture content of soil affects the resistivity parameter and it should be considered in the interpretation of data.

Keywords


Agriculture geophysics, contamination, electrical resistivity method, herbicide.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi10%2F1636-1639