Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence of Open and Polyhouse Conditions on Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission from Amaranthus Plots with Different Nutrient Management Practices under Changing Climate Scenario


Affiliations
1 Water Management (Agriculture) Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode 673 571, India
 

A field study was conducted using Amaranthus to assess the impact of increased temperature in polyhouse with three different treatments, viz. 100% organic, 100% inorganic and 50% organic + 50% inorganic nutrition on growth, yield and carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution compared to that of open natural condition. Among the different treatments applied, 100% application of organic manure resulted in maximum CO2 emission in both open (538 mg) and polyhouse conditions (551 mg). The lowest value of CO2 evolution (266 mg) was observed with 100% application of inorganic fertilizers under polyhouse conditions. In all the three treatments, CO2 evolution almost reached a plateau and stabilized during the last two observations. At the last interval, CO2 evolution ranged from 4.00 to 6.80 mg in all the treatments. However, cumulative CO2 evolution showed that the emission was higher under open natural conditions (434 mg) compared to the polyhouse conditions (398 mg) at elevated temperature. This indicated that the microbial respiration was higher under natural conditions. Ambient air temperature and soil temperature were higher under polyhouse condition than open natural condition. However, soil moisture was higher under open condition than polyhouse condition for most observations. It could be observed from the experiment that Amaranthus production declined with increase in temperature, and maximum yield was obtained with 100% application of organic manure under open condition. Under elevated temperature condition in polyhouse, 50% application of inorganic fertilizer + 50% application of organic manure (T3) registered the maximum crop production. This suggests that sufficient mitigation strategies need to be adopted for sustaining crop production under changing climate scenario.

Keywords

Amaranthus, Carbon Dioxide Emission, Crop Productivity, Soil Temperature.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • IPCC, Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Solomon, S. D. et al.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.

  • Rao, G. S. L. H. V., Kesava Rao, A. V. R., Krishnakumar, K. N. and Gopakumar, C. S., Impact of climate change on food and plantation crops in the humid tropics of India. In ISPRS Archives XXXVIII-8/W3 Workshop Proceedings: Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture, 2009, p. 127.

  • Surendran, U., Sushanth, C. M., Mammen, G. and Joseph E. J., Modeling the impacts of increase in temperature on irrigation water requirements in Palakkad district – a case study in humid tropical Kerala. J. Water Climate Change, 2014, 5, 471–487.

  • Surendran, U., Sushanth, C. M., Mammen, G. and Joseph, E. J., FAO-CROPWAT model-based estimation of crop water need and appraisal of water resources for sustainable water resource management: pilot study for Kollam district – humid tropical region of Kerala, India. Curr. Sci., 2017, 112, 76–86.

  • Pathak, H., Ladha, J. K., Aggarwal, P. K., Peng, S., Das, S. and Singh, Y., Climatic potential and on farm yield trends of rice and wheat in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Field Crops Res., 2003, 80, 223–234.

  • Rawson, H. M., Gifford, R. M. and Condon, B. N., Temperature gradient chambers for research on global environment change. I. Portable chambers for research on short stature vegetation. Plant Cell Environ., 1995, 18, 1048–1054.

  • Barlow, K. M., Christy, B. P., O’Leary, G. J., Riffkin, P. A. and Nuttall, J. G., Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: a review. Field Crops Res., 2015, 171, 109–119.

  • Lobell, D. B. and Field, C. B., Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ. Res. Lett., 2007, 2, 014002; doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/014002.

  • Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. and Costa-Roberts, J., Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 2011, 333, 616– 620.

  • Hatfield, J. L. and Prueger, J. H., Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Climate Extr., 2015, 10, 4–10.

  • Rustad, L. E., Huntington, T. G. and Boone, R. D., Controls on soil respiration: implication for climate change. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48, 1–6.

  • Raich, J. W., Potter, C. S. and Bhagavatti, D., Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980–94. Global Change Biol., 2002, 8, 800–812.

  • Pendall, E. et al., Below-ground process responses to elevated CO2 and temperature: a discussion of observations, measurement methods and models. New Phytol., 2004, 162, 311–322.

  • Solomon, S., Plattner, G. K., Knutti, R. and Friedlingstein, R., Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2009, 106, 1704–1709.

  • Coleman, D. C., Anderson, R. V. and Cole, C. V., Tropic interactions in soils as they affect energy and nutrient dynamics. IV. Flows of metabolic and biomass carbon. J. Microb. Ecol., 1978, 4, 373–380.

  • Surendran, U. and Vani, D., Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sugarcane productivity under semi arid tropical agro ecosystem. Int. J. Plant Prod., 2013, 7, 269–278.

  • Surendran, U., Ramasubramoniam, S., Raja, P., Kumar, V. and Murugappan, V., Budgeting of major nutrients and the mitigation options for nutrient mining in semi arid tropical agro ecosystem of Tamil Nadu, India using NUTMON model. Environ. Monitor. Assess, 2016, 188, 1–17.

