Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction Effects on 3D Integral Railway Bridge under High-Speed Moving Loads


Affiliations
1 Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
 

Here, we have studied a ballastless double-track fivespan integral bridge subjected to China Railway High-speed train loading. Soil–structure interaction (SSI) is considered to assess the resonant response of each span of this bridge. Finite element method is used to analyse the 3D bridge model. Four soil conditions, viz. fixed base, hard soil, medium soil and soft soil are considered to examine the dynamic response of the bridge. For each soil condition and for all the spans, it is observed that the resonant speeds correspond to higher modal frequencies. This study reveals the occurrence of resonance phenomenon for all the spans of an integral bridge, suggesting the importance of moving load analysis. Finally, the vertical resonant responses of the central span of an integral bridge and a continuous bridge are compared.

Keywords

Finite Element Analysis, Integral Railway Bridge, Moving Loads, Soil–Structure Interaction.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Marx, S. and Seidl, G., Integral railway bridges in Germany. Struct. Eng. Int., 2011, 3, 332–340.
  • Faraji, S., Ting, J. M., Crovo, D. S. and Helmut, E., Nonlinear analysis of integral bridges: finite-element model. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 2001, 127, 454–461.
  • Shoukry, S. N., William, G. W. and Riad, M. Y., Response of an integral abutment bridge to temperature variations. In Proceedings of Structures Congress: Crossing Borders, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2008, pp. 1–10.
  • Javier, R., Francisco, M. and Joaquin, M., Integral bridge for highspeed railway. Struct. Eng. Int., 2011, 3, 297–303.
  • Shamsabadi, A. and Kapuskar, M., Nonlinear soil–abutment– foundation–structure interaction analysis of skewed bridges subjected to near-field ground motions. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, 2010, 2202, 192–205.
  • Fry’ba, L., A rough assessment of railway bridges for high-speed trains. Eng. Struct., 2001, 23(5), 548–556.
  • Kwark, J. W., Choi, E. S., Kim, Y. J., Kim, B. S. and Kim, S. I., Dynamic behavior of two-span continuous concrete bridges under moving high-speed train. Comput. Struct., 2004, 82(4–5), 463– 474.
  • Wang, Y., Wei, Q. C., Shi, J. and Long, X., Resonance characteristics of two-span continuous beam under moving high speed trains. Latin Am. J. Solids Struct., 2010, 7, 185–199.
  • Yau, J. D., Resonance of continuous bridges due to high speed trains. J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 2001, 9(1), 14–20.
  • Li, X. Z., Liu, X. H., Liu, D. J. and Zhang, X., Influences of soil– structure interaction on coupled vibration of train–bridge system: theoretical and experimental study. Adv. Struct. Eng., 2013, 16(8), 1355–1364.
  • Wu, Y. S., Yang, Y. B. and Yau, J. D., Three-dimensional analysis of train–rail–bridge interaction problems. Veh. Syst. Dyn., 2001, 36 (1), pp. 1–35.
  • Ülker-Kaustell, M., Karoumi, R. and Pacoste, C., Simplified analysis of the dynamic soil–structure interaction of a portal frame railway bridge. Eng. Struct., 2010, 32, 3692–3698.
  • Yang, Y. B., Yau, J. D. and Wu, Y. S., Vehicle–Bridge Interaction Dynamics with Applications to High-Speed Railways, World Scientific, USA, 2004.
  • SAP2000, Integrated structural analysis and design software. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California, USA, 2005.
  • Gazetas, G., Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations. J. Geotech. Eng., 1991, 117(9), 1363– 1381.
  • Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi, 2008, 3rd edn.
  • European Committee for Standardisation (CEN). Eurocode1: actions on structures – part 2: traffic loads on bridges, 2003.
  • Fry’ba, L., Vibration of solids and structures under moving loads. Thomas Telford, 1999.
  • Liu, K., Reynders, E., DeRoeck, G. and Lombaert, G., Experimental and numerical analysis of a composite bridge for high-speed trains. J. Sound Vibr., 2009, 320, 201–220.
  • Zeng, Z., Zhu, K., He, X., Xu, W., Chen, L. and Lou, P., Random vibration analysis of train moving over slab track on bridge under track irregularities and earthquakes by pseudo excitation method. Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2015, 2015, 1–22.
  • Wang, S. J., Xu, Z. D., Li, S. and Dyke, S. J., Safety and stability of light-rail train running on multispan bridges with deformation. J. Bridge Eng., 2016, 21(9), 1–7.
  • Lei, X., Wu, S. and Zhang, B., Dynamic analysis of the high speed train and slab track nonlinear coupling system with the cross iteration algorithm. J. Nonlinear Dyn., 2016, 2016, 1–17.

Abstract Views: 231

PDF Views: 80




  • Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction Effects on 3D Integral Railway Bridge under High-Speed Moving Loads

Abstract Views: 231  |  PDF Views: 80

Authors

Anand M. Gharad
Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India
Ranjan S. Sonparote
Department of Applied Mechanics, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440 010, India

Abstract


Here, we have studied a ballastless double-track fivespan integral bridge subjected to China Railway High-speed train loading. Soil–structure interaction (SSI) is considered to assess the resonant response of each span of this bridge. Finite element method is used to analyse the 3D bridge model. Four soil conditions, viz. fixed base, hard soil, medium soil and soft soil are considered to examine the dynamic response of the bridge. For each soil condition and for all the spans, it is observed that the resonant speeds correspond to higher modal frequencies. This study reveals the occurrence of resonance phenomenon for all the spans of an integral bridge, suggesting the importance of moving load analysis. Finally, the vertical resonant responses of the central span of an integral bridge and a continuous bridge are compared.

Keywords


Finite Element Analysis, Integral Railway Bridge, Moving Loads, Soil–Structure Interaction.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi6%2F972-981