Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

How Unequal is Rural Punjab? Empirical Evidence from Spatial Income Distribution


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
2 Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
 

The present study assesses the inequality arising from variation of economic opportunity across agroclimatic zones of Punjab, India. The analysis indicates that the poor in the state tend to diversify their income portfolio towards wages and salaries, and livestock sources. Crop farming is the major income source of the households; yet it contributes maximum (75.8%) in total inequality and is inequality triggering in its effect. While livestock and, wages and salaries are the potential sources to bridge the inequality gap in the entire state, non-farm business sources would be effective in the central and western zones of Punjab. The result of Theil index emphasized withingroup inequality as the principal contributor in total inequality across agro-climatic zones and districts. Therefore, policy intervention at individual district and zonal levels would be more imperative for correcting spatial imbalances in income distribution among farm households of the state.

Keywords

Agro-Climatic Zones, Empirical Evidence, Income Inequality, Rural Households, Theil Index.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bhalla, G. S., Chadha, G. K., Kashyap, S. P. and Sharma, R. K., Agricultural growth and structural changes in the Punjab economy: an input–output analysis. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, USA, Research Report 82, 1990.

  • Gulati, A., Roy, R. and Hussain, S., Getting Punjab agriculture back on high growth path: sources, drivers and policy lessons. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, 2017.

  • Economic Survey, Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India (GoI), 2017–18.

  • NSSO, Key indicators of situation of agricultural households in India. In 70th Round (January–December 2013), GoI, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, National Sample Survey Office, New Delhi, 2014.

  • Leibbrandt, M., Woolard, C. and Woolard, I., The contribution of income components to income inequality in the rural farmers’ homelands of South Africa: a decomposable Gini analysis. J. Afr. Stud., 2000, 9(1), 79–99.

  • Kung, J. K. S. and Lee, Y., So what if there is income inequality? The distributive consequences of non-farm employment in rural China. Econ. Develop. Cult. Change, 2001, 50(1), 19–46.

  • De Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E., Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities. World Dev., 2001, 29(3), 467–480.

  • Birthal, P. S., Negi, D. S., Jha, A. K. and Singh, D., Income sources of farm households in India: determinants, distributional consequences and policy implications. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2014, 27(1), 37–48.

  • Ranganathan, T., Farmers’ income in India: evidence from secondary data. Agricultural Economics Research Unit, Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi, 2015; http://www.iegindia.org/ardl/Farmer_Incomes_Thiagu_Ranganathan.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2018).

  • Richard, A. H. and He, J. J., Sources of income, inequality, and poverty in rural Pakistan. IFPRI Research Report #102, Washington DC, USA, 1995.

  • Birthal, P. S., Joshi, P. K. and Kumar, A., Assessment of research priorities for livestock sector in India. Policy Paper 15, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, New Delhi, 2002.

  • Lanjouw, P. and Shariff, A., Rural non-farm employment in India: access, income and poverty impact. Working Paper 81. National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, 2002.

  • Lanjouw, P. and Stern, N., Agricultural change and inequality in Palanpur. In The Economics of Rural Organization: Theory, Practice and Policy (eds Braverman, A., Hoff, K. and Stglitz, J.), Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 1993.

  • Vatta, K. and. Sidhu, R. S., Income diversification among rural households in Punjab: dynamics, impacts and policy implications. Indian J. Labour Econ., 2007, 50(4), 723–736.

  • Pavithra, S. A. and Vatta, K., Role of non-farm sector in sustaining rural livelihoods in Punjab. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2013, 26(2), 257–265.

  • Sidhu, R. S., Vatta, K. and Singh, J., Pattern of employment and wage relation in Punjab agriculture. Man Dev., 2012, 34(3), 77– 88.

  • Vatta, K. and Garg, B. R., Rural non-farm sector in Punjab: pattern and access to employment and income. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2008, 63(2), 223–243.

  • Vatta, K., Garg, B. R. and Sidhu, M. S., Rural employment and income: the inter-household variations in Punjab. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2008, 21(2), 201–210.

  • FICCI, Labour in Indian agriculture: a growing challenge, KPMG analysis, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, 2015.

  • Chakravorty, S., Chandrasekhar, S. and Naraparaju, K., Income generation and inequality in India’s agricultural sector: the consequences of land fragmentation. IGIDR Working Paper, WP-16028, 2016.

  • Fields, G. S., Poverty, Inequality, and Development, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 1980.

  • Kaditi, E. A. and Nitsi, E. I., Vertical and horizontal decomposition of farm income inequality in Greece. Agric. Econ. Rev., 2011, 12(1), 69–80.

  • Lerman, R. and Yitzhaki, S., Income inequality effects by income source: a new approach and applications to the United States. Rev. Econ. Stat., 1985, 67(1), 151–156.

  • Kimhi, A., Arayama, Y. and Kim, J. M., Identifying determinants of income inequality in the presence of multiple income sources: the case of Korean farm households. In Poster presented at EAAE Congress ‘Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies’, Slovenia, 2014.

  • Bellù, L. G. and Liberati, P., Describing income inequality: theil index and entropy classindexes. FAOEasyPoI051, 2006; http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypoI/445/theil_index_051en.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2018).

  • Punjab Revenue, 2012; http://punjabrevenue.nic.in/for%20website/agro-climatic%20zone.htm (accessed on 22 October 2018).


Abstract Views: 248

PDF Views: 83




  • How Unequal is Rural Punjab? Empirical Evidence from Spatial Income Distribution

Abstract Views: 248  |  PDF Views: 83

Authors

Bishwa Bhaskar Choudhary
Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
Priyanka Singh
Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004Department of Economics and Sociology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India

Abstract


The present study assesses the inequality arising from variation of economic opportunity across agroclimatic zones of Punjab, India. The analysis indicates that the poor in the state tend to diversify their income portfolio towards wages and salaries, and livestock sources. Crop farming is the major income source of the households; yet it contributes maximum (75.8%) in total inequality and is inequality triggering in its effect. While livestock and, wages and salaries are the potential sources to bridge the inequality gap in the entire state, non-farm business sources would be effective in the central and western zones of Punjab. The result of Theil index emphasized withingroup inequality as the principal contributor in total inequality across agro-climatic zones and districts. Therefore, policy intervention at individual district and zonal levels would be more imperative for correcting spatial imbalances in income distribution among farm households of the state.

Keywords


Agro-Climatic Zones, Empirical Evidence, Income Inequality, Rural Households, Theil Index.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi11%2F1855-1862