Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Granger Causality Test of the Causal Relationship Between the Number of Editorial Board Members and the Scientific Output of Universities in the Field of Chemistry


Affiliations
1 School of Information Management, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Shanxi, China
 

Editorial board members, who are considered the gatekeepers of scientific journals, play an important role in academia. The aim of this study is to explore the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of universities. In this article, we have used time-series data and Granger causality test to explore the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the number of articles published by top universities in the field of chemistry. Furthermore, we interviewed some editorial board members about this causal relationship. The Granger causality test results suggest that the causal relationship is not obvious overall. Combining these findings with the results of qualitative interviews with editorial board members, we discuss the causal relationship between the two variables.

Keywords

Causality Test, Chemistry, Editorial Board Members, Scientometrics, Scientific Output of Universities.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • García-Carpintero, E., Granadino, B. and Plaza, L. M., The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scientific output of the same countries. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(3), 799-811.

  • Braun, T. and Dióspatonyi, I., Counting the gatekeepers of international science journals a worthwhile science indicator. Curr. Sci., 2005, 89(9), 1548-1551.

  • Braun, T. and Dióspatonyi, I., The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 2005, 62(3), 297-319.

  • Braun, T. and Dióspatonyi, I., Gatekeeping indicators exemplified by the main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2005, 56(8), 854-860.

  • Zsindely, S., Schubert, A. and Braun, T., Editorial gatekeeping patterns in international science journals. a new science indicator. Scientometrics, 1982, 4(1), 57-68.

  • Chan, K. C. and Fok, R. C. W., Membership on editorial boards and finance department rankings. J. Financ. Res., 2003, 26(3), 405-420.

  • Frey, B. S. and Rost, K., Do rankings reflect research quality? J. Appl. Econ., 2010, 13(1), 1-38.

  • Gibbons, J. D. and Fish, M., Rankings of economics faculties and representation on editorial boards of top journals. J. Econ. Educ., 1991, 22(4), 361-366.

  • Kaufman, G. G., Rankings of finance department by faculty representation on editorial boards of professional journal: a note. J. Finance, 1984, 39(4), 1189-1195.

  • Urbancic, F. R., Faculty representation of the editorial boards of leading marketing journals: an update of marketing department. Market. Educ. Rev., 2005, 15(2), 61-69.

  • Wang, X., The relationship between sci editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: a quantile regression approach. Malays. J. Libr. Inform. Sci., 2018, 23(1), 67-84.

  • Braun, T., Dióspatonyi, I., Zádor, E. and Zsindely, S., Journal gatekeepers indicator-based top universities of the world, of Europe and of 29 countries - a pilot study. Scientometrics, 2007, 71(2), 155-178.

  • Burgess, T. F. and Shaw, N. E., Editorial board membership of management and business journals: a social network analysis study of the financial times 40. Br. J. Manage., 2010, 21(3), 627- 648.

  • Chan, K. C., Fung, H.-G. and Lai, P., Membership of editorial boards and rankings of schools with international business orientation. J. Int. Business Stud., 2005, 36(4), 452-469.

  • Brown, C., The role of web-based information in the scholarly communication of chemists: citation and content analyses of American Chemical Society Journals. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol., 2007, 58(13), 2055-2065.

  • Brogaard, J., Engelberg, J. and Parsons, C. A., Networks and productivity: causal evidence from editor rotations. J. Financ. Econ., 2014, 111(1), 251-270.

  • Yu, L., Study on interactive relationship of different sources of R&D input and S&T output based on panel data and panel VAR model. Sci. Res. Manage., 2013, 34(10), 94-102.

  • Bošnjak, L., Puljak, L., Vukojević, K. and Marušić, A., Analysis of a number and type of publications that editors publish in their own journals: case study of scholarly journals in Croatia. Scientometrics, 2010, 86(1), 227-233.

  • Frandsen, T. F. and Nicolaisen, J., Praise the bridge that carries you over: testing the flattery citation hypothesis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2011, 62(5), 807-818.

  • Sugimoto, C. R. and Cronin, B., Citation gamesmanship: testing for evidence of ego bias in peer review. Scientometrics, 2012, 95(3), 851-862.


Abstract Views: 264

PDF Views: 80




  • A Granger Causality Test of the Causal Relationship Between the Number of Editorial Board Members and the Scientific Output of Universities in the Field of Chemistry

Abstract Views: 264  |  PDF Views: 80

Authors

Xing Wang
School of Information Management, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Shanxi, China

Abstract


Editorial board members, who are considered the gatekeepers of scientific journals, play an important role in academia. The aim of this study is to explore the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of universities. In this article, we have used time-series data and Granger causality test to explore the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the number of articles published by top universities in the field of chemistry. Furthermore, we interviewed some editorial board members about this causal relationship. The Granger causality test results suggest that the causal relationship is not obvious overall. Combining these findings with the results of qualitative interviews with editorial board members, we discuss the causal relationship between the two variables.

Keywords


Causality Test, Chemistry, Editorial Board Members, Scientometrics, Scientific Output of Universities.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv116%2Fi1%2F35-39