Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Smitha, S.
- Scale to Measure Attitude of the Farmers towards Greenhouse Technology (GT)
Abstract Views :241 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana), IN
2 Department of Extension Education, Bansilal Amrutlal College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat), IN
1 National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal (Haryana), IN
2 Department of Extension Education, Bansilal Amrutlal College of Agriculture, Anand Agricultural University, Anand (Gujarat), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 11, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 158-162Abstract
A scale was developed to measure the attitude of the farmers towards greenhouse technology based on "Scale Product Method" which combines the Thurston's technique of Equal Appearing Interval Scale for selection of the items and Likert's techniques of summated rating for ascertaining the response on the scale. A tentative list of 33 statements was drafted keeping in view the applicability of statements suited to the area of study. The statements collected were edited in the light of the criteria suggested by Edward. These statements were framed in such a way that they expressed the positive or negative attitude of the farmers. The score of each individual item on the scale was calculated by summing up the weights of the individual items. Scale and Q value was calculated by using Thurstone and Chave inter-quartile range. Finally the scale consisted of 12 statements whose median (scale) values were greater than Q values. However, when a few statements had the same scale values, statements having lowest Q value were selected by arranging the scale value in an order. Reliability was tested with 20 respondents and its value was 0.77 and validity of the scale was examined.Keywords
Attitude, GT, Continuum, Reliability, Validity.
References
- Edward, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction, Appleton Century Crofts, Inc., NEW YORK, U.S.A.
- Eysenck, H. J. and Crown, S. (1949). An experimental study in opinion attitude methodology. Internat. J. Attit. Res., 3: 47-86.
- Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods.Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd., Bombay, 378-382 pp.
- Likert, R. A. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitude scales. Arch. Psychol. New York, No.140 pp.
- Thurstone, L. L. (1946). The measurement of attitude, American J. Soc., Chicago Univ. Chicago Press, 39-50pp.
- Thurston, L.L. and Chave, E.G. (1928).The measurement of opinion.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 22 : 415-430.
- Linkage Among Stakeholders in Livestock Sector-A Technology Adoption Perspective
Abstract Views :249 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
S. Smitha
1,
M. C. A. Devi
1
Affiliations
1 SRS of ICAR-NDRI, Bengaluru (Karnataka), IN
1 SRS of ICAR-NDRI, Bengaluru (Karnataka), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 13, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 470-476Abstract
India is endowed, as the largest milk producer (165.4 million tons) with largest livestock population (512.05 million) in the World. Indian livestock farming embrace major share of smallholder dairy farmers and have a great potential for further improvement and is mandated to bring different stakeholders in dairy sector together, share knowledge and resources in order to engage in concerted action. One of the major challenges of the livestock sector is dissemination of technology, skills and quality services to farmers for improving productivity and quality of the produce, which need to be addressed. Various stakeholders from government, non-government and private sector are involved in livestock research and extension activities. But the major focus of all these stakeholders goes on animal health care activities and underscores livestock extension activities. Due to lack of proper linkage between these stakeholders, the research carried out in various institutions are not in accordance with the priority needs of dairy farmers and reduces the fitness of technology in field level. In order to tackle the present situation, it is essential to relook and reframe policies that assure effective linkages among researchers, extensionist, decision-makers and farmers, who have complementary expertise.Keywords
Linkage, Farmers, Stakeholders, Technology.References
- Adekunle, A.A. and Fatunbi, A.O. (2012). Approaches for setting-up multi-stakeholder platforms for agricultural research and development. World Appl. Sci. J., 16(7) : 981-988.
- Aflakpui, G. K. (2007). Present outlook and transformation in the delivery of agricultural extension services: implications for research–extension–farmer linkages. Outlook on Agric., 36(1): 35-39.
- Agwu, A.E., Dimelu, M.U. and Madukwe, M.C. (2008). Innovation system approach to agricultural development: Policy implications for agricultural extension delivery in Nigeria. African J. Biotechnol., 7(11):1604-1611.
- Anonymous (2011). Proceedings of the regional workshop on effective delivery of livestock services 4-5, November 2011 Organized by Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Rajiv Gandhi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Kurumbapet, Puducherry.
- Anonymous (2013). Policy and process guidelines for farmer producer organizations, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry Of Agriculture, Govt. of India.
- Ayalew, T., Mamo, M. and Kebedom, A. (2013). An analysis of agricultural linkage and technology innovation system: With Special Focus in Ethiopia.
- Bouma, J. (2010). Implications of the knowledge paradox for soil science. Adv. Agron., 106 : 143-171.
- Carrascal, M. J., Pau, L. F. and Reiner, L. (1995). Knowledge and information transfer in agriculture using hypermedia: a system review. Comput. &Electron. Agric., 12(2) : 83-119.
- Chambers, R. and Jiggins, J. (1987). Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers Part II: A parsimonious paradigm. Agric. Administr. & Extn.,, 27(2) : 109-128.
- Chander, M.,Dutt, T., Ravikumar, R.K. and Subrahmanyeswari, B. (2010), ‘Livestock technology transfer service in India: A review’, Indian J. Anim. Sci., 80 (11) :1115-1125.
