Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Role of Electrostatics in Artificial Pollination and Future Agriculture


Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 679 573, India
2 Agricultural Research Station, Mannuthy 680 651, India
3 Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture, Vellayani 695 522, India
 

Pollination is the process of pollen detachment from the male part, i.e. anther of a flower, travel through a medium and deposition onto the female part, i.e. pistil of flower, thereby enabling fertilization and reproduction. Majority (87.5%) of flowering plants rely on animal pollination, on insects in particular, with the remnants of species being wind-pollinated and with autonomous seed-producing capabilities. The reproductive phase of a plant has direct impact on crop yield and quality of produce in terms of biomorphological characters which affect its market value. On a global account, 80% of all plant species depend on pollination for reproduction, which influences 35% of crop production and worth US$ 117 billion per year. However, drastic decline in native pollinators has raised major concerns for the assurance of pollination services. Studies have revealed that the absence of pollinators may reduce the global agricultural crop production by 3–8%. Also, keeping in mind the world scenario of crop production and population expansion in relation to land under cultivation which remains the same; rather it shows a decreasing trend. Crop productivity has to be optimized from all possible points of view to meet the future food demand. Here the concept of precision agriculture arises, i.e. optimum utilization of available resources to achieve maximum possible yield from the same land area and desirable quality, without jeopardizing the environment. If the pollination process is disturbed due to climatic factors or insufficient pollinators during the period of bloom, it may directly result in lower yield, undesirable biomorphological changes and quality loss, leading to mass economic drop. To overcome this situation, artificial pollination techniques have been developed.