  • Surendran, U., Ramesh, V., Jayakumar, M., Marimuthu, S. and Sridevi, G., Improved sugarcane productivity with tillage and trash management practices in semi arid tropical agro ecosystem in India. Soil Till. Res., 2016, 158, 10–21.

  • Eliasson, P. E., McMurtrie, R. E. and Pepper, D. A., The response of heterotrophic CO2 flux to soil warming. Global Change Biol., 2005, 11, 167–181.

  • Fang, C. et al., Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature, 2005, 433, 57–59.

  • Melillo, J. M., Steudler, P. A. and Aber, J. D., Soil warming and carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system. Science, 2002, 298, 2173–2176.

  • Zhang, W. et al., Soil microbial responses to experimental warming and clipping in a tallgrass prairie. Global Change Biol., 2005, 11, 266–277.

  • Balser, T. C. et al., Bridging the gap between micro- and macro-scale perspectives on the role of microbial communities in global change ecology. Plant Soil, 2006, 289, 59–70.

  • Davidson, E. A. and Janssens, I. A., Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 2006, 440, 165–173.

  • Rustad, L., Campbell, J. and Marion, G., A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecolagia, 2001, 126, 543–562.

  • Fierer, N., Craine, J. M. and McLauchlan, K., Litter quality and the temperature sensitivity of decomposition. Ecology, 2005, 86, 320–326.

  • French, S., Levy-Booth, D., Samarajeewa, A., Shannon, K. E., Smith, J. and Trevors, J. T., Elevated temperatures and carbon dioxide concentrations: effects on selected microbial activities in temperate agricultural soils. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2009, 25, 1887–1900.

  • Barnard, R. X. and Leadley, P. W., Global change, nitrification, and denitrification: a review. Global Biogeochem. Cycle, 2005, 19, GB1007.

  • Aggarwal, P. K., Assessment of climate change impacts on wheat production in India. In Global Climate Change and Indian Agriculture – Case Studies from ICAR Network Project (ed. Aggarwal P. K.), ICAR, New Delhi Publication, New Delhi, 2009, p. 512.

  • Akanni, D. I., Ojeniyi, S. O. and Awodun, M. A., Soil properties, growth yield and nutrient content of Maize, Pepper and Amaranthus as influenced by organic and organomineral fertilizer. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 2011, 1, 1074–1078.

  • Olowoake, A. A. and Ojo, J. A., Effect of fertilizer types on the growth and yield of Amaranthus caudatus in Ilorin, Southern Guinea, Savanna Zone of Nigeria. Adv. Agric., 2014; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/947062.


Abstract Views: 196

PDF Views: 79




  • Influence of Open and Polyhouse Conditions on Soil Carbon Dioxide Emission from Amaranthus Plots with Different Nutrient Management Practices under Changing Climate Scenario

Abstract Views: 196  |  PDF Views: 79

Authors

U. Surendran
Water Management (Agriculture) Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode 673 571, India
Aswathy K. Vijayan
Water Management (Agriculture) Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode 673 571, India
V. Bujair
Water Management (Agriculture) Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode 673 571, India
E. J. Joseph
Water Management (Agriculture) Division, Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode 673 571, India

Abstract


A field study was conducted using Amaranthus to assess the impact of increased temperature in polyhouse with three different treatments, viz. 100% organic, 100% inorganic and 50% organic + 50% inorganic nutrition on growth, yield and carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution compared to that of open natural condition. Among the different treatments applied, 100% application of organic manure resulted in maximum CO2 emission in both open (538 mg) and polyhouse conditions (551 mg). The lowest value of CO2 evolution (266 mg) was observed with 100% application of inorganic fertilizers under polyhouse conditions. In all the three treatments, CO2 evolution almost reached a plateau and stabilized during the last two observations. At the last interval, CO2 evolution ranged from 4.00 to 6.80 mg in all the treatments. However, cumulative CO2 evolution showed that the emission was higher under open natural conditions (434 mg) compared to the polyhouse conditions (398 mg) at elevated temperature. This indicated that the microbial respiration was higher under natural conditions. Ambient air temperature and soil temperature were higher under polyhouse condition than open natural condition. However, soil moisture was higher under open condition than polyhouse condition for most observations. It could be observed from the experiment that Amaranthus production declined with increase in temperature, and maximum yield was obtained with 100% application of organic manure under open condition. Under elevated temperature condition in polyhouse, 50% application of inorganic fertilizer + 50% application of organic manure (T3) registered the maximum crop production. This suggests that sufficient mitigation strategies need to be adopted for sustaining crop production under changing climate scenario.

Keywords


Amaranthus, Carbon Dioxide Emission, Crop Productivity, Soil Temperature.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi06%2F1311-1317