Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Formal Structures of Mentorship in Universities and Research Institutions will Benefit Both Science and Scientists


Affiliations
1 National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bellary Road, Bengaluru 560 065, India
 

As the number of science researchers grows in India, existing science academics need to consider how they can contribute meaningfully to support this growth of younger colleagues working in a range of academic environments. The introduction of formal mentorship mechanisms for academics at all steps of their career is currently insufficiently appreciated and could be transformative in a broad sense. Formal mentoring structures that permeate widely across all nature of academic and research organizations are infrequent, patchy and more often than not missing altogether. These would be beneficial for several reasons. In science especially, mentoring at appropriate stages can help the mentee take good decisions on a range of issues that affect their own careers and importantly, also of younger colleagues working with them. In addition to providing support mechanisms related to career progression, mentoring can help emphasize the importance of following correct ethical practices in the organization and in interactions with students and other laboratory personnel. If done thoroughly at the individual level and at sufficient scale across institutions, the existence of a good mentoring culture will increase scientifically meaningful success stories. Over time this will also help improve the general perception of why public money needs to be spent on teaching and research.
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 243

PDF Views: 70




  • Formal Structures of Mentorship in Universities and Research Institutions will Benefit Both Science and Scientists

Abstract Views: 243  |  PDF Views: 70

Authors

Gaiti Hasan
National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bellary Road, Bengaluru 560 065, India

Abstract


As the number of science researchers grows in India, existing science academics need to consider how they can contribute meaningfully to support this growth of younger colleagues working in a range of academic environments. The introduction of formal mentorship mechanisms for academics at all steps of their career is currently insufficiently appreciated and could be transformative in a broad sense. Formal mentoring structures that permeate widely across all nature of academic and research organizations are infrequent, patchy and more often than not missing altogether. These would be beneficial for several reasons. In science especially, mentoring at appropriate stages can help the mentee take good decisions on a range of issues that affect their own careers and importantly, also of younger colleagues working with them. In addition to providing support mechanisms related to career progression, mentoring can help emphasize the importance of following correct ethical practices in the organization and in interactions with students and other laboratory personnel. If done thoroughly at the individual level and at sufficient scale across institutions, the existence of a good mentoring culture will increase scientifically meaningful success stories. Over time this will also help improve the general perception of why public money needs to be spent on teaching and research.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi10%2F1615-1616