Keywords

Artificial Pollination, Crop Production, Electrostatic Charging, Food Security, Honey Bee.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Klein, A. M., Vaissiere, B. E., Cane, J. H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunnigham, S. A., Kremen, C. and Tscharntke, T., Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. London B, 2007, 274, 303–313; doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.
  • Lawrence, T., Pollination and protecting bees and other pollinators. Extension – Washington State University, USA, 2015, pp. 1–9; doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.3099.1203.
  • Ollerton, J., Winfree, R. and Tarrant, S., How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos Forum, 2011, 120, 321– 326; doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x.
  • Linder, H. P., Morphology and the evolution of wind pollination. Reprod. Biol. R. Bot. Gard., 1998, 123–135.
  • Friedman, J. and Barrett, H., Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in windpollinated plants. Ann. Bot., 2009, 103, 1515–1527.
  • Shapiro, A., Korkidi, E. and Demri, A., Toward elevated agrobotics: development of a scaled-down prototype for visually guided date palm tree sprayer. J. Field Robot., 2009, 26(6–7), 572–590.
  • Timerman, D. Pollen clumping and release mechanisms in wind pollinated plants. M Sc (Biol.) thesis, Concordia University, Canada, 2013, p. 106.
  • Hilmi, M., Bradbear, N. and Mejia, D., Beekeeping and Sustainable Livelihoods, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2011, 2nd edn, p. 71.
  • Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne'eman, G. and Willmer, P., Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology, 2003, 84, 2628–2642.
  • Yang, C. and Guo, Y., Floral evolution: beyond traditional viewpoint of pollinator mediated floral design. Chinese Sci. Bull., 2005, 50(21), 2413–2417.
  • Rehel, S., Varghese, A., Bradbear, N., Davidar, P., Roberts, S., Roy, P. and Potts, S. G., Benefits of biotic pollination for nontimber forest products and cultivated plants. Conserv. Soc., 2009, 7, 213.
  • Schowalter, T., Pollination, seed predation and seed dispersal. Insect Ecology – An Ecosystem Approach, Academic Press, 2016, 4th edn, pp. 445–476.
  • Yuan, G., Weihua, M., Wenqing, W. and Huailei, S., Fruit tree pollination technology and industrialization in China. In Beekeeping and Bee Conservation – Advances in Research, 2016, Ch. 6, pp. 153–175, ISBN:978-953-51-2412-2; doi:10.5772/61424.
  • Vaknin, Y., Gan-Mor, S., Bechar, A. and Ronen, B., The role of electrostatic forces in pollination. Plant Syst. Evol., 2000, 222, 133–142.
  • Vaknin, Y., Eisikowitch, D., Gan-Mor, S. and Bechar, A., Electrostatic pollination of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) – a novel technique of pollen supplementation in agriculture. In 11th GREMPA Seminar on Pistachios and Almonds. Zaragoza, CIHEAM, Sanliurfa, Turkey, 2001, pp. 53–57; http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF= 1600152.
  • Vaknin, Y., Gan-Mor, S., Bechar, A. and Ronen, B., Are flowers morphologically adapted to take advantage of electrostatic forces in pollination? New Phytol., 2001, 151, 301–306.
  • Goodwin, R. M. and Steven, D., Behaviour of honey bees visiting kiwifruit flowers. NZ J. Crop Hortic. Sci., 1993, 21(1), 17–24; doi:10.1080/01140671.1993.9513741.
  • Goodwin, M., Pollination in Australia and New Zealand, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2012, vol. 12(059), p. 120; ISBN:978-1-74254-402-1.
  • Goodwin, R. M., McBrydie, H. M. and Taylor, M. A., Wind and honey bee pollination of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis ‘HORT16A’). NZ J. Bot., 51(3), 229–240; doi:10.1080/ 0028825X.2013.806934.
  • Hii, M. J., Kiwifruit flower pollination – wind pollination efficiencies and sprayer jet applications. Ph D thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 2004, p. 323.
  • Luca, P. and Mario, M., The ecology and evolutionary significance of buzz-pollination. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2013, 16, 1–7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.05.002.
  • Gan-Mor, S., Schwartzi, Y., Bechar, A. and Eisikowitch, D., Relevance of electrostatic forces in natural and artificial pollination. Can. Agric. Eng., 1995, 37(3), 189–194.
  • Bowker, G. and Crenshaw, H., Electrostatic forces in windpollination – Part 1: measurement of the electrostatic charge on pollen. Atmosp. Environ., 2007a, 41, 1587–1595; http://www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv.
  • Bowker, G. and Crenshaw, H., Electrostatic forces in windpollination – Part 2: simulations of pollen capture. Atmos. Environ., 2007b, 41, 1596–1603; http://www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv.
  • Gupta, A., Godara1, R., Sharma, R. and Panda, A., Artificial pollination: a tool for improving fruiting traits in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett., 2017, 6(22), 1312–1320.
  • Awad, M. A. Pollination of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) ‘Lulu’ with pollen grains–water Suspension. Met., Environ Arid Land Agric. Sci., 2011, 22(1) 91–101.
  • Oliveira, A. R., The contribution of coulomb to applied mechanics. In International Symposium on History of Machines and Mechanics, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004, pp. 217– 226; ISBN 978-1-4020-2204-3; https://doi.org/10.1007/1-40202204-2_18
  • Jha, D. K., Text Book of Electrostatics, Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, 2005, 1st edn, p. 100.
  • Sharp, K., Water: structure and properties. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, pp. 1–7.
  • Zakon, H., Electric fields of flowers stimulate the sensory hairs of bumble bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2016, 113(26), 7020– 7021.
  • Clarke, D., Whitney, H., Sutton, G. and Robert, D., Detection and learning of floral electric fields by bumblebees. Science, 2013, 340(6128), 66–69; doi:10.1126/science.1230883.
  • Badger, M., Victor, O. and Ashley, S. Electrostatic charge on flying hummingbirds and its potential role in pollination. University of Nebraska, 2015, p. 11.
  • Clarke, D., Morley, E. and Robert, D., The bee, the flower, and the electric field: electric ecology and aerial electroreception. J.Comp. Physiol., 2017, 203(9), 737–748.
  • Zhao, S., Peter, G. S. and Adamiak, K., Comparison of conduction and induction charging in liquid spraying. J. Electrostat., 2005, 63(6–10), 871–876.
  • Pelesz, A. and Czapka, T., Empirical and numerical analysis of conduction and induction charging of droplets in a three-electrode system. Energies, 2020, 13(469), 1–15; doi:10.3390/en13020469.
  • Yu, R., Zhou, H. and Zheng, J., Design and experiments on droplet charging device for high range electrostatic sprayer. In Pesticides in Modern World – Pesticide Use and Manage., pp.137–148; doi:10.5772/950
  • Williams, M. W., Triboelectric charging of insulating polymers – some new perspectives. AIP Adv., 2012, 2, 5200–5207.
  • Landauer, J. and Forest, P., Influence of particle contact number on triboelectric separation selectivity. Processes, 2019, 7(716), 1–13; doi:10.3390/pr7100716.
  • Luciana, N. and Cramariuc, R., Contribution about the electrohydrodynamic spraying. UPB Sci. Bull., Series C, 2009, 71(3), 205– 213.
  • Xie, J., Jiang, J., Davoodi, P., Srinivasan, M. and Wang C., Electrohydrodynamic atomization: a two-decade effort to produce and process micro-/nanoparticulate materials. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2015, 125, 32–57.
  • Smith, D. B., Goering, C. E., Liljeldahl, L. A. and Reichard, D. L. AC charging of Agricultural sprays. Trans. ASAE, 1977, 34(6), 1002–1007.
  • Anantheswaran, R. C. and Law, S. E., Electrostatic spraying of turf grass. US Golf Assoc., Green Section Project Rec., 1979, 17(6), 1–4.
  • Law, S. E. and Michael, D. L., Electrostatic deposition of pesticide spray onto foliar targets of varying morphology. Trans. ASAE, 1981, 1441–1445.
  • Mamidi, V., Ghanashyam, C., Patel, M. K., Reddy, V. and Kapur, P., Electrostatic hand pressure swirl nozzle for small crop growers. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Techol., Res. Excellence, 2012, 2(2), 164–168.
  • Marchewicz, A., Sobczyk, A. T., Krupa, A. and Jaworek, A., Electrostatic charging of water spray by induction. J. Phys., Conf. Ser., 2019, 1322(012032), 1–5.
  • Khatawkar, D. S., Dhalin, D., James, P. S. and Subhagan, S. R., Electrostatic induction spray-charging system (embedded electrode) for knapsack mist-blower. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2020, 39(5), 80–91; https://doi.org/10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i530549.
  • Khatawkar, D. S., Dhalin, D. and James, P. S., Electrostatic conversion kit for conventional knapsack mist-blower: development and performance evaluation. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 2020, 9(3), 2227–2242; https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.903.254.
  • Philippe, G. and Baldet, P., Electrostatic dusting: an efficient technique of pollination in larch. Ann. Sci. Forest., 1997, 54(3), 301–310.
  • Monique, P. and Lemay, P., A novel approach for the operational production of hybrid larch seeds under northern climatic conditions. For. Chronicle, 2008, 84(1) 95–104.
  • Bowen, H. D., Hebblethwaite, P. and Carleton, W., Application of electrostatic charging to the deposition of insecticides and fungicides on plant surfaces. Agric. Eng., 1952, 33(6), 347–350.
  • Castle, G. S. P., Inculet, I. I., Menzies, D. R. and Frank, R., Deposition studies with a novel form of electrostatic crop sprayer. J. Electrostat., 1981, 10, 65–72.
  • Law, S. E., Embedded-electrode electrostatic induction spray charging nozzle: theoretical and engineering design. Trans. ASAE, 1978, 21(10), 1096–1104.