- Douthwaite, B., Keatinge, J. D. H. and Park, J. R. (2001). Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Research Policy, 30(5) : 819-836.
- Duraisamy, P. (1992). Effects of education and extension contacts on agricultural production. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 47 : 205–14.
- GOI (2002). Proceedings of the 21st National Workshop on Planning and Management of Agricultural Extension Training, 22–23 January, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Co operation, Directorate of Extension, Krishi Vistar Bhavan, New Delhi, India.
- GOI (2013).National livestock policy, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
- GOI (2017). Department of animal husbandry, dairying and fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
- Hemmati, M. (2012). Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond deadlock and conflict. Routledge.
- Jabbar, M. and Ahuja, V. (2015). A multi-stakeholder dairy platform for the Asia-pacific region: Justification and issues to be considered for formation and management (No. 208726). International Livestock Research Institute.
- Kaske, D. K. (2007). Agricultural information networks of farm women and role of agricultural extension: the case of Dale Woreda, Southern Nations, Nationalities & Peoples’ Region (Doctoral dissertation, Haramaya University).
- Kaur, M. and Kaur, R. (2013). Linkage mechanism of researchextensionfarmer with market in Punjab. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 13(3) : 19-24.
- Klerkx, L., Hall, A. and Leeuwis, C. (2009). Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer?. Internat. J. Agric. Resour. Governance & Ecol., 8 (5-6) : 409-438.
- Lehmann, R., Vishva, R., Ramesh, K. S., Subramanyam, S., Ray, N. and Waelty, S. (1994). Bovine and dairy development in Andhra Pradesh. Indo Swiss Project Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, India.
- Mondal, S. (2014). Text book of agricultural extension with global innovations. Kalyani Publishers.
- Morton, J. and Matthewman, R. (1996). Improving livestock production through extension; information needs, institutions and opportunities. Network paper 12, London, ODI.
- Rao, S.V. N. and Kherde, R.L. (1985). Dairy development through Extension. Indian Dairyman, 37: 391–396.
- Rao, S. V. N.,Rangnekar, D. V., Dey, R. and Den Ban, A. W. Van (1995). Farmers’ perception of innovations. Hand book for straw feeding system, pp.107-116.
- Rao, S.V.N., Ramkumar, S., Natchimuthu, K. and Joseph, A.K. (2008). Quality veterinary education for effective livestock service delivery, CALPI programme series-10, Inter cooperation in India, Hyderabad, India.
- Rao, S. V. N.,Natchimuthu, K. and Ramkumar, S. (2013). Beyond technology dissemination: Why extension should also focus on policy change? Aesa Blog. 24.
- Rasouliazar, S. and Fealy, S. (2013). Affective factors in the wheat farmers’ adoption of farming methods of soil management in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran. Internat. J. Agric. Manage. Dev., 3(2) : 73-82.
- Reddy, M.N. (2006). Institutional reforms for strengthening research – extension-farmer linkages, proceeding of the regional workshop on Research-Extension Linkage for Effective Delivery of Agricultural Technologies in SAARC Countries, NAARM, Hyderabad.
- Sen, Binoo (2002). Proceedings of National Conference of State Secretaries of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries.14 – 15th November, New Delhi, India.
- Sulaiman, R.V. and Hall, A. J. (2002). India: The emergence of Extension-Plus: Future for extension beyond technology transfer. Extension and Rural Development’(The World Bank, Washington, DC) (forth coming).
- Sulaiman, V.R. and Van Den, Ban A. W. (2003). Funding and delivering agricultural extension in India. J. Internat. Agric. & Extn. Edu., 10: 21–30.
- Sulaiman, V.R. (2009). Farmer first or still last? Uneven institutional development in the Indian agricultural innovation system. Farmer first revisited: Innovation for agricultural research and development.
- Suvedi, M. and Kaplowitz, M. D. (2016). What every extension worker should know: Core competency handbook. Michigan State University, Department of Community Sustainability.
- Swaminathan, M.S. (2004). Technological change in food production: Implications for vulnerable sections. Chronic Poverty & Develop. Policy India, 337.
- Van Crowder, L. and Anderson, J. (1997). Linking research, extension and education: why is the problem so persistent and pervasive? European J. Agric. Edu. & Extn.,3(4) : 241-249.
- Adeokun, O.A. and Akinyemi, J.O. (2003). Assessment of Veterinary Extension Services to livestock farmers in Egba Division. OgunState, College of Agricultural Sciences, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria,
- Economic Review. (2015). Retrieved fromhttps://kerala.gov.in/economic-review.
- FAOSTAT (2014). Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/ {20– July–2014}.
- http://aesa.oskarblues.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Puducherry-FIP-Blog.pdf.
- http://diragrijmu.nic.in/CSS%20GUIDELINES/RKVY-NADP/FPO-Policy&Process-Guidelines.pdf.
- Rao, S. V. N. (2013). Why collaboration matters for livestock development? Aesa Blog.6. http://www.aesagfras.net/admin/kcfinder/upload/files/Blog%206%20Why%20collaboration%20matters.pdf.
- Rathod and Chander (2015). Are we generating need based and relevant livestock technologies? Aesa Blog.51. http://www.aesa-gfras.net/admin/kcfinder/upload/files/BLOG%2051.pdf.