Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Tournament Metaphor for Dominance Hierarchy


Affiliations
1 A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram 695 016, India
 

We explore the possibility of using Ramanuja-charyulu’s tournament metaphor to get new dominance indices. This graph theoretic approach leads to two dimensionless rating measures, a power-weakness ratio (PWR) and a normalized power-weakness difference (nPWD). Three popular dominance indices already in use are the Clutton-Brock et al.’s index (CBI), David’s score (DS) and frequency-based dominance index (FDI), and weshall show that CBI and FDI are ratio scales like PWR, and DS is an interval scale like nPWD. Unlike the PWR which can become singular (i.e. it ranges from zero to infinity), the nPWD ranges from –1 to +1. The new dominance indices yield unique scores and ranks and can be used interchangeably as they have a monotonic one-to-one relationship.

Keywords

Clutton-brock et al.’s Index, David’s Score, Dominance Hierarchy, Dominance Index, Frequency-based Dominance Index, Power-weakness Ratio, Normalized Power-weakness Difference.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Ramanujacharyulu, C., Analysis of preferential experiments. Psychometrika, 1964, 29(3), 257–261.

  • Prathap, G., Nishy, P. and Savithri, S., On the orthogonality of indicators of journal performance. Curr. Sci., 2016, 111(5), 876– 881.

  • Leydesdorff, L., de Nooy, W., Bornmann, L. and Prathap, G., The ‘tournaments’ metaphor in citation impact studies: power– weakness ratios (PWR) as a journal indicator, CoRR, vol.abs/1411.0906, 2014.

  • Cowden, D. J., A method of evaluating contestants. Am. Stat., 1975, 29(2), 82–84.

  • Prathap, G., The Best Team at IPL 2014 and EPL 2013–2014. Sci.Rep., 2014, 51(8), 44–47.

  • Todeschini, R., Grisoni, F. and Nembri, S., Weighted power-weakness ratio for multi-criteria decision making. Chemometr.Intell. Lab., 2015, 146, 329–336

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D., Gibson, R. M. and Guinness, F. E., The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphusL.). Anim. Behav., 1979, 27, 211–225.

  • David, H. A., Ranking from unbalanced paired-comparison data. Biometrika, 1987, 74, 432–436.

  • Bang, A., Deshpande, S., Sumana, A. and Gadagkar, R., Choosing an appropriate index to construct dominance hierarchies in animal societies: a comparison of three indices. Anim. Behav., 2010, 79(3), 631–636.

  • Gammell, M. P., de Vries, H., Jennings, D. J., Carlin, C. M. and Hayden, T. J., David’s score: a more appropriate dominance ranking method than Clutton-Brock et al.’s index. Anim. Behav., 2003, 66, 601–605.

  • de Vries, H., Finding a dominanceorder most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. Anim. Behav., 1998, 55, 827–843.

  • Boyd, R. and Silk, J. B., A method for assigning cardinal dominance ranks. Anim. Behav., 1983, 31, 45–58.

  • Bell, W. J. and Gorton Jr, R. E., Informational analysis of agonistic behaviour and dominance hierarchy formation in a cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea. Behaviour, 1978, 67, 217–235.


Abstract Views: 229

PDF Views: 78




  • A Tournament Metaphor for Dominance Hierarchy

Abstract Views: 229  |  PDF Views: 78

Authors

Gangan Prathap
A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram 695 016, India

Abstract


We explore the possibility of using Ramanuja-charyulu’s tournament metaphor to get new dominance indices. This graph theoretic approach leads to two dimensionless rating measures, a power-weakness ratio (PWR) and a normalized power-weakness difference (nPWD). Three popular dominance indices already in use are the Clutton-Brock et al.’s index (CBI), David’s score (DS) and frequency-based dominance index (FDI), and weshall show that CBI and FDI are ratio scales like PWR, and DS is an interval scale like nPWD. Unlike the PWR which can become singular (i.e. it ranges from zero to infinity), the nPWD ranges from –1 to +1. The new dominance indices yield unique scores and ranks and can be used interchangeably as they have a monotonic one-to-one relationship.

Keywords


Clutton-brock et al.’s Index, David’s Score, Dominance Hierarchy, Dominance Index, Frequency-based Dominance Index, Power-weakness Ratio, Normalized Power-weakness Difference.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi9%2F1432-1436