Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Antibacterial Activity of Protease Hydrolysates Isolated from Silybum marianum


Affiliations
1 College of Food Science, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
2 College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
 

In this study, the antibacterial activity of protease hydrolysates from Silybum marianum protein isolates (SMPIs) was investigated. Neutral protease, papain, pepsin and alkaline protease were used as experimental enzymes, while Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Sarcina lutea and Bacillus subtilis were the bacterial indicators. The results showed that neutral protease, papain and pepsin hydrolysates exerted inhibitory effects on the four types of bacteria tested. However, alkaline protease hydrolysates of SMPI showed stimulatory effects on replication of the four bacteria tested. The antibacterial mechanism of SMPI hydrolysates was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and the results showed effective inhibition of E. coli (Gram-negative, G-) and S. aureus (Gram-positive, G+). It is speculated that the underlying mechanism of SMPI hydrolysates may involve injury to E. coli and S. aureus cell membranes. Currently, no similar studies have been conducted on the antibacterial activity of SMPI.

Keywords

Antibacterial Activity, Antibacterial Mechanism, Proteolysis, Silybum marianum.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Compiling group of comprehensive utilization of milk thistle. Comprehensive Utilization of Milk Thistle, Science Press, Beijing, 1980.
  • Li, F. et al., Extraction, physicochemical and functional properties of proteins from Milk Thistle Silybum marianum L. Gaernt seeds. Int. J. Food Prop., 2013, 16, 1750–1763.
  • Wang, H. N. et al., Physicochemical properties and oxidative stability of Silybum marianum oil. Food Sci. Tech-China, 2015, 40, 212–218.
  • Qian, X. S. et al., Development of the oil of Silybum marianum. Chin. Wild Plant Resour., 2006, 25, 13–16.
  • Fathi-Achachlouei, B. and Azadmard-Damirchi, S., Milk thistle seed oil constituents from different varieties grown in Iran. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 2009, 86, 643–649.
  • Charrier, C. et al., Preparation of silybin phase II metabolites: streptomyces catalyzed glucuronidation. J. Mol. Catal. B-Enzym, 2014, 102, 167–173.
  • Sadava, D. and Kane, S. E., Silibinin reverses drug resistance in human small-cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett., 2013, 339, 102–106.
  • Rastegar, H. et al., The role of milk thistle extract in breast carcinoma cell line (MCF-7) apoptosis with doxorubicin. Acta Med. Iran, 2013, 51, 591–598.
  • Liu, Z. G. et al., Research progress in pharmacological effects of silymarin. J. Liaoning. Univ. TCM, 2012, 14, 91–93.
  • Chen, Y. Q., Wang, C. M. and Zhang, W., Basic research on comprehensive utilization of Silybum Marianum II. Study on the fat and protein of Silybum marianum fruit. Acta Agric. Boreal. Sin., 1998, 7, 79–81.
  • Zhu, S. Y. et al., Amino acid composition and in vitro digestibility of protein isolates from Silybum marianum. J. Food Agric. Environ., 2013, 11, 136–140.
  • Liu, H. S., Hu, R. B. and Qi, X. Y., Optimization of soluble protein extraction from milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seed by response surface methodology. Hubei Agric. Sci., 2011, 50, 4250–4255.
  • Zhu, S. Y. et al., Enzymatic hydrolysis of milk thistle meal protein and antioxidation of hydrolysates. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc., 2011, 26, 68–72.
  • Sun, Y. H., Dong, Y. and Qi, L. L., Ultrasonic-assisted extraction of protein from milk thistle residues. Cereals Oils Process., 2007, 4, 58–60.
  • Dionysius, D. A. and Milne, J. M., Antibacterial peptides of bovine lactoferrin: purification and characterization. J. Dairy Sci., 1997, 80, 667–674.
  • Song, R. et al., Antibacterial activity and stability of half-fin anchovy (Setipinna taty) protein hydrolysate. Food Sci., 2010, 31, 88–92.
  • Wu, J. et al., Studies on antibacterial components from maggot homogenate and its enzymatic hydrolysate. Jiangsu Agric. Sci., 2007, 4, 153–155.
  • Cao, J. and Shi, J. L., Food Enzymology, Zhengzhou University Press, 2011, pp. 202–205.
  • Haney, E. F. et al., Mechanism of action of puroindoline derived tryptophan-rich antimicrobial peptides (J). BBA-Biomembranes, 2013, 1828, 1802–181.
  • Li, C. H. et al., Effect of protease types and parameters on the antioxidant activity, physico-chemical items and sensory quality of Silybum marianum’s kernel protein hydrolysate, Food Fermn. Ind., 2013, 39, 118–121.

Abstract Views: 210

PDF Views: 77




  • Antibacterial Activity of Protease Hydrolysates Isolated from Silybum marianum

Abstract Views: 210  |  PDF Views: 77

Authors

Jing Yue
College of Food Science, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Zhicheng Zhu
College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
Xinhua Li
College of Food Science, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China

Abstract


In this study, the antibacterial activity of protease hydrolysates from Silybum marianum protein isolates (SMPIs) was investigated. Neutral protease, papain, pepsin and alkaline protease were used as experimental enzymes, while Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Sarcina lutea and Bacillus subtilis were the bacterial indicators. The results showed that neutral protease, papain and pepsin hydrolysates exerted inhibitory effects on the four types of bacteria tested. However, alkaline protease hydrolysates of SMPI showed stimulatory effects on replication of the four bacteria tested. The antibacterial mechanism of SMPI hydrolysates was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and the results showed effective inhibition of E. coli (Gram-negative, G-) and S. aureus (Gram-positive, G+). It is speculated that the underlying mechanism of SMPI hydrolysates may involve injury to E. coli and S. aureus cell membranes. Currently, no similar studies have been conducted on the antibacterial activity of SMPI.

Keywords


Antibacterial Activity, Antibacterial Mechanism, Proteolysis, Silybum marianum.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi03%2F496-500