Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Deciphering Sub-Regional Dimensions of Household Level Poverty in Karnataka


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Vijayanagara Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Vinayaka Nagar, Cantonment, Ballari 583105, Karnataka, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study, using 61st (2004-2005) and 68th (2011-2012) rounds of NSSO unit level household consumer expenditure data examines comprehensively the regional as well as disaggregated distributional patterns of poverty across socio-religious groups in Karnataka. The results reveal that during the study period a large proportion of the population is still under poverty and this proportion is higher in Kalaburagi division, which constitutes the entire Hyderabad Karnataka (HK) region. The poverty among SC, ST is higher in this region relative to other social groups in entire state as well as in all administrative divisions. The results provide a glimpse of spatial variation and concentration of poverty in the state, which helps to frame region specific policies for poverty reduction.

Keywords

No Keywords.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Arora, A. and S.P. Singh (2015), Poverty across Social and Religious Groups in Uttar Pradesh: An Interregional Analysis, Economic and Political Weekly, 50(52): 100–109.

  • Barro, J.R. (2000), Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries, Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1): 5-32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009850119329

  • Chambers, R. (1988), Poverty in India: Concepts Measurement and Reality, IDS Working Paper, Sussex: IDS.

  • Chandra, H., U. Sud and N. Salvati (2011), Estimation of District Level Poor Households in the State of Uttar Pradesh in India by Combining NSSO Survey and Census Data, Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 65(1): 1-8.

  • Dieterlen, P. (2005), Poverty A Philosophical Approach, Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.

  • Diwakar, D.M. (2009), Intra-Regional Disparities, Inequality, and Poverty in Uttar Pradesh, Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26-27): 264–273.

  • Friedman, Milton (1955), A Memorandum to the Government of India, New Delhi: available at http://www.indiapolicy.org/debate/Notes/friedman.htm

  • Garson, G.D. (2011), Logistic Regression: Topics in Manalysis, NC State University: Quantitative Research in Public Administration.

  • Ghosal, R.K. (2012), Growth, Poverty and Inequality Paradox in India—A Panel Data Approach, Kolkata, University of Calcutta.

  • GOI (2007), Household Consumer Expenditure across Socio-Economic Groups: 2004–05, New Delhi: National Sample Survey Organization.

  • ---------- (2013), Press Note on Poverty Estimates, 2011–12, Planning Commission, New Delhi.

  • Harper, C., R. Marcus and K. Moore (2003), Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Lifecourse and Intergenerational Poverty Transmissions, World Development, 31(3): 535-554.

  • Hulme, D. and Shepherd (2003), Chronic Poverty and Development Policy, World Development, 31(3): 399-402.

  • Jha, R. (2000), Reducing Poverty and Inequality in India: Has Liberalization Helped? Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.

  • John, R. and R. Mutatkar (2005), State wise Estimates of Poverty among Religious Groups in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 40(13): 1337-1344.

  • Kapoor, R. (2013), Inequality Matters, Economic and Political Weekly, 48(2): 58-65.

  • Kuznets, S. (1955), Economic Growth and Income Inequality, The American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28.

  • Meenakshi, J.V., R. Ray and S. Gupta (2000), Estimates of Poverty for SC, ST and Female - Headed Households, Economic and Political Weekly, 35(3): 2748-2755

  • Murugai, R., M.H. Suryanarayan and S. Zaidi (2003), Measuring Poverty in Karnataka: The Regional Dimension, Economic and Political Weekly, 38(4): 404-408.

  • Mutatkar, R. (2005), Social Group Disparities and Poverty in India, Working Paper Series No. WP2005-004, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR).

  • Nanjundappa, D.M. (2002), High-Power Committee for Redressal of Regional Imbalances (HPCRRI), Bengaluru: Government of Karnataka.

  • NSSO (2014), Level and Pattern of Consumer Expenditure 2011-12, National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.

  • Rangarajan, C. (2014), Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Measurement of Poverty, Planning Commission, Government of India.

  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Srivastava, K.D. and K.S. Sanyal, et. al. (2007), Rural Poverty in Madhya Pradesh, Looking beyond Conventional Measures, Economic and Political Weekly, 42(5): 381-388.

  • Tendulkar Committee (2009), Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Estimation of Poverty, Planning Commission, Government of India.

  • Thorat, S. and A. Dubey (2012), Has Growth Been Socially Inclusive during 1993-94 – 2009-10? Economic and Political Weekly, 47(10): 43-53.

  • Vakulabharanam, V. and S. Motiram (2012), Understanding Poverty and Inequality in Urban India since Reforms: Bringing Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches Together, Economic and Political Weekly, XLVII (47 and 48): 44-52.

  • Velez, F. (1994), Introduction, in F. Velez and F. Velez (Ed.), La pobreza en Mexico, Causas y politicas para combatirla, pp. 7-13.

  • Vyasalu, V. and B.P. Vani (1997), Development and Deprivation in Karnataka: A District-Level Study, Economic and Political Weekly, 32(46): 2970-2975.


Abstract Views: 444

PDF Views: 4




  • Deciphering Sub-Regional Dimensions of Household Level Poverty in Karnataka

Abstract Views: 444  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Niranjan R.
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Vijayanagara Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Vinayaka Nagar, Cantonment, Ballari 583105, Karnataka, India

Abstract


The study, using 61st (2004-2005) and 68th (2011-2012) rounds of NSSO unit level household consumer expenditure data examines comprehensively the regional as well as disaggregated distributional patterns of poverty across socio-religious groups in Karnataka. The results reveal that during the study period a large proportion of the population is still under poverty and this proportion is higher in Kalaburagi division, which constitutes the entire Hyderabad Karnataka (HK) region. The poverty among SC, ST is higher in this region relative to other social groups in entire state as well as in all administrative divisions. The results provide a glimpse of spatial variation and concentration of poverty in the state, which helps to frame region specific policies for poverty reduction.

Keywords


No Keywords.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2021%2Fv63%2Fi3%2F210626