Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Unique Breeding Activity and Oviposition in Annandale’s High-Altitude Tree Frog, Kurixalus naso (Annandale, 1912) in Meghalaya, North East India


Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793 022, India
2 Nature Environment and Wildlife Society, Angul 759 123, India
 

The present study highlights the unique characteristics of the breeding activity and oviposition of Annandale’s high-altitude tree frog, Kurixalus naso (Annandale, 1912) at Mawsynram, Meghalaya, North East India. After the cold, dry, winter months (September– January), the first rainfall in February triggers the onset of a short breeding activity of the species, which lasts for 3–4 weeks during February to March. The first shower causes an increase in soil moisture content and decrease in soil temperature. Immediately after the first showers, males make their advertisement calls, followed by females engaging in amplexus with the males and ovipositing in the moist soil. The females come only once to the breeding site and leave after mating; parental care is provided by the males. Multiple amplecting pairs at the breeding site are seen inside the burrows and some are observed to amplect in the open soil surface, lasting for 5–6 h. No aggregation and competition among the males is observed. The amplecting females lay eggs inside the excavated burrows and the males, using their hind limbs, expose the eggs by pushing them to the mouth of the burrowing hole. Sometimes, the females oviposit at the base of hollow tree trunks and occasionally in the open soil surface. The eggs are mixed with the soil and they resemble perhaps masquerade as seeds. Most frogs display a biphasic life cycle. However, K. naso shows a distinct non-aquatic oviposition with aquatic larva. Further, soil moisture content and temperature may support the development of embryos in open soil surfaces and burrows.

Keywords

Amplexus, Breeding, Burrows, Kurixalus naso, Oviposition.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Willaert, B., Suyesh, R., Garg, S., Giri, V. B., Bee, M. A. and Biju, S. D., A unique mating strategy without physical contact during fertilization in Bombay Night Frogs (Nyctibatrachus humayuni) with the description of a new form of amplexus and female call. Peer J., 2016, doi:10.7717/peerj.2117.

  • Duellman, W. E. and Trueb, L., Biology of Amphibians, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1986.

  • Oda, F. H. et al., Anuran species richness, composition, and breeding habitat preferences: a comparison between forest remnants and agricultural landscapes in southern Brazil. Zool. Stud., 2016; doi:10.6620/ZS.2016.55-34.

  • Wells, K. D., The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 2007.

  • Oseen K. L. and Wassersug, R. J., Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans. Oecologia, 2002, 133, 616–625.

  • Prado, C. P. A., Uetanabaro, M. and Haddad, C. F. B., Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia, 2005, 26, 211–221.

  • Yoo, E. and Jang, Y., Abiotic effects on calling phenology of three frog species in Korea. Anim. Cells Syst., 2012, 16(3), 260–267.

  • Lemkert, F., Penman, T. and Mahony, M. J., Relationship of calling intensity to micrometeorology in pond breeding frogs from central eastern New South Wales. Proc. Int. Acad. Ecol. Environ. Sci., 2013, 3(2), 170–180.

  • Bertoluci, J., Annual patterns of breeding activity in Atlantic Rainforest anurans. J. Herpetol., 1998, 32(4), 607–611.

  • Xavier, A. L. and Napoli, M. F., Contribution of environmental variables to anuran community structure in the Caatinga Domain of Brazil. Phyllomedusa, 2011, 10(1), 45–64.

  • Resetarits Jr, W. J. and Wilbur, H. M., Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology, 1989, 70, 220–228.

  • Alford, R. A., Ecology: Resource use, competition, and predation. In Tadpoles. The Biology of Anuran Larvae (eds McDiarmid, R. W. and Altig, R.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1999, pp. 240–278.

  • Murphy, P. J., Does reproductive site choice in a Neotropical frog mirror variable risks facing offspring? Ecol. Monogr., 2003, 73, 45–67.