Abstract Views: 239

PDF Views: 83




  • Role of Electrostatics in Artificial Pollination and Future Agriculture

Abstract Views: 239  |  PDF Views: 83

Authors

Dipak S. Khatawkar
Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur 679 573, India
Shaji P. James
Agricultural Research Station, Mannuthy 680 651, India
D. Dhalin
Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture, Vellayani 695 522, India

Abstract


Pollination is the process of pollen detachment from the male part, i.e. anther of a flower, travel through a medium and deposition onto the female part, i.e. pistil of flower, thereby enabling fertilization and reproduction. Majority (87.5%) of flowering plants rely on animal pollination, on insects in particular, with the remnants of species being wind-pollinated and with autonomous seed-producing capabilities. The reproductive phase of a plant has direct impact on crop yield and quality of produce in terms of biomorphological characters which affect its market value. On a global account, 80% of all plant species depend on pollination for reproduction, which influences 35% of crop production and worth US$ 117 billion per year. However, drastic decline in native pollinators has raised major concerns for the assurance of pollination services. Studies have revealed that the absence of pollinators may reduce the global agricultural crop production by 3–8%. Also, keeping in mind the world scenario of crop production and population expansion in relation to land under cultivation which remains the same; rather it shows a decreasing trend. Crop productivity has to be optimized from all possible points of view to meet the future food demand. Here the concept of precision agriculture arises, i.e. optimum utilization of available resources to achieve maximum possible yield from the same land area and desirable quality, without jeopardizing the environment. If the pollination process is disturbed due to climatic factors or insufficient pollinators during the period of bloom, it may directly result in lower yield, undesirable biomorphological changes and quality loss, leading to mass economic drop. To overcome this situation, artificial pollination techniques have been developed.

Keywords


Artificial Pollination, Crop Production, Electrostatic Charging, Food Security, Honey Bee.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv120%2Fi3%2F484-491