A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Phadke, Manasi
- Design Elements of Centrally Sponsored Schemes: An Explanation for Variability in Centre-State Fund Transfers
Authors
1 Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune-411004, Maharashtra, IN
Source
Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Vol 60, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 406-422Abstract
States receive transfers from the centre through the Finance Commission (FC), (erstwhile) Planning Commission and from the central ministries which run the central sector (CS) and centrally sponsored schemes (CSS). While FC transfers are largely formulaic, transfers by central ministries are not determined through a formula and have remained “discretionary”.
Discretionary transfers to states, co-incident with the presence of coalition governments at the centre, have led to a debate in academic literature about whether political considerations may affect discretionary transfers in India. However, the data findings have not been conclusive. We present an alternative view of how the inherent design elements of scheme-based transfers can create differentials in the transfers to different states. Using the examples of two major schemes in India, we attempt to identify design level rigidities that could potentially lead to differences in state-level transfers.
References
- Aiyar, Y., S.K. Mehta and S. Samji (n.d.), Strengthening public accountability: Lessons from implementing social audits in Andhra Pradesh, Engaging Accountability: Working Paper Series, Accountability Initiative, Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi Bagchi, S. (1984), Employment Guarantee Scheme in Maharashtra, Economic and Political Weekly, 19(37): 1633-1638.
- Bhanumurthy, N.R., H.K. Amarnath, A. Verma and A. Gupta (2014), Unspent Balances and Fund Flow Mechanism under MNREGS, Report, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (NIPFP), New Delhi.
- Biswas, R., S. Marjit and M. Velayoudom (2008), Fiscal Federalism, State Lobbying and Discretionary Finance: Evidence from India, CSH Occasional Paper.
- Choudhary, M., R.K. Mohanty and A. Garg (2017), Utilization, Fund Flows and Public Financial Management under the National Health Mission: Study of Selected States, Report, NIPFP, New Delhi, India.
- Dasgupta, S., A. Dhillon and B. Dutta (2001), Electoral Goals and Centre-state Transfers in India, Working Paper, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi.
- GOI Press Release (2017), National Health Mission, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Press Information Bureau (March 2017), Retrieved from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=159404
- Khemani, S. (2003), Partisan Politics and Intergovernmental Transfers in India, Development Research Group, The World Bank.
- Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MNREGA), 2005 (42 of 2005) with Schedules as amended in 2017, http://nrega.nic.in/amendments_2005_2018.pdf Mathur, N. (2012), Transparent‐making Documents and the Crisis of Implementation: A Rural Employment Law and Development Bureaucracy in India, Political and Legal Anthropology Review (PoLAR), 35(2): 167-185.
- ---------- (2016), Paper Tiger, Material Production of Transparency, p. 83, Cambridge University Press.
- Niti Aayog (n.d.), Three Year Action Agenda 2017-18 to 2019-20, New Delhi, India. Retrieved from http://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/coop/IndiaActionPlan.pdf Rao, M.G. (2015), Central Transfers to States in India: Rewarding Performance while ensuring Equity, NIPFP, New Delhi.
- Rao, M.G. and N. Singh (2001), The Political Economy of Centre-State Fiscal Transfers in India, Centre for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Working Paper No. 107, Stanford University, September 2001.
- Saxena, N. (2002), Reaching the Poor: The Influence of Policy and Administrative Processes on the Implementation of Government Poverty Schemes, Report United Nations Development Program.