  • Khongwir, S., Hooroo, R. N. K. and Dutta, S. K., Breeding and nesting behaviour of Rhacophorus maximus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) in Meghalaya, North East India. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(6), 1102–1105.

  • Deuti, K., Breeding ecology of Annandale’s tree frog Chirixalus simus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) near Kolkata, West Bengal. J. Bom. Nat. Hist. Soc., 2001, 98(3), 341–345.

  • Biju, S. D., A novel nesting behavior of a treefrog, Rhacophorus lateralis in the Western Ghats, India. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(3), 433– 437.

  • Kadadevaru, G. G. and Kanamadi, R. D., Courtship and nesting behaviour of the Malabar gliding frog, Rhacophorus malabaricus (Jerdon, 1870). Curr. Sci., 2000, 79(3), 377–380.

  • Seshadri, K. S., Gururaja, K. V. and Bickford, D. P., Breeding in bamboo: a novel anuran reproductive strategy discovered in rhacophorid frogs of the Western Ghats, India. Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 2015, 114, 1–11.

  • Gosner, K. L., A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica, 1960, 16, 183–190.

  • Crump, M. L., Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Misc. Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist. Univ. Kansas, 1974, 61, 1–68.

  • Aichinger, M., Annual activity patterns of anurans in the seasonal Neotropical environment. Oecologia, 1987, 71, 583–592.

  • Donelly, M. A. and Guyer, C., Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia, 1994, 98, 291–302.

  • Neckel-Oliveira, S., Magnusson, W. E., Lima, A. P. and Albernaz, A. L. K., Diversity and distribution of frogs in an Amazonian Savanna in Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia, 2000, 21, 317–326.

  • Licht, L. E., Comparative breeding biology of the red-legged frog (Rana aurora aurora) and the Western spotted frog (Rana pretiosa pretiosa) in Southwestern British Columbia. Can. J. Zool., 1969, 47, 505–509.

  • Bider, J. R. and Morrison, K. A., Changes in toad (Bufo americanus) responses to abiotic factors at the northern limit of their distribution. Am. Midl. Nat., 1981, 106, 293–304.

  • Weist Jr., J. A., Anuran succession at temporary ponds in a post Oak-Savanna region of Texas. US Fish and Widl. Res. Rep., 1982, 13, 39–47.

  • Pough, F. H., Taigen, T. L., Stewart, M. M. and Brussard, P. F., Behavioral modification of evaporative water loss by a Puerto Rican frog. Ecology, 1983, 64, 244–252.

  • Semlitsch, R. D, Analysis of climatic factors influencing migrations of the Salamander Ambystoma talpoideum. Copeia, 1985, 2, 477–489.

  • Warkentin, K. M., Plasticity of hatching in amphibians: evolution, trade-offs, cues and mechanisms. Integr. Comp. Biol., 2011, 51(1), 111–127.

  • Petranka, J. W., Salamanders of the United States and Canada, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1998.

  • Anderson, J. D. and Williamson, G. K., Terrestrial mode of reproduction in Ambystoma cingulatum. Herpetologica, 1976, 32, 214– 221.

  • Rudolf, V. H. W. and Rödel, M. O., Oviposition site selection in a complex variable environment: the role of habitat quality and conspecific cues. Oecologia, 2005, 142, 316–325.

  • Huk, T. and Kuhne, B., Substrate selection by Carabus clatratus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and its consequences for offspring development. Oecologia, 1999, 121, 348–354.

  • Reich, P. and Downes, B. J., Experimental evidence for physical cues involved in oviposition site selection of lotic hydrobiosid caddis flies. Oecologia, 2003, 136, 465–475.

  • Green, A. J., Determinants of chorus participation and the effects of size, weight and competition on advertisement calling in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (Leptodactylidae). Anim. Behav., 1990, 39, 620–638.

  • Taigen, T. L. and Wells, K. D., Energetics of vocalization by an anuran amphibian (Hyla versicolour). J. Comp. Physiol. B, 1985, 155, 163–170.

