Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Do Floodplain Wetlands Enhance the Potential of Fish Ponds? Assessing Supporting Ecosystem Service of Chatla Wetland of Barak Valley, Assam, India


Affiliations
1 Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
 

Wetland ecosystems provide a range of ecological and economic benefits to people and society through provisioning of various goods and services. Many studies have highlighted the role of wetlands in provisioning of ecosystem goods, viz. fishery, agriculture, non-timber forest products, etc. Culture- and capture-fishery are important economic activities of people living in the Southeast Asian countries, viz. India and Bangladesh, which have large areas under floodplain wetlands. Globally, around one billion people rely on fish as the only source of protein, of which 35 million people are engaged in fishing and aquaculture, and 95% of them reside in developing countries like India and Bangladesh. In this region, a large number of people practice commercial culture fishery by constructing earthen ponds in and around the floodplains (http://agritech.tnau.ac.in).
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Maltby, E., Waterlogged Wealth: Why Waste the World’s Wet Places? Earthscan, London, UK, 1986, p. 200.

  • Davis, T. J., Towards wise use of wetlands. Wise use project, Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, 1993, p. 180.

  • Turyahabwe, N., Kakuru, W., Tweheyo, M. and Tumusiime, D. M., Agric. Food Security, 2013, 2, 5–9.

  • Sarkar, P. and Das, T., In Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation (ed. Upadhaya, K.), Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, 2016, pp. 59–76.

  • Thompson, P. M., Sultana, P., Islam, M. N., Kabir, M. M., Hossain, M. M. and Kabir, M. S., In proceedings of the International workshop on Fisheries Co-management, Penag, Malaysia, 1999.

  • Ayyappan, S., National aquaculture sector overview: India. National Aquaculture Sector Overview Fact Sheets, FAO, Rome, 2006; http://www.fao.org/fishery/countrysector/naso_india/en

  • Thompson, P. M., Sultana, P. and Islam, N., J. Environ. Manage., 2003, 69, 307–321.

  • Tockner, K., Pennetzdorfer, D., Reiner, N., Schiemer, F. and Ward, J. V., Freshwater Biol., 1999, 41, 521–535.

  • Mitsch, W. J., Gosselink, J. G., Anderson, C. J. and Zhang, L., Wetland Ecosystems, John Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersy, USA, 2009, p. 296.

  • Mitrovic, M. S., Bowling, L. C. and Buckney, R. T., Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 2001, 86, 285–298.

  • Mihaljevic, M., Stević, F., Horvatic, J. and Hackenberger, K. B., Hydrobiologia, 2009, 618, 77–88.

  • Richardson, K., In ICES Marine Sci. Symp., Montpellier, France, 2002.

  • Smith, E. V. and Swingle, H. S., Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 2011, 68, 309–315.

  • Viadero, R. C., Water Encycl., 2005. 3, 129–133.

  • Anderson, J. T. and Davis, C. A. (eds), Wetland Techniques: Volume 1: Foundations, Springer Science and Business Media, Dordrecht, Springer, the Netherlands, 2013, vol. 1, p. 459.

  • APHA, Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, New York, USA, 2012, p. 1496.

  • Biswas, K., Common Fresh and Brackish Water Algal Flora of India and Burma, International Book Distributers, Dehradun, 1980, p. 105.

  • Anand, N., Indian Freshwater Microalgae, Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, 1998, p. 93.

  • Dutta, N. K., Phytoplankton: A Practical Approach, Kasturi Publication, Guwahati, 2007, p. 503.

  • Needham, J. G. and Needham, P. R., A Guide to the Study of Freshwater Biology, Holden-Day Inc. San Francisco, USA, 1972, 5th edn, p. 108.

  • Battish, S. K., Fresh Water Zooplanktons of India, Mohan Primlaini, New Delhi, 1992, p. 803.

  • Michael, R. G. and Sharma, B. K., Indian Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Cladocera). Fauna of India and adjacent countries series. Zoological Survey India, Calcutta, 1998, p. 262.

  • Sharma, S. and Sharma, B. K., Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No. 290, 2008, pp. 1–307.

  • Sharma, B. K., Trop. Ecol., 2000, 41(2), 175–181.

  • Sharma, B. K. and Hussain, M., Ecol., Environ. Conserv., 2001, 7, 397–403.

  • Rangareddy Y, Guide to the Identification of the Macro Invertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World (ed. Dumont, H. J. F.), SPB Publications, The Netherlands, 1994, pp. 1–221.

  • Lackey, J. B., The manipulation and counting of river plankton and changes in some organisms due to formalin preservation. Public health reports (1896–1970). 1938, 25, 2080–2093.

  • Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. and Ryan, P. D., PAST: Paleontogical statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeonto. Electronica, 2001, 4, 9.

  • Alabaster, J. S. and Lloyd, R., Water quality criteria for freshwater fish. European inland fisheries advisory commission report, FAO. Buttersworth, London-UK, 1980, p. 297.

  • Karmakar, S., Haque, S. S., Hossain, M. M. and Shafiq, M., J. For. Res., 2011, 22, 87–92.

  • Panosso, R. and Esteves, F. A., J. Plankton Res., 2000, 22, 589–595.

  • Jin, Lv., Hongjuan, Wu. and Mengqiu, Chen., Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on phytoplankton composition and biomass in 15 subtropical, urban shallow lakes in Wuhan, China. Limnologica, 2011, 41, 48–56.

  • Sipauba-Tavares, L. H., Donadon, A. R. V. and Milan, R. N., Water quality and plankton populations in an earthen polyculture pond. Braz. J. Biol., 2011, 71, 845–855.

  • Lubzens, E.,Tandler, A. and Minkoff, G., Rotifers as food in aquaculture. Hydro-biologia, 1989, 186, 387–400.


Abstract Views: 248

PDF Views: 69




  • Do Floodplain Wetlands Enhance the Potential of Fish Ponds? Assessing Supporting Ecosystem Service of Chatla Wetland of Barak Valley, Assam, India

Abstract Views: 248  |  PDF Views: 69

Authors

Sultana Parven
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
Priyanka Sarkar
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India
Tapati Das
Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Assam University, Silchar 788 011, India

Abstract


Wetland ecosystems provide a range of ecological and economic benefits to people and society through provisioning of various goods and services. Many studies have highlighted the role of wetlands in provisioning of ecosystem goods, viz. fishery, agriculture, non-timber forest products, etc. Culture- and capture-fishery are important economic activities of people living in the Southeast Asian countries, viz. India and Bangladesh, which have large areas under floodplain wetlands. Globally, around one billion people rely on fish as the only source of protein, of which 35 million people are engaged in fishing and aquaculture, and 95% of them reside in developing countries like India and Bangladesh. In this region, a large number of people practice commercial culture fishery by constructing earthen ponds in and around the floodplains (http://agritech.tnau.ac.in).

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi12%2F2434-2436