Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scale, Style and Spread of Global Institutional Research


Affiliations
1 A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram 695 016, India
 

Most research in the world is organized around institutions which can be categorized as belonging to different sectors, e.g. higher education, government, health, etc. In this article we have evaluated how countries share and spread their research efforts across these sectors. This is made possible because the Scimago Institutions Rankings (SIR) uses a five-sector classification of the leading 5362 research institutions in the world. It is shown that each country has its distinctive style of sharing and spreading its research efforts across major sectors. Some countries are similar to others (e.g. Spain and the Netherlands, or Iran and Turkey), while some are very different from each other (e.g. Spain and Iran). Various row-wise and column-wise operations on a country– sector matrix allow us to quantify and visualize these styles and spreads, and measure their shares of the global institutional research efforts.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Institutions Rankings, National Comparison, Research Efforts.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Whitehead, A. N., Science and the Modern World, The Macmillan Company, London, UK, 1925.

  • Edquist, C. and Johnson, B., Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (ed. Edquist, C.), Pinter/Cassell Academic, London, UK, 1997, p. 47.

  • North, D. C., Structure and Change in Economic History, Norton and Company Inc., New York, USA, 1981.

  • North, D. C., Institutions. J. Econ. Perspectives, 1991, 5(1), 97– 112.

  • May, R. M., The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 1997, 275(5301), 793–796.

  • King, D. A., The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 2004, 430(6997), 311–316.

  • Juraida, S., Kozubek, S., Munich, D. and Skoda, S., Scientific publication performance in post-communist countries: still lagging far behind. Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1), 315–328.

  • Krauze, T. K. and McGinnis, R., A matrix analysis of scientific specialties and careers in science. Scientometrics, 1979, 1(5–6), 419–444.

  • Prathap, G., Totalized input–output assessment of research productivity of nations using multi-dimensional input and output. Scientometrics, 2018, 115(1), 577–583.

  • Ramanujacharyulu, C., Analysis of preferential experiments. Psychometrika, 1964, 29(3), 257–261.


Abstract Views: 241

PDF Views: 84




  • Scale, Style and Spread of Global Institutional Research

Abstract Views: 241  |  PDF Views: 84

Authors

Gangan Prathap
A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technological University, Thiruvananthapuram 695 016, India

Abstract


Most research in the world is organized around institutions which can be categorized as belonging to different sectors, e.g. higher education, government, health, etc. In this article we have evaluated how countries share and spread their research efforts across these sectors. This is made possible because the Scimago Institutions Rankings (SIR) uses a five-sector classification of the leading 5362 research institutions in the world. It is shown that each country has its distinctive style of sharing and spreading its research efforts across major sectors. Some countries are similar to others (e.g. Spain and the Netherlands, or Iran and Turkey), while some are very different from each other (e.g. Spain and Iran). Various row-wise and column-wise operations on a country– sector matrix allow us to quantify and visualize these styles and spreads, and measure their shares of the global institutional research efforts.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Institutions Rankings, National Comparison, Research Efforts.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi4%2F530-535