Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scaling of Hydraulic Functions in Heterogeneous Soil Using Nonlinear Least Squares Minimization Method


Affiliations
1 Division of Farm Machinery and Post Harvest Technology, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, India
 

Presenting soil heterogeneity precisely in various spatial scales is the main key to simulate water and solute transport through it. The method described by Richards is mostly used to study water flow through vadose zone. It requires spatial representation of hydraulic functions and water retention relationship in the soil. To represent the spatial relationship of soil hydraulic functions, scaling approach is being used since the last few decades. In this study, a simple scaling method using nonlinear least squares minimization technique has been used to scale soil matric potential, hydraulic conductivity as well as simultaneous scaling of soil matric potential and hydraulic conductivity data. Simultaneous scaling is necessary as it reduces the volume of data by producing a single set of scale factors for hydraulic functions in a heterogeneous soil. Van Genuchten’s semi-empirical expressions were used in this study to parameterize soil hydraulic functions. Results showed that correlation coefficient from raw and descaled data was superior when soil matric potential and hydraulic conductivity data were scaled separately than simultaneously. Improvement of correlation coefficient in simultaneous scaling can be obtained by adding more weight to the soil matric potential data than unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data, which enhances the overall correlation coefficient in simultaneously scaling. Statistical analysis of the scale factors showed that they are lognormally distributed. Scale factors calculated by solving simple equations obtained using the method described in this study can be used to simulate water movement through heterogeneous soil conditions using HYDRUS model.

Keywords

Effective Saturation, Lognormal Distribution, Scaling, Soil Matric Potential, Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Richards, L. A., Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics, 1931, 1, 318–333.

  • Van Genuchten, M. T., A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1980, 44, 892–898.

  • Mualem, Y., A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 1976, 13(3), 513–522.

  • Miller, E. E. and Miller, R. D., Physical theory for capillary flow phenomena. Appl. Phys. J., 1956, 27, 324–332.

  • Clausnitzer, V., Hopmans, J. W. and Nielsen, D. R., Simultaneous scaling of soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves. Water Resour. Res., 1992, 28(1), 19–31.

  • Warrick, A. W., Mullen, G. J. and Nielsen, D. R., Scaling field-measured soil hydraulic properties using similar media concept. Water Resour. Res., 1977, 13(2), 355–362.

  • Russo, D. and Bresler, E., Scaling soil hydraulic properties of a heterogeneous field. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1980, 44, 681–684.

  • Simmons, C. S., Nielsen, D. R. and Biggar, J. W., Scaling of field-measured soil-water properties. I. Methodology, II. Hydraulic conductivity and flux, Agricultural Experiment Station. Hilgardia, 1979, 47(4), 349–358.

  • Peck, A. J., Luxmoore, R. J. and Stolzy, J. L., Effects of spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties in water budget modeling. Water Resour. Res., 1977, 13(2), 248–354.

  • Ahuja, L. R., Naney, J. W. and Nielsen, D. R., Scaling soil water properties and infiltration modeling. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1984, 48, 970–973.

  • Hopmans, J. W. and Stricker, J. N. M., Soil hydraulic properties in the study area Hupselse Beek as obtained from three different scales of observation: an overview. Research Report, Department of Hydraulics & Catchment Hydrology, Wageningen, 1987.

  • Lascano, R. J. and van Bavel, C. H. M., Spatial variability of soil hydraulic and remotely sensed soil parameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1982, 46, 223–228.

  • Unlu, K., Nielsen, D. R. and Biggar, J. W., Stochastic analysis of unsaturated flow: one-dimensional Monte Carlo simulations and comparisons with spectral perturbation analysis and field observations. Water Resour. Res., 1990, 26(9), 2207–2218.

  • Brooks, R. H. and Corey, A. T., Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow. J. Irrig. Drain E, 1966, 72, 61–88.

  • Vachaud, G., Vauclin, M. and Balabanis, P., Stochastic approach of soil water flow through the use of scaling factors: measurement and simulation. Agric. Water Manage., 1988, 13, 249–261.

  • Tuli, A., Kosugi, K. and Hopmans, J. W., Simultaneous scaling of soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions assuming lognormal pore-size distribution. Adv. Water Resour., 2001, 24, 677–688.

  • Nasta, P., Kamai, T., Chirico, G., Hopmans, J. W. and Romano, N., Scaling soil water retention functions using particle-size distribution. J. Hydrol., 2009, 374(3), 223–234.

  • Nasta, P., Romano, N., Assouline, S., Vrugt, J. A. and Hopmans, J. W., Prediction of spatially variable unsaturated hydraulic conductivity using scaled particle-size distribution functions. Water Resour. Res., 2013, 49, 4219–4229.

  • Stoffregen, H. and Wessolek, G., Scaling the hydraulic functions of a water repellent sandy soil. Int. Agrophys., 2014, 28, 349–358.

  • Shukla, M. K., Soil Physics: An Introduction, CRC Press, Florida, 2013.

  • Simúnek, J., Sejna, M. and van Genuchten, M. T., Hydrus-2d. User manual. International Ground Water Modeling Center, Colorado School of Mines, 1996.

  • Marquardt, D. W., An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 1963, 11(2), 431–441.

  • Schmitz, G. H., Schutze, N. and Wohling, T., Irrigation Control: Towards a New Solution of an Old Problem, IHP-HWRP, Germany, 2005, vol. 5.


Abstract Views: 273

PDF Views: 77




  • Scaling of Hydraulic Functions in Heterogeneous Soil Using Nonlinear Least Squares Minimization Method

Abstract Views: 273  |  PDF Views: 77

Authors

Akram Ahmed
Division of Farm Machinery and Post Harvest Technology, Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, India

Abstract


Presenting soil heterogeneity precisely in various spatial scales is the main key to simulate water and solute transport through it. The method described by Richards is mostly used to study water flow through vadose zone. It requires spatial representation of hydraulic functions and water retention relationship in the soil. To represent the spatial relationship of soil hydraulic functions, scaling approach is being used since the last few decades. In this study, a simple scaling method using nonlinear least squares minimization technique has been used to scale soil matric potential, hydraulic conductivity as well as simultaneous scaling of soil matric potential and hydraulic conductivity data. Simultaneous scaling is necessary as it reduces the volume of data by producing a single set of scale factors for hydraulic functions in a heterogeneous soil. Van Genuchten’s semi-empirical expressions were used in this study to parameterize soil hydraulic functions. Results showed that correlation coefficient from raw and descaled data was superior when soil matric potential and hydraulic conductivity data were scaled separately than simultaneously. Improvement of correlation coefficient in simultaneous scaling can be obtained by adding more weight to the soil matric potential data than unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data, which enhances the overall correlation coefficient in simultaneously scaling. Statistical analysis of the scale factors showed that they are lognormally distributed. Scale factors calculated by solving simple equations obtained using the method described in this study can be used to simulate water movement through heterogeneous soil conditions using HYDRUS model.

Keywords


Effective Saturation, Lognormal Distribution, Scaling, Soil Matric Potential, Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi05%2F1046-1054