Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Greywater Treatment Using Horizontal, Vertical and Hybrid Flow Constructed Wetlands


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Environment and Water Resource Engineering Division, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
 

The performance evaluation of three pilot scale subsurface flow constructed wetlands (CW), i.e. horizontal flow (HFCW), vertical flow (VFCW) and a baffle type-hybrid (HYCW) was studied. The units were continuously fed with greywater and were planted with Phragmites australis. The inflow concentrations of BOD, COD, TSS, NO3, TP and FC were in the range of 72–120 mg/l, 216–320 mg/l, 224–320 mg/l 10.3–14.6 mg/l, 2.9–3.8 mg/l and 50–120 CFU/100 ml respectively. The average removal efficiencies of BOD, COD, TSS, TP, TN and FC in HYCW were 95 ± 2%, 96 ± 3%, 98 ± 2%, 92 ± 2%, 98 ± 2% and 98 ± 2% respectively and comparatively more than the other two constructed wetlands.

Keywords

Constructed Wetlands, Hybrid Flow, Horizontal Flow, Organics and Nutrients, Phragmites australis, Vertical Flow.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Lazarova, V., Levine, B., Sack, J., Cirelli, G., Jeffrey, P., Muntau, H. and Brissaud, F., Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries. Water Sci. Technol., 2001, 43(10), 25–33.
  • Vymazal, J., Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ., 2007, 380, 48–65.
  • Saumya, S., Akansha, S., Rinaldo, J., Jayasri, M. A. and Suthindhiran, K., Construction and evaluation of prototype subsurface flow wetland planted with Heliconiaangusta for the treatment of synthetic greywater. J. Clean. Prod., 2015, 91, 235–240.
  • Department of Health Western Australia (DHWA), Draft Guidelines for the Reuse of Greywater in Western Australia, Department of Health, Perth, Australia, 2002.
  • Crook, J., Mosher, P. J. J. and Casteline, J. M., Status and role of water reuse. An International View, Global Water Research Coalition. United Kingdom, London, 2005.
  • Gross, A., Shmueli, O., Ronen, Z. and Raveh, E., Recycled vertical flow constructed wetland (RVFCW) – a novel method of recycling greywater for irrigation in small communities and households. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(5), 916–923.
  • Beck, S. E., Rodriguez, R. A., Salveson, A., Goel, N., Rhodes, S., Kehoe, P. and Linden, K. G., Disinfection methods for treating low TOC, light greywater to California Title 22 water reuse standards. J. Environ. Eng., 2013, 139(9), 1137–1145.
  • Chen, Z., Kuschk, P., Paschke, H., Kastner, M., Muller, J. A. and Koser, H., Treatment of a sulphate-rich groundwater contaminated with perchloroethene in a hydroponic plant ischolar_main mat filter and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland at pilot-scale. Chemosphere, 2014, 117, 178–184.
  • Wurochekke, A. A., Harun, N. A., Mohamed, R. M. S. R. and Kassim, A. H. B. M., Constructed wetland of Lepironia articulata for household greywater treatment. APCBEE Procedia, 2014, 10, 103–109.
  • Saeed, T. and Sun, G., A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J. Environ. Manage., 2012, 112, 429–448.
  • Vymazal, J., The use of sub-surface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic: 10 years experience. Ecol. Eng., 2002, 18(5), 633–646.
  • UN-HABITAT, Constructed Wetlands Manual. UN-HABITAT Water for Asian Cities Programme Nepal, Kathmandu, 2008.
  • American Public Health Association. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 21st edn, 2005.
  • Antonopoulou, G., Kirkou, A. and Stasinakis, A. S., Quantitative and qualitative greywater characterization in Greek households and investigation of their treatment using physicochemical methods. Sci. Total Environ., 2013, 454, 426–432.
  • Tee, H. C., Lim, P. E., Seng, C. E. and Nawi, M. A. M., Newly developed baffled subsurface-flow constructed wetland for the enhancement of nitrogen removal. Bioresour. Technol., 2012, 104, 235–242.
  • Abou-Elela, S. I., Golinielli, G., Abou-Taleb, E. M. and Hellal, M. S., Municipal wastewater treatment in horizontal and vertical flows constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng., 2013, 61, 460–468.
  • Zurita, F., De Anda, J. and Belmont, M. A., Treatment of domestic wastewater and production of commercial flowers in vertical and horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng., 2009, 35(5), 861–869.
  • Akratos, C. S. and Tsihrintzis, V. A., Effect of temperature, HRT, vegetation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng., 2007, 29(2), 173–191.

Abstract Views: 281

PDF Views: 84




  • Greywater Treatment Using Horizontal, Vertical and Hybrid Flow Constructed Wetlands

Abstract Views: 281  |  PDF Views: 84

Authors

C. Ramprasad
Department of Civil Engineering, Environment and Water Resource Engineering Division, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
Ligy Philip
Department of Civil Engineering, Environment and Water Resource Engineering Division, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India

Abstract


The performance evaluation of three pilot scale subsurface flow constructed wetlands (CW), i.e. horizontal flow (HFCW), vertical flow (VFCW) and a baffle type-hybrid (HYCW) was studied. The units were continuously fed with greywater and were planted with Phragmites australis. The inflow concentrations of BOD, COD, TSS, NO3, TP and FC were in the range of 72–120 mg/l, 216–320 mg/l, 224–320 mg/l 10.3–14.6 mg/l, 2.9–3.8 mg/l and 50–120 CFU/100 ml respectively. The average removal efficiencies of BOD, COD, TSS, TP, TN and FC in HYCW were 95 ± 2%, 96 ± 3%, 98 ± 2%, 92 ± 2%, 98 ± 2% and 98 ± 2% respectively and comparatively more than the other two constructed wetlands.

Keywords


Constructed Wetlands, Hybrid Flow, Horizontal Flow, Organics and Nutrients, Phragmites australis, Vertical Flow.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv114%2Fi01%2F155-165