Current Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Bibliometric Profile of Current Science between 1961 and 2015


Affiliations
1 Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
2 Research Center of Science Technology and Society, Dalian University, Dalian Economic Technological Development Zone, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
 

A bibliometric analysis of 31,403 publications in Current Science between 1961 and 2015 revealed an unstable trend; the highest citations per publication appeared during 2003-2005. The impact factor of Current Science had an overall increasing trend and placed the journal in the quartile Q2 within 'Multidisciplinary sciences' category. The h-index of Current Science was 82 and 24 authors had more than one H-Classic articles. The most productive country was India and Current Science was dominated by contributions from Indian institutions. Analysis of author keywords showed 11 main research themes for the journal. These findings will help the readers to get a quick and intuitive overview of Current Science.

Keywords

Bibliometrics, Citation Impact, Current Science, Research Theme, Scientific Journals Evaluation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • http://www.currentscience.ac.in/php/about.php (retrieved 5 November 2016).

  • https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/JCRJournalHomeAction.action (retrieved 7 November 2016).

  • Dutt, B., Garg, K. C. and Bali, A., Scientometrics of the international journal Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 2003, 56, 81–93.

  • Garg, K. C., Srivastava, J. and Bebi, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights – A bibliometric analysis of cited references. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., 2015, 35, 436–442.

  • Cordoba, J. R., Pilkington, A. and Bernroider, E. W. N., Information systems as a discipline in the making: comparing EJIS and MISQ, between 1995 and 2008. Eur. J. Inform. Syst., 2012, 21(5), 479–495.

  • Coupe, T., Revealed performances: worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 2003, 1(1), 1309–1345.

  • Mostafavi, E. and Bazrafshan, A., Research and collaboration overview of Institute Pasteur International Network: a bibliometric approach toward research funding decisions. Int. J. Health Policy Manage., 2014, 2(1), 21–28.

  • Gupta, B. M., Dhawan, S. M. and Walke, R., Indo-Russian collaboration in S&T: an analysis through co-authored publications, 1995–99. Curr. Sci., 2002, 82(9), 1075–1077.

  • Iefremova, O, Sas, D. and Kozak, M., International collaboration among authors of Current Science. Curr. Sci., 2016, 110(8), 1414–1418.

  • Prathap, G., A bibliometric profile of Current Science. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106(7), 958–963.

  • Garg, K. C. and Kumar, S., Uncitedness of Indian scientific output. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(6), 965–970.

  • Eck, N. J. V. and Waltman, L., Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(2), 523–538.

  • Chen, C., CiteSpace II: detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2006, 57(3), 359–377.

  • Hirsch, J. E., An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2005, 102, 16569–16572.

  • Costas, R. and Bordons, M., Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics, 2008, 77(2), 267–288.

  • Vanclay, J., On the robustness of the h-index. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2007, 58(10), 1547–1550.

  • Alonso, S. et al., h-index: a review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. J. Informetr., 2009, 3(4), 273–289.

  • Martinez, M. A. et al., Characterizing highly cited papers in social work through H-classics. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2), 1–17.


Abstract Views: 303

PDF Views: 81




  • A Bibliometric Profile of Current Science between 1961 and 2015

Abstract Views: 303  |  PDF Views: 81

Authors

Peng Wang
Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
Fangwei Zhu
Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
Haoyang Song
Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China
Jianhua Hou
Research Center of Science Technology and Society, Dalian University, Dalian Economic Technological Development Zone, Dalian City, Liaoning Province, China

Abstract


A bibliometric analysis of 31,403 publications in Current Science between 1961 and 2015 revealed an unstable trend; the highest citations per publication appeared during 2003-2005. The impact factor of Current Science had an overall increasing trend and placed the journal in the quartile Q2 within 'Multidisciplinary sciences' category. The h-index of Current Science was 82 and 24 authors had more than one H-Classic articles. The most productive country was India and Current Science was dominated by contributions from Indian institutions. Analysis of author keywords showed 11 main research themes for the journal. These findings will help the readers to get a quick and intuitive overview of Current Science.

Keywords


Bibliometrics, Citation Impact, Current Science, Research Theme, Scientific Journals Evaluation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.18520/cs%2Fv113%2Fi03%2F386-392