  • Hauselberger, K. F. and Alford, R. A., Effects of season and weather on calling in the Australian microhylid frogs Austrochaperina robusta and Cophixalus ornatus. Herpetologica, 2005, 61, 349–363.

  • Almeida-Gomes, M., Van Sluys, M. and Rocha, C. F. D., Calling activity of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest area at Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Belg. J. Zool., 2007, 137, 203–207.

  • Wright, A. H., North American anura. In Life-Histories of the Anura of Ithaca, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, USA, 1914.

  • Wright, A. H. and Wright, A. A., Handbook of Frogs and Toads, Comstock, Ithaca, New York, USA, 1949.

  • Barreto, L. and Moreira, G., Seasonal variation in age structure and spatial distribution of a savanna larval anuran assemblage in Central Brazil. J. Herpetol., 1996, 30, 87–92.

  • Ecterovick, P. C. and Sazima, I., Structure of an anuran community in a montane meadow in Southeastern Brazil: effects of seasonality, habitat, and predation. Amphibai-Reptilia, 2000, 21, 439–461.

  • Touchon, J. C. and Warkentin, K. M., Reproductive mode plasticity: aquatic and terrestrial oviposition in a tree frog. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105, 7495–7499.

  • Magnusson, W. E. and Hero, J. M., Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia, 1991, 86, 310–318.

  • Haddad, C. F. B. and Sawaya, R. J., Reproductive modes of Atlantic Forest Hylid frogs: a general overview and the description of a new mode. Biotropica, 2000, 32, 862–871.

  • Crump, M. L. and Kaplan, R. H., Clutch energy partitioning of tropical tree frogs (Hylidae). Copeia, 1979, 626–635.

  • Seymour, R. S., Respiration of aquatic and terrestrial amphibian embryos. Am. Zool., 1999, 39, 261–270.

  • Kluge, A. G., The gladiator frog of Middle America and Colombia – a reevaluation of their systematics (Anura: Hylidae). Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan, 1979, 688, 1–24.


Abstract Views: 267

PDF Views: 67




  • Unique Breeding Activity and Oviposition in Annandale’s High-Altitude Tree Frog, Kurixalus naso (Annandale, 1912) in Meghalaya, North East India

Abstract Views: 267  |  PDF Views: 67

Authors

P. W. Shangpliang
Department of Zoology, North Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793 022, India
R. N. K. Hooroo
Nature Environment and Wildlife Society, Angul 759 123, India
S. K. Dutta
Nature Environment and Wildlife Society, Angul 759 123, India

Abstract


The present study highlights the unique characteristics of the breeding activity and oviposition of Annandale’s high-altitude tree frog, Kurixalus naso (Annandale, 1912) at Mawsynram, Meghalaya, North East India. After the cold, dry, winter months (September– January), the first rainfall in February triggers the onset of a short breeding activity of the species, which lasts for 3–4 weeks during February to March. The first shower causes an increase in soil moisture content and decrease in soil temperature. Immediately after the first showers, males make their advertisement calls, followed by females engaging in amplexus with the males and ovipositing in the moist soil. The females come only once to the breeding site and leave after mating; parental care is provided by the males. Multiple amplecting pairs at the breeding site are seen inside the burrows and some are observed to amplect in the open soil surface, lasting for 5–6 h. No aggregation and competition among the males is observed. The amplecting females lay eggs inside the excavated burrows and the males, using their hind limbs, expose the eggs by pushing them to the mouth of the burrowing hole. Sometimes, the females oviposit at the base of hollow tree trunks and occasionally in the open soil surface. The eggs are mixed with the soil and they resemble perhaps masquerade as seeds. Most frogs display a biphasic life cycle. However, K. naso shows a distinct non-aquatic oviposition with aquatic larva. Further, soil moisture content and temperature may support the development of embryos in open soil surfaces and burrows.

Keywords


Amplexus, Breeding, Burrows, Kurixalus naso, Oviposition.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv118%2Fi3%2F467-472