Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

India Needs Genetic Modification Technology in Agriculture


Affiliations
1 Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 019, India
2 Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
3 Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Right Authority, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Societies Block, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
4 Agrasen Apartment, Plot 10, Sector 7, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 075, India
5 Division of Rural Development, JSS Mahavidyapeetha, Mysuru 570 004, India
6 Raviram Residency, 13/1 Chitale Marg, Dhantoli, Nagpur 440 012, India
7 Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
8 Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751 023, India
9 Trust for Advancement of Agricultural Sciences, Avenue II, Pusa Campus, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012,, India
10 Indian Institute of Advanced Research, Koba Institutional Area, Gandhinagar 382 007, India
11 National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Knowledge City, Mohali 140 306,, India
12 ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnolgy, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
13 National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, NASC Complex, Dev Prakash Shastri Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
14 National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110 067, India
15 Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi, South Campus, New Delhi 110 021, India
16 Advanced Centre for Plant Virology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
17 School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, India
 

India does not have a clear stand on the release and consumption of genetically modified crops (food). The only approved crop is Bt-cotton, which has put India on the global map as a cotton exporting country. Even so, Bt-brinjal is under moratorium and GM mustard is prevented from undergoing commercial trial. All these decisions are not based on sound scientific principles. Activism against has successfully prevented exploitation of a powerful technology that can contribute to India’s food and nutrition security. This article attempts to give a balanced perspective of genetic modification technology as one of the serious options to be considered on case to case basis. Ambivalence will seriously affect India’s food security in the future.

Keywords

Bt-Cotton, Food Security, Gene Editing, Genetically Modified Crops, Mustard.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Kesavan, P. C. and Swaminathan, M. S., Modern technologies for sustainable food and nutrition security. Curr. Sci., 2018, 115, 1876–1883.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects, The National Academy Press, 2016; https://doi.org/10.17226/23395.
  • European Commission, a decade of EU-funded GMO research (2001–2010), 2010; ec, europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_reserach.pdf.).
  • Klumper, W. and Qaim, M. A., Meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9, e111629; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111629.
  • Eenennaam, A. L. and Young, A. E., Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations. J. Anim. Sci., 2014, 92, 4255–4278.
  • Cotton Corporation of India – Statistics, Government of India undertaking; https://cotcorp.org.in/statistics.aspx
  • Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P., Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016. GM Crops Food, 2018, 9, 1–31.
  • Brookes, G. and Barfoot, P., Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2016: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops Food, 2018, 9, 109–139.
  • Krishna, V. and Qaim, M. B., Bt-cotton and sustainability of pesticide reduction in India. Agric. Syst., 2012, 107, 47–55.
  • Plewis, I., Indian farmer suicides – is GM cotton to blame? Significance, 2014, 11, 14–18.
  • Plewis, I., Hard evidence: does GM cotton lead to farmer suicide in India? In The Conversation, 2014; Theconversation.com.hard.evidence-does-gm-cotton-lead-to-farmer-suicide-in-india-24045.
  • Shukla, K. A., et al., Expression of an insecticidal fern protein protects against white fly. Nature Biotechnol., 2016, 34, 1046– 1051.
  • Lynas, M., Seeds of Science, Bloomsbury Sigma. United Kingdom, 2018, pp. 118–123.
  • Shelton, A. M. et al., Bt eggplant project in Bangladesh: history, present status and future direction. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 2018; https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00106.
  • Food Standards Australia/New Zealand (FSANZ). Response to Seralini paper, October 2016.
  • Glyphosate: EFSA updates toxicological profile, 2015; www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/151112.
  • Alberts, B. et al., Standing up for GMOs. Science, 2013, 341, 1320.
  • Kaur, N. et al., CRISPR/Cas9-mediated efficient editing in phytoene desaturase (PDS) demonstrates precise manipulation in banana cv. Rasthali genome. Funct. Integr. Genomics, 2018, 18, 89–99; doi.org/10.1007/s10142-017-0577-5.
  • Kumar, S., Bhatnagar, R. K., Kranthi, K. R. and Datta, S., The legal battle over field trials of GM crops. Nature India, 2014; doi:10.1038/nindia.2014.
  • National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Policy brief: to accelerate utilization of GE technology for food and nutrition security and improving farmers’ income, NAAS, New Delhi, 2016.

Abstract Views: 222

PDF Views: 87




  • India Needs Genetic Modification Technology in Agriculture

Abstract Views: 222  |  PDF Views: 87

Authors

S. Datta
Department of Botany, University of Calcutta, Kolkata 700 019, India
B. S. Dhillon
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India
P. L. Gautam
Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Right Authority, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, Societies Block, NASC Complex, DPS Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
J. L. Karihaloo
Agrasen Apartment, Plot 10, Sector 7, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 075, India
M. Mahadevappa
Division of Rural Development, JSS Mahavidyapeetha, Mysuru 570 004, India
C. D. Mayee
Raviram Residency, 13/1 Chitale Marg, Dhantoli, Nagpur 440 012, India
G. Padmanaban
Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, India
A. Parida
Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar 751 023, India
R. S. Paroda
Trust for Advancement of Agricultural Sciences, Avenue II, Pusa Campus, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012,, India
M. Sharma
Indian Institute of Advanced Research, Koba Institutional Area, Gandhinagar 382 007, India
T. R. Sharma
National Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Knowledge City, Mohali 140 306,, India
N. K. Singh
ICAR-National Research Centre on Plant Biotechnolgy, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110 012, India
R. B. Singh
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, NASC Complex, Dev Prakash Shastri Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India
R. V. Sonti
National Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110 067, India
A. K. Tyagi
Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi, South Campus, New Delhi 110 021, India
A. Varma
Advanced Centre for Plant Virology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, India
K. Veluthambi
School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai 625 021, India

Abstract


India does not have a clear stand on the release and consumption of genetically modified crops (food). The only approved crop is Bt-cotton, which has put India on the global map as a cotton exporting country. Even so, Bt-brinjal is under moratorium and GM mustard is prevented from undergoing commercial trial. All these decisions are not based on sound scientific principles. Activism against has successfully prevented exploitation of a powerful technology that can contribute to India’s food and nutrition security. This article attempts to give a balanced perspective of genetic modification technology as one of the serious options to be considered on case to case basis. Ambivalence will seriously affect India’s food security in the future.

Keywords


Bt-Cotton, Food Security, Gene Editing, Genetically Modified Crops, Mustard.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv117%2Fi3%2F390-394